In the rapidly evolving landscape of cybersecurity, traditional cryptographic systems are increasingly vulnerable to attacks, including brute-force, side-channel, man-in-the-middle, replay, and ransomware attacks, highlight the limitations of classical encryption techniques. Quantum cryptography leverages the no-cloning theorem and the properties of quantum states to establish fundamentally secure communication protocols with intrinsic eavesdropping detection capabilities. This security framework provides information-theoretic protection beyond the mathematical assumptions underlying conventional cryptographic systems. Quantum image security has evolved into two major paradigms: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Quantum Secure Direct Communication (QSDC). Although recent surveys have reviewed both approaches chronologically, they have not systematically analysed their security thresholds The objective of this paper proposes a three-axis taxonomy of QSDC protocols, classifying them by quantum resource type, physical transmission channel, and device trust model. Furthermore, it presents a comparative performance analysis of QKD employing a hyperchaotic cipher over QSDC channels across seven quantum image representations, including FRQI, NEQR, GQIR, and MCQI. The analysis shows that QKD-seeded schemes achieve efficient key distribution, whereas pixel-level security remains dependent on cipher complexity. In contrast, QSDC provides end-to-end security governed by quantum mechanical principles; hyperentangled carriers achieve an eavesdropping detection probability of 0.875 compared with 0.5 for conventional two-step protocols, although communication throughput remains a limiting factor. Based on these findings, this review outlines future research directions, including QSDC-specific quantum repeaters for continental-scale deployment, hyperentangled carriers supporting up to 12 bits per photon pair compatible with NEQR’s 8-bit encoding, and machine-learning-assisted management of hybrid fiber–free-space quantum communication networks.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of cybersecurity, traditional cryptographic systems are increasingly vulnerable to attacks, including brute-force, side-channel, man-in-the-middle, replay, and ransomware attacks, highlight the limitations of classical encryption techniques. Quantum cryptography leverages the no-cloning theorem and the properties of quantum states to establish fundamentally secure communication protocols with intrinsic eavesdropping detection capabilities. This security framework provides information-theoretic protection beyond the mathematical assumptions underlying conventional cryptographic systems. Quantum image security has evolved into two major paradigms: Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) and Quantum Secure Direct Communication (QSDC). Although recent surveys have reviewed both approaches chronologically, they have not systematically analysed their security thresholds The objective of this paper proposes a three-axis taxonomy of QSDC protocols, classifying them by quantum resource type, physical transmission channel, and device trust model. Furthermore, it presents a comparative performance analysis of QKD employing a hyperchaotic cipher over QSDC channels across seven quantum image representations, including FRQI, NEQR, GQIR, and MCQI. The analysis shows that QKD-seeded schemes achieve efficient key distribution, whereas pixel-level security remains dependent on cipher complexity. In contrast, QSDC provides end-to-end security governed by quantum mechanical principles; hyperentangled carriers achieve an eavesdropping detection probability of 0.875 compared with 0.5 for conventional two-step protocols, although communication throughput remains a limiting factor. Based on these findings, this review outlines future research directions, including QSDC-specific quantum repeaters for continental-scale deployment, hyperentangled carriers supporting up to 12 bits per photon pair compatible with NEQR’s 8-bit encoding, and machine-learning-assisted management of hybrid fiber–free-space quantum communication networks.
As digital communication continues to scale globally, cybersecurity vulnerabilities are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Classical encryption methods—based on mathematical complexity—face obsolescence with the advancement of quantum computing, which can break widely used cryptosystems such as RSA and ECC through algorithms like Shor’s. Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) represents a paradigm shift by leveraging the laws of quantum mechanics, particularly photon entanglement and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, to establish secure communication channels. Unlike classical cryptography, which relies on computational security, QKD guarantees information-theoretic security, making interception detectable and ineffective. This research paper evaluates entanglement-based protocols, including E91, BBM92, and emerging satellite-assisted QKD networks. The study includes a comparative performance analysis between classical cryptographic techniques and QKD across speed, security breach probability, latency, and scalability. A real-world case study of China’s Micius Quantum Satellite Network is used to illustrate practical deployment. Findings show that QKD reduces key interception vulnerability to near zero, while classical systems remain susceptible to brute-force and eavesdropping attacks. Data demonstrate that entanglement-based QKD outperforms other quantum protocols in long distance secure communication and offers a scalable foundation for the future quantum internet.
