This project hosts the preprint *From Phase Waves to Event Latency: A Temporal Reconstruction of Quantum Mechanics*. The paper reconstructs de Broglie’s phase wave from the Lorentz transformation of an internal periodic process and distinguishes the resulting general phase structure from the specifically quantum correspondence between frequency and energy. It shows how a general phase-closure condition acquires the form of the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization rule only through the de Broglie relation. In the second part, Bohmian trajectories are interpreted not as classical particle paths but as a latent structure of possible detection events. As a first step, the paper thereby develops a temporal and event-based interpretation of quantum mechanics without modifying its empirical predictions.
This project hosts the preprint From Phase Waves to Event Latency: A Temporal Reconstruction of Quantum Mechanics. The paper reconstructs de Broglie’s phase wave from the Lorentz transformation of an internal periodic process and distinguishes the resulting general phase structure from the specifically quantum correspondence between frequency and energy. It shows how a general phase-closure condition acquires the form of the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization rule only through the de Broglie relation. In the second part, Bohmian trajectories are interpreted not as classical particle paths but as a latent structure of possible detection events. As a first step, the paper thereby develops a temporal and event-based interpretation of quantum mechanics without modifying its empirical predictions.
This paper develops a temporal interpretation of quantum mechanics through the concept of chronomorphic reduction: a controlled mapping from the event latency of a physical process to an amplitude–phase representation, termed a chromogent. Revisiting de Broglie’s phase-wave approach, it examines phase closure, reconstruction of selected observation data, and the conditions under which a tangent provides an adequate local approximation. The harmonic oscillator supplies an explicit model with controlled spectral approximation errors. The accompanying archive, Zeittheorie_Lean_v1.1.0.zip, contains eleven Lean 4 modules with pinned Mathlib dependencies, documentation linking formal statements to the article, reproduction instructions, and successful build records. Verified results include local Taylor and readout-error bounds, phase and rescaled-action limits, common-unitary stability estimates, oscillator truncation bounds, phase identities, and comparison-space identification. Formal verification applies to the encoded mathematical statements under their explicit hypotheses. The oscillator spectrum and eigenbasis, the Born readout, and the prescribed unitary evolution enter as model assumptions. The package does not constitute a formal verification of the entire manuscript or its physical and ontological interpretation. The scope and limitations are detailed in Appendix B.
This paper develops a phase-first reconstruction of quantum interference within standard quantum mechanics and wave optics. Its central idea is that interference patterns become conceptually clearer when the complex phase is treated as the organizing structure and probability or intensity density is treated as the visible statistical expression of that structure. The guiding principle is: the phase structures the pattern; the density renders it visible. The paper shows how this principle applies to single-slit diffraction, double-slit interference, Airy patterns, Fourier optics, Fresnel propagation, probability current, the Madelung representation, which-way marking, reduced coherence, and quantum eraser experiments. In each case, the observed density pattern is interpreted as the visible result of coherent phase relations among amplitudes. The reconstruction is strictly conservative. It does not modify quantum mechanics, the Born rule, unitary dynamics, or standard wave optics. It introduces no new postulates and makes no new empirical prediction. Its purpose is conceptual and pedagogical: to clarify the architecture of quantum interference by placing relative phase at the center of the analysis. This work is Part I of the series The Geometry of Phase. It establishes the phase-geometric foundation for later parts of the series, where the same perspective is extended to de Broglie matter waves, proper-time phase, relativistic action, and possible curvature-coupled phase extensions.
A formulation is proposed for the behavior of a particle in a box based on two assumptions: (1) particles have an associated phase which changes periodically with time as defined by de Broglie, and (2) the transmission of phase information follows optical principles, including reflection at potential boundaries and relativistic Doppler effects. This approach defines optimal trajectories by matching the phase of a source and its reflections. The momentum of the particle is guided by a de Broglie wave which follows the equation R exp {i[w0 (1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2][(t - vz)/c^2]} cos {[w0(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2/c](vt-z)} This wave is generated by reflections occurring an even number of times, the phase and amplitude of which correspond to Lorentz transforms relative to the time and position, respectively. Nodes are produced by reflections occurring an odd number of times, which can be conceived to generate a wave traveling in the opposite direction and shifted by a phase constant π. Application to an individual particle in an infinite potential well affords the same results for energies and nodes as derived by the Schrödinger equation.
