Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Information Processing

Weakest precondition calculus and relative completeness of satisfaction-based quantum Hoare logic

Xin Sun, Xingchi Su, Xiaoning Bian, Huiwen Wu

Published Jul 28, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract Quantum Hoare logic (QHL) is a formal verification tool specifically designed to ensure the correctness of quantum programs. There has been an ongoing challenge to achieve a relatively complete satisfaction-based QHL with a while loop since its inception in 2006. This paper presents a solution. We prove the relative completeness in two steps. First, we establish a semantics and proof system of Hoare triples with quantum programs and deterministic assertions. Then, utilizing the weakest precondition of deterministic assertion, we construct the weakest preterm calculus of probabilistic expressions. The relative completeness of QHL is then obtained as a consequence of the weakest preterm calculus.

DOI
10.1007/s11128-026-05296-w

Related papers

On the Relative Completeness of Satisfaction-based Quantum Hoare Logic

Sun, Xin, Xingchi Su, Xiaoning Bian +1 more

Quantum Hoare logic (QHL) is a formal verification tool specifically designed to ensure the correctness of quantum programs. There has been an ongoing challenge to achieve a relatively complete satisfaction-based QHL with while-loop since its inception in 2006. This paper presents a solution by proposing the first relatively complete satisfaction-based QHL with while-loop. The completeness is proved in two steps. First, we establish a semantics and proof system of Hoare triples with quantum programs and deterministic assertions. Then, by utilizing the weakest precondition of deterministic assertion, we construct the weakest preterm calculus of probabilistic expressions. The relative completeness of QHL is then obtained as a consequence of the weakest preterm calculus. Using our QHL, we formally verify the correctness of Deutsch's algorithm and quantum teleportation.

arXiv:2405.01940•May 3, 2024•0 citations

Hoare Logic for Quantum Programs

Mingsheng Ying

Hoare logic is a foundation of axiomatic semantics of classical programs and it provides effective proof techniques for reasoning about correctness of classical programs. To offer similar techniques for quantum program verification and to build a logical foundation of programming methodology for quantum computers, we develop a full-fledged Hoare logic for both partial and total correctness of quantum programs. It is proved that this logic is (relatively) complete by exploiting the power of weakest preconditions and weakest liberal preconditions for quantum programs.

arXiv:0906.4586•Jun 25, 2009•9 citations

Formal Verification of Quantum Algorithms Using Quantum Hoare Logic

Junyi Liu, Bohua Zhan, Shuling Wang +5 more

We formalize the theory of quantum Hoare logic (QHL) [TOPLAS 33(6),19], an extension of Hoare logic for reasoning about quantum programs. In particular, we formalize the syntax and semantics of quantum programs in Isabelle/HOL, write down the rules of quantum Hoare logic, and verify the soundness and completeness of the deduction system for partial correctness of quantum programs. As preliminary work, we formalize some necessary mathematical background in linear algebra, and define tensor products of vectors and matrices on quantum variables. As an application, we verify the correctness of Grover’s search algorithm. To our best knowledge, this is the first time a Hoare logic for quantum programs is formalized in an interactive theorem prover, and used to verify the correctness of a nontrivial quantum algorithm.

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•83 citations

Formal Verification of Continuous-Variable Quantum Programs

Stefanie Muroya, Thomas A. Henzinger

We provide a formal framework for Continuous-Variable Quantum Computing (CQC). While CQC is supported by photonic quantum hardware, we are not aware of a formal semantics for continuous-variable quantum programs nor of a unary Hoare logic for their verification. There are several technical obstacles to extending to CQC any of the formal frameworks available for Discrete-Variable Quantum Computing (DQC). Most importantly, continuous-variable quantum programs act on {\em infinite-dimensional} Hilbert spaces; their measurement outcomes are often {\em unbounded} and have expected values that are defined by an improper integral (or an infinite series), which may not converge. We overcome these challenges to give a formal semantics to a universal programming language for CQC and to provide the first Hoare logic for CQC. The assertions of our logic are built from polynomials over canonical observables. Besides proving relative completeness, we implement a symbolic weakest-precondition calculator for CQC based on our logic. Our tool has successfully verified CQC algorithms from textbooks and calculated their approximation errors for physically realizable implementations, proved the correctness (i.e., equivalence) of gate decompositions for CQC hardware, and computed the resource requirements (i.e., number of photon-number states) for achieving a desired accuracy in the classical simulation of continuous-variable quantum programs.

quant-pharXiv:2607.17714•Jul 21, 2026•0 citations

An Expressive Assertion Language for Quantum Programs

Bonan Su, Yuan Feng, Mingsheng Ying +1 more

In this paper, we define an assertion language designed for expectation-based reasoning about quantum programs. The key design idea is a representation of quantum predicates by quasi-probability distributions of generalized Pauli operators. Then we extend classical techniques such as Gödelization to prove that this language is expressive with respect to the quantum programs with loops–specifically, for any program S and any postcondition ψ formulated in the assertion language, the weakest precondition of S with respect to ψ can also be expressed as a formula in the assertion language. As an application, we present a sound and relatively complete quantum Hoare logic upon our expressive assertion language.

Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages•Jan 8, 2026•1 citation

Floyd--hoare logic for quantum programs

Mingsheng Ying

Floyd--Hoare logic is a foundation of axiomatic semantics of classical programs, and it provides effective proof techniques for reasoning about correctness of classical programs. To offer similar techniques for quantum program verification and to build a logical foundation of programming methodology for quantum computers, we develop a full-fledged Floyd--Hoare logic for both partial and total correctness of quantum programs. It is proved that this logic is (relatively) complete by exploiting the power of weakest preconditions and weakest liberal preconditions for quantum programs.

ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems•Dec 1, 2011•187 citations
Abstract Quantum Hoare logic (QHL) is a formal verification tool specifically designed to ensure the correctness of quantum programs. There has been an ongoing challenge to achieve a relatively complete satisfaction-based QHL with a while loop since its inception in 2006. This paper presents a solution. We prove the relative completeness in two steps. First, we establish a semantics and proof system of Hoare triples with quantum programs and deterministic assertions. Then, utilizing the weakest precondition of deterministic assertion, we construct the weakest preterm calculus of probabilistic expressions. The relative completeness of QHL is then obtained as a consequence of the weakest preterm calculus.
Quantum Hoare logic (QHL) is a formal verification tool specifically designed to ensure the correctness of quantum programs. There has been an ongoing challenge to achieve a relatively complete satisfaction-based QHL with while-loop since its inception in 2006. This paper presents a solution by proposing the first relatively complete satisfaction-based QHL with while-loop. The completeness is proved in two steps. First, we establish a semantics and proof system of Hoare triples with quantum programs and deterministic assertions. Then, by utilizing the weakest precondition of deterministic assertion, we construct the weakest preterm calculus of probabilistic expressions. The relative completeness of QHL is then obtained as a consequence of the weakest preterm calculus. Using our QHL, we formally verify the correctness of Deutsch's algorithm and quantum teleportation.
Hoare logic is a foundation of axiomatic semantics of classical programs and it provides effective proof techniques for reasoning about correctness of classical programs. To offer similar techniques for quantum program verification and to build a logical foundation of programming methodology for quantum computers, we develop a full-fledged Hoare logic for both partial and total correctness of quantum programs. It is proved that this logic is (relatively) complete by exploiting the power of weakest preconditions and weakest liberal preconditions for quantum programs.
We formalize the theory of quantum Hoare logic (QHL) [TOPLAS 33(6),19], an extension of Hoare logic for reasoning about quantum programs. In particular, we formalize the syntax and semantics of quantum programs in Isabelle/HOL, write down the rules of quantum Hoare logic, and verify the soundness and completeness of the deduction system for partial correctness of quantum programs. As preliminary work, we formalize some necessary mathematical background in linear algebra, and define tensor products of vectors and matrices on quantum variables. As an application, we verify the correctness of Grover’s search algorithm. To our best knowledge, this is the first time a Hoare logic for quantum programs is formalized in an interactive theorem prover, and used to verify the correctness of a nontrivial quantum algorithm.
We provide a formal framework for Continuous-Variable Quantum Computing (CQC). While CQC is supported by photonic quantum hardware, we are not aware of a formal semantics for continuous-variable quantum programs nor of a unary Hoare logic for their verification. There are several technical obstacles to extending to CQC any of the formal frameworks available for Discrete-Variable Quantum Computing (DQC). Most importantly, continuous-variable quantum programs act on {\em infinite-dimensional} Hilbert spaces; their measurement outcomes are often {\em unbounded} and have expected values that are defined by an improper integral (or an infinite series), which may not converge. We overcome these challenges to give a formal semantics to a universal programming language for CQC and to provide the first Hoare logic for CQC. The assertions of our logic are built from polynomials over canonical observables. Besides proving relative completeness, we implement a symbolic weakest-precondition calculator for CQC based on our logic. Our tool has successfully verified CQC algorithms from textbooks and calculated their approximation errors for physically realizable implementations, proved the correctness (i.e., equivalence) of gate decompositions for CQC hardware, and computed the resource requirements (i.e., number of photon-number states) for achieving a desired accuracy in the classical simulation of continuous-variable quantum programs.
In this paper, we define an assertion language designed for expectation-based reasoning about quantum programs. The key design idea is a representation of quantum predicates by quasi-probability distributions of generalized Pauli operators. Then we extend classical techniques such as Gödelization to prove that this language is expressive with respect to the quantum programs with loops–specifically, for any program S and any postcondition ψ formulated in the assertion language, the weakest precondition of S with respect to ψ can also be expressed as a formula in the assertion language. As an application, we present a sound and relatively complete quantum Hoare logic upon our expressive assertion language.
Floyd--Hoare logic is a foundation of axiomatic semantics of classical programs, and it provides effective proof techniques for reasoning about correctness of classical programs. To offer similar techniques for quantum program verification and to build a logical foundation of programming methodology for quantum computers, we develop a full-fledged Floyd--Hoare logic for both partial and total correctness of quantum programs. It is proved that this logic is (relatively) complete by exploiting the power of weakest preconditions and weakest liberal preconditions for quantum programs.