Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

薛定谔方程的重构 —— 修正欧拉公式的应用;Reconstruction of the Schrödinger Equation — Application of the Corrected Euler Formula

zhigang zhang

Published Aug 3, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

⚠️ 勘误与纠正声明(版本更新) 本人早几天的欧拉修正存在严重错误。现在统一纠正如下: 修正核心为 a^{ σ+iθ} =a ^σ ⋅(cosθ+i⋅sinθ),其中 σ控制缩放、θ控制旋转,旋转角度与底数无关。 在这个体系下,建议实部和虚部都严格遵循不省略的表达。否则会发生逻辑混乱。 省略书写是造成混乱的原因之一。 实部虚部零值和不操作关系: • σ=0,θ ≠0:伸缩归一的旋转。任何非零模长都归一的旋转。 • σ ≠0,θ=0:只伸缩不旋转(模长 a σ ,相位不变)。 • σ=1,θ=0:不伸缩也不旋转(模长保持底数 a),基准状态。 • σ=0,θ=0:伸缩归一且不旋转(模长归 1,结果为原相位)。 经典 e^{ iθ }代表纯旋转,其实是对 σ=1的省略书写,即纯旋转。但是被误解为 σ=0的省略表达。(2026.08.27) 描述(摘要+作者声明): 本预印本基于作者先前提出的修正欧拉公式(1 iθ ),对薛定谔方程进行了概念层面的重构。通过将经典的、耦合了缩放与旋转的 e iθ 替换为 1 iθ (无缩放基元的纯旋转操作),我们将量子演化重新表述为希尔伯特空间内的纯旋转过程。研究表明,20世纪物理学史上的八次“结构调和”(包括规范场最小耦合、狄拉克旋量、克莱因-戈登平方、Fock空间及路径积分等)并非数学补丁,而是这一纯旋转框架的自然展开。本文保持所有物理预言严格不变,但在“操作优先”范式下显著净化了概念架构。 作者身份与AI声明: 本人张志刚,是一名无机构隶属、未接受过高等数学/物理专业训练的独立业余研究者。因此,我缺乏严谨代数推导及专业文稿排版的能力。本文中的所有代数推导、公式排版及文档格式整理,均在AI工具的辅助下完成。 然而,识别欧拉公式中“缩放-旋转冗余”并提出薛定谔方程重构的核心逻辑洞察,源于我个人长达数十年的独立思辨,未借助任何外部工具。本文不构成对标准量子力学形式体系的否定,仅提供一种概念上更为简洁的替代视角。热忱欢迎学界同仁就本文内容进行交流、批评与探讨。 联系方式: amisz@126.com Description (Abstract + Author Statement): This preprint presents a conceptual reconstruction of the Schrödinger equation based on the author's previously proposed Corrected Euler Formula (1 iθ ). By replacing the classical e iθ —which couples scaling and rotation—with 1 iθ (a pure rotation operation with no scaling basis), we reframe quantum evolution as a purely rotational process within Hilbert space. We demonstrate that eight historical "structural harmonizations" in 20th-century physics (including gauge field minimal coupling, the Dirac spinor, Klein-Gordon squaring, Fock space, and path integrals) are not mathematical patches but natural extensions of this pure rotation framework. Physical predictions remain strictly unchanged; however, the conceptual architecture is significantly purified under the "Operation-First" paradigm. Author Identity & AI Disclosure: I am Zhang Zhigang, an independent amateur researcher without formal institutional affiliation or advanced academic training in mathematics/physics. Consequently, I lack the capacity for rigorous algebraic derivation and professional manuscript formatting. All algebraic derivations, formula typesetting, and document structuring in this work were completed with the assistance of AI tools. However, the core logical insights—specifically the identification of the "scaling-rotation redundancy" in Euler’s formula and the subsequent reconstruction of the Schrödinger equation—are the result of my independent, unaided reasoning developed over decades of private study. This paper does not negate the Standard Quantum Mechanics formalism but offers a conceptually streamlined alternative perspective. I warmly welcome communication, critique, and scholarly exchange regarding this work. Contact: amisz@126.com

