Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in networks and systems

Multi-objective Route Optimization Using Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) with Comparative Analysis of Classical Algorithms

Kalpita Ajinkya Wagaskar, Bhakti Palkar

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-27563-9_43

Related papers

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm applied to multi-objective routing for large scale 6G networks

Oumayma Bouchmal, Bruno Cimoli, Ripalta Stabile +2 more

A multi-objective optimization problem involves optimizing two or more conflicting objectives simultaneously. This type of problem arises in many scientific and industrial areas and it is classified as NP-Hard. Network routing optimization with multiple objectives falls into this category. In the context of 6G networks, solving this problem will become even more challenging due to the exponential growth of Internet of Things devices and the high quality of service requirements. Finding good quality solutions for large-scale networks will be increasingly difficult. In this paper, we introduce a quantum-inspired routing optimization scheme in which noisy-intermediate scale quantum computers (NISQ) can be used to solve the Multi-Objective Routing Problem (MORP). We evaluate the application of the proposed scheme in detail by first developing the mathematical formulas for both single-objective and multi-objective routing and mapping the problem onto gate-based models by using the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) approach. To validate the proposed scheme, we use the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), the go-to approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems that are classically intractable. For the simulation, we use the IBM-Qasm simulator and Qiskit framework. Additionally, we use the Chernoff Bound as a standard technique to estimate the sample complexity of QAOA. Finally, we provide a detailed numerical and theoretical analysis of the proposed scheme, including its time complexity, resource requirements, and the challenges associated with it. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach operates with a time complexity of O ( E 2 ) per iteration in both single and multi-objective scenarios, with an overall runtime of ( n iteration + n CB ) ⋅ O ( E 2 ) influenced by the sampling overhead, significantly outperforming Dijkstra’s algorithm in the multi-objective case, where the complexity increases to O ( 2 k ( N ( k + log N ) + 2 k E ) ) .

Computer Networks•May 13, 2025•17 citations

Application to optimization problem with multiple constraints using quantum approximation optimization algorithm (QAOA)

Koudai Shiba

The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence•Apr 1, 2020•0 citations

Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) for Solving NP-Hard Problems

Srikanth Kilaru, Thota Sravya Vardhani, Attluri Udaya Lakshmi +2 more

IEEE Nexo-Tech International Conference on Advanced Technologies and Innovations (ICATI)•May 8, 2026•0 citations

A UNIFIED BENCHMARKING FRAMEWORK FOR CLASSICAL AND QAOA-BASED MULTI-OBJECTIVE ROUTING IN COMMUNICATION NETWORKS

BALAMURUGAN N M KALAVATHI S

Multi-objective routing in communication networks requires simultaneous optimization of delay, congestion, and reliability—posing challenges for classical single-metric routing protocols. This paper presents a rigorous quantitative benchmarking framework comparing classical deterministic routing paradigms, namely Routing Information Protocol and Open Shortest Path First, against a quantum-assisted routing formulation based on the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). The routing problem is encoded as a constrained Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model incorporating flow-conservation and path-continuity constraints. Random connected weighted graphs (10–20 nodes) were evaluated across 50 independent runs per topology size under a unified scalarized cost function (0.5D + 0.3C + 0.2L). Results demonstrate that deterministic link-state routing achieves optimal path selection with minimal computational complexity O(m log n), while QAOA attains near-optimal solutions (3–8% deviation) at significantly higher computational overhead due to qubit scaling and variational optimization loops. Scalability analysis reveals quadratic qubit growth with network size, limiting NISQ-era applicability. The study establishes a structured comparative benchmark and positions quantum routing as a complementary exploratory mechanism rather than a replacement for classical routing.

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology•Apr 15, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Approximate Multi-Objective Optimization in Routing Problems

Eduardo Willwock Lussi, Alisson dos Passos Fumaco, Marcos Vinicius Reballo +3 more

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems are common in logistics, where routing decisions must balance conflicting objectives such as travel distance, delivery time, and operational risk. A recently proposed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) parameter-transfer strategy solves multi-objective MAX-CUT problems by reusing parameters trained on smaller instances, avoiding costly reoptimization for each scalarized problem. However, its effectiveness has only been demonstrated on proof-of-concept instances tailored to quantum hardware connectivity. In this work, we evaluate the applicability of this strategy to realistic routing problems. We formulate the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models, reduce them to MAX-CUT, and assess the parameter-transfer framework under conditions matching the original study. Validation is performed through classical simulations and experiments on IBM quantum hardware. The resulting Pareto fronts are compared with those obtained using an adapted classical ε-constraint method, using hypervolume as the primary quality metric. Results indicate that parameter transfer remains effective, frequently achieving higher hypervolume and often finding competitive solutions earlier. However, performance depends on problem structure. The approach is consistently effective for TSP instances but less stable for the more constrained VRP, suggesting that QAOA parameter transferability decreases as the optimization landscape becomes more complex. These results provide the first comprehensive evaluation of QAOA parameter transfer on realistic multi-objective routing problems and demonstrate its potential beyond proof-of-concept MAX-CUT benchmarks.

