This repository is a verification-first release of SFT: a theory/framework plus a set of runners designed for external audit. Update — FEM cross-backend exploratory bridge outputs Update date: 2026-07-07 This repository now includes SFT_FEM_CROSSBACKEND_REPRO_v0_1_12, an exploratory FEM cross-backend bridge package for selected SFT-facing audit targets. The previous Firedrake/UFL bridge line is preserved through SFT_FIREDRAKE_CORE_REPRO_v0_1_10 and the v0_1_11 S-compliance addendum. The new v0_1_12 package adds an independent FEniCSx/DOLFINx bridge layer for compatibility, native collapse, spin FR, double-slit readout, and Mercury/Venus perihelion gates. This repository therefore now contains selected SFT-facing audit targets implemented across two FEM environments: Firedrake/UFL bridge outputs for spin-½ FR bend robustness, spin/topological memory, scalar recovery/residue controls, hydrogenic radial Coulomb H/T 2s/2p gates, Venus/Mercury 1PN perihelion geometry gates, alpha-localization capacity scans, double-slit phase/visibility diagnostics, double-slit Born-readout diagnostics, exploratory alpha-thread proxy gates, an exploratory S-rigidity compliance-window scan, and an intentionally incomplete Alpha-Out bridge report. FEniCSx/DOLFINx bridge outputs for the compatibility operator, native collapse gate, spin-½ FR signature, double-slit phase/visibility/Born-readout diagnostics, and Mercury/Venus 1PN perihelion gates. The v0_1_10 package consolidates the Firedrake/UFL bridge suite, including spin/topological memory, radial and perihelion sanity gates, recovery/residue controls, double-slit Born readout, and exploratory alpha-thread proxy gates. The v0_1_11 addendum adds a focused S-rigidity compliance landscape: a fixed-physical-time scan mapping a bounded medium regime between rupture and persistent scalar residue under locked gates. This S-compliance landscape is not an alpha result, not a particle-identification result, and not a global physical validation of SFT. The v0_1_12 cross-backend package adds an independent FEniCSx/DOLFINx implementation layer. It supports the narrower claim that selected SFT-facing compatibility, collapse, topological, readout, and geometry gates can be represented reproducibly in both Firedrake/UFL and FEniCSx/DOLFINx under declared protocols. These FEM bridge outputs are more informative than synthetic CI checks because they are produced in external real-solver environments and exported as auditable JSON/CSV artifacts with SHA-256 manifests and machine-checkable PASS/FAIL gates. They are not presented as global physical validation of SFT, nor as derivations of the Standard Model, General Relativity, Born's rule, the electron/photon, the physical fine-structure constant, or matter programmability. They should be read as exploratory P-bridge outputs: real-solver bridge results that exercise the verification-first contract, while still requiring independent third-party REAL runs at multiple resolutions for physical confirmation. Evidence labels used in this repository: CI (C): CPU-only validation of tooling, schemas, manifests, regression checks, and PASS/FAIL logic. REAL-ready (P-input): verifier and artifact contract are ready to ingest third-party real-solver outputs. Exploratory P-bridge: real-solver bridge outputs produced in an external solver environment, with hashes and machine-checkable reports, but not yet independently replicated. Cross-backend exploratory bridge: selected audit targets represented across Firedrake/UFL and FEniCSx/DOLFINx, strengthening implementation transparency without constituting physical confirmation. REAL-verified (P): reserved for independent third-party real-solver runs with artifacts, hashes, locked gates, and at least two resolutions.