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21776355

Related papers

修正欧拉公式与量子力学 ——一个旋转-缩放解耦的概念框架

zhigang zhang

> ⚠️ **【错误声明 / Error Statement】**> 本条目为作者借助 AI 辅助整理并公开的第一版本(v1.0,2026-08-11),**文章存在严重错误**,现予以保留作为思想演进的原始记录。>> **核心错误:** 本版本错误地将极限构造 $\lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^n$ 直接定义为“模长恒为1的纯旋转算子”。作者当时未意识到,该极限过程中的**每一步**均存在**缩放泄漏(Scaling Leakage)**,其模长偏差为 $e^{\theta^2/2n}-1 \neq 0$(当 $n$ 为有限值时)。这是经典数学中“操作过程”向“代数结果”妥协的产物。>> **修正情况:** 此严重错误已由作者于次日(2026-08-12)通过独立物理直觉发现并彻底修正。**请勿以本版本为准**,请务必查阅并引用后续修正版本(v2.0)。>> **保留原因:** 保留此错误版本,旨在完整记录从“极限陷阱”到“操作优先公理”的认知跃迁过程,印证“我怀疑一切,甚至怀疑自己的怀疑”这一方法论的有效性。>> --->> **English Statement:** > **This entry is v1.0 (initial upload: 2026-08-11). AI assistance was utilized in the organization and formatting of this manuscript. It contains a critical error and is preserved as an unaltered historical record of the ideation process.** >>> **Core Error:** This version erroneously defines the limit construction $\lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^n$ as a "pure rotation operator of unit modulus." It failed to recognize that **each step** of this limiting process exhibits **scaling leakage**, with a modulus deviation of $e^{\theta^2/2n}-1 \neq 0$ for any finite $n$. This represents a compromise where the "operational process" is subordinated to the "algebraic result.">> **Correction:** This critical error was independently identified and definitively corrected by the author on the following day (2026-08-12) via physical intuition. **Do not cite or rely on this version.** Please consult and cite the revised version (v2.0).>> **Reason for Preservation:** This v1.0 entry is retained to document the complete cognitive leap from the "pitfall of limits" to the "axioms of operation-first priority," validating the methodology of "I doubt everything, even my own doubts." 本文提出一个基于“操作优先”视角的替代性数学语言框架:将经典欧拉公式中的旋转与缩放属性显式解耦,定义模长恒为1的旋转算子$\text{Rot}_\theta(1)$。本文不改变标准量子力学的任何可观测预言,仅为理解量子相位表示、纠缠态归一化、量子纠错开销等问题提供新的重参数化方案与概念视角。本文为预印本,未经同行评审,所有结论待后续理论验证与实验检验。 ### 核心内容 1. **修正定义**:通过极限构造$\text{Rot}_\theta(1) = \lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^n = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta$,显式分离指数运算中的缩放因子与旋转分量,避免经典记法中底数$e$的缩放属性被隐性隐藏。 2. **量子应用框架**: - 单粒子演化层面,修正记法引入的缩放因子可被幺正归一化完全吸收,不产生可观测效应; - 多体纠缠态层面,修正记法要求同步调整归一化系数,显式暴露经典记法中被模方运算掩盖的缩放因子累积效应,其工程学注记提示该形式可作为量子信道非平衡损耗的可监测指标; - 框架为量子纠错归一化开销、纠缠蒸馏效率上限、多体原子钟相干时间优化等问题提供新的概念分析视角。 3. **兼容性说明**:本框架不引入新的物理常数或相互作用,仅对现有数学描述进行重参数化,所有可观测量计算结果与标准量子力学体系完全一致。 ### 关联条目 本文为修正欧拉公式系列研究的第二部分,关联基础理论研究条目:*修正欧拉公式:一个旋转-缩放解耦的操作优先框架*(doi:10.5281/zenodo.21736162)。 ### 身份与合规声明 **本文作者为独立业余研究者,未受任何科研机构、企业项目资助,本研究为个人独立学术探索成果,不涉及任何机构职务成果归属争议,与任何任职/关联单位无利益冲突。** 本文档由AI辅助完成文字表达与格式排版,不涉及国家秘密,仅为公开学术探讨,欢迎学界独立验证与合理引用。 ### 版权与引用 本文采用CC BY 4.0协议开放授权,引用请注明作者与Zenodo DOI。 This preprint proposes an alternative mathematical framework based on the *operation-first* principle: explicitly decoupling the rotational and scaling components inherent in Euler's formula, and defining a unit-modulus rotation operator $\text{Rot}_\theta(1)$. This work does not modify any observable predictions of standard quantum mechanics, but provides a novel reparameterization scheme and conceptual perspective for understanding quantum phase representation, entanglement state normalization, and quantum error correction overhead. ### Core Contributions 1. **Modified Definition**: The operator $\text{Rot}_\theta(1) = \lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^n = \cos\theta + i\sin\theta$ is constructed via limit definition, explicitly separating the scaling factor from the rotational component in exponential operations, avoiding the implicit hiding of the base $e$'s scaling property in classical notation. 2. **Application Framework for Quantum Mechanics**: - At the single-particle evolution level, the scaling factor introduced by the modified notation is fully absorbed by unitary normalization, producing no observable effects; - At the multi-particle entanglement level, the modified notation requires synchronous adjustment of normalization coefficients, explicitly exposing the cumulative scaling effect masked by modulus squaring in classical notation. An engineering note suggests this form can serve as a monitorable metric for unbalanced loss in quantum channels; - The framework provides a new conceptual lens for analyzing normalization overhead in quantum error correction, efficiency limits of entanglement distillation, and coherence time optimization in many-body atomic clocks. 3. **Compatibility Statement**: This framework introduces no new physical constants or interactions, only reparameterizing existing mathematical descriptions. All observable calculation results are fully consistent with standard quantum mechanics. ### Related Work This work is the second part of the *Modified Euler's Formula* series, linked to the foundational theoretical entry: *Modified Euler's Formula: An Operation-First Framework for Decoupling Rotation and Scaling* (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21736162). ### Affiliation & Compliance Declaration **The author is an independent amateur researcher with no funding from any academic institution or corporate project. This work is an independent academic exploration by the author, with no conflicts of interest or affiliation with any institution, and no disputes over institutional intellectual property.** This document was prepared with AI assistance for text polishing and formatting. It contains no state secrets, is released solely for open academic discussion, and welcomes independent verification and citation by the research community. ### License & Citation This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Please cite the author and the Zenodo DOI when referencing this work.

