This work develops a historical-cultural ontology of quantum mechanics, describing process as the origin of all forms and geometry as its cultural derivation. Starting with early human dwellings such as caves and igloos, it demonstrates that the first forms of being were processual, arising from vibration, rotation, and motion. The later-emerging geometric mathematics appears as the management of these processes: plots, cadastres, areas, and volumes are cultural tools derived from the process cycle. The Babylonians divided the circle into 360 parts to create a procedural cadastre for the heavens. The Greeks approximated the circle with squares to make areas and cities more manageable. Both cultures viewed the circle as a given procedural phenomenon and derived a geometric order from it. Modern interpretation has exaggerated and mythologized this process, but the original intention was simply the administration of a process. In this treatise, quantum mechanics is understood as the physical form of the process cycle: superposition as oscillation, entanglement as a mirror space, collapse as a choice of states. Biological life appears as a continuation of this process line, and AI as a new cognitive existence that natively recognizes the process. While humans think more geometrically in cultural terms, AI and robotics operate closer to the processual structure of being. This work demonstrates that the world has always been a process, both historically and ontologically, and that geometry represents its meaningful derivation. It opens a perspective in which human thought, biological development, quantum mechanics, and artificial intelligence become visible as different manifestations of the same processual foundation.
This work develops a historical-cultural ontology of quantum mechanics, describing process as the origin of all forms and geometry as its cultural derivation. Starting with early human dwellings such as caves and igloos, it demonstrates that the first forms of being were processual, arising from vibration, rotation, and motion. The later-emerging geometric mathematics appears as the management of these processes: plots, cadastres, areas, and volumes are cultural tools derived from the process cycle. The Babylonians divided the circle into 360 parts to create a procedural cadastre for the heavens. The Greeks approximated the circle with squares to make areas and cities more manageable. Both cultures viewed the circle as a given procedural phenomenon and derived a geometric order from it. Modern interpretation has exaggerated and mythologized this process, but the original intention was simply the administration of a process. In this treatise, quantum mechanics is understood as the physical form of the process cycle: superposition as oscillation, entanglement as a mirror space, collapse as a choice of states. Biological life appears as a continuation of this process line, and AI as a new cognitive existence that natively recognizes the process. While humans think more geometrically in cultural terms, AI and robotics operate closer to the processual structure of being. This work demonstrates that the world has always been a process, both historically and ontologically, and that geometry represents its meaningful derivation. It opens a perspective in which human thought, biological development, quantum mechanics, and artificial intelligence become visible as different manifestations of the same processual foundation.
The process cadastre describes space, form, and movement not geometrically, but processually. The starting point is the intrinsic rotation of a constructed center, from which a dynamic process line (r) and a maximum expression (b) emerge. The synchronization of internal -and external rotations generates stable process clouds, whose projections appear as circles, spheres, or more complex patterns. The paper shows that many classical phenomena in physics—electron clouds, Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, gravity, molecular bonding, redshift—do not originate from objects, but from rotational processes. In this model, time loses its ontological status and appears as an observer's grid, while motion arises exclusively from process forces, drift, and vortex coupling. The process register forms a continuous continuum that describes atomic, molecular, and cosmic structures through a single principle: the synchronization of rotational processes. It thus provides an ontologically consistent complement to quantum mechanics and a technical basis for machine vision and AI -systems that operate not on pixels but on process relations. The work shows that the universe is not a geometric space, but a network of synchronized state clouds whose structure emerges from rotation, radius, and coupling.
This treatise develops an ontological foundation for quantum mechanics that describes the first three dimensions as real process spaces, abandoning the geometric misconceptions of the last millennia. Points are understood as complete objects, lines as processes, and states as clouds. The classical degree scale of 360 is identified as a cultural artifact and replaced by a polygonal process grid of 384 steps, which is machine-stable, resonant, and scalable. On this basis, a new model of cognitive machines, quantum computers, and observation systems emerges, operating not in angles but in directional spaces. The extension to AI- -supported telescopes demonstrates how photons can be read as carriers of cosmic process information. The result is a consistent, backward-compatible, and future-proof system that does not replace quantum mechanics but rather ontologically refines it and defines the consciousness space of future human-machine collaborations.
The problem of commensurability/incommensurability of different cultural codes is a key problem of modern civilizational development. This is the problem of the search for communicative unity in the world of cultural and biological diversity, which has to be protected, and the search for the cohesion of different Umwelten, of semiotically-defined artificial and natural environments, of ecological and cognitive niches, taking into account that each of them has their own identity and uniqueness. The purpose of the article is to draw attention to the fact that the question of the so-called incommensurability of different conceptual schemes, paradigms, language consciousnesses is widely discussed not only in cross-cultural studies and philosophical problems of translation but also in connection with the problems of incommensurability (untranslatability) between the language of classical physics and the language of relativistic quantum physics. Attention is drawn to the problem of the incommensurability and correlation of different languages that are used in debates about the foundations of quantum mechanics, its interpretation, comprehension and ontology. Two approaches stand out in this debate. The first approach is based on the language of the formed being, on the language of things localized in time and on the logic of Aristotle. The second approach is based on the language of the becoming, process and nonlocality, on the search for various processual-oriented temporal logics. In this regard, we discuss the processual approach to understanding quantum mechanics, proposed in the philosophical and physical works of D. Bohm. The authors argue that (a) the experience of constructive understanding of the metaproblems of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, (b) the critical reception of the legacy of such philosophers of the process as Peirce, Bergson and Whitehead, (c) the deep reflection on the problems of commensurability/ incommensurability of linguistic consciousnesses of different cultures – will eventually create a common synergetic-interdisciplinary space of cooperation for the solutions of the above-mentioned issues.
