Presentation of the Heuristic Interpretive Model of Quantum Physics: Quantum Motion through SpaceQuantum Motion through Space — abbreviated as QMS — is a heuristic interpretive model of quantum physics that aims to provide an intelligible representation of quantum phenomena, fundamental fields, and elementary particles. It does not seek to replace the established mathematical formalisms of contemporary physics, but rather to extend their conceptual scope by proposing a physical and geometrical image of the quantum world.Starting from a fundamental postulate concerning the discrete structure of space and the dynamical role of quanta of action, the QMS model examines both historical and contemporary physical theories in order to develop a coherent interpretive framework. Within this perspective, quantum phenomena are not considered solely as mathematical structures, but also as processes that may be represented through an underlying dynamics: the motion of quanta of action through a discrete spatial substrate.This approach also has a philosophical dimension. By revisiting long-standing questions concerning the nature of space, matter, vacuum, and physical reality, QMS seeks to establish a dialogue between fundamental physics, the ontology of space, and the metaphysics of nature. The model is therefore presented as an attempt at conceptual clarification, situated at the intersection of quantum physics, relativity, gravitation, and speculative cosmology.The thesis is organized into two main parts.The first part, comprising Chapters I to IV, is devoted to the foundations and dynamics of Quantum Motion through Space. It presents the physical and philosophical assumptions of the model, before developing its interpretation of quantum propagation, particles, the wave function, mass, energy, and gravitation.The second part, comprising Chapters V and VI, explores the cosmological and ontological extension of the model. It introduces the speculative framework of Black Holes–White Mountains, together with a reflection on quantum gravity, the discrete structure of space, and the mereological issues associated with such a conception of physical reality.As a whole, this work aims to formulate a coherent, cautious, and speculative interpretive framework intended to make conceivable an underlying kinetics of quantum and cosmological phenomena, while remaining attentive to the observational and theoretical achievements of contemporary physics.
Presentation of the Heuristic Interpretive Model of Quantum Physics: Quantum Motion through SpaceQuantum Motion through Space — abbreviated as QMS — is a heuristic interpretive model of quantum physics that aims to provide an intelligible representation of quantum phenomena, fundamental fields, and elementary particles. It does not seek to replace the established mathematical formalisms of contemporary physics, but rather to extend their conceptual scope by proposing a physical and geometrical image of the quantum world.Starting from a fundamental postulate concerning the discrete structure of space and the dynamical role of quanta of action, the QMS model examines both historical and contemporary physical theories in order to develop a coherent interpretive framework. Within this perspective, quantum phenomena are not considered solely as mathematical structures, but also as processes that may be represented through an underlying dynamics: the motion of quanta of action through a discrete spatial substrate.This approach also has a philosophical dimension. By revisiting long-standing questions concerning the nature of space, matter, vacuum, and physical reality, QMS seeks to establish a dialogue between fundamental physics, the ontology of space, and the metaphysics of nature. The model is therefore presented as an attempt at conceptual clarification, situated at the intersection of quantum physics, relativity, gravitation, and speculative cosmology.The thesis is organized into two main parts.The first part, comprising Chapters I to IV, is devoted to the foundations and dynamics of Quantum Motion through Space. It presents the physical and philosophical assumptions of the model, before developing its interpretation of quantum propagation, particles, the wave function, mass, energy, and gravitation.The second part, comprising Chapters V and VI, explores the cosmological and ontological extension of the model. It introduces the speculative framework of Black Holes–White Mountains, together with a reflection on quantum gravity, the discrete structure of space, and the mereological issues associated with such a conception of physical reality.As a whole, this work aims to formulate a coherent, cautious, and speculative interpretive framework intended to make conceivable an underlying kinetics of quantum and cosmological phenomena, while remaining attentive to the observational and theoretical achievements of contemporary physics.