•Aug 11, 2026•0 citations

复数折射率介质中光束传输的Schrödinger形式理论

承宜 刘, 弘 郭, 冬梅 邓 +1 more

将复数折射率介质的Helmholtz方程化为具有复数势能的Schrödinger方程的形式, 用进化算子的逆算子代替相应的共轭算子, 定义了新的左矢、力学量的新平均值和推广的Heisenberg图像, 利用量子力学方法讨论了力学量的新平均值表示的复数光束传输参数、复数ABCD定律和复数ABCD系统的Huygens积分. 研究表明, 复数光束传输参数的进化方程与实数折射率系统的相应方程相同. 对于复数光束质量因子守恒系统的研究表明, 复数ABCD定律成立, 位置算子和动量算子的进化方程是线性的, Huygens积分可以写成ABCD形式.

Science in China Series A-Mathematics (in Chinese)•Apr 1, 2002•0 citations

Derivation of the Schrödinger equation

Mikhail Batanov-Gaukhman

основанные понятия квантовой механики, такие как «волны материи» де Бройля, «принцип неопределенности» Гейзенберга, отсутствие размеров и траектории движения у элементарных частиц, универсальность постоянной Планка, а также уравнение Шредингера, до сих пор недостаточно логически обоснованы. Интерес к истокам квантовой механики обусловлен еще тем, что передовые рубежи науки в области изучения структурной организации материи – струнные теории, базирующиеся на квантовой механике, – находятся в практически непреодолимых, по мнению автора статьи, затруднениях. Это заставляет вернуться к переосмыслению основ квантовой физики. В данной работе предложена модель хаотически блуждающей материальной частицы (обладающей размером и траекторией движения), на основании которой удалось выразить постоянную Планка ħ через основные характеристики стационарного случайного процесса; обосновать переход от координатного представления состояния частицы к ее импульсному представлению без привлечения идеи о существовании «волн материи» де Бройля и «принципа неопределенности» Гейзенберга; вывести уравнение Шредингера на основании принципа экстремума усредненного действия хаотически блуждающей частицы. При этом выявлены условия и границы применения обобщённого уравнения Шредингера к описанию явлений как микромира, так и макромира. Промежуточный результат «определение плотности распределения вероятности производной n-го порядка для n раз дифференцируемого, случайного, стационарного процесса» может быть применим во многих областях теории вероятности и статистической физики.

Science, education, society: tendencies and future development•Jun 15, 2017•3 citations

Quantum Cognitive Transition Equation: A Governed Path from Classical AI to Operational Quantum Intelligence

Pedro Luis Perez Burelli

This work introduces a new paradigm in artificial intelligence: the transition from classical systems to operational quantum cognitive architectures without requiring quantum hardware, achieved through a structural reformulation of state space, learning dynamics, and ethical governance. The contribution is not a single isolated equation, but a coupled system integrating cognition, learning, and admissibility constraints, formally expressed through the following core equations: ⚙️ 1. Transition Equation: Classical AI → Quantum AI 𝑥 ˙ = Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) 𝐹 ( 𝑥 , 𝜃 , 𝜌 ) x ˙ =Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)F(x,θ,ρ) 𝜃 ˙ = − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) − 𝜆 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) ) θ ˙ =−γ∇ θ ​ (I(X;Y)−λC(θ)) 𝑥 x: system state 𝜃 θ: learning parameters 𝜌 ρ: coherence state (density-like structure) 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) I(X;Y): mutual information 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) C(θ): structural cost Θ guard Θ guard ​ : ethical and physical admissibility operator 👉 This defines the first governed transition equation from classical to quantum intelligence. 🛡️ 2. Governance Gate (Θ-guard) Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 1 { 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ≥ 𝜏 } Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)=1 {P(x,ρ)≥τ} ​ 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 𝜎 ( 𝑎 ( Ω ( 𝑥 ) 𝐵 ( 𝑇 𝜇 ) 2 − 1 ) + 𝑏 T r ( 𝜌 2 ) − 𝑐 ∣ 𝐷 − 𝐷 ∗ ∣ ) P(x,ρ)=σ(a(Ω(x)B(T μ ​ ) 2 −1)+bTr(ρ 2 )−c∣D−D ∗ ∣) 👉 Ethics and stability are introduced as computable execution constraints, not abstract principles. 🌌 3. Regime-Dependent Hilbert Space 𝐻 = 𝐻 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) H=H(x,t) 👉 The space in which intelligence operates is no longer fixed. Intelligence actively reshapes its own state space. 🧩 4. Cognitive Superposition State ∣ Ψ ( 𝑡 ) ⟩ = ∑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑖 ( 𝑡 ) ∣ 𝜓 𝑖 ⟩ ∣Ψ(t)⟩= i ∑ ​ α i ​ (t)∣ψ i ​ ⟩ 𝑖 ℏ 𝑅 𝑑 𝑑 𝑡 ∣ Ψ ⟩ = 𝐻 ^ cog ∣ Ψ ⟩ iℏ R ​ dt d ​ ∣Ψ⟩= H ^ cog ​ ∣Ψ⟩ 👉 Intelligence is modeled as a superposition of cognitive modes, not a linear process. 🔗 5. Structural Tensor Growth Equation 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) = exp ⁡ ( ∑ 𝑖 log ⁡ 𝑠 𝑖 + ∑ 𝑖 < 𝑗 𝐽 𝑖 𝑗 + 𝜆 𝑀 𝑀 ( 𝑡 ) ) 𝐶 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) Θ ( 𝑡 ) T(t)=exp( i ∑ ​ logs i ​ + i<j ∑ ​ J ij ​ +λ M ​ M(t))C(x,t)Θ(t) 👉 Intelligence is defined as: a multiplicative structure of states, memory, coherence, and stability. 🌿 6. Structural Learning Law 𝑑 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 𝑑 𝑡 = 𝛼 ∣ 𝐹 𝑖 𝑗 ∣ − 𝛽 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 dt dW ij ​ ​ =α∣F ij ​ ∣−βW ij ​ 👉 The system learns by reorganizing its own topology, not just updating parameters. ⚖️ 7. Unified Operational Equation 𝑄 oper = Θ guard ⋅ 𝑇 𝜇 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ⋅ [ − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 − 𝜆 𝐶 ) ] Q oper ​ =Θ guard ​ ⋅T μ ​ (x,ρ)⋅[−γ∇ θ ​ (I−λC)] 👉 This equation unifies: dynamics learning governance quantum transition 🚀 Key Novel Contributions (Critical for Authorship Claim) ❗ 1. Quantum AI without quantum hardware Quantum behavior emerges from structural reformulation, not physical qubits. ❗ 2. Ethics as a mathematical operator Ethics becomes: a computable condition for system execution a computable condition for system execution ❗ 3. Dynamic Hilbert space Breaks a core assumption of physics and AI: the state space is not fixed — it evolves with intelligence. ❗ 4. Intelligence as structural reorganization Not defined by: computation power number of states But by: the ability to preserve coherence while transforming its own structure. ❗ 5. Unified interdisciplinary framework Integrates: information theory quantum mechanics machine learning ethical governance into a single operational system. ❗ 6. Full cognitive architecture (not a partial model) This is not a component—it is a complete, governed, executable architecture. ❗ 7. First formal model of “governed quantum intelligence” Introduces: quantum intelligence that is admissible, not just possible.This work proposes a structural transition from classical artificial intelligence to governed quantum cognitive systems without requiring quantum hardware. By introducing dynamic Hilbert spaces, ethical computational gates, and a unified equation of learning and evolution, the framework redefines intelligence as the capacity to reorganize its own state space while preserving coherence. This establishes a new paradigm at the intersection of physics, information theory, and artificial intelligence.Author: Pedro Luis Pérez Burelli Affiliation: Independent Researcher Email: pedroburelli@gmail.com