This repository is a verification-first release of SFT: a theory/framework plus a set of runners designed for external audit. Update — FEM cross-backend exploratory bridge outputs Update date: 2026-07-07 This repository now includes SFT_FEM_CROSSBACKEND_REPRO_v0_1_12, an exploratory FEM cross-backend bridge package for selected SFT-facing audit targets. The previous Firedrake/UFL bridge line is preserved through SFT_FIREDRAKE_CORE_REPRO_v0_1_10 and the v0_1_11 S-compliance addendum. The new v0_1_12 package adds an independent FEniCSx/DOLFINx bridge layer for compatibility, native collapse, spin FR, double-slit readout, and Mercury/Venus perihelion gates. This repository therefore now contains selected SFT-facing audit targets implemented across two FEM environments: Firedrake/UFL bridge outputs for spin-½ FR bend robustness, spin/topological memory, scalar recovery/residue controls, hydrogenic radial Coulomb H/T 2s/2p gates, Venus/Mercury 1PN perihelion geometry gates, alpha-localization capacity scans, double-slit phase/visibility diagnostics, double-slit Born-readout diagnostics, exploratory alpha-thread proxy gates, an exploratory S-rigidity compliance-window scan, and an intentionally incomplete Alpha-Out bridge report. FEniCSx/DOLFINx bridge outputs for the compatibility operator, native collapse gate, spin-½ FR signature, double-slit phase/visibility/Born-readout diagnostics, and Mercury/Venus 1PN perihelion gates. The v0_1_10 package consolidates the Firedrake/UFL bridge suite, including spin/topological memory, radial and perihelion sanity gates, recovery/residue controls, double-slit Born readout, and exploratory alpha-thread proxy gates. The v0_1_11 addendum adds a focused S-rigidity compliance landscape: a fixed-physical-time scan mapping a bounded medium regime between rupture and persistent scalar residue under locked gates. This S-compliance landscape is not an alpha result, not a particle-identification result, and not a global physical validation of SFT. The v0_1_12 cross-backend package adds an independent FEniCSx/DOLFINx implementation layer. It supports the narrower claim that selected SFT-facing compatibility, collapse, topological, readout, and geometry gates can be represented reproducibly in both Firedrake/UFL and FEniCSx/DOLFINx under declared protocols. These FEM bridge outputs are more informative than synthetic CI checks because they are produced in external real-solver environments and exported as auditable JSON/CSV artifacts with SHA-256 manifests and machine-checkable PASS/FAIL gates. They are not presented as global physical validation of SFT, nor as derivations of the Standard Model, General Relativity, Born's rule, the electron/photon, the physical fine-structure constant, or matter programmability. They should be read as exploratory P-bridge outputs: real-solver bridge results that exercise the verification-first contract, while still requiring independent third-party REAL runs at multiple resolutions for physical confirmation. Evidence labels used in this repository: CI (C): CPU-only validation of tooling, schemas, manifests, regression checks, and PASS/FAIL logic. REAL-ready (P-input): verifier and artifact contract are ready to ingest third-party real-solver outputs. Exploratory P-bridge: real-solver bridge outputs produced in an external solver environment, with hashes and machine-checkable reports, but not yet independently replicated. Cross-backend exploratory bridge: selected audit targets represented across Firedrake/UFL and FEniCSx/DOLFINx, strengthening implementation transparency without constituting physical confirmation. REAL-verified (P): reserved for independent third-party real-solver runs with artifacts, hashes, locked gates, and at least two resolutions.
In this work we present two contributions: physical hypothesis (SFT) and a verification protocol designed to test it, which by its generic nature can be reused to evaluate any similar field theory. The protocol is built around a structured sequence of artifacts—SCAN, REGION, and REPORT—together with pre-registered gates, schema-validated outputs, and deterministic verification tools. Its purpose is to provide a clear, transparent, and falsifiable framework that allows independent reviewers to assess specific claims without ambiguity. Beyond its role as a verification mechanism, the protocol also functions as a practical research compass. Each module produces explicit PASS or FAIL outcomes tied to well-defined metrics and thresholds. A FAIL is not merely a negative result: it identifies the precise gate, metric, and artifact where the breakdown occurs, offering immediate diagnostic information. This structure enables rapid iteration, guiding model refinement and helping researchers navigate complex hypothesis spaces efficiently. We believe this work aligns well with methodological rigor, openness, and reproducibility. We hope it will be of value to researchers working on computational physics, speculative frameworks, and verification-driven scientific practice. SFT — Structural Field Theory (Docs + Runners) This repository is a verification-first release of SFT: a theory/framework plus a set of runners designed for external audit. Start here: read Doc 0 — Abstract & Orientation for the ontological stance, scope, current limitations, and falsifiable predictions. The key idea is simple: The “vacuum” is treated as a structural medium/field. “Particles” are stable field configurations (discrete in manifestation, continuous in availability). The project is organized so third parties can verify pipelines via PASS/FAIL gates, hash manifests, and schema-validated artifacts. Important: many included datasets are synthetic (C) because this release is built to be verified on CPU-only.Physical end-to-end confirmation requires REAL (P) solver outputs. CI only validates the verification pipeline (CPU-only), not physical validation. REAL-ready: verifiers + artifact contract are in place; can consume third-party real-solver outputs. REAL-verified: a real-solver run has been published with artifacts + hashes and passes the declared gates. Repository structure Doc_01/ ... Doc_14/ The full documentation set (each doc in its own folder). *_CLEANED.zip and runner bundles When a document has an executable verification component, the corresponding zipped runner bundle is included. https://github.com/Xaquer69/sft-theory-and-runners
This update consolidates the formal, numerical, and publication-level corrections identified after Revision 3.0 of the FEINMAN 2 project and after direct execution of its reproducibility package. The underlying proposal remains a typed directed operator-graph calculus organized through the locked 4S-11S operator-space chain. The update does not introduce a new interaction or a confirmed deviation from standard quantum mechanics or quantum electrodynamics. Its main contribution is instead evidential and methodological: the complete package was checked by exact SHA-256 verification and rerun in the frozen environment (Python 3.13.5, NumPy 2.3.5, Linux x86_64/glibc 2.41), producing STATE=DONE and TESTS=PASS. The run reproduces the Cl(0,8) eight-generator certificate, the 32x32 extended Pauli certificate, the standard-QED anomalous-frequency checksum, the TERRA/ZERRA finite-grid count, and the frozen H2/H3+ finite-basis molecular outputs. The update corrects the benchmark-contract hash to c006873e...db777, distinguishes a recovery checksum from an independent one-loop integration, replaces the ambiguous bridge limit B->I by an explicitly declared identification or isometry between Hilbert spaces, and separates verified implementation claims from open physical claims. It also records incomplete executable coverage for graph-schema rejection tests, numerical no-signalling regression, and the TERRA/ZERRA norm-residual certificate. FEYNMAN-2 is therefore supported as a reproducible formal and computational research platform, while promotion to a physical theory still requires a nonidentity operator assignment frozen before a sealed holdout and independently replicated.
