Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Structure-Sensitive Mathematics V: Physical, Quantum, and Artificial Intelligence Systems — Omega-Based Structural Monitoring and Pre-Failure Detection

Halil Özbil

Published Jun 14, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This work presents the fifth and final paper of the Structure-Sensitive Mathematics (SSM) research series, extending the Omega framework from mathematical foundations into physical modeling, quantum information, artificial intelligence systems, and reliability analysis. Building upon: Part I — Omega-Sensitive Function Spaces Part II — Omega-Banach and Omega-Hilbert Structures Part III — Omega-Operator Theory and Omega-Calculus Part IV — Omega-Topology and Omega-Geometry this study explores the application layer of Structure-Sensitive Mathematics. The central principle investigated is: Observable equivalence does not necessarily imply structural equivalence. The framework extends system representation from: x toward: (x, Ω(x)) where Ω represents a structure-sensitive functional combining geometric, informational, and complexity-related components. This paper introduces and discusses: • Omega-based physical field extensions • Structure-sensitive action principles • Omega-field equations • Quantum structural state discrimination • Connections with Quantum Structural Perturbation Framework (QSPF) • Structural decoherence indicators • AI model structural monitoring • Omega-based pre-failure detection • Structure-sensitive digital twin concepts Core formulations include: δ(S + λΩ) = 0 and: Ω = αG + βI + γC The proposed approach investigates whether systems that appear identical under classical measurements may contain hidden structural differences affecting future evolution, robustness, or reliability. Potential research connections include: • theoretical physics • quantum information science • artificial intelligence safety and reliability • complex adaptive systems • digital twins • predictive maintenance • structure-aware engineering systems This work does not replace existing physical, quantum, or computational theories. Instead, it proposes an additional structural analysis layer and defines open problems requiring experimental validation, domain-specific calibration, and empirical testing. Part V of V — Applications and Future Directions of Omega-Based Structural Analysis.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20688962

Related papers

QSPF: A Structure-Sensitive Quantum Information Functional for Resolving Fidelity Degeneracy in Open Quantum Systems

Halil Özbil

This technical report introduces the Quantum Structural-Process Functional (QSPF), a proposed complementary diagnostic framework for analyzing structural information degradation in open quantum systems. While conventional quantum metrics such as fidelity, trace distance, and Bures distance quantify state similarity, they may assign similar values to quantum processes that damage different structural components of the density matrix. QSPF introduces a structure-sensitive decomposition based on: • coherence loss• population-geometry loss• purity degradation combined into a unified functional ΩQ(t). The work presents the Structural Degeneracy Separation Principle, demonstrating that equivalent fidelity loss does not necessarily imply equivalent geometric deformation. The framework is evaluated through: • fidelity-matched single-qubit noise channels• robustness testing across initial states• Bell-state entanglement extension• comparison with trace and Bures distances• weight sensitivity analysis• additional quantum noise channels• IBM-inspired T1/T2 decoherence simulations QSPF is proposed as a complementary diagnostic tool for NISQ-era quantum processor characterization and structure-sensitive quantum control. This work is part of the Structure-Sensitive Science Research Initiative.

•Jun 3, 2026•0 citations

ΩQ: A Structure-Sensitive Heisenberg Framework for Early Detection of Quantum State Degradation and QEC Stability

Halil Özbil

ΩQ introduces a structure-sensitive framework for monitoring quantum system stability based on Heisenberg-picture dynamics and commutator-norm analysis. The framework defines ΩQ as a structural stability metric derived from the relationship between a Hamiltonian and observable operators, and extends it to open quantum systems (ΩQE) by incorporating environmental noise contributions. This work investigates whether structural changes in quantum systems can provide an early-warning diagnostic signal before conventional error indicators become observable. Key components include: • A commutator-norm-based structural metric derived from Heisenberg dynamics• Extension to open quantum systems with environmental interaction terms• Analytical relationship studies with fidelity and purity degradation• Robustness evaluation through parameter testing• Quantum Error Correction (QEC) benchmarks using stabilizer-based models• Surface-code-type analysis with realistic syndrome extraction timing• Proposed Stim + MWPM decoder-level validation protocol ΩQ is not proposed as a replacement for existing quantum error correction methods or as a new physical law. Instead, it is presented as a complementary diagnostic layer for studying structural transitions, degradation dynamics, and potential early-warning mechanisms in quantum systems. The framework is designed to be falsifiable and further validated through full circuit-level quantum simulations. Version: ΩQ v1.4Author: Halil Özbil

•Jun 23, 2026•0 citations

ΩQ-SILQ v1.2: Structure-Sensitive Quantum Compilation with Hamiltonian Metrics and Qiskit Benchmark Protocol

Halil Özbil

This work introduces ΩQ-SILQ, a structure-sensitive quantum compilation framework that extends high-level quantum programming concepts with Hamiltonian-aware stability analysis. Modern quantum compilers and languages such as Silq improve quantum software development through abstraction, resource optimization, and automatic uncomputation. However, traditional optimization primarily focuses on computational metrics such as gate count, circuit depth, and qubit usage. ΩQ-SILQ proposes an additional structure-sensitive layer based on a commutator-norm metric: Omega_Q(U,H) = ||[H,U]|| / ||U|| to evaluate the compatibility between quantum operations and the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics of the target system. The framework introduces: • Hamiltonian-aware structural scoring of quantum circuits • Structure-sensitive compiler decision functions • Integration concept with high-level quantum language pipelines • Fidelity-based validation using logically equivalent circuit decompositions • Extended GHZ benchmark experiments • A proposed Qiskit transpiler comparison protocol Initial simulations demonstrate that lower ΩQ circuit selections can preserve higher fidelity under structurally coupled noise models. A multi-sample GHZ benchmark further evaluates the relationship between structural-score differences and fidelity behavior. This work does not propose replacing existing quantum compilers or quantum error correction methods. Instead, ΩQ-SILQ is presented as a complementary pre-error structural optimization layer designed to explore how future quantum compilers may incorporate physical system dynamics alongside computational efficiency. Version v1.1 includes extended hub-selection benchmarking, and the accompanying v1.2 protocol defines future validation against Qiskit transpiler optimization levels and standard quantum algorithm families.