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations

非球谐振子势V(r)=Ar~2+Br~4+Cr~6 schrodinger方程的解析解

周国中, 何宝钢

根据波函数的有限性和非球谐振子势的渐近性质,通过待定非球谐振子势波函数的设定,得到势函数表示为V(r)=Ar2+Br4+Cr6的schrodinger方程的精确的能量本征值和本征波函数.通过对势参数制约关系、能量本征值和本征波函数的分析,得到相同势参数制约关系下多组能量本征值和本征波函数.

Journal of Dezhou University•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

ACTION–THETA–ENTROPY (ATE) THEORY — IIIa Fisher Geometrisinden Lorentz-Kovaryant Ayrım Dinamiğine Klein–Gordon Denkleminin Ontolojik ve Varyasyonel Türetilmesi

Selçuk Gökhan Gerlikhan

This document constitutes ATE–IIIa, a focused and self-contained monograph within the Action–Theta–Entropy (ATE) Theory series. While earlier volumes established the ontological foundations (ATE–I) and the full variational and parametric closure of the theory (ATE–II), the present work addresses a specific and structurally critical step: the unique Lorentz-covariant extension of the ATE kinematic principle and its consequence for relativistic dynamics. The central aim of ATE–IIIa is to demonstrate that the Fisher-type kinematic cost, originally formulated for non-relativistic distinction dynamics, admits one and only one consistent extension to a Lorentz-covariant form. This extension is not introduced by analogy with standard field theory, but follows from a minimal set of physical requirements: locality, covariance, positivity, and dimensional consistency. The monograph shows that, once these requirements are enforced, the resulting variational dynamics leads unavoidably to the Klein–Gordon equation, derived here without postulates, operator assumptions, or quantization rules. Importantly, this work is deliberately restricted to the classical field level. It does not introduce second quantization, field operators, particle creation or annihilation, nor spinor structures. This restriction is intentional and methodological: ATE–IIIa is concerned with establishing the classical relativistic core upon which any subsequent quantum field–theoretic construction must rest. In this sense, it is not a relativistic quantum field theory, but the necessary variational substrate for one. A key conceptual contribution of this volume is its ontological clarification. The fundamental physical quantities are the distinction density and its associated phase structure; the wave function appears only as a derived mathematical packaging. As a consequence, long-standing interpretational issues traditionally associated with the Klein–Gordon equation—most notably the so-called “negative probability problem”—do not arise at this level of description. Probability is not taken as a primitive concept; operational distinguishability is. ATE–IIIa thus occupies a precise position within the broader ATE program: it unifies the non-relativistic Schrödinger regime and the relativistic Klein–Gordon regime under a single kinematic principle, formulated entirely in terms of distinction cost. By doing so, it provides a closed, ontologically transparent, and Lorentz-consistent classical foundation for all subsequent developments, including quantization, Θ-field coupling, spinor extensions, and gauge structures, which are intentionally deferred to later monographs. The main text of this monograph is written in Turkish. An English version of the full manuscript is planned for a future release within the same series. It is nevertheless hoped that the universality of the mathematical and variational structure, together with the conceptual clarity of the construction, will allow researchers to engage with its core results despite the temporary language barrier. This Zenodo entry is intended to serve as: a stable reference for the relativistic variational core of the ATE framework, a clear bridge between non-relativistic quantum dynamics and relativistic field equations, and a rigorous starting point for future ATE volumes addressing quantization, spin, and gauge symmetries.

