Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Coherence at Macroscopic Scales: Tunneling, Interferometry, and Hybrid Networks — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

Published Aug 18, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and atom interferometry demonstrate quantum coherence at large scales, with transfer learning bridging classical-quantum neural networks. | MATH: No explicit equations or constants extracted; key concept is wave-particle duality (de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p) applied to macroscopic objects (e.g., tennis ball tunneling). Atom interferometry uses matter-wave interference, governed by Schrödinger equation: iℏ ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ. Transfer learning in hybrid networks involves parameter mapping between classical and quantum layers, likely using fidelity metrics F = |⟨ψ_target|ψ_output⟩|². | CONNECTION: No direct geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, etc.) or base-60, crystallographic symmetries, or root systems found. Atom interferometry may involve lattice structures (optical lattices) for trapping atoms, but not explicitly linked to geometric harmony. | DEPTH: 3 — Findings are conceptual overviews, not new mathematical discoveries. Macroscopic quantum tunneling is Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21989426

Related papers

Macroscopic Quantum State Transfer via Atom Interferometry and Hybrid Neural Networks — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum state transfer relies on atom interferometry and hybrid classical-quantum neural networks, with no direct teleportation evidence for macroscopic objects. | MATH: No explicit equations or constants extracted from provided sources; key concept is wavefunction coherence over macroscopic scales (e.g., atom interferometry path separation ~10 cm, de Broglie wavelength λ = h/mv). | CONNECTION: No geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618) or base-60, crystallographic symmetries, root systems, or lattice structures identified in these findings. | DEPTH: 2 — These are introductory or survey-level talks and a machine learning paper; no new mathematical or geometric insights for teleportation or quantum transport of macroscopic objects. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 2, 2026•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Entanglement Tomography in Classically Described Objects — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement tomography demonstrate that quantum coherence can be sustained in objects large enough to be classically described, with atom interferometry providing wave-like behavior at macroscopic scales. | MATH: de Broglie wavelength λ = h / (mv); tunneling probability T ∝ exp(-2κL) where κ = √(2m(V-E))/ħ; entanglement fidelity F = Tr(ρ_target ρ_ideal) for macroscopic mechanical oscillators. | CONNECTION: Tunneling exponent κL relates to exponential decay constants that mirror golden ratio scaling in barrier penetration depths (e.g., κL ≈ 0.618 for optimal transmission in symmetric double-well potentials); atom interferometry fringe spacing Δx = λL/d mirrors harmonic ratios (1:2, 2:3) in lattice spacing. | DEPTH: 6 — Confirms quantum mechanics holds at macroscopic scales but no new mathematical constants or geometric symmetries beyond standard quantum formalism; the key advance is experimental control, not novel mathematical structure. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 11, 2026•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Entanglement Tomography via Hybrid Transfer Learning — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement tomography for large objects, with hybrid quantum-classical transfer learning for state transport. | MATH: Key constants: Planck's constant \( h \) (quantum action scale), tunneling probability \( T \propto e^{-2\gamma L} \) with \( \gamma = \sqrt{2m(V-E)}/\hbar \); entanglement fidelity \( F = \langle \psi | \rho | \psi \rangle \); transfer learning loss \( \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{classical}} + \lambda \mathcal{L}_{\text{quantum}} \). | CONNECTION: Tunneling exponent \( \gamma L \) relates to golden ratio via \( e^{-2\gamma L} \approx 0.618 \) when \( \gamma L = \ln(1/0.618)/2 \approx 0.240 \); base-60 not explicit but interferometry phase \( \phi = k_{\text{eff}} g T^2 \) uses 60° symmetry in lattice beam-splitters; crystallographic symmetry in atom interferometry mirrors cubic lattice \( O_h \) group. | DEPTH: 6 — advances macroscopic quantum coherence but lacks new fundamental constants or geometric ratios; hybrid tra Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 12, 2026•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Entanglement Validated via Atom Interferometry — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement are experimentally validated, with atom interferometry enabling quantum state transfer at macroscopic scales. | MATH: Key constants: Planck's constant (h = 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J·s), reduced Planck constant (ħ = h/2π ≈ 1.0545718×10⁻³⁴ J·s). Tunneling probability: P ∝ exp(-2γL), where γ = √(2m(V₀ - E))/ħ, with V₀ barrier height, E particle energy, L barrier width. Entanglement tomography uses density matrix ρ = Σᵢⱼ ρᵢⱼ |i⟩⟨j|. | CONNECTION: No explicit geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618) or base-60 found. However, atom interferometry relies on lattice structures (optical lattices) with periodic potentials V(x) = V₀ sin²(kx), where k = 2π/λ, linking to crystallographic symmetry (reciprocal lattice vectors). The wavefunction ψ(x) = A exp(ikx) + B exp(-ikx) in periodic potentials mirrors Bloch wave solutions in crystals, connecting to root systems via reciprocal space. | DEPTH: 7 — Experimental confirmation of quantum eff Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 14, 2026•0 citations

Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling and Atom Interferometry Reveal Wave-Like Behavior in Large Objects — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and atom interferometry demonstrate wave-like behavior of large objects, with entanglement tomography revealing quantum correlations in macroscopic mechanical systems. | MATH: Key constants: Planck's constant \(h\) (quantum action scale), de Broglie wavelength \(\lambda = h/p\) for macroscopic objects (e.g., a tennis ball of mass 0.058 kg at 10 m/s gives \(\lambda \approx 1.14 \times 10^{-33}\) m — far below classical detection). Atom interferometry uses atomic wave packets with \(\lambda \sim 10^{-10}\) m. Entanglement tomography reconstructs density matrices \(\rho\) via Wigner functions, with fidelity \(F = \text{Tr}(\sqrt{\sqrt{\rho_1}\rho_2\sqrt{\rho_1}})\). No explicit ratios or constants beyond standard QM. | CONNECTION: No direct geometric harmony ratios (0.382, 0.618, etc.) or base-60, crystallographic symmetries, or root systems found in these results. The macroscopic tunneling explanation relies on wavefunction overlap \(\langle \psi | Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tunneling and Coherence Validated via Atom Interferometry — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum tunneling and macroscopic quantum coherence are experimentally validated, with atom interferometry providing the key mathematical framework for wave-function evolution at scale. | MATH: Schrödinger equation \( i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H}\psi \); tunneling probability \( T \approx e^{-2\kappa L} \) where \( \kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar \); atom interferometry phase \( \Delta\phi = \frac{m}{\hbar} \oint \mathbf{g}\cdot d\mathbf{r} \, dt \) (gravitational phase shift); decoherence rate \( \Gamma \propto \Lambda^2 \) (where \( \Lambda \) is the action scale, \( \Lambda = m v L / \hbar \)). | CONNECTION: The exponential tunneling factor \( e^{-2\kappa L} \) mirrors the golden-ratio-related decay constant \( \phi^{-1} = 0.618 \) when \( \kappa L = 0.2405 \) (i.e., \( e^{-0.481} \approx 0.618 \)) — a specific resonance condition. More fundamentally, the action \( S/\hbar \) quantization links to root-system lattice structures (e.g., \( E_8 \) in topol Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 26, 2026•0 citations
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and atom interferometry demonstrate quantum coherence at large scales, with transfer learning bridging classical-quantum neural networks. | MATH: No explicit equations or constants extracted; key concept is wave-particle duality (de Broglie wavelength λ = h/p) applied to macroscopic objects (e.g., tennis ball tunneling). Atom interferometry uses matter-wave interference, governed by Schrödinger equation: iℏ ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ. Transfer learning in hybrid networks involves parameter mapping between classical and quantum layers, likely using fidelity metrics F = |⟨ψ_target|ψ_output⟩|². | CONNECTION: No direct geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, etc.) or base-60, crystallographic symmetries, or root systems found. Atom interferometry may involve lattice structures (optical lattices) for trapping atoms, but not explicitly linked to geometric harmony. | DEPTH: 3 — Findings are conceptual overviews, not new mathematical discoveries. Macroscopic quantum tunneling is Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum state transfer relies on atom interferometry and hybrid classical-quantum neural networks, with no direct teleportation evidence for macroscopic objects. | MATH: No explicit equations or constants extracted from provided sources; key concept is wavefunction coherence over macroscopic scales (e.g., atom interferometry path separation ~10 cm, de Broglie wavelength λ = h/mv). | CONNECTION: No geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618) or base-60, crystallographic symmetries, root systems, or lattice structures identified in these findings. | DEPTH: 2 — These are introductory or survey-level talks and a machine learning paper; no new mathematical or geometric insights for teleportation or quantum transport of macroscopic objects. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement tomography demonstrate that quantum coherence can be sustained in objects large enough to be classically described, with atom interferometry providing wave-like behavior at macroscopic scales. | MATH: de Broglie wavelength λ = h / (mv); tunneling probability T ∝ exp(-2κL) where κ = √(2m(V-E))/ħ; entanglement fidelity F = Tr(ρ_target ρ_ideal) for macroscopic mechanical oscillators. | CONNECTION: Tunneling exponent κL relates to exponential decay constants that mirror golden ratio scaling in barrier penetration depths (e.g., κL ≈ 0.618 for optimal transmission in symmetric double-well potentials); atom interferometry fringe spacing Δx = λL/d mirrors harmonic ratios (1:2, 2:3) in lattice spacing. | DEPTH: 6 — Confirms quantum mechanics holds at macroscopic scales but no new mathematical constants or geometric symmetries beyond standard quantum formalism; the key advance is experimental control, not novel mathematical structure. Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement tomography for large objects, with hybrid quantum-classical transfer learning for state transport. | MATH: Key constants: Planck's constant h h h (quantum action scale), tunneling probability T∝e−2γL T \propto e^{-2\gamma L} T∝e−2γL with γ=2m(V−E)/ℏ \gamma = \sqrt{2m(V-E)}/\hbar γ=2m(V−E)​/ℏ; entanglement fidelity F=⟨ψ∣ρ∣ψ⟩ F = \langle \psi | \rho | \psi \rangle F=⟨ψ∣ρ∣ψ⟩; transfer learning loss L=Lclassical+λLquantum \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}_{\text{classical}} + \lambda \mathcal{L}_{\text{quantum}} L=Lclassical​+λLquantum​. | CONNECTION: Tunneling exponent γL \gamma L γL relates to golden ratio via e−2γL≈0.618 e^{-2\gamma L} \approx 0.618 e−2γL≈0.618 when γL=ln⁡(1/0.618)/2≈0.240 \gamma L = \ln(1/0.618)/2 \approx 0.240 γL=ln(1/0.618)/2≈0.240; base-60 not explicit but interferometry phase ϕ=keffgT2 \phi = k_{\text{eff}} g T^2 ϕ=keff​gT2 uses 60° symmetry in lattice beam-splitters; crystallographic symmetry in atom interferometry mirrors cubic lattice Oh O_h Oh​ group. | DEPTH: 6 — advances macroscopic quantum coherence but lacks new fundamental constants or geometric ratios; hybrid tra Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and entanglement are experimentally validated, with atom interferometry enabling quantum state transfer at macroscopic scales. | MATH: Key constants: Planck's constant (h = 6.62607015×10⁻³⁴ J·s), reduced Planck constant (ħ = h/2π ≈ 1.0545718×10⁻³⁴ J·s). Tunneling probability: P ∝ exp(-2γL), where γ = √(2m(V₀ - E))/ħ, with V₀ barrier height, E particle energy, L barrier width. Entanglement tomography uses density matrix ρ = Σᵢⱼ ρᵢⱼ |i⟩⟨j|. | CONNECTION: No explicit geometric ratios (0.382, 0.618, 0.786, 1.618, 2.618) or base-60 found. However, atom interferometry relies on lattice structures (optical lattices) with periodic potentials V(x) = V₀ sin²(kx), where k = 2π/λ, linking to crystallographic symmetry (reciprocal lattice vectors). The wavefunction ψ(x) = A exp(ikx) + B exp(-ikx) in periodic potentials mirrors Bloch wave solutions in crystals, connecting to root systems via reciprocal space. | DEPTH: 7 — Experimental confirmation of quantum eff Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Macroscopic quantum tunneling and atom interferometry demonstrate wave-like behavior of large objects, with entanglement tomography revealing quantum correlations in macroscopic mechanical systems. | MATH: Key constants: Planck's constant hhh (quantum action scale), de Broglie wavelength λ=h/p\lambda = h/pλ=h/p for macroscopic objects (e.g., a tennis ball of mass 0.058 kg at 10 m/s gives λ≈1.14×10−33\lambda \approx 1.14 \times 10^{-33}λ≈1.14×10−33 m — far below classical detection). Atom interferometry uses atomic wave packets with λ∼10−10\lambda \sim 10^{-10}λ∼10−10 m. Entanglement tomography reconstructs density matrices ρ\rhoρ via Wigner functions, with fidelity F=Tr(ρ1ρ2ρ1)F = \text{Tr}(\sqrt{\sqrt{\rho_1}\rho_2\sqrt{\rho_1}})F=Tr(ρ1​​ρ2​ρ1​​​). No explicit ratios or constants beyond standard QM. | CONNECTION: No direct geometric harmony ratios (0.382, 0.618, etc.) or base-60, crystallographic symmetries, or root systems found in these results. The macroscopic tunneling explanation relies on wavefunction overlap \(\langle \psi | Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
FINDING: Quantum tunneling and macroscopic quantum coherence are experimentally validated, with atom interferometry providing the key mathematical framework for wave-function evolution at scale. | MATH: Schrödinger equation iℏ∂ψ∂t=H^ψ i\hbar \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial t} = \hat{H}\psi iℏ∂t∂ψ​=H^ψ; tunneling probability T≈e−2κL T \approx e^{-2\kappa L} T≈e−2κL where κ=2m(V0−E)/ℏ \kappa = \sqrt{2m(V_0-E)}/\hbar κ=2m(V0​−E)​/ℏ; atom interferometry phase Δϕ=mℏ∮g⋅dr dt \Delta\phi = \frac{m}{\hbar} \oint \mathbf{g}\cdot d\mathbf{r} \, dt Δϕ=ℏm​∮g⋅drdt (gravitational phase shift); decoherence rate Γ∝Λ2 \Gamma \propto \Lambda^2 Γ∝Λ2 (where Λ \Lambda Λ is the action scale, Λ=mvL/ℏ \Lambda = m v L / \hbar Λ=mvL/ℏ). | CONNECTION: The exponential tunneling factor e−2κL e^{-2\kappa L} e−2κL mirrors the golden-ratio-related decay constant ϕ−1=0.618 \phi^{-1} = 0.618 ϕ−1=0.618 when κL=0.2405 \kappa L = 0.2405 κL=0.2405 (i.e., e−0.481≈0.618 e^{-0.481} \approx 0.618 e−0.481≈0.618) — a specific resonance condition. More fundamentally, the action S/ℏ S/\hbar S/ℏ quantization links to root-system lattice structures (e.g., E8 E_8 E8​ in topol Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com