Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle as an Emergent Topological Stress in Quantum Graph Emergent Field Theory (QGEFT)

Yaniv Cohen

Published Jul 22, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The current Paper 76 benchmark does not claim that continuum quantum mechanics or the exact $\hbar/2$ bound has been derived from first principles. It does show that the verified QGEFT Phase-4 kappa scan and HMC pipeline now resolve a clear inverse relationship between position certainty (IPR) and momentum/energy scale (mass gap, force norms). At $\kappa=0.5$, the fermion is tightly confined ($IPR\approx0.998$) with a large mass gap ($\approx0.140$); at $\kappa=2.0$, it delocalizes ($IPR\approx0.020$) with a collapsed mass gap ($\approx0.017$). The HMC trajectory confirms that maintaining any fermionic state demands enormous topological forces ($\|F_{edge}\| \sim 10^6$), and the correlation structure supports the Heisenberg trade-off: $\mathrm{Corr}(IPR, gap) = -0.73$. The defensible conclusion is that uncertainty emerges in QGEFT as a topological pressure-release phenomenon---the graph's mechanical response to avoid structural fracture when forced into geometrically singular configurations.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21480905

Related papers

The Unifying Force: A Computational Proof of Wavefunction Collapse and Energy Emission via Topological Stress in QGEFT

Yaniv Cohen

Paper 80 does not claim that full continuum quantum mechanics or the exact Landauer bound has been derived from first principles. It does show that the verified QGEFT benchmark now supports a quantitative unifying-force law $F_U = -k_\tau W_M D_i$: a dispersed wave ($D_i = 2.17$) collapses to a point ($D_i = 0$) in a single Monte Carlo sweep once the anchor weight crosses the threshold $W_M^* = 950$ (theory $\approx 923$), and the released quadratic energy ($\Delta E_{rel} = 1164$) correlates with the erased virtual arcs at $r = 0.985$, providing a mechanical, thermodynamic origin for photon emission.

•Aug 10, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Graph Emergent Field Theory (QGEFT) Part II: Topological Entanglement, Information Chirality, and the Pauli Exclusion Principle as a Data Collision Avoidance Mechanism

Yaniv Cohen

The current Paper 46 benchmark does not claim that full continuum quantum electrodynamics, exact fermionic statistics, or a literal microscopic derivation of all chemistry have already been completed inside QGEFT. It does show that the framework now supports a coherent algorithmic interpretation of three core quantum phenomena in one place: spin as information chirality, Pauli exclusion as collision avoidance, and repulsive force as the macroscopic shadow of rejected Monte Carlo proposals. The empirical anchor is the verified Paper 34 covalent-bond benchmark, where the isolated baseline energy `11.6759` drops into a bond minimum `9.5200` at `d ≈ 1.0` and then rises sharply to `14.9835` at `d = 0.8` and `52.0309` at `d = 0.6`. The defensible conclusion is therefore that QGEFT can already encode bonding and exclusion as local routing admissibility rules on a discrete information substrate.

•Jun 3, 2026•0 citations

Computational Proof of Quantum Graph Emergent Field Theory (QGEFT): From Quantum Mechanics to Gravity via Topological Optimization

Yaniv Cohen

Paper 78 does not claim that the continuum limits of quantum field theory, general relativity, or the Standard Model have been fully derived. It claims a narrower but still powerful result: five cornerstone phenomena of modern physics—wave-particle duality, interference, entanglement, gravity, and electromagnetism—all emerge naturally from a single computational engine (Monte Carlo edge-swap on a discrete graph minimizing $E = \sum (k_i - k_0)^2$) without coding any of the standard equations (Schrödinger, Einstein, Maxwell) into the experiments. The 5-for-5 outcome provides strong computational evidence that the QGEFT paradigm of "All forces = Local Optimization + Topology" is both viable and quantitatively testable.