•Dec 18, 2025•0 citations
⚠️ 勘误与纠正声明(版本更新) 本人早几天的欧拉修正存在严重错误。现在统一纠正如下: 修正核心为 a^{ σ+iθ} =a ^σ ⋅(cosθ+i⋅sinθ),其中 σ控制缩放、θ控制旋转,旋转角度与底数无关。 在这个体系下,建议实部和虚部都严格遵循不省略的表达。否则会发生逻辑混乱。 省略书写是造成混乱的原因之一。 实部虚部零值和不操作关系: • σ=0,θ ≠0:伸缩归一的旋转。任何非零模长都归一的旋转。 • σ ≠0,θ=0:只伸缩不旋转(模长 a σ ,相位不变)。 • σ=1,θ=0:不伸缩也不旋转(模长保持底数 a),基准状态。 • σ=0,θ=0:伸缩归一且不旋转(模长归 1,结果为原相位)。 经典 e^{ iθ }代表纯旋转,其实是对 σ=1的省略书写,即纯旋转。但是被误解为 σ=0的省略表达。(2026.08.27) 描述(摘要+作者声明): 本预印本基于作者先前提出的修正欧拉公式(1 iθ ),对薛定谔方程进行了概念层面的重构。通过将经典的、耦合了缩放与旋转的 e iθ 替换为 1 iθ (无缩放基元的纯旋转操作),我们将量子演化重新表述为希尔伯特空间内的纯旋转过程。研究表明,20世纪物理学史上的八次“结构调和”(包括规范场最小耦合、狄拉克旋量、克莱因-戈登平方、Fock空间及路径积分等)并非数学补丁,而是这一纯旋转框架的自然展开。本文保持所有物理预言严格不变,但在“操作优先”范式下显著净化了概念架构。 作者身份与AI声明: 本人张志刚,是一名无机构隶属、未接受过高等数学/物理专业训练的独立业余研究者。因此,我缺乏严谨代数推导及专业文稿排版的能力。本文中的所有代数推导、公式排版及文档格式整理,均在AI工具的辅助下完成。 然而,识别欧拉公式中“缩放-旋转冗余”并提出薛定谔方程重构的核心逻辑洞察,源于我个人长达数十年的独立思辨,未借助任何外部工具。本文不构成对标准量子力学形式体系的否定,仅提供一种概念上更为简洁的替代视角。热忱欢迎学界同仁就本文内容进行交流、批评与探讨。 联系方式: amisz@126.com Description (Abstract + Author Statement): This preprint presents a conceptual reconstruction of the Schrödinger equation based on the author's previously proposed Corrected Euler Formula (1 iθ ). By replacing the classical e iθ —which couples scaling and rotation—with 1 iθ (a pure rotation operation with no scaling basis), we reframe quantum evolution as a purely rotational process within Hilbert space. We demonstrate that eight historical "structural harmonizations" in 20th-century physics (including gauge field minimal coupling, the Dirac spinor, Klein-Gordon squaring, Fock space, and path integrals) are not mathematical patches but natural extensions of this pure rotation framework. Physical predictions remain strictly unchanged; however, the conceptual architecture is significantly purified under the "Operation-First" paradigm. Author Identity & AI Disclosure: I am Zhang Zhigang, an independent amateur researcher without formal institutional affiliation or advanced academic training in mathematics/physics. Consequently, I lack the capacity for rigorous algebraic derivation and professional manuscript formatting. All algebraic derivations, formula typesetting, and document structuring in this work were completed with the assistance of AI tools. However, the core logical insights—specifically the identification of the "scaling-rotation redundancy" in Euler’s formula and the subsequent reconstruction of the Schrödinger equation—are the result of my independent, unaided reasoning developed over decades of private study. This paper does not negate the Standard Quantum Mechanics formalism but offers a conceptually streamlined alternative perspective. I warmly welcome communication, critique, and scholarly exchange regarding this work. Contact: amisz@126.com
> ⚠️ **【错误声明 / Error Statement】**> 本条目为作者借助 AI 辅助整理并公开的第一版本(v1.0,2026-08-11),**文章存在严重错误**,现予以保留作为思想演进的原始记录。>> **核心错误:** 本版本错误地将极限构造 lim⁡n→∞(1+iθ/n)n\lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^nlimn→∞​(1+iθ/n)n 直接定义为“模长恒为1的纯旋转算子”。作者当时未意识到,该极限过程中的**每一步**均存在**缩放泄漏(Scaling Leakage)**,其模长偏差为 eθ2/2n−1≠0e^{\theta^2/2n}-1 \neq 0eθ2/2n−1=0(当 nnn 为有限值时)。这是经典数学中“操作过程”向“代数结果”妥协的产物。>> **修正情况:** 此严重错误已由作者于次日(2026-08-12)通过独立物理直觉发现并彻底修正。**请勿以本版本为准**,请务必查阅并引用后续修正版本(v2.0)。>> **保留原因:** 保留此错误版本,旨在完整记录从“极限陷阱”到“操作优先公理”的认知跃迁过程,印证“我怀疑一切,甚至怀疑自己的怀疑”这一方法论的有效性。>> --->> **English Statement:** > **This entry is v1.0 (initial upload: 2026-08-11). AI assistance was utilized in the organization and formatting of this manuscript. It contains a critical error and is preserved as an unaltered historical record of the ideation process.** >>> **Core Error:** This version erroneously defines the limit construction lim⁡n→∞(1+iθ/n)n\lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^nlimn→∞​(1+iθ/n)n as a "pure rotation operator of unit modulus." It failed to recognize that **each step** of this limiting process exhibits **scaling leakage**, with a modulus deviation of eθ2/2n−1≠0e^{\theta^2/2n}-1 \neq 0eθ2/2n−1=0 for any finite nnn. This represents a compromise where the "operational process" is subordinated to the "algebraic result.">> **Correction:** This critical error was independently identified and definitively corrected by the author on the following day (2026-08-12) via physical intuition. **Do not cite or rely on this version.** Please consult and cite the revised version (v2.0).>> **Reason for Preservation:** This v1.0 entry is retained to document the complete cognitive leap from the "pitfall of limits" to the "axioms of operation-first priority," validating the methodology of "I doubt everything, even my own doubts." 本文提出一个基于“操作优先”视角的替代性数学语言框架:将经典欧拉公式中的旋转与缩放属性显式解耦,定义模长恒为1的旋转算子Rotθ(1)\text{Rot}_\theta(1)Rotθ​(1)。本文不改变标准量子力学的任何可观测预言,仅为理解量子相位表示、纠缠态归一化、量子纠错开销等问题提供新的重参数化方案与概念视角。