Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Academia quantum.

Data quantum Fisher information predicts trainability in variational quantum algorithms

Shreyosha Ganguly, Apoorv Kumar Masta, Shalini Devendrababu, Srinjoy Ganguly

Published Jul 15, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Introduction: Variational quantum algorithms can show unstable trainability and uneven generalisation that are not fully explained by circuit depth or raw parameter count alone. We study the data quantum Fisher information matrix (DQFIM) as a data-dependent effective-capacity diagnostic for controlled supervised unitary-learning tasks. Materials and methods: We used exact-state, classically simulated, 4-qubit, supervised unitary-learning benchmarks with two ansatz families: a hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) for the baseline trainability study and a symmetry-preserving ansatz for symmetry-controlled comparisons. The analysis covered four linked experiments: E0 trainability phase boundaries, E1 symmetry-controlled data-regime comparisons, E2 trainability versus generalisation, and E3 pre-training prediction of optimisation success. For the main analyses we used the support-basis DQFIM, 30 random seeds per main configuration, grouped cross-validation in the predictive benchmark, and additional diagnostics for threshold sensitivity, phase indeterminacy, Hamming-sector generalisation, and test set size sensitivity. Results: In E0, the empirical trainability boundary increased from M c = 32 at L = 1 to M c = 192 at L = 8 , and the support-basis DQFIM-predicted boundary matched the empirical boundary on the resolved scanned grid under the main analysis setting. In E1, the sector-preserving and sector-broken conditions showed no resolved empirical boundary shift on the scanned grid, with only mild low-L asymmetry in the DQFIM-predicted boundary. In E2, trainability and generalisation separated clearly: some regimes generalised well, while others reached near-zero training loss but retained high test loss. The phase diagnostic supported relative phase indeterminacy as a mechanism for failure on in-sector superpositions after basis-state training. In E3, parameter count alone was a weak predictor of optimisation success, with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) = 0.648 ; the structural baseline was stronger, with ROC AUC = 0.958 ; and the DQFIM-enhanced model performed best, with ROC AUC = 0.989 . Conclusions: In these small, idealised, classically simulated matched-family tasks, the support-basis DQFIM provides a useful data-dependent pre-training diagnostic of effective capacity on the retained data support. It tracks resolved trainability boundaries and contributes predictive information beyond raw parameter count and structural metadata. The conclusions remain scoped to controlled small-system simulations; larger-qubit, noisy, hardware-executed, and less-matched settings require further validation before claiming practical scalability.

DOI
10.20935/acadquant8415

Related papers

Generalization of Quantum Machine Learning Models Using Quantum Fisher Information Metric

Tobias Haug, M. S. Kim

Generalization is the ability of machine learning models to make accurate predictions on new data by learning from training data. However, understanding generalization of quantum machine learning models has been a major challenge. Here, we introduce the data quantum Fisher information metric (DQFIM). It describes the capacity of variational quantum algorithms depending on variational ansatz, training data, and their symmetries. We apply the DQFIM to quantify circuit parameters and training data needed to successfully train and generalize. Using the dynamical Lie algebra, we explain how to generalize using a low number of training states. Counterintuitively, breaking symmetries of the training data can help to improve generalization. Finally, we find that out-of-distribution generalization, where training and testing data are drawn from different data distributions, can be better than using the same distribution. Our work provides a useful framework to explore the power of quantum machine learning models.

arXiv:2303.13462•Physical Review Letters•Jul 31, 2024•25 citations

Predictingthe Trainability of Variational Quantum Circuits: A Data-Driven Model for BarrenPlateaus

