We show that the standard 1+1D Z_{2}×Z_{2} cluster model has a noninvertible global symmetry, described by the fusion category Rep(D_{8}). Therefore, the cluster state is not only a Z_{2}×Z_{2} symmetry protected topological (SPT) phase, but also a noninvertible SPT phase. We further find two new commuting Pauli Hamiltonians for the other two Rep(D_{8}) SPT phases on a tensor product Hilbert space of qubits, matching the classification in field theory and mathematics. We identify the edge modes and the local projective algebras at the interfaces between these noninvertible SPT phases. Finally, we show that there does not exist a symmetric entangler that maps between these distinct SPT states.
Higher-order topological phases with invertible symmetries have been extensively studied in recent years, revealing gapless modes localized on boundaries of higher codimension. In this work, we extend the framework of higher-order symmetry-protected topological (SPT) phases to include noninvertible symmetries. We construct a concrete model of a second-order SPT phase in
2+1 dimensions that hosts symmetry-protected corner modes protected by a noninvertible symmetry. This construction is then generalized to a
dth-order SPT phase in
d+1 dimensions, featuring similarly protected corner modes. Additionally, we demonstrate a second-order SPT phase in
3+1 dimensions exhibiting hinge modes protected by a noninvertible symmetry.
As the understanding of global symmetry has been expanded, quantum phases of matter can have a refined classification, protected or enriched by noninvertible symmetry, a type of generalized symmetry whose transformation may not have an inverse. In this paper, I use the duality method, proposed in Ref. 1 , to classify noninvertible symmetry protected topological (NISPT) phases. Under the duality transformation, different NISPT phases are mapped to different classes of spontaneous symmetry breaking phases with ordinary group symmetry. I demonstrate this method with the simplest Kramers–Wannier duality transformation, also known as gauging [Formula: see text] symmetry, to classify Rep([Formula: see text]) NISPT in [Formula: see text]. I also construct lattice models realizing these NISPT on tensor product Hilbert space and study the projective algebras at the interfaces between different classes of NISPTs.