Este depósito contiene el protocolo experimental completo, pre-registrado y auditable, diseñado para evaluar de forma falsable si la atención consciente enfocada (o la intención dirigida) produce desviaciones estadísticas medibles en sistemas cuánticos, más allá del azar y de los artefactos conocidos. El diseño incluye dos protocolos complementarios: Protocolo A: Generador Cuántico de Números Aleatorios (QRNG) basado en división de haz de fotones individuales. Protocolo B: Interferometría de fotón único (Mach-Zehnder / doble rendija) con medición de visibilidad de franjas. Características metodológicas principales: Pre-registro formal del plan de análisis estadístico y bayesiano antes de la captura de datos. Adquisición de datos con escritura inmutable (HDF5 + cadena HMAC-SHA256 / Merkle tree). Cegamiento criptográfico de las etiquetas de condición. Motor de veto ambiental en tiempo real (temperatura, campos electromagnéticos, vibración) con umbrales predefinidos. Análisis primario: tests frecuentistas (Mann-Whitney, t-test) con corrección FDR/Bonferroni y umbral α = 10⁻⁶; co-primario: Factor de Bayes BF₁₀ (Beta-Binomial). Tamaño muestral calculado para detectar efectos del orden d ≈ 0.001 con potencia ≥ 0.95. Regla de parada estricta y ausencia de análisis intermedios. Controles explícitos: atención enfocada, atención pasiva y control máquina (sala vacía). Replicación independiente como condición sine qua non de aceptación de resultados positivos. El paquete incluye: Documento maestro del protocolo experimental (diseño, hipótesis, métricas, potencia, ética y cronograma). Código fuente del pipeline unificado de adquisición y análisis (v2.0.0). Protocolo de calibración del QRNG (ICQ-CAL-001) en cinco fases. Acta de inicio de la Fase 1 de estabilización térmica y electromagnética. Especificaciones de software, umbrales de exclusión y esquema de datos. Este registro no afirma la existencia del efecto. Su único objetivo es convertir una hipótesis audaz en un experimento rigurosamente falsable, reproducible y auditable por terceros independientes. Identificador de sistema: QCAL-SYMBIO-BRIDGE v2.0.0 Frecuencia de referencia operativa: f₀ = 141.7001 Hz Fecha de depósito: 2026-08-22
Specular Series — Overview of Prior VersionsWorking Paper Collection Valentina MoroniORCID: 0009-0009-5931-1106Independent ResearcherLondon, United Kingdom2026 Overview The Specular Series collects the earlier conceptual and exploratory works produced during the initial development of the Specular Field Theory (SFT). These documents represent prior versions and preliminary formulations of ideas that have since evolved into more refined structures and updated interpretations. This page provides an overview of prior versions, preserving the developmental trajectory of the framework and maintaining traceability across its successive iterations. The works listed here do not represent the current formulation of the theory; they are retained solely to document the progression of concepts, terminology, and structural approaches explored during the early stages of research. It does not represent the current state of the theory. The concepts presented here were drafted during the initial try-error phase of the work, before the framework was refined, reorganized, and superseded by more recent documents. These early attempts are preserved intentionally to maintain developmental continuity and to document how the theory evolved through iteration, correction, and conceptual restructuring.