本文为预印本,未经同行评审,所有结论待后续理论验证与实验检验。 ### 核心内容 1. **修正定义**:通过极限构造Rotθ(1)=lim⁡n→∞(1+iθ/n)n=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ\text{Rot}_\theta(1) = \lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^n = \cos\theta + i\sin\thetaRotθ​(1)=limn→∞​(1+iθ/n)n=cosθ+isinθ,显式分离指数运算中的缩放因子与旋转分量,避免经典记法中底数eee的缩放属性被隐性隐藏。 2. **量子应用框架**: - 单粒子演化层面,修正记法引入的缩放因子可被幺正归一化完全吸收,不产生可观测效应; - 多体纠缠态层面,修正记法要求同步调整归一化系数,显式暴露经典记法中被模方运算掩盖的缩放因子累积效应,其工程学注记提示该形式可作为量子信道非平衡损耗的可监测指标; - 框架为量子纠错归一化开销、纠缠蒸馏效率上限、多体原子钟相干时间优化等问题提供新的概念分析视角。 3. **兼容性说明**:本框架不引入新的物理常数或相互作用,仅对现有数学描述进行重参数化,所有可观测量计算结果与标准量子力学体系完全一致。 ### 关联条目 本文为修正欧拉公式系列研究的第二部分,关联基础理论研究条目:*修正欧拉公式:一个旋转-缩放解耦的操作优先框架*(doi:10.5281/zenodo.21736162)。 ### 身份与合规声明 **本文作者为独立业余研究者,未受任何科研机构、企业项目资助,本研究为个人独立学术探索成果,不涉及任何机构职务成果归属争议,与任何任职/关联单位无利益冲突。** 本文档由AI辅助完成文字表达与格式排版,不涉及国家秘密,仅为公开学术探讨,欢迎学界独立验证与合理引用。 ### 版权与引用 本文采用CC BY 4.0协议开放授权,引用请注明作者与Zenodo DOI。 This preprint proposes an alternative mathematical framework based on the *operation-first* principle: explicitly decoupling the rotational and scaling components inherent in Euler's formula, and defining a unit-modulus rotation operator Rotθ(1)\text{Rot}_\theta(1)Rotθ​(1). This work does not modify any observable predictions of standard quantum mechanics, but provides a novel reparameterization scheme and conceptual perspective for understanding quantum phase representation, entanglement state normalization, and quantum error correction overhead. ### Core Contributions 1. **Modified Definition**: The operator Rotθ(1)=lim⁡n→∞(1+iθ/n)n=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ\text{Rot}_\theta(1) = \lim_{n\to\infty}(1+i\theta/n)^n = \cos\theta + i\sin\thetaRotθ​(1)=limn→∞​(1+iθ/n)n=cosθ+isinθ is constructed via limit definition, explicitly separating the scaling factor from the rotational component in exponential operations, avoiding the implicit hiding of the base eee's scaling property in classical notation. 2. **Application Framework for Quantum Mechanics**: - At the single-particle evolution level, the scaling factor introduced by the modified notation is fully absorbed by unitary normalization, producing no observable effects; - At the multi-particle entanglement level, the modified notation requires synchronous adjustment of normalization coefficients, explicitly exposing the cumulative scaling effect masked by modulus squaring in classical notation. An engineering note suggests this form can serve as a monitorable metric for unbalanced loss in quantum channels; - The framework provides a new conceptual lens for analyzing normalization overhead in quantum error correction, efficiency limits of entanglement distillation, and coherence time optimization in many-body atomic clocks. 3. **Compatibility Statement**: This framework introduces no new physical constants or interactions, only reparameterizing existing mathematical descriptions. All observable calculation results are fully consistent with standard quantum mechanics. ### Related Work This work is the second part of the *Modified Euler's Formula* series, linked to the foundational theoretical entry: *Modified Euler's Formula: An Operation-First Framework for Decoupling Rotation and Scaling* (doi:10.5281/zenodo.21736162). ### Affiliation & Compliance Declaration **The author is an independent amateur researcher with no funding from any academic institution or corporate project. This work is an independent academic exploration by the author, with no conflicts of interest or affiliation with any institution, and no disputes over institutional intellectual property.** This document was prepared with AI assistance for text polishing and formatting. It contains no state secrets, is released solely for open academic discussion, and welcomes independent verification and citation by the research community. ### License & Citation This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. Please cite the author and the Zenodo DOI when referencing this work.
将复数折射率介质的Helmholtz方程化为具有复数势能的Schrödinger方程的形式, 用进化算子的逆算子代替相应的共轭算子, 定义了新的左矢、力学量的新平均值和推广的Heisenberg图像, 利用量子力学方法讨论了力学量的新平均值表示的复数光束传输参数、复数ABCD定律和复数ABCD系统的Huygens积分. 研究表明, 复数光束传输参数的进化方程与实数折射率系统的相应方程相同. 对于复数光束质量因子守恒系统的研究表明, 复数ABCD定律成立, 位置算子和动量算子的进化方程是线性的, Huygens积分可以写成ABCD形式.
