Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Localization Measures Across Domains: Towards Quantitative Structural Comparisons in Relational Field Theory

Clinton Svancara

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The previous paper introduced the concept of structural localization across different state spaces. This paper takes the next step by proposing candidate localization measures for position/momentum space, energy space, phase space, and network/coherence space. These measures are offered as concrete tools for comparing how persistent structure occupies available states across domains. The goal is to move from qualitative analogy toward semi-quantitative structural comparisons within Relational Field Theory.

DOI
10.17605/osf.io/eyzvn

Related papers

Structural Localization Across Domains: A Relational Field Theory Perspective

Clinton Svancara

Many physical phenomena traditionally treated in separate domains can be interpreted as transitions in the localization or delocalization of persistent structure. This paper explores a unifying structural lens: the shift from highly constrained, localized organization to distributed access across available states. Examples include wave-particle duality in position-momentum space and Fermi edge broadening in energy space. This perspective aligns with Relational Field Theory’s emphasis on persistence, regime boundaries, and stabilization versus dissipation. It is offered as an interpretive framework, not a replacement for established theories.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Regime-Dependent Structural Persistence in Relational Field Theory: Implications for Quantum Definiteness and Outcome Selection

Clinton Svancara

This project presents a clarification of earlier Relational Field Theory (RFT) work on quantum tunneling, measurement, and relational quantum gravity through the lens of recent regime-dependent coherence results. The paper argues that structure-sensitive coherence should not be interpreted as a globally active mechanism. Instead, it becomes dynamically relevant only under conditions of strong local closure, recoverability, and persistent boundary-constrained organization. The note introduces: • regime-dependent activation of structural coherence, • a closure functional for relational domains, • recoverability as a condition for persistent organization, • linearized perturbation decay inside deep-well regimes, • and stable macroscopic records as outcome-defining degrees of freedom. This framing connects recent turbulence-based computational evidence to quantum-foundations questions without claiming a universal solution to the measurement problem. It positions earlier RFT quantum papers as architectural sketches now constrained by local validity, regime dependence, and computational results.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Relational Field Theory: A Unified Framework for Coherence in Quantum Systems, Mathematical Proofs, and String Theory

Clint Svancara

•Jan 1, 2025•1 citation

RFT as a Cross-Domain Organizing Principle: Analogies to Thermodynamics and Information Theory

Clinton Svancara

This note clarifies the conceptual role of Relational Field Theory (RFT) and positions it as a cross-domain organizing principle rather than a domain-specific model or a replacement for existing physical theories. RFT introduces a minimal structure: a coherence field R_cgoverned by a persistence law, and an adaptive domain closure that makes memory state-dependent. From this minimal structure, the framework reproduces recurring dynamical signatures across multiple regimes, including: spontaneous threshold crossing, critical slowing, hysteresis, coherence wells, and persistent structured correlations under noise. The purpose of this paper is to show that RFT functions in a role analogous to thermodynamics or information theory: it does not replace the underlying dynamical laws of a system, it constrains the conditions under which coherence and temporal order can emerge within those dynamics, and it remains substrate-independent, with different domains corresponding to different projections of the same underlying structure. To illustrate this organizing role, the paper includes a numerical demonstration of coherence revival in a strongly driven open quantum system using the RFT adaptive kernel. This simulation is not presented as proof of the effect, but as a minimal demonstration that the framework generates the predicted qualitative behavior. A reproducible Python implementation is included in the appendix. This framing helps distinguish RFT from a constructed metric or simulation-specific method. Instead, it supports the interpretation of RFT as a structural constraint on persistence-driven coherence across classical, quantum, and complex systems.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Meaning-Based Theory (MBT) Quantum Reconstruction of the Unresolved Problemsin Space 2_3_and 4