cs.ETCross-listedarXiv:2610.00168•Sep 17, 2026•0 citations

A Tutorial on Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA): Fundamentals and Applications

Choi Jaeho, Joongheon Kim

IEEE Conference Proceedings•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations
A multi-objective optimization problem involves optimizing two or more conflicting objectives simultaneously. This type of problem arises in many scientific and industrial areas and it is classified as NP-Hard. Network routing optimization with multiple objectives falls into this category. In the context of 6G networks, solving this problem will become even more challenging due to the exponential growth of Internet of Things devices and the high quality of service requirements. Finding good quality solutions for large-scale networks will be increasingly difficult. In this paper, we introduce a quantum-inspired routing optimization scheme in which noisy-intermediate scale quantum computers (NISQ) can be used to solve the Multi-Objective Routing Problem (MORP). We evaluate the application of the proposed scheme in detail by first developing the mathematical formulas for both single-objective and multi-objective routing and mapping the problem onto gate-based models by using the quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) approach. To validate the proposed scheme, we use the quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA), the go-to approach for solving combinatorial optimization problems that are classically intractable. For the simulation, we use the IBM-Qasm simulator and Qiskit framework. Additionally, we use the Chernoff Bound as a standard technique to estimate the sample complexity of QAOA. Finally, we provide a detailed numerical and theoretical analysis of the proposed scheme, including its time complexity, resource requirements, and the challenges associated with it. Our results demonstrate that the proposed approach operates with a time complexity of O ( E 2 ) per iteration in both single and multi-objective scenarios, with an overall runtime of ( n iteration + n CB ) ⋅ O ( E 2 ) influenced by the sampling overhead, significantly outperforming Dijkstra’s algorithm in the multi-objective case, where the complexity increases to O ( 2 k ( N ( k + log N ) + 2 k E ) ) .
Multi-objective routing in communication networks requires simultaneous optimization of delay, congestion, and reliability—posing challenges for classical single-metric routing protocols. This paper presents a rigorous quantitative benchmarking framework comparing classical deterministic routing paradigms, namely Routing Information Protocol and Open Shortest Path First, against a quantum-assisted routing formulation based on the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA). The routing problem is encoded as a constrained Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model incorporating flow-conservation and path-continuity constraints. Random connected weighted graphs (10–20 nodes) were evaluated across 50 independent runs per topology size under a unified scalarized cost function (0.5D + 0.3C + 0.2L). Results demonstrate that deterministic link-state routing achieves optimal path selection with minimal computational complexity O(m log n), while QAOA attains near-optimal solutions (3–8% deviation) at significantly higher computational overhead due to qubit scaling and variational optimization loops. Scalability analysis reveals quadratic qubit growth with network size, limiting NISQ-era applicability. The study establishes a structured comparative benchmark and positions quantum routing as a complementary exploratory mechanism rather than a replacement for classical routing.
Multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems are common in logistics, where routing decisions must balance conflicting objectives such as travel distance, delivery time, and operational risk. A recently proposed Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) parameter-transfer strategy solves multi-objective MAX-CUT problems by reusing parameters trained on smaller instances, avoiding costly reoptimization for each scalarized problem. However, its effectiveness has only been demonstrated on proof-of-concept instances tailored to quantum hardware connectivity. In this work, we evaluate the applicability of this strategy to realistic routing problems. We formulate the Traveling Salesman Problem (TSP) and Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) models, reduce them to MAX-CUT, and assess the parameter-transfer framework under conditions matching the original study. Validation is performed through classical simulations and experiments on IBM quantum hardware. The resulting Pareto fronts are compared with those obtained using an adapted classical ε-constraint method, using hypervolume as the primary quality metric. Results indicate that parameter transfer remains effective, frequently achieving higher hypervolume and often finding competitive solutions earlier. However, performance depends on problem structure. The approach is consistently effective for TSP instances but less stable for the more constrained VRP, suggesting that QAOA parameter transferability decreases as the optimization landscape becomes more complex. These results provide the first comprehensive evaluation of QAOA parameter transfer on realistic multi-objective routing problems and demonstrate its potential beyond proof-of-concept MAX-CUT benchmarks.