Abstract Quantum mechanics and relativity are extraordinarily successful mathematical theories, yet their conventional physical interpretations rely on substantially different conceptual frameworks. The Theory of Space (TS) proposes a fourth dimension defined by the Planck-related interval, with interpreted as a longitudinal dimension associated with energy (cτ), rather than as the conventional Minkowski spacetime interval. This fourth dimension does not coexist continuously with the observable three spatial dimensions as a conventional four-dimensional manifold. Instead, TS proposes an oscillatory existence between observable 3D presence and a non-observable fourth-dimensional phase. Through this oscillation, the quantum system undergoes repeated dimensional projection into observable 3D, with individual eigenstates manifested probabilistically while the underlying quantum state continues to evolve. Within this framework, phenomena including measurement, the Born rule, the arrow of time, entropy, entanglement, tunneling, and Bell-type correlations acquire a common physical interpretation. Heisenberg uncertainty and non-commutativity are interpreted as consequences of physical parameters associated with different phases of the dimensional oscillation and therefore not simultaneously manifested within the same 3D instance. TS further distinguishes between the quantum system’s spatial component and its compact physical entity. Their coexistence within the complete system provides a proposed physical basis for quantum interference and phase-dependent phenomena, including the double-slit experiment and the path-integral description of quantum evolution. As an extension of the model, TS proposes that the periodic displacement and replacement of quantum space generate a pulsed inward spatial flow. This mechanism provides a possible basis for a quantized gravitational interaction and suggests that gravitational energy may be represented by a positive contribution. Related developments, including spiral spatial flows, follow naturally from the same dimensional-oscillation mechanism. The Theory of Space therefore seeks to provide a common conceptual framework for quantum, relativistic, and gravitational phenomena without replacing the established mathematical equations that successfully reproduce experimental observations. The present work develops this framework and invites critical examination of its assumptions, physical implications, and potential experimental consequences. Keywords: relativity; Lorentz transformation; quantum superposition; quantum superposition; collapse; entanglement; quantum gravity
Quantum mechanics is considered to be one of the most successful as well as revolutionary theories in the history of physics. It gives the conceptual and mathematical basis of the behavior of matter and energy at atomic and subatomic level. In the course of time quantum mechanics has grown out of a theory that was created to cover experimental anomalies to a comprehensive theory that forms the basis of theoretical physics as known today. Its use is much broader to the early atomic models and now it is central to quantum field theory, particle physics and condensed matter physics, cosmology, and new theories of quantum gravity. Quantum mechanics has a significant impact on the philosophical concept of physical reality because of its abstract nature, the probabilistic nature of its interpretations, wave functions and non-local correlations. The classical physics, in contrast to quantum mechanics, presupposes the determinism and exact predictability of the phenomena; quantum mechanics regards the unpredictability of phenomena as the natural law. This change of thought has enabled physicists to develop a set of theoretical frameworks, which better capture experimental data, especially at gross extremes of energy and space. Quantum mechanics is a theory and a method of modern theoretical physics. It allows the development of field theories of the description of fundamental interactions, predicts the occurrence of previously unknown particles, and the explanation of complex collective phenomena in many-body systems. Moreover, additional quantum concepts have already become essential in the study of the early universe, black holes and microphysical geometry of space-time. The purpose of the research paper is to examine the vast number of theoretical physics studies using quantum mechanics as a tool. The paper has emphasised the contribution of quantum mechanics in the current research on the study of unification of physical theories as it is manifested in key subfields to which quantum mechanics has made contributions. There are also some reflections of where quantum mechanics is likely to make a paradigm shift in the future that confirm its relevance as a fundamental pillar of theoretical physics.
Book of Physics — On Difference Tractatus Principio, Volume II What if the fundamental entities of physics are not the foundations of reality, but the results of the relations through which reality becomes measurable? Book of Physics, the second volume of Tractatus Principio — On Difference by C.H.F. Warnke, extends the relational foundation developed in Volume I into the domain of physical reality. The work challenges a fundamental assumption underlying many physical descriptions: that mathematical abstractions such as points, particles, fields, and measurable quantities must correspond to independently existing constituents of the world. Its central distinction is between the mathematical representation of a physical phenomenon and the ontological interpretation of that representation. Beginning with a critical examination of classical mechanics, Cartesian geometry, Newtonian point-mass models, relativity, and quantum physics, the book investigates how relational descriptions can become interpreted as properties of self-contained physical objects. The work proposes a reversal of this perspective: physical objects are not the original bearers of relations. Rather, their determinacy emerges through relational structures, interactions, and the conditions under which they are observed and measured. Building upon the mathematical language of difference, represented by |, and its self-referential unfolding through Δ, the volume develops alternative interpretations of space, time, energy, mass, gravitation, and light. It examines dimensional measurement, relational invariance, the proposed significance of 39.19 within its own formal framework, and the organization of physical appearances through recursive structures and degrees of freedom. Gravitation is reconsidered through a relational shell model. Motion and time are investigated through the concept of complete relational states, or Frozen Frames, whose differences become readable as temporal succession. A central part of the work concerns measurement itself. Rather than treating measurement as the passive discovery of an already fully determined property, the book examines the relationship between observer, apparatus, registration, and interpretation. A measuring apparatus is understood as a materially realized question: its construction determines which differences can become detectable and how their results can be interpreted. From this perspective, particles and other physical entities are investigated as stable forms of relational determination rather than necessarily self-standing objects independent of every measurement context. The later chapters explore the uniformity of relational processes across different scales, including a reinterpretation of Bose–Einstein condensation, before returning to the distinction between scientific explanation and the conceptual images through which reality is understood. These proposals constitute an alternative theoretical interpretation within the framework of Tractatus Principio. Their physical validity is not established merely by the mathematical or conceptual arguments presented. The investigation ultimately reaches the observer himself. If every measurement is relational, the question arises of how the observer becomes capable of recognizing his own position within those relations. This question forms the transition to Volume III, the Book of Self-Knowledge. The central question of Volume II is not merely what physics measures, but what makes a physical reality measurable as something determinate in the first place.
