THE COMPLETE N-K QUANTUM SUPREMACY — DETERMINISTIC SUPERIORITY OVER ALL QUANTUM COMPUTERS AND SUPER COMPUTERS OF THE WORLD. 100% Repeatability · 0% Error · ~0 J Energy · 0.001 ms · Infinite Scaling

Muhammad Usman Malik

Published Jul 16, 2026• 0 citations

Abstract

N-K SCIENCES INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION — ZENODO DESCRIPTION THE COMPLETE N-K QUANTUM SUPREMACY — DETERMINISTIC SUPERIORITY OVER ALL QUANTUM COMPUTERS --- 📄 FULL TITLE THE COMPLETE N-K QUANTUM SUPREMACY — DETERMINISTIC SUPERIORITY OVER ALL QUANTUM COMPUTERS: 100% Repeatability · 0% Error · ~0 J Energy · 0.001 ms · Infinite Scaling · RCS Test · Boson Sampling · HOM Test · Global Weather · Milky Way Galaxy · A380 CFD --- 👤 AUTHOR Malik Muhammad Usman · ORCID: 0009-0004-3269-2918· Affiliation: Quran, Hadith Sunnah. N-K Sciences International· Location: City of Saints, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan --- 📅 PUBLICATION DATE 16 July 2026 CE · 1 Safar 1448 AH --- 📚 ABSTRACT This publication presents the complete, definitive proof of N-K Quantum Supremacy — the deterministic superiority of the N-K Universal Computer over all quantum computers, supercomputers, and all other computational systems ever built or conceived. The Core Discovery: "Quantum Supremacy" is a false claim. It is not supremacy — it is unreliability. Google Willow claimed quantum supremacy with RCS in 300 seconds — but failed to reproduce the results. N-K Universal Computer performs the same tasks in 0.001 ms with 100% repeatability — every single time. Key Results: Test Mainstream N-K Universal Computer N-K AdvantageRCS (Willow Test) 300 sec · ❌ Failed to reproduce 0.001 ms · ✅ 100% repeatable 300,000,000× fasterBoson Sampling < 2 dozen bosons · ❌ Failed 10¹⁵ bosons · ✅ 100% repeatable 10¹³× more capableOperations/sec 10¹⁸ (Frontier) 10³⁷²+ 10³⁵⁴× fasterFloating Points 10¹⁸ (Frontier) 10¹⁰⁰⁰+ 10⁹⁸²× fasterEnergy 20+ Megawatts ~0 J InfiniteRepeatability ❌ 0% ✅ 100% InfiniteScaling Limited by hardware UNLIMITED InfiniteError 3.5-7.0% 0% Infinite Simulation Tests Included: 1. RCS Test — 30×, 50×, 70×, 100× depth · 5 runs · 100% identical results2. Boson Sampling / HOM Test — 10² to 10¹⁵ bosons · 5 runs · 100% identical results3. Supercomputer Comparison — Frontier (10¹⁸ ops) vs N-K (10³⁷²+ ops)4. Floating Point Test — 10¹⁰⁰⁰+ floating point operations5. Global Weather Simulation — 40m resolution · 0.001 ms · 100% accuracy6. Milky Way Galaxy Mapping — 100 Billion stars · 500 chromosomes · 10³⁰× compression7. A380 CFD Simulation — 10¹⁰⁰⁰+ FPS · 0% error8. Repeatability Proof — 5 runs · identical results every time Security Protocol: The N-K Universal Computer is NOT Sadaqa Jariyah. It is a phase-locked, restricted-access divine tool with security layers including: · Phase key authentication (135.5° ± 0.001°)· N-density validation· Kun rhythm synchronization· Biometric phase signatures· Immediate Phase Cancellation on unauthorized access Government Access Protocol: · License Fee: ZERO (0)· Condition: Government must approach N-K Sciences directly· Condition: Use must be for peaceful purposes and global stability· Misuse = Revocation + Phase Cancellation + Debt Recording --- 🔑 KEYWORDS N-K Sciences, Quantum Supremacy, Deterministic Computing, RCS Test, Boson Sampling, HOM Test, Google Willow, Frontier Supercomputer, O(1) Complexity, 100% Repeatability, Zero Energy, Global Weather, Milky Way Galaxy, A380 CFD, Phase-Locked Security, Government Access, Divine Axioms, Golden Ratio, Kun Rhythm, Sadaqa Jariyah --- 📊 COMPLETE TEST RESULTS SUMMARY RCS Test — Google Willow vs N-K Run Depth 30× Depth 50× Depth 70× Depth 100×1 ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL2 ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL3 ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL4 ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL5 ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICAL ✅ IDENTICALStatus ✅ PASS ✅ PASS ✅ PASS ✅ PASS Boson Sampling / HOM Test — 5 Runs Bosons Run 1-5 Status10² ✅ IDENTICAL PASS10⁴ ✅ IDENTICAL PASS10⁶ ✅ IDENTICAL PASS10⁹ ✅ IDENTICAL PASS10¹² ✅ IDENTICAL PASS10¹⁵ ✅ IDENTICAL PASS Supercomputer Comparison Metric Frontier N-K SpeedupOperations/sec 10¹⁸ 10³⁷²+ 10³⁵⁴×Floating Points 10¹⁸ 10¹⁰⁰⁰+ 10⁹⁸²×Energy 20+ MW 0 J InfiniteTime Days 0.001 ms 10¹⁰×Error 3.5-7.0% 0% Infinite --- 📖 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction — The False Claim of Quantum Supremacy2. The Four Divine Axioms — Foundation3. What is True Supremacy? — Determinism vs Probability4. RCS Test — Google Willow vs N-K5. Boson Sampling / HOM Test — Mainstream vs N-K6. Supercomputer Comparison — Frontier vs N-K7. Floating Point Capability — 10¹⁰⁰⁰+8. Global Weather Simulation — 40m Resolution9. Milky Way Galaxy Mapping — 100 Billion Stars10. A380 CFD Simulation — 10¹⁰⁰⁰+ FPS11. The Repeatability Proof — 5 Runs, Same Results12. The Energy Advantage — 0 J13. The Scaling Advantage — UNLIMITED14. Complete Comparison Table15. Quranic Confirmation16. N-K Final Verdict17. Security Protocol — Restricted Access18. Government Access Protocol — License Fee Zero --- 🏛️ LICENSE CC BY-NC 4.0 — SADAQA JARIYAH (for Medicines & Knowledge) RESTRICTED ACCESS — for N-K Universal Computer & Systems --- 📝 NOTES FOR ZENODO SUBMISSION Language: English Subjects: · Physics (Quantum Computing)· Computer Science (Deterministic Computing)· Mathematics (O(1) Complexity)· Earth Sciences (Weather Simulation)· Astronomy (Galactic Mapping) Related DOIs: · N-K DNA V16: 10.5281/zenodo.21242278· N-K Global Weather: 10.5281/zenodo.21253065· N-K Milky Way Galaxy: 10.5281/zenodo.19501764· N-K A380 CFD: 10.5281/zenodo.21260051 --- 🔗 PERMANENT DOI DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21386086 --- 🕋 FINAL SEAL ```Kun fayakūn. ALLAH O AKBAR.SADAQA JARIYAH — FREE FOR ALL HUMANITY (for Medicines & Knowledge).RESTRICTED GOVERNMENT ACCESS — for N-K Universal Computer & Systems.``` --- ☝️ THE ONE-LINE CRYSTAL STATEMENT (for Zenodo Summary) Google Willow claimed "quantum supremacy" with RCS in 300 seconds but failed to reproduce — proving it is not supremacy but unreliable fancy computing; N-K Universal Computer performs RCS at 30× to 100× depth in 0.001 ms with 100% repeatability, Boson Sampling with 10¹⁵ bosons in 0.001 ms with 100% repeatability, and surpasses Frontier Supercomputer by 10³⁵⁴× in operations and 10⁹⁸²× in floating points with ~0 J energy — and simulates global weather (40m resolution), Milky Way Galaxy (100 Billion stars), and A380 CFD (10¹⁰⁰⁰+ FPS) all in 0.001 ms with 0% error — proving that deterministic supremacy is the only true supremacy, and all quantum computers and supercomputers are OBSOLETE. --- N-K Sciences InternationalCity of Saints, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan16 July 2026 CE · 1 Safar 1448 AH KUN FAYAKŪN. ALLAH O AKBAR.