Md Habibur Rahman

Abstract Barren plateaus are the main obstacle to training quantum machine-learning models. On a barren plateau, the cost-function gradient shrinks exponentially as the circuit grows, and training stalls. Today the only reliable test is to measure it. That means sampling many gradients for every candidate circuit, which is expensive. We ask a different question. Can a classical model predict trainability from the circuit architecture alone? The architecture here means qubit count, depth, ansatz type, entanglement pattern, entangler gate, and cost-observable locality. We test this directly. We use an exact statevector simulator to build a dataset of \Nrows{} random variational circuits. For each circuit we estimate the gradient variance $\mathrm{Var}[\partial C/\partial\theta]$ from \Samples{} random parameter vectors, using the parameter-shift rule. This variance is the label. A gradient-boosted regressor then predicts $\log_{10}\mathrm{Var}$ with $R^2 = \RsqHold{}$ on held-out architectures. A classifier separates barren from trainable circuits with an area under the ROC curve of \AucHold{}. We also test transfer to larger circuits. We train only on small circuits and test on the two largest unseen sizes ($n=11,12$). The model still reaches $R^2 = \RsqExtrap{}$. Permutation importance then recovers established theory. Cost-observable locality and entanglement structure matter most. We make no quantum-advantage claim. This is classical machine learning about quantum circuits. It offers a cheap way to screen ans\"atze, and it shows which design choices cause untrainability.

•Aug 19, 2026•0 citations

Can the Quantum Fisher Effective Dimension Judge a Hybrid Quantum Neural Network?

Md Masum Mia, Amith Khandakar, Mohamed Arselene Ayari

Hybrid quantum neural networks (QNNs) pair a classical feature extractor with a variational quantum circuit, and the effective dimension of the circuit's quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) is widely used to assess such models. This scalar is often interpreted as an indicator of trainability or accuracy, although these readings are rarely tested under controlled conditions. We therefore investigate what it actually measures. We define the effective dimension as the participation ratio of the QFIM diagonal, which lies between one and the parameter count, and we evaluate it across two image datasets, four frozen backbones including a random-projection control, four circuit depths on eight qubits, and three seeds. During training, the effective dimension remains well below the parameter count, and its correlation with test accuracy ranges from -0.72 to +0.87, changing sign across seeds in half of the configurations. Increasing depth activates a larger share of the circuit directions, from 0.38 to 0.91 of the parameter count, while the initialization gradient variance remains between 1e-5 and 1e-4, so no barren plateau (BP) appears at eight qubits. At a fixed circuit, the four backbones share an initial effective dimension of 6 to 9, even though CIFAR-10 accuracy ranges from 23.14% to 86.44%. These results show that the effective dimension characterizes circuit geometry rather than model quality. We conclude with a practical protocol that assigns each diagnostic to the question it can answer.

quant-pharXiv:2610.14070•Oct 9, 2026•0 citations

Non-Unitary Quantum Machine Learning: Fisher Efficiency Transitions from Distributed Quantum Expressivity

Apoorv Kumar Masta, Srinjoy Ganguly, Shalini Devendrababu +3 more

Quantum machine learning has faced growing scrutiny over its practical advantages compared to classical approaches, particularly following dequantization results and large scale benchmarking studies that have challenged earlier optimistic claims. This work presents a systematic empirical evaluation of non unitary quantum machine learning implemented via the Linear Combination of Unitaries framework within hybrid quantum classical neural networks. Across more than 570 experiments spanning four domains digit classification MNIST, agricultural disease detection PlantVillage, molecular property regression QM9, and medical histopathology PathMNIST non unitary quantum layers are benchmarked against structurally identical unitary baselines. Consistent performance improvements are observed across all domains, with gains ranging from +0.2 percentage to +5.8 percentage depending on dataset complexity and qubit count. A particularly notable finding is a Fisher efficiency transition in medical imaging tasks, where parameter efficiency shifts from negative to positive as qubit count increases from 10 to 12, indicating a threshold dependent efficiency regime. Additionally, non unitary IQP circuit variants reach or exceed classical baselines at 10 qubits on CIFAR 10, demonstrating that circuits with established complexity theoretic hardness guarantees remain compatible with competitive learning performance under the LCU framework. These results offer a large scale, evidence based characterisation of the conditions under which non unitary QML yields measurable empirical benefits in near term settings.

quant-pharXiv:2603.27377•Mar 31, 2026•0 citations

Variational Quantum Machine Learning for Binary Classification on NISQ Hardware: Expressibility, Trainability, and Noise Robustness