Quantum mechanics (QM) is not just a theory of micro-objects: it is our current fundamental theory of motion. It expresses a deeper understanding of Nature than classical mechanics. Precisely as classical mechanics, the conventional formulation of QM describes evolution of states and observables in time. Precisely as classical mechanics, this is not sufficient to deal with general relativistic systems, because these systems do not describe evolution in time; they describe correlations between observables. Therefore, a formulation of QM slightly more general than the conventional one – or a quantum version of the relativistic classical mechanics discussed in the previous chapter – is needed. In this chapter I discuss the possibility of such a formulation. In the last section I discuss the general physical interpretation of QM. QM can be formulated in a number of more or less equivalent formalisms: canonical (Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators), covariant (Feynman's sum-over-histories), algebraic (states as linear functionals over an abstract algebra of observables) and others. Generally, but not always, we are able to translate these formalisms into one another, but often what is easy in one formulation is difficult in another. A generalrelativistic sum-over-histories formalism has been developed by Jim Hartle. Here I focus on the canonical formalism, because the canonical formalism has provided the mathematical completeness and precision needed to explicitly construct the mathematical apparatus of quantum gravity. Later I will consider alternative formalisms.
This work presents a unified, realistic, and mechanically grounded interpretation of fundamental physics across all scales, from quarks and elementary particles to atoms, macroscopic bodies, planetary motion, and black holes. The proposed framework provides a single coherent physical description capable of reproducing and explaining, within a common dynamical structure, the full range of phenomena traditionally treated separately by general relativity, quantum mechanics, and quantum electrodynamics. Within this approach, long-standing conceptual problems such as wave–particle duality, quantum interference, entanglement, and wavefunction collapse are not postulated as fundamental features of nature, but emerge naturally as dynamical properties of a physically real medium. The apparent dual behavior of matter and radiation, as well as nonlocal quantum correlations, arise from coherent and topologically constrained excitations of this medium, without invoking probabilistic ontologies or nonphysical abstractions. The theory is based on a revised physical concept of space, treated as a real superfluid medium endowed with density, elasticity, viscosity, permittivity, permeability, and a very small but non-zero electrical conductivity. In this model, space is no longer a passive geometric background, but an active physical system capable of storing, transmitting, and dissipating energy.Mass is interpreted as an isotropic compression of the superfluid, electric charge as an oriented torsional configuration, and fields as elastic stress and vorticity distributions of the medium itself. Electromagnetic and gravitational waves are described as propagating perturbations of the superfluid, while particles correspond to stable solitonic configurations sustained by the medium dynamics.At the microscopic level, starting from classical fluid equations (continuity and Euler equations) and applying the Madelung transformation, the Schrödinger equation is shown to emerge as a compact complex representation of the underlying real fluid dynamics, rather than as a fundamental postulate. Quantum phenomena such as quantization, tunneling, spin, and exclusion principles follow from stability, coherence, and topological constraints of solitonic wave structures. On cosmological scales, the same framework provides a unified interpretation of redshift, large-scale expansion phenomena, and the cosmic microwave background as cumulative dynamical and dissipative effects of wave propagation within the superfluid medium, rather than as consequences of metric expansion alone. Effects commonly attributed to dark matter and dark energy are reinterpreted as emergent manifestations of spatial density gradients, elastic stresses, and dissipative properties of the superfluid, without introducing additional unknown components. A wide range of experimentally verified phenomena—including the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, Zeeman–Stark effects, the Aharonov–Bohm effect, Casimir effect, Unruh radiation, and cosmological attenuation effects—are consistently described within this unified framework. The proposed model offers an alternative foundational paradigm for physics, in which space, matter, and interactions emerge from a single physically intelligible dynamical system, restoring a continuous and causal description of nature from microscopic to cosmological scales.
The enterprise to construct a local causal model of quantum theory (QT), including quantum field theory (QFT), resulted in the identification of "quantum objects" as the elementary units of causality and locality.Quantum objects are collections of particles (including single particles) whose collective dynamics and measurement results can only be described by the laws of QT/ QFT.Quantum objects run autonomously with system state update frequency based on their local proper time and with no or minimal dependency on external parameters.The autonomy of quantum objects necessitates well-defined causal interrelationships between quantum objects and spacetime: 1) Quantum objects are embedded in space and move within space.2) In the proposed causal model, the dynamics of space is triggered by the dynamics of the quantum objects.The causal model of QT/QFT assumes discretized spacetime similar to the spacetime of causal dynamical triangulation.