•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Temporal Entanglement Swapping and Topological Memory in the Large Scale Limit of QGEFT

Yaniv Cohen

The current Paper 75 benchmark does not claim that full continuum quantum gravity or laboratory entanglement swapping has already been derived on a graph. It does show that the verified QGEFT temporal entanglement engine reproduces the Megidish-Eisenberg (2013) result: particle D, created *after* particle A was destroyed, inherits A's topological fingerprint through the scar region with composite similarity **0.9379** and **Z=3.56** ($>2\sigma$, null $\mu=0.8163\pm0.0342$). The control measurement (A↔C, where C was placed far from A's scar) shows a lower similarity of 0.8502, proving the memory is spatially localized. At $N\le64$, the signal drowns in background noise (null similarity $\approx0.93$), confirming that $N\ge256$ is required for clean topological memory emergence. The defensible conclusion is that entanglement is a statistical correlation preserved in the dynamic memory of quantum spacetime—not a physical thread stretched through space.

•Jul 19, 2026•0 citations

Emergent Atomic Orbitals and Quantum Non-Collapse via Spectral Graph Theory in QGEFT

Yaniv Cohen

Paper 31 does not claim that the full hydrogen spectrum or full quantum chemistry have already been derived on a graph. It does show that a weighted shell graph in QGEFT already supports a concrete non-collapse mechanism: the first four non-trivial weighted-Laplacian modes on a verified 73-node benchmark keep the nucleus-core density at only `1.4645%`, `0.0317%`, `0.0027%`, and `0.0243%`, while developing shell-organized standing waves and strong participation-ratio contraction.

•May 18, 2026•0 citations

Geometric Origin and State-Dependent Deformation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle under Emergent Complex Structures

Konstantinos Dimitropoulos

We derive the structural modifications and physical implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle under the framework of the Three-Dimensional Complex Necessity (3DCN) principle. In standard quantum mechanics, the uncertainty relation is bounded by a constant scalar value derived from the axiomatic commutation relation [x, p] = i*hbar. By replacing the static imaginary unit i with the dynamically locked universal complex structure operator J_U, we prove that the commutator deforms into a state-dependent operator equation [x, p] = J_U*hbar. We demonstrate that the lower bound of quantum uncertainty is no longer invariant, but fluctuates based on the local geometry of the real phase space substrate and the energy density of the flavor-locking mechanism. This deformation naturally regularizes sub-Planckian spatial measurements, establishing a fundamental physical cutoff that prevents infinite information density localized in real space, thereby avoiding gravitational collapses at the quantum level.

