Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Quantum Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland and generalized constraints in iterative quantum algorithms

Anonymous, Stuart Hadfield

Published Jul 14, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1103/8g3p-tyz1

Related papers

Quantum DPLL and Generalized Constraints in Iterative Quantum Algorithms

Lucas T. Brady, Stuart Hadfield

Too often, quantum computer scientists seek to create new algorithms entirely fresh from new cloth when there are extensive and optimized classical algorithms that can be generalized wholesale. At the same time, one may seek to maintain classical advantages of performance and runtime bounds, while enabling potential quantum improvement. Hybrid quantum algorithms tap into this potential, and here we explore a class of hybrid quantum algorithms called Iterative Quantum Algorithms (IQA) that are closely related to classical greedy or local search algorithms, employing a structure where the quantum computer provides information that leads to a simplified problem for future iterations. Specifically, we extend these algorithms beyond past results that considered primarily quadratic problems to arbitrary k-local Hamiltonians, proposing a general framework that incorporates logical inference in a fundamental way. As an application we develop a hybrid quantum version of the well-known classical Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) algorithm for satisfiability problems, which embeds IQAs within a complete backtracking based tree search framework. Our results also provide a general framework for handling problems with hard constraints in IQAs. We further show limiting cases of the algorithms where they reduce to classical algorithms, and provide evidence for regimes of quantum improvement.

arXiv:2509.02689•Sep 2, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Linear System Algorithms: Iterative Methods

Osama M. Raisuddin, Suvranu De

Springer eBooks•Nov 14, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Algorithms: Application and Feasibility

Duong Bui, Kimmo Halunen, Nhan Nguyen +1 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Nov 26, 2024•0 citations

Size Dependence of the Minimum Excitation Gap in the Quantum Adiabatic Algorithm

A. P. Young, Sergey Knysh, Vadim Smelyanskiy

We study the typical (median) value of the minimum gap in the quantum version of the exact cover problem using quantum Monte Carlo simulations, in order to understand the complexity of the quantum adiabatic algorithm for much larger sizes than before. For a range of sizes N< or =128, where the classical Davis-Putnam algorithm shows exponential median complexity, the quantum adiabatic algorithm shows polynomial median complexity. The bottleneck of the algorithm is an isolated avoided-crossing point of a Landau-Zener type (collision between the two lowest energy levels only).

arXiv:0803.3971•Physical Review Letters•Oct 23, 2008•127 citations

Quantum algorithms: A survey of some recent results

Martin Rötteler

Informatik - Forschung und Entwicklung•Sep 15, 2006•20 citations

On the Critical Behaviour, Crossover Point and Complexity of the Exact Cover Problem

Robin D. Morris, Vadim Smelyanskiy, Daniel Shumow +1 more

Research into quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems has rekindled interest in the detailed study a broad class of combinatorial problems. A recent paper applied the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm to the Exact Cover problem for 3-sets (EC3), and provided an empirical evidence that the algorithm was polynomial. In this paper we provide a detailed study of the characteristics of the exact cover problem. We present the annealing approximation applied to EC3, which gives an over-estimate of the phase transition point. We also identify empirically the phase transition point. We also study the complexity of two classical algorithms on this problem: Davis-Putnam and Simulated Annealing. For these algorithms, EC3 is significantly easier than 3-SAT.

•Apr 10, 2003•0 citations
Too often, quantum computer scientists seek to create new algorithms entirely fresh from new cloth when there are extensive and optimized classical algorithms that can be generalized wholesale. At the same time, one may seek to maintain classical advantages of performance and runtime bounds, while enabling potential quantum improvement. Hybrid quantum algorithms tap into this potential, and here we explore a class of hybrid quantum algorithms called Iterative Quantum Algorithms (IQA) that are closely related to classical greedy or local search algorithms, employing a structure where the quantum computer provides information that leads to a simplified problem for future iterations. Specifically, we extend these algorithms beyond past results that considered primarily quadratic problems to arbitrary k-local Hamiltonians, proposing a general framework that incorporates logical inference in a fundamental way. As an application we develop a hybrid quantum version of the well-known classical Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland (DPLL) algorithm for satisfiability problems, which embeds IQAs within a complete backtracking based tree search framework. Our results also provide a general framework for handling problems with hard constraints in IQAs. We further show limiting cases of the algorithms where they reduce to classical algorithms, and provide evidence for regimes of quantum improvement.
We study the typical (median) value of the minimum gap in the quantum version of the exact cover problem using quantum Monte Carlo simulations, in order to understand the complexity of the quantum adiabatic algorithm for much larger sizes than before. For a range of sizes N< or =128, where the classical Davis-Putnam algorithm shows exponential median complexity, the quantum adiabatic algorithm shows polynomial median complexity. The bottleneck of the algorithm is an isolated avoided-crossing point of a Landau-Zener type (collision between the two lowest energy levels only).
Research into quantum algorithms for NP-complete problems has rekindled interest in the detailed study a broad class of combinatorial problems. A recent paper applied the quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm to the Exact Cover problem for 3-sets (EC3), and provided an empirical evidence that the algorithm was polynomial. In this paper we provide a detailed study of the characteristics of the exact cover problem. We present the annealing approximation applied to EC3, which gives an over-estimate of the phase transition point. We also identify empirically the phase transition point. We also study the complexity of two classical algorithms on this problem: Davis-Putnam and Simulated Annealing. For these algorithms, EC3 is significantly easier than 3-SAT.