Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Many Witnesses, One Fact: Charge Sharpening as the Quantum Darwinism–Encoding Transition of Monitored Circuits

Rolando P. Hong Enriquez

Published Jul 14, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A quantum circuit interrupted by random measurements undergoes a well-known entanglement transition; when it also conserves a charge, it undergoes a second, distinct "charge-sharpening" transition at which the measurement record comes to pin down the total charge. This paper shows that charge sharpening is an objectivity transition — the quantum-Darwinism transition of the conserved charge. For a charge-conserving monitored circuit the paper establishes several results. Objectivity onset is exactly charge sharpening, and is generically a different transition from the entanglement one. In the sharp phase the charge is redundantly broadcast into the record, with redundancy growing as the system size, and the sharp-phase state has broadcast structure whose center is the charge. A per-fragment information measure rises from zero to one bit across the transition. And the objective sector is exactly the conserved charge, while its conjugate stays hidden. The paper further shows that objectivity — many observers each agreeing — is strictly stronger than mere learnability by a single decoder reading the whole record, and that the picture extends from the simplest symmetry to any compact symmetry group, including non-abelian spin sharpening. The transition carries a falsifiable signature: the redundancy is an observable order parameter, few-shot readable from a small fragment in the sharp phase and not in the fuzzy phase, testable on today's symmetric monitored simulators; every structural result is proved analytically and cross-checked by exact computation. In short: charge sharpening is the moment a monitored circuit's conserved charge becomes objective — many witnesses, one classical charge.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.21358019

Related papers

Statistical Mechanics of Non-Abelian Learnability Transitions

Ruochen Ma, Romain Vasseur

Monitored many-body quantum systems can undergo sharp learnability transitions characterized by how much information can be learned by the observer. When the dynamics conserves a non-Abelian charge, such as an $SU(2)$ spin, understanding how the observer learns the total charge remains an outstanding problem. Unlike the Abelian case, where charge measurements on distinct sites commute, the $SU(2)$-symmetric readouts are noncommuting fusion measurements, making learning a genuinely quantum inference problem. In this work, we propose a theory of $1+1d$ monitored quantum dynamics with $SU(2)$ symmetry, and show that it can be described by an effective replicated loop model comprised of a replica-pairing field and a diffusive ($z=2$) background sector that carries the $SU(2)$ charge and remains gapless throughout the phase diagram. Our theory predicts that the "spin-sharpening'' and entanglement transitions coincide as a single transition. Ordering of the pairing field produces volume-law entanglement and hides the background sector from measurements, leading to a learning time of $t\sim L^{3}$ for the total spin. When the pairing field disorders, the background sector alone gives logarithmic entanglement and a diffusive learning time $t\sim L^{2}$. Our analysis is controlled by a large-loop-fugacity expansion.

quant-pharXiv:2608.19325•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations

One Center, Many Worlds: A Classification Theorem and a Complementarity Dichotomy for Quantum Darwinism

Rolando P. Hong Enriquez

Across the twenty papers above, one idea recurs: an observable becomes an objective classical fact — redundantly recorded so that many observers agree on it without disturbance — exactly when it lies in the "center" of the algebra of accessible observables. This capstone consolidates the whole program (Q1–Q20) and, above the synthesis, proves the two questions it had left open. As a synthesis it organizes the twenty results into five pieces: a master-table classification of the objective center across every arena; a general "objective-plus-encoded" complementarity relating the center to its hidden quantum shadow; a flow linking the static arenas to their dynamical transitions; a unified table of falsifiable predictions sharing one signature, a redundancy plateau; and a dependency map showing the program is one edifice on a small toolbox. Above the synthesis it proves two theorems: a classification theorem — an objective observable must be central and classical, and for a symmetry the objective center is exactly the algebra of conserved-charge labels, the largest broadcastable sector; and a complementarity dichotomy — the arena-specific trade-offs split into exactly two families, multiplicative (entanglement, coherence) and additive (entropies), sorted by a simple test and provably not reducible to one inequality. The paper closes with a near-term experiment: on a monitored circuit or a driven-dissipative pointer, a conserved charge's redundancy plateau — how many independent fragments can read it — should rise sharply as objectivity switches on, and its absence would falsify the picture. In short: one center underlies many worlds. Across cosmology, black holes, gauge theory, broken symmetries, monitored circuits, and the rest, the same simple thing keeps happening — a physical fact becomes classical exactly when it settles into the center of what observers can access, it becomes objective in proportion to how redundantly that center is copied into the environment, and whatever is left outside the center is precisely the quantum part that no amount of copying can ever broadcast. The many worlds of the program are not many mechanisms but one: classicality is the birth of a center, objectivity is its redundancy, and the quantum is its shadow. The capstone turns this picture into two theorems and a single experimental signature — a redundancy plateau — so that the same idea that explains why the sky looks classical can be tested on a chip.