This project presents a conceptual reinterpretation of wave–particle phenomena in quantum experiments by introducing a relational-temporal perspective on measurement and event formation. Rather than treating wave-like and particle-like behavior as competing ontological properties of quantum entities, the framework distinguishes between extended relational amplitude structures and localized measurement events. Interference phenomena are interpreted as manifestations of relational structures distributed across spacetime, while particle detections are understood as temporally stabilized events emerging through measurement interactions. By reviewing key experimental paradigms—including double-slit interference, which-path experiments, quantum erasers, weak measurements, and decoherence—the study demonstrates that many apparent paradoxes of quantum mechanics arise from classical assumptions about intrinsic properties and time as an external background parameter. Without modifying the formalism of quantum theory, the relational-temporal interpretation offers a physically conservative framework that reframes wave–particle duality as a distinction between structure and event rather than a dual ontology of physical objects.
The Schrödinger equation and the Born rule constitute two of the most successful structures in quantum mechanics. The former governs the continuous evolution of the wave function, while the latter connects its squared amplitude to the statistical distribution of experimental outcomes. Yet these two structures operate at different descriptive levels: the Schrödinger state is continuous, spatially extended, and phase-sensitive, whereas individual experiments terminate in localized physical events. This paper develops a theoretical framework for reconstructing the physical relation between these two levels. Rather than proceeding only in the conventional direction from Schrödinger dynamics to Born probabilities, we introduce an inverse explanatory strategy: from Born back to Schrödinger. Born statistics are treated as an empirical constraint from which the physical role of the wave function is reconsidered. We propose that, for the single-particle regime examined here, the wave function may be interpreted functionally as a dynamical propagation structure rather than as the localized particle itself. Its amplitude, phase, conserved current, gauge-covariant propagation momentum, and associated velocity field jointly define a structured family of possible motions. This interpretation leads to three separations: propagation from localization, propagation from physical population, and arrival from detector registration. A physical preparation generates a source measure (\mu_0^{\rm phys}); Schrödinger dynamics generates a propagation map (\Phi_\Psi); and microscopic detector dynamics is represented by a response map (\mathcal R_D). The Born problem can then be formulated as the closure condition RD[(ΦΨ)∗μ0phys]=?μBorn,D. This relation is not claimed here as a derived law, but as the central dynamical problem that a physical reconstruction of quantum probability must solve without inserting the Born measure at either boundary. The paper synthesizes six preceding studies on wave-packet localization, Born's scattering interpretation, the emergence of probability, the physical meaning of the wave function, source-to-detector transport, and unified propagation dynamics. It places the resulting framework in dialogue with Madelung and Hamilton–Jacobi formulations, Bohmian mechanics, decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, structural and symmetry-based derivations of the Born rule, Everettian approaches, objective-collapse theories, and detector models. The resulting proposal is best understood as a propagation-first theoretical reconstruction program: Schrödinger dynamics organizes possible propagation, while Born statistics constrain how that propagation becomes physically realized. Keywords: Schrödinger equation; Born rule; wave function; quantum foundations; propagation structure; quantum probability; quantum trajectories; source-to-detector transport; detector response; wave–particle duality; Bohmian mechanics; quantum measurement
Bohmian mechanics is endowed with an ontological package that supposedly allows to solve the main interpretational problems of quantum mechanics. We are concerned in this work by the emergence of classicality from the quantum mechanical substrate. We will argue that although being superficially attractive, the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation does not shed new light on the quantum-to-classical transition. This is due to nature of the dynamical law of Bohmian mechanics by which the particles follow the streamlines of the probability flow. As a consequence, Bohmian trajectories can be highly non-classical even when the wavefunction propagates along classical trajectories, as happens in semiclassical systems. In order to account for classical dynamics, Bohmian mechanics needs non-spreading and non-interfering wave packets: this is achieved for practical purposes by having recourse to decoherence and dense measurements. However one then faces the usual fundamental problems associated with the meaning of reduced density matrices. Moreover the specific assets of the de Broglie-Bohm interpretation – in particular the existence of point-like particles pursuing well-defined trajectories – would play no role in accounting for the emergence of classical dynamics.