Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Can Quantum Mechanics Work Without Imaginary Numbers? A Critical Examination of the Role of Complex Numbers in the Quantum Description of Nature

Ijaz Durrani

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.13140/rg.2.2.33056.96004

Related papers

Ruling out real-number description of quantum mechanics

Ming-Cheng Chen, Can Wang, Fengming Liu +13 more

Standard quantum mechanics has been formulated with complex-valued Schrodinger equations, wave functions, operators, and Hilbert spaces. However, previous work has shown possible to simulate quantum systems using only real numbers by adding extra qubits and exploiting an enlarged Hilbert space. A fundamental question arises: are the complex numbers really necessary for the quantum mechanical description of nature? To answer this question, a non-local game has been developed to reveal a contradiction between a multiqubit quantum experiment and a player using only real numbers. Here, based on deterministic and high-fidelity entanglement swapping with superconducting qubits, we experimentally implement the Bell-like game and observe a quantum score of 8.09(1), which beats the real number bound of 7.66 by 43 standard deviations. Our results disprove the real-number description of nature and establish the indispensable role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics.

•Mar 15, 2021•3 citations

Complex numbers, quantum mechanics and reality

International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Why Quantum Mechanics Requires Complex Numbers as Props to Build Its Foundation On

Durrani, Ijaz

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum physics needs complex numbers

Marc-Olivier Renou, David Trillo, Mirjam Weilenmann +5 more

Complex numbers, i.e., numbers with a and an imaginary part, are essential for mathematical analysis, while their role in other subjects, such as electromagnetism or special relativity, is far less fundamental. Quantum is the only physical theory where these numbers seem to play an indispensible role, as the theory is explicitly formulated in terms of operators acting on complex Hilbert spaces. The occurrence of complex numbers within the quantum formalism has nonetheless puzzled countless physicists, including the fathers of the theory, for whom a version of quantum physics, where states and observables are represented by operators, seemed much more natural. In fact, previous works showed that such real quantum physics can reproduce the outcomes of any multipartite experiment, as long as the parts share arbitrary quantum states. Thus, are complex numbers really needed for a quantum description of nature? Here, we show this to be case by proving that and complex quantum make different predictions in network scenarios comprising independent quantum state sources. This allows us to devise a Bell-type quantum experiment whose input-output correlations cannot be approximated by any quantum model. The successful realization of such an experiment would disprove quantum physics, in the same way as standard Bell experiments disproved local physics.

•Jan 26, 2021•19 citations

The mystery of square root of minus one in quantum mechanics, and its demystification

C.P. Kwong

To most physicists, quantum mechanics must embrace the imaginary number i = square root of minus one is at least a common belief if not a mystery. We use the famous example pq -qp = h/(2 pi i) to demonstrate the possible elimination of i when constructing this noncommutative relationship. We then discuss the role of i in the formulation of Schroedinger's wave equation. Common to the original development of these two quantum theories was the use of complex exponential to represent the fundamental variables (i.e., p, q, and the wave function). Understanding this complex function from the right perspective, as we suggest in this essay, removes the mysteries surrounding the complex nature of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:0912.3996•Dec 20, 2009•1 citation

Quantum Theory and the Category of Complex Numbers

Simon Davis

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 1, 2006•5 citations
Standard quantum mechanics has been formulated with complex-valued Schrodinger equations, wave functions, operators, and Hilbert spaces. However, previous work has shown possible to simulate quantum systems using only real numbers by adding extra qubits and exploiting an enlarged Hilbert space. A fundamental question arises: are the complex numbers really necessary for the quantum mechanical description of nature? To answer this question, a non-local game has been developed to reveal a contradiction between a multiqubit quantum experiment and a player using only real numbers. Here, based on deterministic and high-fidelity entanglement swapping with superconducting qubits, we experimentally implement the Bell-like game and observe a quantum score of 8.09(1), which beats the real number bound of 7.66 by 43 standard deviations. Our results disprove the real-number description of nature and establish the indispensable role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics.
Complex numbers, i.e., numbers with a and an imaginary part, are essential for mathematical analysis, while their role in other subjects, such as electromagnetism or special relativity, is far less fundamental. Quantum is the only physical theory where these numbers seem to play an indispensible role, as the theory is explicitly formulated in terms of operators acting on complex Hilbert spaces. The occurrence of complex numbers within the quantum formalism has nonetheless puzzled countless physicists, including the fathers of the theory, for whom a version of quantum physics, where states and observables are represented by operators, seemed much more natural. In fact, previous works showed that such real quantum physics can reproduce the outcomes of any multipartite experiment, as long as the parts share arbitrary quantum states. Thus, are complex numbers really needed for a quantum description of nature? Here, we show this to be case by proving that and complex quantum make different predictions in network scenarios comprising independent quantum state sources. This allows us to devise a Bell-type quantum experiment whose input-output correlations cannot be approximated by any quantum model. The successful realization of such an experiment would disprove quantum physics, in the same way as standard Bell experiments disproved local physics.
To most physicists, quantum mechanics must embrace the imaginary number i = square root of minus one is at least a common belief if not a mystery. We use the famous example pq -qp = h/(2 pi i) to demonstrate the possible elimination of i when constructing this noncommutative relationship. We then discuss the role of i in the formulation of Schroedinger's wave equation. Common to the original development of these two quantum theories was the use of complex exponential to represent the fundamental variables (i.e., p, q, and the wave function). Understanding this complex function from the right perspective, as we suggest in this essay, removes the mysteries surrounding the complex nature of quantum mechanics.