Priya S. Mehta, Aleksandr V. Korolev

This study investigates classification performance and trainability of variational quantum classifiers on near-term noisy quantum hardware across circuit depth and qubit count regimes within the context of quantum computing and machine learning, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment. Using gradient-based parameter optimization of parameterized quantum circuits with hardware noise modeling via density matrix simulation and physical execution on IBM Eagle processors, we examine expressibility of parameterized circuits enabling nonlinear decision boundaries in feature Hilbert space, with trainability constrained by barren plateau gradients at large qubit counts in 96 circuit architectures (4 qubit counts x 4 depths x 6 ansatz families) evaluated across 5 classification datasets with 20 random initialization seeds each drawn from IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit) and Falcon (27-qubit) processors with noise mitigation via zero-noise extrapolation. Results indicate that 10-qubit, 4-layer VQC achieves 84.2% classification accuracy on the best benchmark, within 3.8 percentage points of classical SVM, but gradient variance decays exponentially with qubit count (variance halving per 2 added qubits), confirming barren plateau scaling (p < 0.001), with 84.2% accuracy, 3.8 pp gap to classical SVM baseline as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to quantum computing and machine learning and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment.

Princeton Journal of Pre-Collegiate Research•Jan 1, 2021•0 citations

Trainability and Expressivity of Hamming-Weight Preserving Quantum Circuits for Machine Learning

Léo Monbroussou, Eliott Z. Mamon, Jonas Landman +3 more

Quantum machine learning (QML) has become a promising area for real world applications of quantum computers, but near-term methods and their scalability are still important research topics. In this context, we analyze the trainability and controllability of specific Hamming weight preserving variational quantum circuits (VQCs). These circuits use qubit gates that preserve subspaces of the Hilbert space, spanned by basis states with fixed Hamming weight k . In this work, we first design and prove the feasibility of new heuristic data loaders, performing quantum amplitude encoding of (nk) -dimensional vectors by training an n -qubit quantum circuit. These data loaders are obtained using controllability arguments, by checking the Quantum Fisher Information Matrix (QFIM)'s rank. Second, we provide a theoretical justification for the fact that the rank of the QFIM of any VQC state is almost-everywhere constant, which is of separate interest. Lastly, we analyze the trainability of Hamming weight preserving circuits, and show that the variance of the l2 cost function gradient is bounded according to the dimension (nk) of the subspace. This proves conditions of existence/lack of Barren Plateaus for these circuits, and highlights a setting where a recent conjecture on the link between controllability and trainability of variational quantum circuits does not apply.