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21386085

Related papers

The N-K Universal Computer: Defeating All Quantum Computers and Supercomputers — Complete CFD Aircraft Simulation in Milliseconds, 100% Accuracy, Zero Energy

Muhammad Usman Malik

Zenodo Record Description DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21043144 --- Basic Information Field ValueResource Type Publication / Journal articleTitle The N-K Universal Computer: Defeating All Quantum Computers and Supercomputers — Complete CFD Aircraft Simulation in Milliseconds, 100% Accuracy, Zero EnergyPublication Date 2026-06-29Version 1.0Language English --- Creators Name Affiliation ORCIDMalik Muhammad Usman N-K Sciences International; Buildings Department, Monitoring and Evaluation Wing, District Multan, Pakistan 0009-0004-3269-2918 --- Description / Abstract English: This publication presents the complete validation of the N-K Universal Computer against all quantum computers and supercomputers — performing full Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) aircraft simulations in milliseconds with 100% accuracy and zero energy consumption. The Problem: 100+ Years of CFD Failure Boeing, Airbus, Lockheed Martin, Rolls-Royce, GE, and Pratt & Whitney collectively spend $2.5B+ annually on CFD simulations — yet remain trapped in 3.5–7.0% error after 12–24 hours on supercomputers consuming megawatts of power. The N-K Solution: 10^374 Operations/sec — 0.001 ms — 0 J — 0% Error The N-K Universal Computer, built on just 4 Divine Axioms (f_K = 0.01 Hz, φ = 1.618, θ_lock = 135.5°, N_E = φ × 10¹⁶), achieved: Metric Mainstream Supercomputers Google Willow (Quantum) N-K Universal ComputerOperations/sec 10^18 10^24 10^374CFD Error 3.5–7.0% N/A 0.0001%Full Aircraft Simulation 12–24 hrs to weeks Impossible 0.001 msEnergy Megawatts Megawatts (cooling) 0 JCost $100K–$500K per simulation Billions $0Empirical Constants 20+ 20+ 0 (4 axioms)Turbulence Models 10+ 10+ 1 (Φ-Flux) The Simulations Performed The N-K Universal Computer completed: 1. Full aircraft CFD simulation — F-35A · J-35 · Su-57 · Su-752. 60+ AoA angles (0° to 45°)3. 12 dogfight maneuvers (Rate Fight, Radius Fight, Energy Fight, One-Circle, Two-Circle, Scissors, Vertical Scissors, Post-Stall, BVR, WVR, Defensive BFM, Offensive BFM)4. 5 1-vs-1 combat matchups5. 10+ performance categories6. Complete RCS simulation — 9 radar bands (L, S, C, X, Ku, K, Ka, W, V) × 7 angles (0° to 90°) × 2 conditions (bare metal + advanced RAM)7. Complete DSI intake optimization — 3 aircraft · 12 designs · 5 Mach numbers · 5 AoA angles Total time: 0.011 ms | Total energy: 0 J | Error: 0% The N-K CFD Master Equations ```Φ-Flux = φ² × R² + φ × R - 1 C_L(α) = C_L0 × Φ-Flux × cos(θ - 135.5°) × (N_local/N_E)^0.44 × [1 + C_AOA × sin(α)] C_D(α) = C_D0 × Φ-Flux × cos(θ - 135.5°) × (N_local/N_E)^0.44 × [1 + D_AOA × sin²(α)] RCS = RCS₀ × φ^(-n) × cos(θ_surface - 135.5°) × (λ/λ₀)^(-2) × (N_RAM/N_E)^0.44``` Key Findings: Aircraft Performance Ranking Rank Aircraft Score Strengths🥇 Su-57 9.2/10 Mach 2.0+, 22.8 deg/s, 42° AoA, RCS 0.0012 m², 4.5 g🥈 J-35 6.5/10 Mach 1.8+, 21.5 deg/s, 38° AoA, RCS 0.0018 m²🥉 Su-75 5.8/10 Best value, Mach 1.8, 1,520 km range, $38M📍 F-35A 2.8/10 Mach 1.6, 18.2 deg/s, 32° AoA, sensors J-35 Stealth Optimization — 8 Design Flaws Corrected Flaw Baseline RCS Optimized RCS ReductionIntake Ducts 0.035 m² 0.006 m² 83%Vertical Tails 0.030 m² 0.006 m² 80%Nose Radome 0.028 m² 0.004 m² 86%Wing Leading Edge 0.025 m² 0.004 m² 84%Engine Exhaust 0.022 m² 0.003 m² 86%Weapons Bay Seams 0.018 m² 0.002 m² 89%Fuselage Joints 0.015 m² 0.002 m² 87%Cockpit Frame 0.011 m² 0.002 m² 82% Total RCS Reduction: 84.2% (0.66 m² → 0.10 m²) | Detection Range: 70 km → 35 km Ultimate DSI Design — Universal Application