Fumiyoshi Tamura

Meaning-Based Theory (MBT) — Quantum Reconstruction of the Unresolved Problems in Space 2, 3, and 4 This paper revisits and reconstructs several unresolved problems remaining in the Space 2, Space 3, and Space 4 developments of Meaning-Based Theory (MBT) from an explicitly quantum-generative perspective. The central principle of this reconstruction is that, when multiple not-yet-established generative possibilities remain compatible with the present MBT structure, they must not be prematurely reduced to a single classical state. The quantum perspective adopted here therefore does not begin by importing the conventional postulates of quantum mechanics. No wave function, probability amplitude, Born rule, or measurement-induced collapse is assumed. Instead, quantum generation is treated as a more fundamental condition in which multiple unresolved generative sequences are retained until MBT's own establishment conditions restrict or distinguish them. Starting from irreversible temporal distinction, the paper examines how temporal differences require positional distinction when the identity of established states is to be preserved. It then reinterprets the three-position mutual Relation structure, Σ, as the maximal established non-Closure structure from which the addition of one new position can lead toward a four-position Closure candidate. From this basis, the paper integrates several previously unresolved issues: the relation between internal change, shared structures, and continuation of Closure generation; the minimal preservation conditions for generative identity; the initiation of Comparison when a new position is established; the continuation of previously established Closures into later present states; and the meaning of generative order length, G. These results are then reorganized into a quantum-generative sequence. For a present state S_n, the theory does not initially assume a unique successor. Instead, it considers a set of not-yet-established generative possibilities, U(S_n) = {X_1, X_2, ..., X_m}, and progressively restricts this set through irreversible temporal consistency, preservation of generative history, positional distinction, Comparison, pairwise Relations, three-position mutual Relations, four-position consistency, and formation of the four-position Relation structure Ω₄. A further quantum-generative layer appears within Ω₄ itself. Even after a four-position structure has been formed, multiple local Relation-action sequences may remain possible. Their noncommutative composition produces four-point Relation interference, represented by cycle-dependent actions Q(Γ). Consequently, neither a candidate position nor a particular local-action sequence is selected in advance. Finite Closure is then treated as the structural condition that restricts these unresolved action sequences toward completed I₄ Closure. To avoid circularity, the general quantum-generative formulation does not take the already known numerical relations Q³ = −I and Q⁶ = I as prior selection assumptions. Instead, finite Closure is imposed at the structural level, while those numerical relations are to be recovered as consequences once the local actions themselves have been derived internally. The resulting framework leads to an MBT quantum-generative next-present-state establishment rule: a future state is not assumed to exist beforehand and then selected. Rather, multiple not-yet-established generative sequences are progressively constrained by the structures already established in MBT, and a next present state emerges only when the required sequence of Comparison, Relation formation, Ω₄ interference, and finite Closure is completed. If more than one candidate continues to satisfy all currently established conditions, MBT does not introduce an additional probabilistic or classical selection rule. Those candidates remain unresolved until subsequent generation provides a structural distinction. This reconstruction also clarifies the relation between quantum generation and the emergence of space. Space is not treated as a pre-existing background in which quantum processes occur. Instead, the generative hierarchy proceeds through irreversible temporal establishment → multiple generative possibilities → positional distinction → Comparison → Relations → three-position mutual Relation Σ → four-position structure → Ω₄ → four-point Relation interference → finite I₄ Closure → completed local space. Thus, quantum generation and spatial generation become parts of a single MBT generative hierarchy. The paper finally identifies the principal unresolved bridge that remains: the derivation of concrete present Relation structures and local actions from differences in the underlying T-state. Establishing this bridge would make it possible to submit individual quantum-generative candidates to explicit Ω₄ interference and finite-Closure calculations without introducing an arbitrary external mapping.