Addendum VIII (Version 2) is an extension of the core publication The Berg Theory: A scalar–tensor energy web as a common foundation of space–time, gravitation, quantum phenomena, and entropy (core article collection DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17937466). It records an audit-ready, fit-ready coherence module for two-path interference, measurement, decoherence, and entanglement, and adds a laboratory-facing interface to quantum-processor diagnostics. The operational backbone is intentionally mainstream-compatible: two-path interference is tracked through measured fringe visibility as the primary coherence proxy, and visibility loss is linked to the physical creation of which-way records via the standard environment-overlap mechanism. The Berg-specific contribution is isolated as a comparative hypothesis: a background-response factor (denoted Xi_Psi in the manuscript) that may rescale the effective decoherence response under carefully defined regime comparisons. Some regime changes are used only to calibrate and verify laboratory couplings (dial checks), while Xi_Psi is tested only under regime changes explicitly designed to keep the laboratory coupling unchanged within declared tolerances. The addendum is designed so that the default outcome is a bound: if no reproducible residual survives controls, the correct report is consistency with the null case in the tested regime. Version 2 strengthens falsifiability and reviewer-robustness by adding: a strict separation between “dimensionless decoherence exponents” and “decoherence rates” to avoid notational ambiguity, an explicit complementarity sanity check as a pipeline diagnostic, an operational regime definition (reference / modified / placebo) with logging requirements, plus blinded analysis and placebo discipline to protect against hidden drift and p-hacking (with the chosen Xi_Psi parametrization pre-declared before unblinding), fit-ready experimental routes for (A) residual coherence in two-path interferometers and (B) entanglement-lifetime curves based on CHSH-type tests, including practical detectability budgets, a quantum-processor section that turns coherence-language into laboratory diagnostics (correlated noise, memory effects, noise spectroscopy) with explicit null hypotheses and significance discipline, and tests a Berg-specific delta: whether any residual structure shows regime dependence under the same placebo/blinding audit rules used for interferometers. Two compact appendices provide independent numerical scale anchors: a double-slit fringe-spacing benchmark (including an electron-scale reference) and a tunneling benchmark included solely as a verified exponential-law boundary-value sanity check complementary to coherence-loss diagnostics.
This upload contains the Version 44 standalone manuscript and supporting package for a JS–SH route-gated Schrodinger recovery equation. The manuscript presents a recursive principal 5:5 gate formulation in which local Schrodinger differential consistency, global path-integral route consistency, and JS–SH equality-throat closure first form candidate route intersections, and then a recursive overlap-core selector Γ* identifies the principal maximal-overlap readout gate. The paper is written as a complete standalone manuscript, not as an internal update log. It develops the reverse double-slit recovery program, the real two-channel JS–SH phase lift, the differential-integral slot-intersection principle, the recursive gate projector, and the staged experimental roadmap from macroscopic resonance analogues to optical, single-photon, or electron reverse-recovery tests. This version includes the cumulative CODE 8100-541 result ledger. Under the declared source-layout/topology-assisted actual PDF-ledger boundary, the recursive principal 5:5 gate recovers 39/39 Chladni frequency classes and rejects 16/16 tested non-ledger frequency candidates. The Chladni pattern contact-sheet figure and supporting frequency-readout materials are retained as visible evidence. The result is not claimed as a new blind laboratory validation and not claimed as a completed quantum-particle recovery experiment. The manuscript also includes a particle-scale sealed comparison, folded shell-depth standing-wave interpretation, Cartesian-radius compression versus JS–SH reciprocal mirror-depth branch split, and a bounded QCD outlook in which QD7 and QD8 are described only as latent or locked quark-depth mode candidates, not as observed new Standard-Model quarks. The claim boundary remains explicit: this work does not replace standard Schrodinger dynamics, Feynman path integration, QED, QCD, QFT, nuclear theory, or localized detector-event physics. It proposes a falsifiable upstream route-gate and recovery framework that can be tested through controlled Chladni, optical, single-photon, and electron double-slit recovery experiments. Files included in this upload are the V44 manuscript PDF, the V44 LaTeX source, cumulative audit and supporting ledger files, Chladni contact-sheet material, source-attribution notes, build report, manifest, and checksum file. ======================== UPDATE JS_SH_STANDALONE_SCHRODINGER_FEYNMAN_PATH_ANALYSIS_V17_ZENODO_READY_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_STANDALONE_SCHRODINGER_FEYNMAN_PATH_ANALYSIS_V18_WAVE_PARTICLE_READOUT_ZENODO_READY_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_ROUTE_GATED_SCHRODINGER_RECOVERY_EQUATION_V21_FINAL_DOI_20950855_LAYOUT_REPAIRED_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_ROUTE_GATED_SCHRODINGER_RECOVERY_EQUATION_V23_FINAL_INTEGRATED_20260701_R1_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_ROUTE_GATED_SCHRODINGER_RECOVERY_EQUATION_V24_AB_RESIDUAL_CHANNEL_NECESSITY_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_ROUTE_GATED_SCHRODINGER_RECOVERY_EQUATION_V37_ZENODO_DOI_21199407_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_ROUTE_GATED_SCHRODINGER_RECOVERY_EQUATION_V44_DOI_21202622_MANUSCRIPT JS_SH_ROUTE_GATED_SCHRODINGER_RECOVERY_EQUATION_V46_DOI_20849560_MANUSCRIPT