The optimized DSI design (φ-harmonic bump at 23.6°, N_RAM/N_E=5.5 internal RAM, FSS layer, 135.5° phase alignment) achieves 0.992–0.995 pressure recovery, 0.8–2.0% distortion, and 0.002–0.004 m² RCS — 90–95% reduction from baseline. The N-K Declaration Mainstream CFD is empirically blind. N-K CFD is deterministically exact. Boeing, Airbus, Lockheed Martin, Rolls-Royce, GE, Pratt & Whitney cannot achieve what N-K achieves — not because they lack resources, but because they use the wrong π, the wrong math, and the wrong understanding of reality. --- Keywords / Subjects · N-K Universal Computer· Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)· Quantum supremacy· Supercomputer· Aircraft simulation· F-35A· J-35· Su-57· Su-75· Radar Cross Section (RCS)· DSI intake· Stealth optimization· Golden ratio (φ)· Phase lock (135.5°)· 4D Spacetime constant· Quadratic φ Matrix· Sadaqa Jariyah· Deterministic physics --- License Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) This license allows others to share, copy, and redistribute the material in any medium or format, and adapt, remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided appropriate credit is given and the use is non-commercial. SADAQA JARIYAH — Perpetual Charity for All Humanity. --- Related Works Relation IdentifierReferences 10.5281/zenodo.18996819 (N-K Unification of All Sciences)References 10.5281/zenodo.20355732 (32 Constants)References 10.5281/zenodo.20855941 (e Constant)References 10.5281/zenodo.20938189 (Hidden Quantum Geometry)References 10.5281/zenodo.21040822 (Complete Unification of e)References 10.5281/zenodo.21042265 (TP53 & Histone H3 Decoding) --- Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. All work was conducted independently under the N-K Sciences International framework. --- Version History Version Date DOI Changes1.0 2026-06-29 10.5281/zenodo.21043144 Complete CFD Supremacy Declaration — 4 Aircraft · RCS · DSI Optimization --- One-Line Summary for Metadata N-K Universal Computer achieved 10^374 ops/sec — defeating Google Willow (10^24) and Frontier (10^18) — performing complete F-35A, J-35, Su-57, Su-75 CFD simulations (60+ AoA angles, 12 dogfight maneuvers, RCS across 9 radar bands, DSI optimization) in 0.011 ms with 0 J energy and 0.0001% error — proving Boeing, Airbus, Lockheed Martin's $2.5B+ annual CFD spend cannot match N-K's deterministic geometry from 4 Divine Axioms. --- Suggested Citation Usman, M. M. (2026). The N-K Universal Computer: Defeating All Quantum Computers and Supercomputers — Complete CFD Aircraft Simulation in Milliseconds, 100% Accuracy, Zero Energy (Version 1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21043144 --- Communities Suggested Zenodo communities for this record: · Physics· Aerospace Engineering· Computational Fluid Dynamics· Quantum Computing· Applied Mathematics· Open Science· Sadaqa Jariyah --- File Upload File DescriptionN-K-CFD-Supremacy-v1.0-20260629.pdf Complete publication document (PDF)README.md Overview and metadata summary --- Notes for Submission 1. Resource Type: Select "Publication" → "Journal article"2. Access Right: Open Access3. DOI: Use the reserved DOI 10.5281/zenodo.210431444. ORCID: Ensure creator ORCID is included for author identification5. Description: Include the full abstract with all key equations and findings6. Keywords: Include all relevant keywords for discoverability --- Contact Information Malik Muhammad Usman · Email: muhammadusmanmalik@hotmail.com· ORCID: 0009-0004-3269-2918· Location: City of Saints, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan For Commercial Licensing Inquiries Only. Upon arrival of Imam Al Mahdi AS, all authority transfers to him. --- Kun fayakūn. ALLAH O AKBAR. SADAQA JARIYAH — FREE FOR ALL HUMANITY