•Jul 14, 2026•0 citations

Field Theory of Charge Sharpening in Symmetric Monitored Quantum Circuits

Fergus Barratt, Utkarsh Agrawal, Sarang Gopalakrishnan +3 more

Monitored quantum circuits (MRCs) exhibit a measurement-induced phase transition between area-law and volume-law entanglement scaling. MRCs with a conserved charge additionally exhibit two distinct volume-law entangled phases that cannot be characterized by equilibrium notions of symmetry-breaking or topological order, but rather by the nonequilibrium dynamics and steady-state distribution of charge fluctuations. These include a charge-fuzzy phase in which charge information is rapidly scrambled leading to slowly decaying spatial fluctuations of charge in the steady state, and a charge-sharp phase in which measurements collapse quantum fluctuations of charge without destroying the volume-law entanglement of neutral degrees of freedom. By taking a continuous-time, weak-measurement limit, we construct a controlled replica field theory description of these phases and their intervening charge-sharpening transition in one spatial dimension. We find that the charge fuzzy phase is a critical phase with continuously evolving critical exponents that terminates in a modified Kosterlitz-Thouless transition to the short-range correlated charge-sharp phase. We numerically corroborate these scaling predictions also hold for discrete-time projective-measurement circuit models using large-scale matrix-product state simulations, and discuss generalizations to higher dimensions.

arXiv:2111.09336•Physical Review Letters•Sep 13, 2022•86 citations

The Computational Complexity of Quantum Darwinism: Producing the Quantum-to-Classical Transition

Rolando P. Hong Enriquez

Quantum Darwinism explains classical objectivity through the redundant broadcast of a system's records into many environment fragments. A companion paper asks how hard it is to certify objectivity from a description of a state; this one asks the dual, dynamical question — how hard is it to produce objectivity in the first place? The paper defines the broadcast complexity — the minimum number of elementary two-qubit operations needed to turn a fresh environment into an objective record of a given redundancy and precision — and determines it. Four results make objectivity a resource measured in gates: with bounded-strength operations the cost is exactly the redundancy times the number of copies needed per witness, achieved by an explicit construction; for arbitrary operations a causal-cone argument forces at least one gate per independent record; complexity is a faithful proxy for objectivity, since redundancy grows in strict proportion to the gates invested; and the total cost equals the volume of an emergent "broadcast geometry" whose boundary is the records, a redundancy area law. Notably, while the total cost grows with the number of witnesses, the time to make a fact objective does not — through many parallel channels it is just the time to write a single sharp record. In short: making the world classical is cheap but not free — it takes only a handful of gates per copy, and no extra time however many witnesses come to share the fact.

•Jul 14, 2026•0 citations

One Center, Many Worlds: A Classification Theorem and a Complementarity Dichotomy for Quantum Darwinism

