Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Temporal Resolution of Quantum Uncertainty Combining Heisenberg and Einstein with the 1/t Paradigm.

Hakan ÜNAL

Published Jun 25, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20859674

Related papers

The Uncertainty of Time Heisenberg and Einstein's Synthesis of Quantum Relativity.

Hakan ÜNAL

•Jun 26, 2026•0 citations

On the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle as a Measurement-Resolution Effect: A Two-Stage Temporal Interpretation Compatible with Quantum Mechanics

Thierry Marechal

The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is typically interpreted as expressing an irreducible indeterminacy of nature. This paper does not challenge that interpretation as a theorem of quantum mechanics. Instead, it proposes that in many experimental contexts, the observed uncertainty budget is dominated by an additional contribution arising from finite temporal resolution — and that this contribution can be separated, modeled, and tested. We construct a two-stage temporal measurement framework in which quantum measurements are modeled as effective processes involving unresolved internal dynamics at timescales far below current detector resolution. The measured uncertainty decomposes into two components: intrinsic state variance (constrained by the Robertson-Schrödinger relation, unchanged) and resolution-dependent variance (arising from temporal coarse-graining of fast internal dynamics). In the ideal limit of infinite resolution, the resolution contribution vanishes and standard quantum uncertainty is recovered exactly. The framework preserves all of quantum mechanics: canonical commutation relations, operator algebra, Born rule, state evolution, and Bell-type correlations are entirely unchanged. This is not a hidden-variable theory, not a modification of quantum mechanics, and not an attempt to evade Bell's theorem. It is a measurement-theoretic interpretation providing a mechanistic picture of how uncertainty emerges at the interface between physical dynamics and finite-bandwidth detection. A weak but testable prediction emerges: measured uncertainty variances should show systematic dependence on the effective temporal resolution of the measurement apparatus. Candidate experimental systems include ultrafast homodyne detection with variable bandwidth, atomic interferometry with controlled gating, time-tagged single-photon detection with variable coincidence windows, and optical atomic clocks with adjustable interrogation times. An appendix connects the framework to the fractal-temporal Lagrangian, where the characteristic internal timescale τ* is identified with the vibrational electron period T_e ≈ 5.7 × 10⁻²¹ s (derived from the Lagrangian, not fitted), and log-periodic structure in the resolution dependence is predicted with period ln√2.

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations

Quantum limits of a space-time reference frame

Davide Mattei, Esteban Castro-Ruiz

We study the limitations for defining spatial and temporal intervals when the only available reference frame is a single composite quantum system, whose internal degrees of freedom serve as a temporal reference, a clock, and whose center of mass degrees of freedom act as a spatial reference, a rod. By combining quantum speed limits with the mass energy equivalence of special relativity, we show that spatial localizability and temporal resolution are not independent: sharpening one inevitably blurs the other. Specifically, the internal energy coherence needed for precise timekeeping affects the center of mass dynamics, enhancing position spreading during free evolution. As a result, a single composite system cannot act as a perfect quantum reference frame for both space and time, leading to a Heisenberg like uncertainty relation between spatial and temporal intervals. After analyzing this trade off from an external perspective, we formulate it in a purely relational manner, by means of covariant observables relative to the space time quantum reference frame, uncovering an additional intrinsic uncertainty of order the Compton wavelength of the frame.

quant-pharXiv:2512.11407•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

The Extended Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (EHUP): A Unified Theory of Temporal Resolution

Stephen Van Meter

•Dec 20, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Uncertainty Dynamics

Md. Manirul Ali

arXiv:2206.14620•Foundations of Physics•Feb 1, 2023•0 citations

Heisenberg, Uncertainty and the Quantum Revolution

David C. Cassidy

Scientific American•May 1, 1992•17 citations
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle is typically interpreted as expressing an irreducible indeterminacy of nature. This paper does not challenge that interpretation as a theorem of quantum mechanics. Instead, it proposes that in many experimental contexts, the observed uncertainty budget is dominated by an additional contribution arising from finite temporal resolution — and that this contribution can be separated, modeled, and tested. We construct a two-stage temporal measurement framework in which quantum measurements are modeled as effective processes involving unresolved internal dynamics at timescales far below current detector resolution. The measured uncertainty decomposes into two components: intrinsic state variance (constrained by the Robertson-Schrödinger relation, unchanged) and resolution-dependent variance (arising from temporal coarse-graining of fast internal dynamics). In the ideal limit of infinite resolution, the resolution contribution vanishes and standard quantum uncertainty is recovered exactly. The framework preserves all of quantum mechanics: canonical commutation relations, operator algebra, Born rule, state evolution, and Bell-type correlations are entirely unchanged. This is not a hidden-variable theory, not a modification of quantum mechanics, and not an attempt to evade Bell's theorem. It is a measurement-theoretic interpretation providing a mechanistic picture of how uncertainty emerges at the interface between physical dynamics and finite-bandwidth detection. A weak but testable prediction emerges: measured uncertainty variances should show systematic dependence on the effective temporal resolution of the measurement apparatus. Candidate experimental systems include ultrafast homodyne detection with variable bandwidth, atomic interferometry with controlled gating, time-tagged single-photon detection with variable coincidence windows, and optical atomic clocks with adjustable interrogation times. An appendix connects the framework to the fractal-temporal Lagrangian, where the characteristic internal timescale τ* is identified with the vibrational electron period T_e ≈ 5.7 × 10⁻²¹ s (derived from the Lagrangian, not fitted), and log-periodic structure in the resolution dependence is predicted with period ln√2.
We study the limitations for defining spatial and temporal intervals when the only available reference frame is a single composite quantum system, whose internal degrees of freedom serve as a temporal reference, a clock, and whose center of mass degrees of freedom act as a spatial reference, a rod. By combining quantum speed limits with the mass energy equivalence of special relativity, we show that spatial localizability and temporal resolution are not independent: sharpening one inevitably blurs the other. Specifically, the internal energy coherence needed for precise timekeeping affects the center of mass dynamics, enhancing position spreading during free evolution. As a result, a single composite system cannot act as a perfect quantum reference frame for both space and time, leading to a Heisenberg like uncertainty relation between spatial and temporal intervals. After analyzing this trade off from an external perspective, we formulate it in a purely relational manner, by means of covariant observables relative to the space time quantum reference frame, uncovering an additional intrinsic uncertainty of order the Compton wavelength of the frame.