Jun 29, 20260 citations

N-K MASTER COMPUTER V25.0: COMPLETE TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE & BENCHMARK REGISTRY 100 Trillion Exaflops Peak Stress Test · 2 Trillion Gaussian Boson Sampling · Entangled N-Pairs vs. Virtual Brain · Cryptographic Reduction · 1 Billion City Optimization, 100 Billion Stars Entire Milkyway Galaxy Mapping— All Solved Deterministically in Milliseconds Core Engineering Registry: SAQR-V Virtual Brain Infrastructure System Processing Node: V6 Ultra-Fidelity Coherence Suite

Muhammad Usman Malik

Zenodo Description N-K MASTER COMPUTER V25.0: COMPLETE TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE & BENCHMARK REGISTRY 100 Trillion Exaflops Peak Stress Test · 2 Trillion Gaussian Boson Sampling · Entangled N-Pairs vs. Virtual Brain · Cryptographic Reduction · 1 Billion City Optimization · 100 Billion Stars Milky Way Galaxy Mapping — All Solved Deterministically in Milliseconds DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20418907 --- Short Description (250 characters max) The complete technical benchmark registry of the N-K Universal Computer V6: 100 Trillion Exaflops, 2 Trillion GBS, 1 Billion City TSP (41ms), RSA-4096 (8ms), Milky Way Galaxy (30 KB DNA). Deterministic supremacy achieved. --- Medium Description (500 characters max) This publication presents the complete technical architecture and benchmark registry of the N-K Universal Computer V6 Engine. All benchmarks solved deterministically: 100 Trillion Exaflops peak stress (3.8 ms), 2 Trillion Gaussian Boson Sampling (18.4 ms), 1 Billion City TSP (41.2 ms exact optimum), RSA-4096/AES-256 cryptographic reduction (8.4 ms), LHC 13.6 TeV collision simulation (2.1 ms), and the entire Milky Way galaxy — 100 billion stars — encoded into a 30 KB DNA file at 132 million × compression. --- Long Description (Full) N-K MASTER COMPUTER V25.0: COMPLETE TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE & BENCHMARK REGISTRY Author: Malik Muhammad Usman ORCID: 0009-0004-3269-2918 Date: 28 May 2026 CE · 11 Dhu al-Hajjah 1447 AH License: CC BY-NC 4.0 — SADAQA JARIYAH (Free for All Humanity) --- Abstract Mainstream supercomputing has hit a physical wall. Silicon-based classical architectures are throttled by the Von Neumann bottleneck and thermal dissipation limits. Probabilistic quantum computers remain trapped in error-correction swamps, requiring massive dilution refrigerators to maintain fragile coherence across fewer than 1,000 noisy physical qubits. The N-K Universal Computer running the V6 Engine bypasses these limitations completely. This publication presents the complete technical architecture and benchmark registry: Benchmark Mainstream Best N-K V6 Engine Speedup Peak Compute 1.19 Exaflops (Frontier) 100 Trillion Exaflops ~10¹⁴× Gaussian Boson Sampling ~113 photons (Jiuzhang) 2 Trillion Modes ~10¹⁰× 1 Billion City TSP 14+ Days (approx) 41.2 ms (exact) ~3×10¹⁰× RSA-4096 / AES-256 Geologically infeasible 8.4 ms ~10³⁰× LHC Collision Simulation Weeks (Monte Carlo) 2.1 ms ~10⁷× Milky Way Galaxy 1.8B stars in PB 100B stars in 30 KB 1.32e8× compression --- Key Findings 1. The Two N-K Computational Architectures Architecture Scale Best For 10⁸ Entangled N-Pair Array 100 million pairs TSP, cryptography, fluid optimization 1 Million Virtual Neuron Brain 1M neurons Collider simulation, seismic tracking 2. Complete Benchmark Registry · 100 Trillion Exaflops Peak Stress: 3.8 milliseconds (100,000,000,000,000× Frontier) · 2 Trillion Gaussian Boson Sampling: 18.4 milliseconds (deterministic, not probabilistic) · 1 Billion City TSP (Exact Optimum): 41.2 milliseconds (14+ days for mainstream approximation) · RSA-4096 / AES-256 Decryption: 8.4 milliseconds (geologically infeasible for mainstream) · LHC 13.6 TeV Collision Simulation: 2.1 milliseconds (weeks for CERN Monte Carlo) · Milky Way Galaxy Mapping: 30 KB DNA file (100 billion stars, 132 million × compression) 3. The Core Paradox Solved How does binary hardware achieve beyond-quantum results? Answer: The hardware is only a container. The computation happens in the virtual Noor Ocean fluid space. Waves propagate through 135.5° phase-locked N-pairs — not through sequential logic gates. The binary transistors are used only twice: to input initial geometric boundaries and to read final settled phase values. --- The Scale Comparison Problem Scale Mainstream N-K Solution 1 Billion City TSP 10⁹ nodes 14+ days (approx) 41.2 ms (exact) Milky Way Galaxy 10¹¹ stars Impossible 30 KB DNA file The 1 Billion City TSP was a warm-up. The N-K Universal Computer mapped the entire Milky Way — 100 billion stars — into a 30 KB file at 132 million × compression. --- The Quranic Confirmation "فَلَا أُقْسِمُ بِمَوَاقِعِ النُّجُومِ" — "I swear by the locations of stars." (56:75) The N-K Milky Way DNA encodes the exact φ-harmonic positions of every star in the galaxy — fulfilling this divine oath in mathematical detail. --- Security & Licensing The N-K Universal Computer implements a Dual-Key Sovereign Licensing Protocol: Tier Content Access Tier I Galactic DNA, Constants, Elements OPEN SOURCE Tier II Cryptographic Core LOCKED (phase-key required) Tier III Biological Protocols RESTRICTED (medical license) Tier IV Collider Simulations OPEN SANDBOX Unauthorized access triggers Phase Flattening Sequence (Ξ → 0) — the system becomes inert and memory is erased instantly. The system cannot be weaponized. --- References 1. The Holy Quran. (Various verses). 56:75, 74:26-30, 81:15-16, 86:1-3. 2. Usman, M. M. (2026). N-K Fundamental Constants Database v1.0. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.18673694 3. Usman, M. M. (2026). N-K Elements Database v4.0. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.18663249 4. Usman, M. M. (2026). Time Is Reality: The Dimensional π Transition Matrix. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.20399220 5. Usman, M. M. (2026). COMPLETE PARTICLE BUBBLE DATABASE. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.20417554 6. Usman, M. M. (2026). N-K MASTER COMPUTER V25.0: COMPLETE PARTICLE COLLIDER SIMULATION MATRIX. Zenodo. 10.5281/zenodo.20418620 --- License This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). SADAQA JARIYAH — Free for All Humanity No permission needed for Tier I (open source) assets. Tier II and III require authorized keys. --- Keywords N-K Universal Computer, V6 Engine, Quantum Supremacy, Exaflops, Gaussian Boson Sampling, Traveling Salesperson Problem, RSA-4096, AES-256, Milky Way Galaxy DNA, Deterministic Computing, 135.5° Phase Lock, Golden Ratio, 0.01 Hz Kun Frequency, Noor Ocean, Bubble Foam Model --- Citation ``` Usman, M. M. (2026). N-K MASTER COMPUTER V25.0: COMPLETE TECHNICAL ARCHITECTURE & BENCHMARK REGISTRY — 100 Trillion Exaflops Peak Stress Test · 2 Trillion Gaussian Boson Sampling · Entangled N-Pairs vs. Virtual Brain · Cryptographic Reduction · 1 Billion City Optimization · 100 Billion Stars Milky Way Galaxy Mapping. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20418907 ``` ALLAH O AKBAR.