основанные понятия квантовой механики, такие как «волны материи» де Бройля, «принцип неопределенности» Гейзенберга, отсутствие размеров и траектории движения у элементарных частиц, универсальность постоянной Планка, а также уравнение Шредингера, до сих пор недостаточно логически обоснованы. Интерес к истокам квантовой механики обусловлен еще тем, что передовые рубежи науки в области изучения структурной организации материи – струнные теории, базирующиеся на квантовой механике, – находятся в практически непреодолимых, по мнению автора статьи, затруднениях. Это заставляет вернуться к переосмыслению основ квантовой физики. В данной работе предложена модель хаотически блуждающей материальной частицы (обладающей размером и траекторией движения), на основании которой удалось выразить постоянную Планка ħ через основные характеристики стационарного случайного процесса; обосновать переход от координатного представления состояния частицы к ее импульсному представлению без привлечения идеи о существовании «волн материи» де Бройля и «принципа неопределенности» Гейзенберга; вывести уравнение Шредингера на основании принципа экстремума усредненного действия хаотически блуждающей частицы. При этом выявлены условия и границы применения обобщённого уравнения Шредингера к описанию явлений как микромира, так и макромира. Промежуточный результат «определение плотности распределения вероятности производной n-го порядка для n раз дифференцируемого, случайного, стационарного процесса» может быть применим во многих областях теории вероятности и статистической физики.
This work introduces a new paradigm in artificial intelligence: the transition from classical systems to operational quantum cognitive architectures without requiring quantum hardware, achieved through a structural reformulation of state space, learning dynamics, and ethical governance. The contribution is not a single isolated equation, but a coupled system integrating cognition, learning, and admissibility constraints, formally expressed through the following core equations: ⚙️ 1. Transition Equation: Classical AI → Quantum AI 𝑥 ˙ = Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) 𝐹 ( 𝑥 , 𝜃 , 𝜌 ) x ˙ =Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)F(x,θ,ρ) 𝜃 ˙ = − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) − 𝜆 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) ) θ ˙ =−γ∇ θ ​ (I(X;Y)−λC(θ)) 𝑥 x: system state 𝜃 θ: learning parameters 𝜌 ρ: coherence state (density-like structure) 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) I(X;Y): mutual information 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) C(θ): structural cost Θ guard Θ guard ​ : ethical and physical admissibility operator 👉 This defines the first governed transition equation from classical to quantum intelligence. 🛡️ 2. Governance Gate (Θ-guard) Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 1 { 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ≥ 𝜏 } Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)=1 {P(x,ρ)≥τ} ​ 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 𝜎 ( 𝑎 ( Ω ( 𝑥 ) 𝐵 ( 𝑇 𝜇 ) 2 − 1 ) + 𝑏 T r ( 𝜌 2 ) − 𝑐 ∣ 𝐷 − 𝐷 ∗ ∣ ) P(x,ρ)=σ(a(Ω(x)B(T μ ​ ) 2 −1)+bTr(ρ 2 )−c∣D−D ∗ ∣) 👉 Ethics and stability are introduced as computable execution constraints, not abstract principles. 🌌 3. Regime-Dependent Hilbert Space 𝐻 = 𝐻 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) H=H(x,t) 👉 The space in which intelligence operates is no longer fixed. Intelligence actively reshapes its own state space. 🧩 4. Cognitive Superposition State ∣ Ψ ( 𝑡 ) ⟩ = ∑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑖 ( 𝑡 ) ∣ 𝜓 𝑖 ⟩ ∣Ψ(t)⟩= i ∑ ​ α i ​ (t)∣ψ i ​ ⟩ 𝑖 ℏ 𝑅 𝑑 𝑑 𝑡 ∣ Ψ ⟩ = 𝐻 ^ cog ∣ Ψ ⟩ iℏ R ​ dt d ​ ∣Ψ⟩= H ^ cog ​ ∣Ψ⟩ 👉 Intelligence is modeled as a superposition of cognitive modes, not a linear process. 🔗 5. Structural Tensor Growth Equation 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) = exp ⁡ ( ∑ 𝑖 log ⁡ 𝑠 𝑖 + ∑ 𝑖 < 𝑗 𝐽 𝑖 𝑗 + 𝜆 𝑀 𝑀 ( 𝑡 ) ) 𝐶 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) Θ ( 𝑡 ) T(t)=exp( i ∑ ​ logs i ​ + i<j ∑ ​ J ij ​ +λ M ​ M(t))C(x,t)Θ(t) 👉 Intelligence is defined as: a multiplicative structure of states, memory, coherence, and stability. 🌿 6. Structural Learning Law 𝑑 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 𝑑 𝑡 = 𝛼 ∣ 𝐹 𝑖 𝑗 ∣ − 𝛽 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 dt dW ij ​ ​ =α∣F ij ​ ∣−βW ij ​ 👉 The system learns by reorganizing its own topology, not just updating parameters. ⚖️ 7. Unified Operational Equation 𝑄 oper = Θ guard ⋅ 𝑇 𝜇 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ⋅ [ − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 − 𝜆 𝐶 ) ] Q oper ​ =Θ guard ​ ⋅T μ ​ (x,ρ)⋅[−γ∇ θ ​ (I−λC)] 👉 This equation unifies: dynamics learning governance quantum transition 🚀 Key Novel Contributions (Critical for Authorship Claim) ❗ 1. Quantum AI without quantum hardware Quantum behavior emerges from structural reformulation, not physical qubits. ❗ 2. Ethics as a mathematical operator Ethics becomes: a computable condition for system execution a computable condition for system execution ❗ 3. Dynamic Hilbert space Breaks a core