Rolando P. Hong Enriquez

Why does the world look solid and definite when the physics underneath it is quantum and fuzzy? Quantum Darwinism offers an answer that adds nothing to quantum mechanics: a fact becomes objective not because someone measures it, but because the environment copies it many times over. Light, air, and surroundings each carry redundant imprints of the same property, so many observers can independently read it, agree on it, and not disturb it. Objectivity, in this view, is simply redundancy of record. Across twenty studies, this program showed that in setting after setting — ordinary measurement, broken symmetry, topological matter, gravity, black holes, the early universe, monitored circuits, reference frames, causal order, and more — the properties that become objective are always the same special kind: the ones that every observer can read without conflict. The technical name for this shared core is the "center" of the observable algebra. This paper is the program's capstone, and it does two things. First, as a synthesis, it gathers the twenty results into one coherent picture: a single master table identifying the objective core in each setting and the complementary "hidden" information left behind; one unifying trade-off principle relating what is broadcast to what stays encoded; a link between the static picture (which properties are objective) and the dynamic one (how a system crosses over from classical-like broadcasting to information-hiding); a single shared experimental signature — a "redundancy plateau" measurable on near-term quantum hardware; and a dependency map showing the whole program rests on a small common toolbox. Second, as new mathematics, it proves two results the synthesis had made precise. The classification theorem shows that any property capable of being objective must be classical in a strict sense — it cannot be freely copied unless it is, and under a symmetry the objective core is pinned down uniquely as the largest shareable part. The complementarity dichotomy shows that the trade-off laws seen across the program come in exactly two distinct families, separated by a single criterion, and proves they cannot be collapsed into one universal formula. The mathematical cores of both theorems are machine-checked in the Lean 4 proof assistant, and the quantitative claims are reproduced by self-testing code. The one-line summary: classicality is the emergence of a shared core, its objectivity is the redundancy of that core, and what the core leaves behind is the hidden, encoded remainder.

•Oct 9, 2026•0 citations

Charge and Spin Sharpening Transitions on Dynamical Quantum Trees

Xiaozhou Feng, Nadezhda Fishchenko, Sarang Gopalakrishnan +1 more

The dynamics of monitored systems can exhibit a measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT) between entangling and disentangling phases, tuned by the measurement rate. When the dynamics obeys a continuous symmetry, the entangling phase further splits into a fuzzy phase and a sharp phase based on the scaling of fluctuations of the symmetry charge. While the sharpening transition for Abelian symmetries is well understood analytically, no such understanding exists for the non- Abelian case. In this work, building on a recent analytical solution of the MIPT on tree-like circuit architectures (where qubits are repatedly added or removed from the system in a recursive pattern), we study entanglement and sharpening transitions in monitored dynamical quantum trees obeying U(1) and SU(2) symmetries. The recursive structure of tree tensor networks enables powerful analytical and numerical methods to determine the phase diagrams in both cases. In the U(1) case, we analytically derive a Fisher-KPP-like differential equation that allows us to locate the critical point and identify its properties. We find that the entanglement/purification and sharpening transitions generically occur at distinct measurement rates. In the SU(2) case, we find that the fuzzy phase is generic, and a sharp phase is possible only in the limit of maximal measurement rate. In this limit, we analytically solve the boundaries separating the fuzzy and sharp phases, and find them to be in agreement with exact numerical simulations.