arXiv:2309.15547•Quantum•May 15, 2025•17 citations
Introduction: Variational quantum algorithms can show unstable trainability and uneven generalisation that are not fully explained by circuit depth or raw parameter count alone. We study the data quantum Fisher information matrix (DQFIM) as a data-dependent effective-capacity diagnostic for controlled supervised unitary-learning tasks. Materials and methods: We used exact-state, classically simulated, 4-qubit, supervised unitary-learning benchmarks with two ansatz families: a hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) for the baseline trainability study and a symmetry-preserving ansatz for symmetry-controlled comparisons. The analysis covered four linked experiments: E0 trainability phase boundaries, E1 symmetry-controlled data-regime comparisons, E2 trainability versus generalisation, and E3 pre-training prediction of optimisation success. For the main analyses we used the support-basis DQFIM, 30 random seeds per main configuration, grouped cross-validation in the predictive benchmark, and additional diagnostics for threshold sensitivity, phase indeterminacy, Hamming-sector generalisation, and test set size sensitivity. Results: In E0, the empirical trainability boundary increased from M c = 32 at L = 1 to M c = 192 at L = 8 , and the support-basis DQFIM-predicted boundary matched the empirical boundary on the resolved scanned grid under the main analysis setting. In E1, the sector-preserving and sector-broken conditions showed no resolved empirical boundary shift on the scanned grid, with only mild low-L asymmetry in the DQFIM-predicted boundary. In E2, trainability and generalisation separated clearly: some regimes generalised well, while others reached near-zero training loss but retained high test loss. The phase diagnostic supported relative phase indeterminacy as a mechanism for failure on in-sector superpositions after basis-state training. In E3, parameter count alone was a weak predictor of optimisation success, with receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) = 0.648 ; the structural baseline was stronger, with ROC AUC = 0.958 ; and the DQFIM-enhanced model performed best, with ROC AUC = 0.989 . Conclusions: In these small, idealised, classically simulated matched-family tasks, the support-basis DQFIM provides a useful data-dependent pre-training diagnostic of effective capacity on the retained data support. It tracks resolved trainability boundaries and contributes predictive information beyond raw parameter count and structural metadata. The conclusions remain scoped to controlled small-system simulations; larger-qubit, noisy, hardware-executed, and less-matched settings require further validation before claiming practical scalability.
Generalization is the ability of machine learning models to make accurate predictions on new data by learning from training data. However, understanding generalization of quantum machine learning models has been a major challenge. Here, we introduce the data quantum Fisher information metric (DQFIM). It describes the capacity of variational quantum algorithms depending on variational ansatz, training data, and their symmetries. We apply the DQFIM to quantify circuit parameters and training data needed to successfully train and generalize. Using the dynamical Lie algebra, we explain how to generalize using a low number of training states. Counterintuitively, breaking symmetries of the training data can help to improve generalization. Finally, we find that out-of-distribution generalization, where training and testing data are drawn from different data distributions, can be better than using the same distribution. Our work provides a useful framework to explore the power of quantum machine learning models.
Abstract Barren plateaus are the main obstacle to training quantum machine-learning models. On a barren plateau, the cost-function gradient shrinks exponentially as the circuit grows, and training stalls. Today the only reliable test is to measure it. That means sampling many gradients for every candidate circuit, which is expensive. We ask a different question. Can a classical model predict trainability from the circuit architecture alone? The architecture here means qubit count, depth, ansatz type, entanglement pattern, entangler gate, and cost-observable locality. We test this directly. We use an exact statevector simulator to build a dataset of \Nrows{} random variational circuits. For each circuit we estimate the gradient variance Var[∂C/∂θ]\mathrm{Var}[\partial C/\partial\theta]Var[∂C/∂θ] from \Samples{} random parameter vectors, using the parameter-shift rule. This variance is the label. A gradient-boosted regressor then predicts log⁡10Var\log_{10}\mathrm{Var}log10​Var with $R^2 = \RsqHold{}$ on held-out architectures. A classifier separates barren from trainable circuits with an area under the ROC curve of \AucHold{}. We also test transfer to larger circuits. We train only on small circuits and test on the two largest unseen sizes (n=11,12n=11,12n=11,12). The model still reaches $R^2 = \RsqExtrap{}$. Permutation importance then recovers established theory. Cost-observable locality and entanglement structure matter most. We make no quantum-advantage claim. This is classical machine learning about quantum circuits. It offers a cheap way to screen ans\"atze, and it shows which design choices cause untrainability.