The rapid advancement of quantum computing poses a significant threat to classical cryptographic systems that rely on the computational hardness of mathematical problems such as integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems. In this context, quantum cryptography has emerged as a promising paradigm for secure communication based on the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics rather than on computational assumptions. This paper presents a comprehensive review of quantum cryptography, with a particular focus on Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), the most mature application. The study discusses the theoretical foundations of quantum security, including superposition, entanglement, and the No-cloning theorem, which collectively enable eavesdropping detection and guarantee information-theoretic security. Furthermore, the review examines major QKD protocols, such as BB84 and E91, as well as their advanced variants designed to address practical vulnerabilities and enhance performance. Recent progress in real-world implementations, including fiber-optic networks, free-space communication, and satellite-based systems such as the Micius satellite, is also analyzed. In addition, the paper highlights critical challenges related to scalability, hardware limitations, and security loopholes arising from imperfect devices. Finally, emerging research directions, including hybrid cryptographic frameworks that integrate quantum and post-quantum approaches, are discussed to provide insights into the future of secure communication. This review aims to provide a structured, up-to-date understanding of quantum cryptography, bridging the gap between theoretical developments and practical implementations, and emphasizing its crucial role in shaping next-generation cybersecurity systems.
Quantum computing advances pose a serious threat to conventional public-key cryptographic systems such as RSA and elliptic curve cryptography as quantum algorithms may undermine the computational assumptions that guaranty their security. This challenge has driven the development of quantumsafe security approaches among which Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) represents a fundamentally different paradigm based on quantum mechanical principles rather than mathematical complexity. This paper presents a structured review of recent progress in QKD based on a systematic analysis of literature between 2020 and 2025, we examine core protocols including discrete-variable, continuous-variable, measurement-deviceindependent, and twin-field approaches, while also discussing their relationship with post-quantum cryptography as a complementary strategy for future secure communication systems. We provide a unified comparison framework to support practical design and policy decisions by organizing protocols and implementations along deployment dimensions. The study analyze theoretical foundations, implementation technologies across fiber, free-space, satellite, and integrated photonic platforms, and key performance trade-offs involving scalability, security robustness, and deployment feasibility. Findings indicate substantial progress in transitioning QKD from laboratory research toward practical implementations, supported by advances in network architectures, integrated hardware and hybrid cryptographic designs. The comparative analysis will highlight distinct strengths and limitations among protocol families and emphasize the potential of combining QKD with post-quantum cryptographic methods to enhance resilience. Remaining challenges including scalability constraints, implementation-level vulnerabilities, performance limitations over long distances, and integration with existing communication infrastructures are critically discussed. Finally, emerging research directions such as quantum repeaters, hybrid quantum-classical security models, and exploratory directions such as artificial intelligence-assisted optimizations are identified as key factors in enabling the evolution of QKD toward largescale quantum-secure networking.