•Sep 3, 2026•0 citations
The current Paper 76 benchmark does not claim that continuum quantum mechanics or the exact ℏ/2\hbar/2ℏ/2 bound has been derived from first principles. It does show that the verified QGEFT Phase-4 kappa scan and HMC pipeline now resolve a clear inverse relationship between position certainty (IPR) and momentum/energy scale (mass gap, force norms). At κ=0.5\kappa=0.5κ=0.5, the fermion is tightly confined (IPR≈0.998IPR\approx0.998IPR≈0.998) with a large mass gap (≈0.140\approx0.140≈0.140); at κ=2.0\kappa=2.0κ=2.0, it delocalizes (IPR≈0.020IPR\approx0.020IPR≈0.020) with a collapsed mass gap (≈0.017\approx0.017≈0.017). The HMC trajectory confirms that maintaining any fermionic state demands enormous topological forces (∥Fedge∥∼106\|F_{edge}\| \sim 10^6∥Fedge​∥∼106), and the correlation structure supports the Heisenberg trade-off: Corr(IPR,gap)=−0.73\mathrm{Corr}(IPR, gap) = -0.73Corr(IPR,gap)=−0.73. The defensible conclusion is that uncertainty emerges in QGEFT as a topological pressure-release phenomenon---the graph's mechanical response to avoid structural fracture when forced into geometrically singular configurations.
Paper 80 does not claim that full continuum quantum mechanics or the exact Landauer bound has been derived from first principles. It does show that the verified QGEFT benchmark now supports a quantitative unifying-force law FU=−kτWMDiF_U = -k_\tau W_M D_iFU​=−kτ​WM​Di​: a dispersed wave (Di=2.17D_i = 2.17Di​=2.17) collapses to a point (Di=0D_i = 0Di​=0) in a single Monte Carlo sweep once the anchor weight crosses the threshold WM∗=950W_M^* = 950WM∗​=950 (theory ≈923\approx 923≈923), and the released quadratic energy (ΔErel=1164\Delta E_{rel} = 1164ΔErel​=1164) correlates with the erased virtual arcs at r=0.985r = 0.985r=0.985, providing a mechanical, thermodynamic origin for photon emission.
The current Paper 46 benchmark does not claim that full continuum quantum electrodynamics, exact fermionic statistics, or a literal microscopic derivation of all chemistry have already been completed inside QGEFT. It does show that the framework now supports a coherent algorithmic interpretation of three core quantum phenomena in one place: spin as information chirality, Pauli exclusion as collision avoidance, and repulsive force as the macroscopic shadow of rejected Monte Carlo proposals. The empirical anchor is the verified Paper 34 covalent-bond benchmark, where the isolated baseline energy `11.6759` drops into a bond minimum `9.5200` at `d ≈ 1.0` and then rises sharply to `14.9835` at `d = 0.8` and `52.0309` at `d = 0.6`. The defensible conclusion is therefore that QGEFT can already encode bonding and exclusion as local routing admissibility rules on a discrete information substrate.
Paper 78 does not claim that the continuum limits of quantum field theory, general relativity, or the Standard Model have been fully derived. It claims a narrower but still powerful result: five cornerstone phenomena of modern physics—wave-particle duality, interference, entanglement, gravity, and electromagnetism—all emerge naturally from a single computational engine (Monte Carlo edge-swap on a discrete graph minimizing E=∑(ki−k0)2E = \sum (k_i - k_0)^2E=∑(ki​−k0​)2) without coding any of the standard equations (Schrödinger, Einstein, Maxwell) into the experiments. The 5-for-5 outcome provides strong computational evidence that the QGEFT paradigm of "All forces = Local Optimization + Topology" is both viable and quantitatively testable.
The current Paper 75 benchmark does not claim that full continuum quantum gravity or laboratory entanglement swapping has already been derived on a graph. It does show that the verified QGEFT temporal entanglement engine reproduces the Megidish-Eisenberg (2013) result: particle D, created *after* particle A was destroyed, inherits A's topological fingerprint through the scar region with composite similarity **0.9379** and **Z=3.56** (>2σ>2\sigma>2σ, null μ=0.8163±0.0342\mu=0.8163\pm0.0342μ=0.8163±0.0342). The control measurement (A↔C, where C was placed far from A's scar) shows a lower similarity of 0.8502, proving the memory is spatially localized. At N≤64N\le64N≤64, the signal drowns in background noise (null similarity ≈0.93\approx0.93≈0.93), confirming that N≥256N\ge256N≥256 is required for clean topological memory emergence. The defensible conclusion is that entanglement is a statistical correlation preserved in the dynamic memory of quantum spacetime—not a physical thread stretched through space.
We derive the structural modifications and physical implications of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle under the framework of the Three-Dimensional Complex Necessity (3DCN) principle. In standard quantum mechanics, the uncertainty relation is bounded by a constant scalar value derived from the axiomatic commutation relation [x, p] = i*hbar. By replacing the static imaginary unit i with the dynamically locked universal complex structure operator J_U, we prove that the commutator deforms into a state-dependent operator equation [x, p] = J_U*hbar. We demonstrate that the lower bound of quantum uncertainty is no longer invariant, but fluctuates based on the local geometry of the real phase space substrate and the energy density of the flavor-locking mechanism. This deformation naturally regularizes sub-Planckian spatial measurements, establishing a fundamental physical cutoff that prevents infinite information density localized in real space, thereby avoiding gravitational collapses at the quantum level.