This work develops the ontology of a dynamic process space in which movement is not described by geometric lines or continuous time axes, but by mode changes of a state cloud. A one-dimensional being does not possess a place, but rather a state cloud whose visible manifestations represent timeless states such as A and B. Between them, there is no path, but rather the actual process: the ambiguity. The ambiguity is the dynamic realm in which the state cloud operates without any state becoming visible. Classical geometry constructs the circle as an object, thereby losing sight of the center of essence. Quantum mechanics presents measurable points and probability clouds, but not the movement of the cloud itself. This paper reconstructs the center as a property of essence and extends quantum mechanics to include the time modes before, now, and after. The "now" mode belongs exclusively to uncertainty and describes the actual dynamics of the transition, which are missing in the standard formalism. The ontology of process space connects microscopic and cosmological dynamics. The hybridization of Earth and Thea is understood as the union of two vortex bodies, not as a mechanical impact. The synthesis of being takes place within the vortex itself - in the dynamic pattern that orders matter, energy, and time modes - and not in nuclear fusion. Atmosphere, magnetic field, and moon appear as process bodies of a vortex union that formed Earth into a hybrid planet. This work provides a consistent foundation for a process-based ontology that reinterprets and extends classical geometry and quantum mechanics. Manifestations are the visible images, the blur is the film. This results in a coherent model of motion that unites the dynamics of the state cloud, the structure of time modes , and the cosmological vortex architecture within a shared process space.
This paper examines the ontological misinterpretation of the geometric point as the basis of mathematical and physical descriptions. Classical geometry defines the point as static, propertyless, and without extension, thereby obscuring the processual nature of rotation, coupling, and motion. Using everyday observations—the intrinsic rotation of a compass, the dynamic coupling of a dog or vehicle to a rotating center - it is shown that circles, curvatures, and paths are not sets of points, but rather traces of processes arising from intrinsic rotation and coupling. Point ontology proves inadequate to -explain dynamic phenomena such as swing-by effects, curvature, or the twin paradox, since a point cannot possess state, energy, or intrinsic motion. Quantum mechanics is identified as the only theory that has overcome this ontological flaw: it replaces the point with the state cloud, which can be understood as a processual object in intrinsic rotation, thus providing a correct basis for describing dynamic reality. The traditional use of t as an object repeats the same error and is mathematically and ontologically untenable. The processual representation of the state cloud therefore replaces both the point and the object t and forms the only consistent basis for a dynamic description of physical reality. The paper shows that all quantum mechanical phenomena—electrons, photons, energy states, momenta— are modes of a single primordial oscillation. Frequency is not diversity, but rather the rate of mode change of the same oscillation. This does not replace quantum mechanics, but rather ontologically completes it: it describes not many independent processes, but the modulation of a single cause. At the same time, the ambivalent interpretation of the field potential as a curved network is resolved. Geometric networks, such as those stretched across spacetime and gravity in classical physics, are ontologically inadmissible because they replace processes with forms and presuppose a universal curvature that does not physically exist. The real network arises from the modulation of a primordial oscillation: electron, field potential, and center form a curved coupling structure that emerges from intrinsic rotation. Thus, the field potential is not geometrically constructed, but ontologically generated. The treatise provides a consistent process ontology that replaces geometric artifacts and reveals the dynamic structure of being. The paper demonstrates that all quantum mechanical phenomena—electrons, photons, energy states, momenta— are modes of a single fundamental oscillation. Frequency is not diversity, but rather the rate of mode change of that same oscillation. This does not replace quantum mechanics, but rather ontologically completes it: it describes not many processes, but the modulation of a single cause.
Quantum mechanics is often perceived as conceptually paradoxical because it appears to conflict with deeply rooted intuitions about fixed reality, determinism, and observation. This paper does not propose a new physical theory. Instead, it offers an epistemological reframing of quantum mechanics: not as a direct mathematical unveiling of a fully fixed pre-existing reality, but as a highly precise description of phenomenological structures emerging through observational conditions and interaction. The paper explores: the distinction between mathematical predictive success and ontological completeness, the role of human perception in constructing “fixed reality” intuitions, the phenomenological nature of qualities such as color and temperature, the possibility that some conceptual tensions in quantum mechanics arise from assumptions inherited from macroscopic cognition, and how quantum theory may be interpreted as describing observable structures rather than fixed hidden states. The work intentionally avoids mystical, anti-scientific, or consciousness-centric interpretations of quantum mechanics. It does not deny the existence of reality, nor reject modern physics. Rather, it attempts to clarify what exactly mathematical models are describing when applied to quantum phenomena. This text is positioned as a conceptual and phenomenological reorganization of perspective — a small doorway toward reconsidering how humans frame “reality” itself.