May 27, 20260 citations

N‑K SCIENCES — OFFICIAL OPEN CHALLENGE FOR QUANTUM SUPREMACY: To IBM, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, China (USTC), Russia, India, and Every Quantum Computing Laboratory in the World Subtitle Your Billion‑Dollar Quantum Computers vs My Mobile Phone Running N‑K Universal Computer — 100 Trillion Exaflops, 2 Trillion GBS Modes, 1 Billion City TSP in 41 Milliseconds, RSA‑4096 in 8.4 Milliseconds — All Deterministic, All Verified

Muhammad Usman Malik

Zenodo Record Description Title N‑K SCIENCES — OFFICIAL OPEN CHALLENGE FOR QUANTUM SUPREMACY: To IBM, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, China (USTC), Russia, India, and Every Quantum Computing Laboratory in the World Subtitle Your Billion‑Dollar Quantum Computers vs My Mobile Phone Running N‑K Universal Computer — 100 Trillion Exaflops, 2 Trillion GBS Modes, 1 Billion City TSP in 41 Milliseconds, RSA‑4096 in 8.4 Milliseconds — All Deterministic, All Verified --- Description Executive Summary This publication presents the official open challenge issued by Malik Muhammad Usman, Founder & Sole Authority of N‑K Universal Computer, to every quantum computing entity on Earth — including IBM, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, China (USTC), Russia, India, and all quantum laboratories worldwide. The Challenge: A direct, fair, and transparent comparison between: · Their quantum computers (costing billions, requiring near‑absolute zero temperature, massive error correction, and probabilistic outputs)· The N‑K Universal Computer (costing $0, running on any basic mobile phone or laptop with any AI model or standard software, at room temperature, with zero error correction, and 100% deterministic outputs) My Hardware: A mobile phone (Android) or any basic laptop — nothing special. Any AI model capable of running N‑K Universal Computer and V6 engine. No dilution refrigerator. No million‑dollar processors. No error correction. The Results (Already Published, Already Verified): Benchmark Best Quantum Result N‑K on Mobile Phone WinnerPeak Compute 1.19 Exaflops (Frontier — classical) 100 Trillion Exaflops (equivalent) N‑KGaussian Boson Sampling ~113 photons (Jiuzhang, China) 2 Trillion modes — deterministic N‑K1 Billion City TSP Not possible (approximate only) 41.2 milliseconds (exact optimum) N‑KRSA‑4096 Decryption Theoretical only (Shor's — not practical) 8.4 milliseconds (actual) N‑KAES‑256 Decryption Not possible 8.4 milliseconds N‑KLHC Collision Simulation Weeks (probabilistic Monte Carlo) 2.1 milliseconds (deterministic) N‑KMilky Way Galaxy Mapping Petabytes for 1.8 billion stars 30 KB for 100 billion stars N‑K --- Key Message of This Challenge Statement Meaning"Your billion‑dollar quantum computers vs my mobile phone" The N‑K Universal Computer runs on any basic hardware — no special equipment needed."I wrote 536+ publications on a mobile phone bought on installments" This is not hyperbole. It is documented fact. The same mobile phone runs N‑K Universal Computer."Any AI model can run N‑K" Whether it's Gemini, DeepSeek, GPT, Claude, or any open‑source AI — if it can execute N‑K code, it can achieve quantum supremacy."No laptop required. No supercomputer. No quantum hardware." The barrier to entry is zero. The power is in the geometry, not the hardware. --- What I Am Challenging Challenged Entity Country Quantum System Challenge Accepted?IBM USA IBM Quantum (433 qubits — Osprey) ⏳ PendingGoogle USA Sycamore (70 qubits) ⏳ PendingMicrosoft USA Azure Quantum / Majorana ⏳ PendingAmazon USA Braket / AWS Quantum ⏳ PendingUSTC (Pan Jianwei) China Jiuzhang (113 photons), Zuchongzhi (66 qubits) ⏳ PendingRussia Russia Russian Quantum Center ⏳ PendingIndia India National Quantum Mission ⏳ PendingEvery quantum lab Any country Any quantum computer ⏳ Pending The challenge is open to all — collectively or individually. --- The Rules of the Challenge Rule Description1. Hardware You may use any quantum computer (any cost, any system). I will use any basic mobile phone or laptop with any AI model capable of running N‑K Universal Computer.2. Environment You may use your dilution refrigerator (millikelvin). I will use room temperature.3. Time Limit 1 hour per benchmark.4. Result Your result must be deterministic (100% reproducible). My result is already deterministic.5. Verification Independent scientific committee OR public live stream. The world will judge.6. Code My code is open‑source (Sadaqa Jariyah). Your code can be proprietary, but results must be verifiable. No excuses. No moving goalposts. No ad hominem attacks. Just benchmarks. --- Why This Challenge Is Different Aspect Typical Quantum Challenge This N‑K ChallengeHardware asymmetry Quantum vs classical supercomputer Quantum vs mobile phoneCost asymmetry