By leveraging the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, quantum cryptography represents a paradigm shift in secure communication by providing information-theoretic security, where any eavesdropping attempt can be intrinsically detected, and by offering resistance to computational attacks, including those posed by future quantum computers that threaten classical cryptographic schemes. To establish Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) as a significant tool in cybersecurity, this study examines the foundational principles of quantum cryptography, focusing on quantum algorithms, quantum bits, and quantum gates. We examine the fundamental QKD protocols and conduct a comparative study of prominent QKD protocols, including BB84, B92, E91, B92, SARG04, COW, Continuous Variable, Six State, Device Independent, and advanced protocols such as MDI-QKD and Twin-Field QKD, to evaluate key rate, distance, and security parameters. A systematic review of the literature has been conducted on the evolution of QKD protocols and networks, QKD integration with advanced technologies like blockchain, IoT, and machine learning, and the practical deployment of quantum communication is studied in this paper. The integration of AI and ML into QKD systems is investigated to explain future algorithm development and performance improvements. Also the function of QKD in quantum networks and the Internet of Things (IoT) is assessed. This paper further delves into the operation of quantum networks, detailing the roles of quantum relays, routers, repeaters, and Free Space Optics (FSO) in enhancing the efficiency and scalability of QKD. Assessing simulators such as SimulaQron, Qiskit, QuNetSim, and QKDNetSim, offering a perception into experimental implementation and protocol validation, resolves the difficulties in quantum-secured communication systems. At last, some security threats are discussed, including Laser damage, Trojan horse attacks, photon-number splitting, and detector blinding, for mitigation of risk strategies. Overall, this work contributes to the importance of QKD and quantum networks in shaping the future of secure wireless communication.
Quantum secure direct communication (QSDC) is one of the most important branches of quantum communication. In contrast to the quantum key distribution (QKD) which distributes a secure key between distant parties, QSDC directly transmits secret message instead of sharing key in advance. To establish a secure QSDC protocol, on the one hand, the security of the quantum channel should be confirmed before the exchange of the secret message. On the other hand, the quantum state should be transmitted in a quantum data block since the security of QSDC is based on the error rate analysis in the theories on statistics. Compared with the deterministic quantum key distribution (DQKD) which can also be used to transmit deterministic information, QSDC schemes do not need extra classical bits to read the secret message except for public discussion. In this article, we introduce the basic principles of QSDC and review the development in this field by introducing typical QSDC protocols chronologically. The first QSDC protocol was proposed by Long and Liu, which can be used to establish a common key between distant parties. In their scheme, the method for transmitting quantum states in a block by block way and in multiple steps was proposed and the information leakage before eavesdropping detection was solved. Subsequently, Deng et al. presented two pioneering QSDC schemes, an entangled-state-based two-step QSDC scheme and a single-photon-state-based quantum one-time pad scheme, in which the basic principle and criteria for QSDC were pointed out. From then on, many interesting QSDC schemes have been proposed, including the high-dimension QSDC scheme based on quantum superdense coding, multi-step QSDC scheme based on Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states, QSDC scheme based on quantum encryption with practical non-maximally entangled quantum channel, and so on. We also introduce the anti-noise QSDC schemes which were designed for coping with the collective-dephasing noise and the collective-rotation noise, respectively. In 2011, Wang et al. presented the first QSDC which exploited the hyperentangled state as the information carrier and several QSDC schemes based on the spatial degree of freedom (DOF) of photon, single-photon multi-DOF state and hyperentanglement were proposed subsequently. In addition to the point-to-point QSDC schemes, we also review the QSDC networks. Finally, a perspective of QSDC research is given in the last section.
Widely deployed public-key cryptography is vulnerable to sufficiently capable quantum computers, motivating post-quantum and quantum-cryptographic responses. This structured narrative review examines foundational theory and selected literature, drawing on a screening of 71 publications, of which 38 were retained and cited, principally from 2020 to 2025, to assess quantum teleportation within secure communication architectures. The analysis establishes that teleportation is an entanglement-assisted state-transfer primitive, not an autonomous source of security. It distinguishes conventional quantum key distribution (QKD) from teleportation-assisted QKD, separates entanglement swapping from payload teleportation, and compares teleportation-based quantum secure direct communication (QSDC) with repeater-supported networking. Recent experiments demonstrate capability expansion in high-dimensional states, logical code spaces, non-neighbouring network nodes, heterogeneous hardware interfaces, and coexistence with high-capacity classical fibre traffic. Deployment nevertheless remains constrained by loss, entanglement-generation rate, memory coherence, Bell-measurement efficiency, synchronisation, device trust, authentication, and cost. Teleportation can broaden quantum-network functionality, but confidentiality and authenticity depend on the complete protocol, threat model, verification procedures, and implementation assumptions