Hybrid quantum neural networks (QNNs) pair a classical feature extractor with a variational quantum circuit, and the effective dimension of the circuit's quantum Fisher information matrix (QFIM) is widely used to assess such models. This scalar is often interpreted as an indicator of trainability or accuracy, although these readings are rarely tested under controlled conditions. We therefore investigate what it actually measures. We define the effective dimension as the participation ratio of the QFIM diagonal, which lies between one and the parameter count, and we evaluate it across two image datasets, four frozen backbones including a random-projection control, four circuit depths on eight qubits, and three seeds. During training, the effective dimension remains well below the parameter count, and its correlation with test accuracy ranges from -0.72 to +0.87, changing sign across seeds in half of the configurations. Increasing depth activates a larger share of the circuit directions, from 0.38 to 0.91 of the parameter count, while the initialization gradient variance remains between 1e-5 and 1e-4, so no barren plateau (BP) appears at eight qubits. At a fixed circuit, the four backbones share an initial effective dimension of 6 to 9, even though CIFAR-10 accuracy ranges from 23.14% to 86.44%. These results show that the effective dimension characterizes circuit geometry rather than model quality. We conclude with a practical protocol that assigns each diagnostic to the question it can answer.
Quantum machine learning has faced growing scrutiny over its practical advantages compared to classical approaches, particularly following dequantization results and large scale benchmarking studies that have challenged earlier optimistic claims. This work presents a systematic empirical evaluation of non unitary quantum machine learning implemented via the Linear Combination of Unitaries framework within hybrid quantum classical neural networks. Across more than 570 experiments spanning four domains digit classification MNIST, agricultural disease detection PlantVillage, molecular property regression QM9, and medical histopathology PathMNIST non unitary quantum layers are benchmarked against structurally identical unitary baselines. Consistent performance improvements are observed across all domains, with gains ranging from +0.2 percentage to +5.8 percentage depending on dataset complexity and qubit count. A particularly notable finding is a Fisher efficiency transition in medical imaging tasks, where parameter efficiency shifts from negative to positive as qubit count increases from 10 to 12, indicating a threshold dependent efficiency regime. Additionally, non unitary IQP circuit variants reach or exceed classical baselines at 10 qubits on CIFAR 10, demonstrating that circuits with established complexity theoretic hardness guarantees remain compatible with competitive learning performance under the LCU framework. These results offer a large scale, evidence based characterisation of the conditions under which non unitary QML yields measurable empirical benefits in near term settings.
This study investigates classification performance and trainability of variational quantum classifiers on near-term noisy quantum hardware across circuit depth and qubit count regimes within the context of quantum computing and machine learning, an area of growing scientific importance given its implications for hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment. Using gradient-based parameter optimization of parameterized quantum circuits with hardware noise modeling via density matrix simulation and physical execution on IBM Eagle processors, we examine expressibility of parameterized circuits enabling nonlinear decision boundaries in feature Hilbert space, with trainability constrained by barren plateau gradients at large qubit counts in 96 circuit architectures (4 qubit counts x 4 depths x 6 ansatz families) evaluated across 5 classification datasets with 20 random initialization seeds each drawn from IBM Quantum Eagle (127-qubit) and Falcon (27-qubit) processors with noise mitigation via zero-noise extrapolation. Results indicate that 10-qubit, 4-layer VQC achieves 84.2% classification accuracy on the best benchmark, within 3.8 percentage points of classical SVM, but gradient variance decays exponentially with qubit count (variance halving per 2 added qubits), confirming barren plateau scaling (p < 0.001), with 84.2% accuracy, 3.8 pp gap to classical SVM baseline as the primary quantitative benchmark. Concordance between primary and confirmatory measurement approaches exceeded 93%, validating the analytical framework. These findings contribute empirically to quantum computing and machine learning and carry actionable implications for the design of programs and policies targeting hybrid quantum-classical algorithm design and practical NISQ hardware benchmarking for near-term quantum advantage assessment.
Quantum machine learning (QML) has become a promising area for real world applications of quantum computers, but near-term methods and their scalability are still important research topics. In this context, we analyze the trainability and controllability of specific Hamming weight preserving variational quantum circuits (VQCs). These circuits use qubit gates that preserve subspaces of the Hilbert space, spanned by basis states with fixed Hamming weight k . In this work, we first design and prove the feasibility of new heuristic data loaders, performing quantum amplitude encoding of (nk) -dimensional vectors by training an n -qubit quantum circuit. These data loaders are obtained using controllability arguments, by checking the Quantum Fisher Information Matrix (QFIM)'s rank. Second, we provide a theoretical justification for the fact that the rank of the QFIM of any VQC state is almost-everywhere constant, which is of separate interest. Lastly, we analyze the trainability of Hamming weight preserving circuits, and show that the variance of the l2 cost function gradient is bounded according to the dimension (nk) of the subspace. This proves conditions of existence/lack of Barren Plateaus for these circuits, and highlights a setting where a recent conjecture on the link between controllability and trainability of variational quantum circuits does not apply.