arXiv:2405.13894•Quantum•Apr 7, 2025•5 citations
A quantum circuit interrupted by random measurements undergoes a well-known entanglement transition; when it also conserves a charge, it undergoes a second, distinct "charge-sharpening" transition at which the measurement record comes to pin down the total charge. This paper shows that charge sharpening is an objectivity transition — the quantum-Darwinism transition of the conserved charge. For a charge-conserving monitored circuit the paper establishes several results. Objectivity onset is exactly charge sharpening, and is generically a different transition from the entanglement one. In the sharp phase the charge is redundantly broadcast into the record, with redundancy growing as the system size, and the sharp-phase state has broadcast structure whose center is the charge. A per-fragment information measure rises from zero to one bit across the transition. And the objective sector is exactly the conserved charge, while its conjugate stays hidden. The paper further shows that objectivity — many observers each agreeing — is strictly stronger than mere learnability by a single decoder reading the whole record, and that the picture extends from the simplest symmetry to any compact symmetry group, including non-abelian spin sharpening. The transition carries a falsifiable signature: the redundancy is an observable order parameter, few-shot readable from a small fragment in the sharp phase and not in the fuzzy phase, testable on today's symmetric monitored simulators; every structural result is proved analytically and cross-checked by exact computation. In short: charge sharpening is the moment a monitored circuit's conserved charge becomes objective — many witnesses, one classical charge.
Monitored many-body quantum systems can undergo sharp learnability transitions characterized by how much information can be learned by the observer. When the dynamics conserves a non-Abelian charge, such as an SU(2)SU(2)SU(2) spin, understanding how the observer learns the total charge remains an outstanding problem. Unlike the Abelian case, where charge measurements on distinct sites commute, the SU(2)SU(2)SU(2)-symmetric readouts are noncommuting fusion measurements, making learning a genuinely quantum inference problem. In this work, we propose a theory of 1+1d1+1d1+1d monitored quantum dynamics with SU(2)SU(2)SU(2) symmetry, and show that it can be described by an effective replicated loop model comprised of a replica-pairing field and a diffusive (z=2z=2z=2) background sector that carries the SU(2)SU(2)SU(2) charge and remains gapless throughout the phase diagram. Our theory predicts that the "spin-sharpening'' and entanglement transitions coincide as a single transition. Ordering of the pairing field produces volume-law entanglement and hides the background sector from measurements, leading to a learning time of t∼L3t\sim L^{3}t∼L3 for the total spin. When the pairing field disorders, the background sector alone gives logarithmic entanglement and a diffusive learning time t∼L2t\sim L^{2}t∼L2. Our analysis is controlled by a large-loop-fugacity expansion.
Across the twenty papers above, one idea recurs: an observable becomes an objective classical fact — redundantly recorded so that many observers agree on it without disturbance — exactly when it lies in the "center" of the algebra of accessible observables. This capstone consolidates the whole program (Q1–Q20) and, above the synthesis, proves the two questions it had left open. As a synthesis it organizes the twenty results into five pieces: a master-table classification of the objective center across every arena; a general "objective-plus-encoded" complementarity relating the center to its hidden quantum shadow; a flow linking the static arenas to their dynamical transitions; a unified table of falsifiable predictions sharing one signature, a redundancy plateau; and a dependency map showing the program is one edifice on a small toolbox. Above the synthesis it proves two theorems: a classification theorem — an objective observable must be central and classical, and for a symmetry the objective center is exactly the algebra of conserved-charge labels, the largest broadcastable sector; and a complementarity dichotomy — the arena-specific trade-offs split into exactly two families, multiplicative (entanglement, coherence) and additive (entropies), sorted by a simple test and provably not reducible to one inequality. The paper closes with a near-term experiment: on a monitored circuit or a driven-dissipative pointer, a conserved charge's redundancy plateau — how many independent fragments can read it — should rise sharply as objectivity switches on, and its absence would falsify the picture. In short: one center underlies many worlds. Across cosmology, black holes, gauge theory, broken symmetries, monitored circuits, and the rest, the same simple thing keeps happening — a physical fact becomes classical exactly when it settles into the center of what observers can access, it becomes objective in proportion to how redundantly that center is copied into the environment, and whatever is left outside the center is precisely the quantum part that no amount of copying can ever broadcast. The many worlds of the program are not many mechanisms but one: classicality is the birth of a center, objectivity is its redundancy, and the quantum is its shadow. The capstone turns this picture into two theorems and a single experimental signature — a redundancy plateau — so that the same idea that explains why the sky looks classical can be tested on a chip.