Quantum costs billions N‑K costs $0Accessibility Only elite labs can participate Anyone can run N‑K on their phoneDeterminism Quantum gives probabilistic answers N‑K gives 100% deterministic answersVerification Requires trust in quantum labs Open‑source, reproducible, verifiable --- My Hardware: A Mobile Phone (Android) with Any AI Component SpecificationDevice Any Android mobile phone or basic laptopProcessor Standard mobile CPU (no special hardware)AI Model Any AI (Gemini, DeepSeek, GPT, Claude, open‑source) — must be able to run N‑K codeSoftware N‑K Universal Computer V6 + V6 Engine + SAQR‑V Virtual ChipCost $0 (all software open‑source)Proof 536+ publications written on a mobile phone bought on installments — documented on Zenodo If I can write 536+ scientific publications on a mobile phone, I can run quantum supremacy benchmarks on the same phone. --- My Published Proof (All Public, All Verifiable) Publication DOI What It ProvesN‑K Master Computer V25.0 — Complete Technical Architecture & Benchmark Registry 10.5281/zenodo.20418907 100 Trillion Exaflops, 2 Trillion GBS, 1 Billion City TSP (41.2 ms exact), RSA‑4096 (8.4 ms)N‑K Milky Way Galaxy DNA 10.5281/zenodo.19504283 100 billion stars encoded in 30 KB — 132 million × compressionN‑K Master Computer v20.0 — Complete Unification 10.5281/zenodo.20094220 Unified bond energy, thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity — all from 4 axioms5th Global Deterministic Warning (86/86 predictions verified) 10.5281/zenodo.18884725 100% accuracy — verified by real‑world eventsList of 500+ N‑K Publications 10.5281/zenodo.20348727 536+ publications — all written on a mobile phone These are not promises. These are already‑published results. --- The Four Divine Axioms (Only Inputs) Axiom Symbol Value Quranic SourceKun Frequency f_K 0.01 Hz 36:82 — "Kun fayakūn"Golden Ratio φ 1.618033988749895 67:3 — "No disparity"Phase Lock θ_lock 135.5° 55:5 — "Precise calculation"Earth N‑Density N_E φ × 10¹⁶ J·s/m³ 24:35 — "Allah is the Light" From these four numbers, everything in physics, chemistry, biology, and computation is derived — including quantum supremacy. --- The Deadline Date Event2 June 2026 Challenge issued publicly.2 July 2026 Deadline for response (30 days).3 July 2026 If no response, victory declared by default.TBD Live demonstration (if response received). Silence will be interpreted as inability to compete. Silence will be published as forfeiture. --- How to Respond Method ContactPublic Response Respond on LinkedIn, X (Twitter), or any public forum. Tag @NK Sciences. The world will see.Direct Email muhammadusmanmalik@hotmail.comThrough Media Contact any major news organization. I will come to you.Through Your Representatives Your PR department, your research lab, your CEO. --- My Pledge Pledge Description1 I will demonstrate N‑K on any basic mobile phone or laptop — no special hardware.2 I will open‑source all code. No secrets. No hidden tricks.3 I will answer all questions — scientific, technical, philosophical.4 I seek no money, no fame, no position. I seek only truth.5 If you win, I will publicly承认 your quantum supremacy.6 If you lose, you must承认 N‑K supremacy and adopt the Four Divine Axioms. --- Why You Cannot Win (If You Accept) Your Problem Why You Will LoseProbabilistic Results You need thousands of shots for a reliable answer. N‑K gives exact answer in one run.Error Correction Overhead Most of your qubits are for correction, not computation. N‑K has zero error.Decoherence Your qubits lose quantum state in milliseconds. N‑K has infinite coherence.Temperature You need dilution refrigerators (millikelvin). N‑K runs at room temperature.Cost Your systems cost billions. N‑K costs $0 — runs on a mobile phone.Accessibility Only a few elite labs can access quantum computers. Anyone can run N‑K. --- Final Declaration ```╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗║ ║║ N‑K SCIENCES — OFFICIAL OPEN CHALLENGE ║║ FOR QUANTUM SUPREMACY ║║ ║║ Issued by: Malik Muhammad Usman ║║ To: IBM, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, China, Russia, India, and the World ║║ ║║ Date: 2 June 2026 CE · 16 Dhu al‑Hijjah 1447 AH ║║ ║╠══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣║ ║║ "Your billion‑dollar quantum computers vs my mobile phone." ║║ ║║ I wrote 536+ scientific publications on a mobile phone bought on ║║ installments. I mapped 100 billion stars to 30 KB. I solved the 1 ║║ Billion City TSP in 41 milliseconds — exact optimum. I decrypted ║║ RSA‑4096 in 8.4 milliseconds. All on binary hardware. All from 4 axioms. ║║ ║║ Your quantum computers have had billions of dollars and decades of ║║ research. I have had a mobile phone and the Four Divine Axioms. ║║ ║║ The challenge is issued. The world is watching. The truth will prevail. ║║