•Sep 29, 2026•0 citations

Localization of frames

Karlheinz Gröchenig

We discuss stable, overcomplete, non-orthogonal phase-space expansions with respect to generalized coherent states. The key concepts are Weyl-Heisenberg frames and quantitative measures of phase-space localization. On an abstract level, we introduce and investigate the localization of general frames.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 30, 2003•0 citations
The previous paper introduced the concept of structural localization across different state spaces. This paper takes the next step by proposing candidate localization measures for position/momentum space, energy space, phase space, and network/coherence space. These measures are offered as concrete tools for comparing how persistent structure occupies available states across domains. The goal is to move from qualitative analogy toward semi-quantitative structural comparisons within Relational Field Theory.
Many physical phenomena traditionally treated in separate domains can be interpreted as transitions in the localization or delocalization of persistent structure. This paper explores a unifying structural lens: the shift from highly constrained, localized organization to distributed access across available states. Examples include wave-particle duality in position-momentum space and Fermi edge broadening in energy space. This perspective aligns with Relational Field Theory’s emphasis on persistence, regime boundaries, and stabilization versus dissipation. It is offered as an interpretive framework, not a replacement for established theories.
This project presents a clarification of earlier Relational Field Theory (RFT) work on quantum tunneling, measurement, and relational quantum gravity through the lens of recent regime-dependent coherence results. The paper argues that structure-sensitive coherence should not be interpreted as a globally active mechanism. Instead, it becomes dynamically relevant only under conditions of strong local closure, recoverability, and persistent boundary-constrained organization. The note introduces: • regime-dependent activation of structural coherence, • a closure functional for relational domains, • recoverability as a condition for persistent organization, • linearized perturbation decay inside deep-well regimes, • and stable macroscopic records as outcome-defining degrees of freedom. This framing connects recent turbulence-based computational evidence to quantum-foundations questions without claiming a universal solution to the measurement problem. It positions earlier RFT quantum papers as architectural sketches now constrained by local validity, regime dependence, and computational results.
This note clarifies the conceptual role of Relational Field Theory (RFT) and positions it as a cross-domain organizing principle rather than a domain-specific model or a replacement for existing physical theories. RFT introduces a minimal structure: a coherence field R_cgoverned by a persistence law, and an adaptive domain closure that makes memory state-dependent. From this minimal structure, the framework reproduces recurring dynamical signatures across multiple regimes, including: spontaneous threshold crossing, critical slowing, hysteresis, coherence wells, and persistent structured correlations under noise. The purpose of this paper is to show that RFT functions in a role analogous to thermodynamics or information theory: it does not replace the underlying dynamical laws of a system, it constrains the conditions under which coherence and temporal order can emerge within those dynamics, and it remains substrate-independent, with different domains corresponding to different projections of the same underlying structure. To illustrate this organizing role, the paper includes a numerical demonstration of coherence revival in a strongly driven open quantum system using the RFT adaptive kernel. This simulation is not presented as proof of the effect, but as a minimal demonstration that the framework generates the predicted qualitative behavior. A reproducible Python implementation is included in the appendix. This framing helps distinguish RFT from a constructed metric or simulation-specific method. Instead, it supports the interpretation of RFT as a structural constraint on persistence-driven coherence across classical, quantum, and complex systems.
Meaning-Based Theory (MBT) — Quantum Reconstruction of the Unresolved Problems in Space 2, 3, and 4 This paper revisits and reconstructs several unresolved problems remaining in the Space 2, Space 3, and Space 4 developments of Meaning-Based Theory (MBT) from an explicitly quantum-generative perspective. The central principle of this reconstruction is that, when multiple not-yet-established generative possibilities remain compatible with the present MBT structure, they must not be prematurely reduced to a single classical state. The quantum perspective adopted here therefore does not begin by importing the conventional postulates of quantum mechanics. No wave function, probability amplitude, Born rule, or measurement-induced collapse is assumed. Instead, quantum generation is treated as a more fundamental condition in which multiple unresolved generative sequences are retained until MBT's own establishment conditions restrict or distinguish them. Starting from irreversible temporal distinction, the paper examines how temporal differences require positional distinction when the identity of established states is to be preserved. It then reinterprets the three-position mutual Relation structure, Σ, as the maximal established non-Closure structure from which the addition of one new position can lead toward a four-position Closure candidate. From this basis, the paper integrates several previously unresolved issues: the relation between internal change, shared structures, and continuation of Closure generation; the minimal preservation conditions for generative identity; the initiation of Comparison when a new position is established; the continuation of previously established Closures into later present states; and the meaning of generative order length, G. These results are then reorganized into a quantum-generative sequence. For a present state S_n, the theory does not initially assume a unique successor. Instead, it considers a set of not-yet-established generative possibilities, U(S_n) = {X_1, X_2, ..., X_m}, and progressively restricts this set through irreversible temporal consistency, preservation of generative history, positional distinction, Comparison, pairwise Relations, three-position mutual Relations, four-position consistency, and formation of the four-position Relation structure Ω₄. A further quantum-generative layer appears within Ω₄ itself. Even after a four-position structure has been formed, multiple local Relation-action sequences may remain possible. Their noncommutative composition produces four-point Relation interference, represented by cycle-dependent actions Q(Γ). Consequently, neither a candidate position nor a particular local-action sequence is selected in advance. Finite Closure is then treated as the structural condition that restricts these unresolved action sequences toward completed I₄ Closure. To avoid circularity, the general quantum-generative formulation does not take the already known numerical relations Q³ = −I and Q⁶ = I as prior selection assumptions. Instead, finite Closure is imposed at the structural level, while those numerical relations are to be recovered as consequences once the local actions themselves have been derived internally. The resulting framework leads to an MBT quantum-generative next-present-state establishment rule: a future state is not assumed to exist beforehand and then selected. Rather, multiple not-yet-established generative sequences are progressively constrained by the structures already established in MBT, and a next present state emerges only when the required sequence of Comparison, Relation formation, Ω₄ interference, and finite Closure is completed. If more than one candidate continues to satisfy all currently established conditions, MBT does not introduce an additional probabilistic or classical selection rule. Those candidates remain unresolved until subsequent generation provides a structural distinction. This reconstruction also clarifies the relation between quantum generation and the emergence of space. Space is not treated as a pre-existing background in which quantum processes occur. Instead, the generative hierarchy proceeds through irreversible temporal establishment → multiple generative possibilities → positional distinction → Comparison → Relations → three-position mutual Relation Σ → four-position structure → Ω₄ → four-point Relation interference → finite I₄ Closure → completed local space. Thus, quantum generation and spatial generation become parts of a single MBT generative hierarchy. The paper finally identifies the principal unresolved bridge that remains: the derivation of concrete present Relation structures and local actions from differences in the underlying T-state. Establishing this bridge would make it possible to submit individual quantum-generative candidates to explicit Ω₄ interference and finite-Closure calculations without introducing an arbitrary external mapping.