This paper develops a constraint-based account of dynamical models in physics, showing that reversible dynamics arise as highly restricted boundary cases of more general irreversible frameworks. Using open quantum systems (Lindblad master equation) and classical statistical mechanics (Boltzmann equation), we prove that reversible models form a proper subclass of irreversible models ($\mathcal{R} \subset \mathcal{I}$), obtained by imposing bijectivity, time-reversal invariance, and strict isolation. This structural inclusion clarifies how unitary Schrödinger evolution and Liouvillian dynamics emerge from dissipative, many-to-one processes, and reframes debates on the arrow of time, coarse-graining, and open-system foundations in terms of constraint hierarchies rather than fundamental reversibility.
This paper develops a constraint-based account of dynamical models in physics, showing that reversible dynamics arise as highly restricted boundary cases of more general irreversible frameworks. Using open quantum systems (Lindblad master equation) and classical statistical mechanics (Boltzmann equation), we prove that reversible models form a proper subclass of irreversible models (R⊂I), obtained by imposing bijectivity, time-reversal invariance, and strict isolation. This structural inclusion clarifies how unitary Schrödinger evolution and Liouvillian dynamics emerge from dissipative, many-to-one processes, and reframes debates on the arrow of time, coarse-graining, and open-system foundations in terms of constraint hierarchies rather than fundamental reversibility.
This paper develops a constraint-based account of dynamical models in physics, showing that reversible dynamics arise as highly restricted boundary cases of more general irreversible frameworks. Using open quantum systems (Lindblad master equation) and classical statistical mechanics (Boltzmann equation), we prove that reversible models form a proper subclass of irreversible models (R⊂I), obtained by imposing bijectivity, time-reversal invariance, and strict isolation. This structural inclusion clarifies how unitary Schrödinger evolution and Liouvillian dynamics emerge from dissipative, many-to-one processes, and reframes debates on the arrow of time, coarse-graining, and open-system foundations in terms of constraint hierarchies rather than fundamental reversibility. This structural inclusion framework provides a unified foundation for ongoing debates in Foundations of Physics concerning irreversibility, symmetry constraints, and the physical status of open-system dynamics.
Nonintegrable Poincaré systems with continuous spectrum (so-called Large Poincaré Systems, LPS) lead to the appearance of diffusive terms in the framework of dynamics. These terms break time symmetry. They lead, therefore, to limitations to classical trajectory dynamics and of wave functions. These diffusive terms correspond to well-defined classes of dynamical processes (i.e., so-called “vacuum-vacuum” transitions). The diffusive effects are amplified in situations corresponding to persistent interactions. As a result, we have to include already in the fundamental dynamical description the two aspects, probability and irreversibility, which are so conspicuous on the macroscopic level. We have to formulate both classical and quantum mechanics on the Liouville level of probability distributions (or density matrices). For integrable systems, we recover the usual formulations of classical or quantum mechanics. Instead of being irreducible concepts, which cannot be further analyzed, trajectories and wave functions appear as special solutions of the Liouville-von Neumann equations. This extension of classical and quantum dynamics permits us to unify the two concepts of nature we inherited from the 19th century, based on the one hand on dynamical time-reversible laws and on the other on an evolutionary view associated to entropy. It leads also to a unified formulation of quantum theory avoiding the conventional dual structure based on Schrödinger’s equation on the one hand, and on the “collapse” of the wave function on the other. A dynamical interpretation is given to processes such as decoherence or approach to equilibrium without any appeal to extra dynamic considerations (such as the many-world theory, coarse graining or averaging over the environment). There is a striking parallelism between classical and quantum theory. For LPS we have, in general, both a “collapse” of trajectories and of wave functions for LPS. In both cases, we need a generalized formulation of dynamics in terms of probability distributions or density matrices. Since the beginning of this century, we know that classical mechanics had to be generalized to take into account the existence of universal constants. We now see that classical as well as quantum mechanics also have to be extended to include unstable dynamical systems such as LPS. As a result, we achieve a new formulation of "laws of physics" dealing no more with certitudes but with probabilities. The formulation is appropriate to describe an open, evolving universe.
The question of how irreversibility can emerge as a generic phenomenon when the underlying mechanical theory is reversible has been a long-standing fundamental problem for both classical and quantum mechanics. We describe a mechanism for the appearance of irreversibility that applies to coherent, isolated systems in a pure quantum state. This equilibration mechanism requires only an assumption of sufficiently complex internal dynamics and natural information-theoretic constraints arising from the infeasibility of collecting an astronomical amount of measurement data. Remarkably, we are able to prove that irreversibility can be understood as typical without assuming decoherence or restricting to coarse-grained observables, and hence occurs under distinct conditions and time scales from those implied by the usual decoherence point of view. We illustrate the effect numerically in several model systems and prove that the effect is typical under the standard random-matrix conjecture for complex quantum systems.
We propose a new approach concerning the introduction of time-irreversibility in statistical mechanics. It is based on a transition function defined in terms of path integral and verifying a time-irreversible equation. We show first how dynamic processes may enter in the description of equilibrium states. In order to do that a characteristic time is associated with closed paths. For large isolated systems at equilibrium or for systems in contact with a thermostat our results are identical with those obtained with the Gibbs ensemble methods. For a model used in the microscopic approaches of the brownian motion no new basic assumption is required to predict a transition from a quantum state to a classical one exhibiting a time-irreversible behavior. This demonstration is sufficient to show that very well accepted approximations can lead to time-irreversible behaviors for a large class of systems. The difference between our work and the system+reservoir approaches is underlined. Here equilibrium states and irreversible processes are described on the same footing representing a progress in the question of time-irreversibility in statistical physics. The transition function is also used for describing a small system for which there is no thermodynamics. By adding to the transition function a second one characterizing the reverse motion we may describe time-reversible systems. In a simple case we replace two real valued transition functions by a complex function verifying a Schrodinger like equation. From this we see how to break the time-reversibility of this equation and how to investigate the connection quantum mechanics-thermodynamics from a very fundamental point of view.
This paper presents a unified formulation of the origin of the arrow of time in classical and quantum mechanics. We begin with a mechanical analysis of a one-dimensional three-particle system, which provides a concrete example in which macroscopic irreversibility emerges despite microscopically reversible dynamics. By abstracting this mechanism, we identify coarse-graining as the essential ingredient responsible for macroscopic time asymmetry. We then formulate a general structural criterion for the thermodynamic arrow of time. We show that when microscopic time evolution forms a group while the induced macroscopic evolution forms only a semigroup, macroscopic time-reversal symmetry is necessarily broken. We prove that this semigroup structure arises if and only if the coarse-graining map from microscopic to macroscopic states is non-injective. This result holds independently of whether the underlying system is classical or quantum. In the quantum case, using density matrices, antiunitary time reversal, and CPTP coarse-graining maps, we show that macroscopic irreversibility follows inevitably from information loss, without requiring any asymmetry in the microscopic laws. Our results demonstrate that the thermodynamic arrow of time has a universal structural origin: the loss of microscopic information inherent in coarse-graining.