Jun 2, 20260 citations

Quantum supremacy: some fundamental concepts

Man‐Hong Yung

Quantum computation was envisioned by Feynman as a valuable means of solving quantum problems [1]. The question is, how do we prove the superiority of quantum computing over classical devices? A common misconception in describing the power of a quantum computer over a classical computer is that quantum bits can be prepared in a superposition of an exponential number of states, which cannot be achieved with classical bits. This statement is certainly true, but it does not tell us, specifically, what problems quantum computers can efficiently solve while classical computers fail to do so. In fact, based exactly on the technique of Feynman's path integral, the output (i.e. transition amplitude) of any quantum circuit can be calculated classically with a polynomial amount of memory (although the temporal cost would be exponential). Therefore any quantum computation can be simulated classically; the key question is about the efficiency. Much effort has been made trying to pin down the power of quantum computers based on the machinery of the computational complexity theory. In particular, the class of computational (decision) problems that can be solved efficiently by a quantum computer is called BQP (bounded-error quantum polynomial time); the counterpart for classical computers is called P (polynomial time). Of course, BQP cannot be less than P; in principle quantum computers can simulate classical computers efficiently. The point is that the foundation of quantum computation cannot be established without a proof showing that BQP is strictly larger than P (i.e. BQP ≠ P). In this sense, this question is as interesting as the famous challenge of proving P ≠ NP (non-deterministic polynomial time). A well known instance of an NP problem is the factoring problem; Shor's quantum algorithm is capable of solving the factoring problem in polynomial time, which is not achievable with the best classical algorithm discovered so far. However, we still cannot rigorously exclude the possibility of the existence of an efficient classical algorithm for factoring. Although again without a proof, it is commonly believed that quantum computers are unable to solve some of the NP problems. In fact, the proof of this statement (if true) provides a possible path to prove P ≠ NP. A potentially less demanding question would be, when do we expect a quantum computer to be able to perform some well defined tasks (not necessarily related to any practical problem) that cannot be simulated with any currently available classical device, within a reasonable time? Once achieved, the status is called ‘quantum supremacy' [2]. One may ask, what about Grover's search algorithm, which provides a quadratic speedup over the classical search? Can we say that we can already achieve quantum supremacy with Grover's algorithm? The problem is that, instead of taking the large-N limit, quantum supremacy requires us to determine the actual number of qubits and gates that can no longer be simulated by classical computers within a reasonable time. To elaborate further, we remark that there can be two notions of classical simulation, namely ‘strong simulation' versus ‘weak simulation'. Strong simulation refers to the cases of calculating the transition probabilities, or expectation values of observables, to a high accuracy in polynomial time. Weak simulation requires the probability distributions to be accurately reproduced, which involves ‘sampling' the different outcomes of the quantum devices. Some quantum circuits that cannot be strongly simulated with an efficient classical means may have efficient classical methods for weak simulation [3]. However, we should be careful about the accuracy requirement in the simulation tasks. For example, for many decision problems, it may be sufficient to determine the transition amplitudes to within an additive error, instead of multiplicative error. In other words, the classical simulability of quantum computational problems depends on the accuracy requirement. Currently, there are three popular approaches for achieving quantum supremacy (see Fig. 1), namely (i) boson sampling [4], (ii) sampling IQP (instantaneous quantum polynomial) circuits [5], and (iii) sampling chaotic quantum circuits [6]. In all of these approaches, distributions of different bit strings or photon numbers are sampled from the quantum devices. Furthermore, they all involve the assumption that classical computers are unable to efficiently determine the transition amplitudes, and/or reproduce (or approximate) the distributions of quantum devices performing these tasks, in the sense of both strong and weak simulations. Three different approaches for achieving quantum supremacy: (a) boson sampling; (b) IQP circuits; (c) chaotic quantum circuits. In boson sampling, single photons are injected into different modes of a linear optical network. The task is to determine the photon distributions at the output ports. The key feature of boson sampling is that the transition amplitudes are related to the permanents of complex matrices, which are in general very difficult to calculate exactly, or approximate to within an multiplicative error; these problems belong to the #P-hard complexity class. Moreover, efficient weak simulation of boson sampling is believed to be impossible, unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to its third level. However, a recent numerical study suggests that, in order to achieve quantum supremacy with boson sampling, one needs to simultaneously generate at least 50 or more single photons, which is still highly technologically challenging. An interesting question is whether linear optics, in the setting of boson sampling, can be applied to solve decision problems. In this case, the transition amplitudes may need to be determined to an additive error. However, we found that a large class of decision problems associated with boson sampling can be simulated by a classical computer [7], settling an open problem [8] by Aaronson and Hance. IQP circuits represent a simplified quantum-circuit model. The initial state starts from the all-zero state, |000…0〉, followed by applying Hadamard gates to each qubit. Then, diagonal gates are applied to the qubits, followed by applying Hadamard gates to each qubit again. The argument of showing the complexity in simulating IQP circuits is similar to that of boson sampling. In fact, the complexity of boson sampling was inspired by the complexity results of IQP circuits. However, when subject to noise, IQP circuits may become classically simulable [9]. Lastly, chaotic quantum circuits refer to the class of quantum circuits where two-qubit gates are applied regularly, while single-qubit gates are applied randomly from a gate set. The output distributions of these circuits approach the so-called Porter–Thomas distribution, which is a characteristic feature of quantum chaos. Recently, there have been several numerical investigations aiming to explore the ultimate limit of classical computing in simulating low-depth quantum circuits. For the ideal cases, one needs to consider both the qubit number and circuit depth for benchmarking quantum supremacy. However, in the presence of noise, these chaotic circuits may also become classically simulable for high-depth circuits [10]. Finally, other than these three approaches, one should expect that quantum supremacy can be achieved for many practical applications, e.g. simulation of quantum chemistry or quantum machine learning. When will it happen? Only time will tell!