Monitored quantum circuits (MRCs) exhibit a measurement-induced phase transition between area-law and volume-law entanglement scaling. MRCs with a conserved charge additionally exhibit two distinct volume-law entangled phases that cannot be characterized by equilibrium notions of symmetry-breaking or topological order, but rather by the nonequilibrium dynamics and steady-state distribution of charge fluctuations. These include a charge-fuzzy phase in which charge information is rapidly scrambled leading to slowly decaying spatial fluctuations of charge in the steady state, and a charge-sharp phase in which measurements collapse quantum fluctuations of charge without destroying the volume-law entanglement of neutral degrees of freedom. By taking a continuous-time, weak-measurement limit, we construct a controlled replica field theory description of these phases and their intervening charge-sharpening transition in one spatial dimension. We find that the charge fuzzy phase is a critical phase with continuously evolving critical exponents that terminates in a modified Kosterlitz-Thouless transition to the short-range correlated charge-sharp phase. We numerically corroborate these scaling predictions also hold for discrete-time projective-measurement circuit models using large-scale matrix-product state simulations, and discuss generalizations to higher dimensions.
Quantum Darwinism explains classical objectivity through the redundant broadcast of a system's records into many environment fragments. A companion paper asks how hard it is to certify objectivity from a description of a state; this one asks the dual, dynamical question — how hard is it to produce objectivity in the first place? The paper defines the broadcast complexity — the minimum number of elementary two-qubit operations needed to turn a fresh environment into an objective record of a given redundancy and precision — and determines it. Four results make objectivity a resource measured in gates: with bounded-strength operations the cost is exactly the redundancy times the number of copies needed per witness, achieved by an explicit construction; for arbitrary operations a causal-cone argument forces at least one gate per independent record; complexity is a faithful proxy for objectivity, since redundancy grows in strict proportion to the gates invested; and the total cost equals the volume of an emergent "broadcast geometry" whose boundary is the records, a redundancy area law. Notably, while the total cost grows with the number of witnesses, the time to make a fact objective does not — through many parallel channels it is just the time to write a single sharp record. In short: making the world classical is cheap but not free — it takes only a handful of gates per copy, and no extra time however many witnesses come to share the fact.
Why does the world look solid and definite when the physics underneath it is quantum and fuzzy? Quantum Darwinism offers an answer that adds nothing to quantum mechanics: a fact becomes objective not because someone measures it, but because the environment copies it many times over. Light, air, and surroundings each carry redundant imprints of the same property, so many observers can independently read it, agree on it, and not disturb it. Objectivity, in this view, is simply redundancy of record. Across twenty studies, this program showed that in setting after setting — ordinary measurement, broken symmetry, topological matter, gravity, black holes, the early universe, monitored circuits, reference frames, causal order, and more — the properties that become objective are always the same special kind: the ones that every observer can read without conflict. The technical name for this shared core is the "center" of the observable algebra. This paper is the program's capstone, and it does two things. First, as a synthesis, it gathers the twenty results into one coherent picture: a single master table identifying the objective core in each setting and the complementary "hidden" information left behind; one unifying trade-off principle relating what is broadcast to what stays encoded; a link between the static picture (which properties are objective) and the dynamic one (how a system crosses over from classical-like broadcasting to information-hiding); a single shared experimental signature — a "redundancy plateau" measurable on near-term quantum hardware; and a dependency map showing the whole program rests on a small common toolbox. Second, as new mathematics, it proves two results the synthesis had made precise. The classification theorem shows that any property capable of being objective must be classical in a strict sense — it cannot be freely copied unless it is, and under a symmetry the objective core is pinned down uniquely as the largest shareable part. The complementarity dichotomy shows that the trade-off laws seen across the program come in exactly two distinct families, separated by a single criterion, and proves they cannot be collapsed into one universal formula. The mathematical cores of both theorems are machine-checked in the Lean 4 proof assistant, and the quantitative claims are reproduced by self-testing code. The one-line summary: classicality is the emergence of a shared core, its objectivity is the redundancy of that core, and what the core leaves behind is the hidden, encoded remainder.
The dynamics of monitored systems can exhibit a measurement-induced phase transition (MIPT) between entangling and disentangling phases, tuned by the measurement rate. When the dynamics obeys a continuous symmetry, the entangling phase further splits into a fuzzy phase and a sharp phase based on the scaling of fluctuations of the symmetry charge. While the sharpening transition for Abelian symmetries is well understood analytically, no such understanding exists for the non- Abelian case. In this work, building on a recent analytical solution of the MIPT on tree-like circuit architectures (where qubits are repatedly added or removed from the system in a recursive pattern), we study entanglement and sharpening transitions in monitored dynamical quantum trees obeying U(1) and SU(2) symmetries. The recursive structure of tree tensor networks enables powerful analytical and numerical methods to determine the phase diagrams in both cases. In the U(1) case, we analytically derive a Fisher-KPP-like differential equation that allows us to locate the critical point and identify its properties. We find that the entanglement/purification and sharpening transitions generically occur at distinct measurement rates. In the SU(2) case, we find that the fuzzy phase is generic, and a sharp phase is possible only in the limit of maximal measurement rate. In this limit, we analytically solve the boundaries separating the fuzzy and sharp phases, and find them to be in agreement with exact numerical simulations.