Since the purpose of the paper1 in question was to examine the responses to Schrödinger’s cat paradox that are engendered by three particular approaches to quantum mechanics, it is appropriate to comment only on the extent to which the given responses do indeed represent the views of proponents of the various interpretations. For the cases of quantum logic and the many worlds interpretation, I believe that the author has indeed captured the essence of a response that a supporter of that interpretation would give. But I should hope that a supporter of the Copenhagen interpretation would not give the response attributed to him, for it completely misses the point.