assumption of physics and AI: the state space is not fixed — it evolves with intelligence. ❗ 4. Intelligence as structural reorganization Not defined by: computation power number of states But by: the ability to preserve coherence while transforming its own structure. ❗ 5. Unified interdisciplinary framework Integrates: information theory quantum mechanics machine learning ethical governance into a single operational system. ❗ 6. Full cognitive architecture (not a partial model) This is not a component—it is a complete, governed, executable architecture. ❗ 7. First formal model of “governed quantum intelligence” Introduces: quantum intelligence that is admissible, not just possible.This work proposes a structural transition from classical artificial intelligence to governed quantum cognitive systems without requiring quantum hardware. By introducing dynamic Hilbert spaces, ethical computational gates, and a unified equation of learning and evolution, the framework redefines intelligence as the capacity to reorganize its own state space while preserving coherence. This establishes a new paradigm at the intersection of physics, information theory, and artificial intelligence.Author: Pedro Luis Pérez Burelli Affiliation: Independent Researcher Email: pedroburelli@gmail.com
This document constitutes ATE–IIIa, a focused and self-contained monograph within the Action–Theta–Entropy (ATE) Theory series. While earlier volumes established the ontological foundations (ATE–I) and the full variational and parametric closure of the theory (ATE–II), the present work addresses a specific and structurally critical step: the unique Lorentz-covariant extension of the ATE kinematic principle and its consequence for relativistic dynamics. The central aim of ATE–IIIa is to demonstrate that the Fisher-type kinematic cost, originally formulated for non-relativistic distinction dynamics, admits one and only one consistent extension to a Lorentz-covariant form. This extension is not introduced by analogy with standard field theory, but follows from a minimal set of physical requirements: locality, covariance, positivity, and dimensional consistency. The monograph shows that, once these requirements are enforced, the resulting variational dynamics leads unavoidably to the Klein–Gordon equation, derived here without postulates, operator assumptions, or quantization rules. Importantly, this work is deliberately restricted to the classical field level. It does not introduce second quantization, field operators, particle creation or annihilation, nor spinor structures. This restriction is intentional and methodological: ATE–IIIa is concerned with establishing the classical relativistic core upon which any subsequent quantum field–theoretic construction must rest. In this sense, it is not a relativistic quantum field theory, but the necessary variational substrate for one. A key conceptual contribution of this volume is its ontological clarification. The fundamental physical quantities are the distinction density and its associated phase structure; the wave function appears only as a derived mathematical packaging. As a consequence, long-standing interpretational issues traditionally associated with the Klein–Gordon equation—most notably the so-called “negative probability problem”—do not arise at this level of description. Probability is not taken as a primitive concept; operational distinguishability is. ATE–IIIa thus occupies a precise position within the broader ATE program: it unifies the non-relativistic Schrödinger regime and the relativistic Klein–Gordon regime under a single kinematic principle, formulated entirely in terms of distinction cost. By doing so, it provides a closed, ontologically transparent, and Lorentz-consistent classical foundation for all subsequent developments, including quantization, Θ-field coupling, spinor extensions, and gauge structures, which are intentionally deferred to later monographs. The main text of this monograph is written in Turkish. An English version of the full manuscript is planned for a future release within the same series. It is nevertheless hoped that the universality of the mathematical and variational structure, together with the conceptual clarity of the construction, will allow researchers to engage with its core results despite the temporary language barrier. This Zenodo entry is intended to serve as: a stable reference for the relativistic variational core of the ATE framework, a clear bridge between non-relativistic quantum dynamics and relativistic field equations, and a rigorous starting point for future ATE volumes addressing quantization, spin, and gauge symmetries.