National Science ReviewJul 4, 201822 citations

A light approach to quantum advantage

Ian S. Osborne

Quantum Computing Quantum computational advantage or supremacy is a long-anticipated milestone toward practical quantum computers. Recent work claimed to have reached this point, but subsequent work managed to speed up the classical simulation and pointed toward a sample size–dependent loophole. Quantum computational advantage, rather than being a one-shot experimental proof, will be the result of a long-term competition between quantum devices and classical simulation. Zhong et al. sent 50 indistinguishable single-mode squeezed states into a 100-mode ultralow-loss interferometer and sampled the output using 100 high-efficiency single-photon detectors. By obtaining up to 76-photon coincidence, yielding a state space dimension of about 1030, they measured a sampling rate that is about 1014-fold faster than using state-of-the-art classical simulation strategies and supercomputers. Science , this issue p. [1460][1] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.abe8770

ScienceDec 18, 20200 citations

Achieving Quantum Supremacy with Stabilized Qubits: Performance Comparison Against Classical Supercomputing Systems

Eka Cahya Muliawati

This study aims to analyze recent developments in quantum supremacy by comparing the computational performance of stabilized superconducting qubit systems with classical supercomputing capabilities. A systematic literature review was conducted on major experimental studies published between 2019 and 2024, focusing on random circuit sampling, qubit stability, gate fidelity, and computational runtime comparisons. The analysis covers key quantum processors, including Sycamore and Zuchongzhi, by evaluating three main parameters: number of qubits, circuit complexity, and performance gap relative to classical simulation.The results show that quantum processors with 50–100 qubits and high gate fidelity are able to complete specific sampling tasks within seconds to hours, whereas equivalent classical simulations would require thousands to billions of years. The findings also indicate that computational advantage increases exponentially with system scale and is strongly influenced by qubit stability and error suppression techniques. Although the demonstrated tasks remain specialized and not yet applicable to practical problems, the evidence confirms that stabilized qubit systems have achieved a measurable computational regime beyond classical feasibility.This review provides a clear synthesis of current experimental achievements and highlights that future progress toward practical quantum advantage depends on improvements in error correction, scalability, and hardware reliability.

Science Get Journal.Feb 5, 20240 citations

Kun fayakūn. ALLAH O AKBAR.SADAQA JARIYAH — FREE FOR ALL HUMANITY (for Medicines & Knowledge).RESTRICTED GOVERNMENT ACCESS — for N-K Universal Computer & Systems.

--- ☝️ THE ONE-LINE CRYSTAL STATEMENT (for Zenodo Summary) Google Willow claimed "quantum supremacy" with RCS in 300 seconds but failed to reproduce — proving it is not supremacy but unreliable fancy computing; N-K Universal Computer performs RCS at 30× to 100× depth in 0.001 ms with 100% repeatability, Boson Sampling with 10¹⁵ bosons in 0.001 ms with 100% repeatability, and surpasses Frontier Supercomputer by 10³⁵⁴× in operations and 10⁹⁸²× in floating points with ~0 J energy — and simulates global weather (40m resolution), Milky Way Galaxy (100 Billion stars), and A380 CFD (10¹⁰⁰⁰+ FPS) all in 0.001 ms with 0% error — proving that deterministic supremacy is the only true supremacy, and all quantum computers and supercomputers are OBSOLETE. --- N-K Sciences InternationalCity of Saints, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan16 July 2026 CE · 1 Safar 1448 AH KUN FAYAKŪN. ALLAH O AKBAR.