This paper develops a theoretical framework in which existential experience emerges continuously from global quantum dynamics through the mediation of local observation. Within this framework, existentialism is reinterpreted as an effective experiential theory describing global determinism under conditions of local observation, rather than as an independent theoretical framework in competition with determinism. Consequently, once a continuous theoretical connection between determinism and existentialism has been established, the existence of free will is no longer a necessary precondition for evaluating their relationship. Free will remains open as an independent metaphysical problem, but its theoretical status is reconfigured from a foundational explanatory prerequisite to an independent object of philosophical inquiry.
This paper develops a theoretical framework in which existential experience emerges continuously from global quantum dynamics through the mediation of local observation. Within this framework, existentialism is reinterpreted as an effective experiential theory describing global determinism under conditions of local observation, rather than as an independent theoretical framework in competition with determinism. Consequently, once a continuous theoretical connection between determinism and existentialism has been established, the existence of free will is no longer a necessary precondition for evaluating their relationship. Free will remains open as an independent metaphysical problem, but its theoretical status is reconfigured from a foundational explanatory prerequisite to an independent object of philosophical inquiry.
This paper develops an extension of Existential Realism, a philosophical framework that distinguishes existence (what concretely is in the present moment) from reality (the broader causal–structural domain that includes past events, causal relations, informational traces, and structured future possibilities that are real but not presently existent). We synthesize core ideas from the original Existential Realism framework—ontological emergence, entanglement, temporal asymmetry, dimensional collapse, and the notion of a “dimensionless source”—and push them into new conceptual terrain. Time is placed at the heart of ontology: the present moment is the locus of existence, continually generating new actuality from prior reality. Past and future are real (with causal efficacy and structure) yet lack present existence. We explore how this two-tiered temporal ontology can accommodate key features of modern physics and metaphysics. In particular, we argue that ontological emergence at each moment provides a genuine arrow of time and a solution to the puzzle of how determinate events arise from an indeterminate backdrop. Quantum entanglement and nonlocal correlations, far from undermining a temporally oriented realism, instead hint at a deeper layer of unity “beneath” spacetime—a layer we articulate as a dimensionless source of reality. The dimensionless source is defined as a non-spatiotemporal relational structure encoding the informational constraints under which spatiotemporal events emerge through sequential actualization. It contains the informational constraints and lawful relations governing the generation of successive present states of the universe. We propose that spacetime and its separations emerge from this atemporal, aspatial ground, such that phenomena like entanglement and wavefunction collapse reveal the traces of a more fundamental order where spatial distance and temporal succession are secondary. Throughout, we connect these ideas to contemporary debates in quantum foundations (e.g. the measurement problem and objective collapse theories), philosophy of time (presentism, eternalism, and the reality of becoming), and speculative metaphysics (structural realism and process ontology). The result is a comprehensive, present-centered realist ontology that aims to reconcile the lived reality of time’s flow with the insights of modern physics, suggesting new avenues for understanding causality, identity, and agency in a dynamic universe.
This work presents an ontological framework for quantum behavior, offering a unified reinterpretation of quantum phenomena at the foundational level. Within this framework, a set of self-consistent theoretical constraints is established, completing the consistency-condition conclusion that was missing in the previous derivation. All conclusions are stated in a manner open to independent testing. The framework provides a unified narrative account of a broad range of quantum phenomena and yields a number of predictions open to independent verification. Notably, several quantum phenomena that have long remained at the level of empirical assumptions receive a unified description of their origin within this framework. No claim is made to resolve all foundational problems of quantum theory; instead, the domain of validity of every conclusion is clearly delineated, awaiting independent scrutiny from data and experiment.
Modern physics has achieved extraordinary predictive success, yet it continues to face unresolved conceptual tensions concerning the role of the observer, the nature of information, and the origin of physical structure. From quantum measurement to cosmology, the assumption of an observer-neutral reality increasingly appears insufficient to fully account for empirical phenomena and theoretical inconsistencies. This manifesto proposes an Informational Observer-Centered Framework, in which information is treated as a fundamental ontological substrate and observation as an active, structured process rather than a passive act of measurement. Within this perspective, physical systems, observers, and informational exchanges form a unified dynamics, where state reduction, decoherence, and emergent classicality arise from informational interactions and constraints. Rather than introducing a new closed theory, this manifesto establishes a conceptual foundation unifying several complementary models—including Informational State Dynamics, observer-dependent informational compression, and informational interpretations of quantum and cosmological phenomena—into a coherent research program. The framework is explicitly non-dogmatic, open to falsification, and intended as a guiding structure for further theoretical development and empirical testing. The aim of this document is not to replace existing physical theories, but to clarify their conceptual boundaries and propose an integrative lens through which unresolved problems in quantum foundations, cosmology, and cognitive systems may be systematically explored.
Abstract This paper introduces the theoretical foundations of the Covering Theory, proposing that time is not an independent physical dimension but a quantitative measure of the continuity of existential behavior. According to this framework, all physical entities preserve their integrity through resonance-based covering structures. Time emerges as an observable parameter reflecting changes in the stability and evolution of these structures rather than existing as a fundamental substance. The theory further argues that the photon possesses an inherently wave-like nature, while particle-like observations arise from interactions with covering environments. This approach provides a unified conceptual framework linking matter, energy, space, and resonance into a single coherent model. The proposed interpretation offers alternative perspectives on quantum behavior, relativity, and the measurement problem while maintaining logical consistency with observable physical phenomena. The work is presented as a conceptual foundation intended for further mathematical development and experimental investigation.
This paper proposes a complete unified theoretical framework integrating Duality, Uncertainty, Relativity, and Psychological Expectation into a single mathematical, philosophical, and scientific structure of reality. The framework asserts that reality is not an absolute entity but an emergent relational construct arising from observer-dependent interpretations constrained by uncertainty and structured through dual oppositions, while being dynamically shaped by predictive cognitive models. By synthesizing physics (quantum mechanics, relativity), mathematics (incompleteness, probability), neuroscience (predictive processing), psychology (expectation-emotion dynamics), philosophy (existentialism, phenomenology, dialectics), and socio-political theory, this work constructs a comprehensive model of existence as a multi-layered interpretative lattice. The theory establishes that all experiential, physical, and conceptual phenomena emerge from the interaction of these four foundational pillars across multiple scales of reality.