•Jun 25, 2026•0 citations

AHDT-Ω/QC v1.0: Adaptive Hamiltonian Digital Twin for Quantum Processor Coherence Monitoring Using Symplectic Energy-Tensor Divergence

Halil Özbil

AHDT-Ω/QC v1.0 introduces an Adaptive Hamiltonian Digital Twin framework for Quantum Processor Coherence Monitoring, investigating symplectic Hamiltonian energy-space divergence as a potential pre-decoherence structural indicator for near-term quantum hardware. Quantum processors are highly sensitive to microscopic disturbances. Current quantum hardware monitoring primarily relies on observable performance indicators such as: • gate fidelity degradation• error rates• calibration drift• T1/T2 relaxation measurements However, quantum state degradation may begin at the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics level before these effects become visible in computational performance. AHDT-Ω/QC explores a complementary structure-sensitive approach: Instead of only asking: “Has the quantum gate performance degraded?” it investigates: “Is the underlying Hamiltonian energy structure of the quantum processor beginning to drift?” The framework introduces: • Quantum Hamiltonian Digital Twin formulation: ℋ_quantum(t)=T(q,p)+V(q,p)+E_coh(t) where: T(q,p) represents kinetic/symplectic components, V(q,p) represents potential interaction terms, E_coh(t) represents coherence-related structural energy information. • Dual Hamiltonian Digital Twin architecture: ℋ_R(t) ↔ ℋ_D(t) (real quantum system vs digital twin reference) • Hamiltonian structural divergence metric: ΔH_F(t)=||ℋ_R(t) − ℋ_D(t)||_F • Quantum Structural Coherence Score: Ω_H(t)=exp(−αΔH_F(t)) • Logarithmic Geometric Correction (LGC) robustness layer • HAD-Ω/QC quantum anomaly monitoring pipeline • Lyapunov-based stability analysis • Uniform Ultimate Boundedness (UUB) formulation under bounded quantum noise disturbances A proof-of-concept Monte Carlo simulation study (N = 1,000) evaluates the framework using synthetic T1/T2 decoherence and Hamiltonian drift scenarios. The study investigates whether Hamiltonian energy-space divergence can provide an additional early-warning signal before measurable quantum performance degradation occurs. Included components: ✓ Symplectic Hamiltonian modeling approach ✓ Quantum energy-structure monitoring framework ✓ Coherence drift analysis ✓ Ω-based structural scoring ✓ LGC robustness mechanism ✓ Stability analysis ✓ Monte Carlo validation framework ✓ Future real-hardware validation roadmap Potential future validation targets include: • IBM Quantum hardware calibration datasets • Superconducting qubit systems • Trapped-ion quantum processors • Multi-qubit coherence monitoring environments Important note: Current quantitative results are based on synthetic proof-of-concept simulations and should not be interpreted as universal quantum error prediction guarantees. Experimental validation on real quantum processors is required as the next research phase. The long-term objective of AHDT-Ω/QC is to investigate whether Hamiltonian structural monitoring can become an additional physics-aware intelligence layer for future quantum computing reliability, calibration, and error mitigation systems. Application domains: Quantum computing, quantum hardware monitoring, quantum error mitigation, digital twins, physics-informed AI, structural intelligence, and complex system stability analysis.

•Jun 20, 2026•0 citations

Structure-Sensitive Quantum Runtime (SSQR): An Adaptive Runtime Framework for Structure-Aware Error Mitigation in NISQ Quantum Computing

Halil Özbil

Structure-Sensitive Quantum Runtime (SSQR): An Adaptive Runtime Framework for Structure-Aware Error Mitigation in NISQ Quantum Computing proposes a structure-sensitive runtime architecture for adaptive execution in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computing. Rather than applying a fixed error mitigation strategy to every quantum circuit, the proposed framework introduces a pre-execution decision layer that analyzes circuit structure and estimates execution reliability before selecting an appropriate mitigation strategy. The paper defines the core concepts of Structure Profile, Structure Fingerprint, Structure Complexity Index (SCI), Runtime Risk, and Confidence Score, and integrates them into a layered runtime architecture consisting of Structure Analysis, Hardware Abstraction, Runtime Intelligence, Adaptive Optimization, and Knowledge layers. This work is intentionally presented as a position and methodology paper. It introduces the mathematical framework, architectural design, theoretical complexity analysis, related-work comparison, and a pre-registered experimental protocol, but does not claim experimental validation or performance improvements. Those questions are reserved for subsequent papers in the SSQR research series. The proposed framework is intended to provide a falsifiable foundation for future research on adaptive quantum runtime systems, structure-aware error mitigation, and experience-driven execution strategies across NISQ quantum computing platforms.

•Jul 2, 2026•0 citations

Structure-Sensitive Quantum Networks: A Geometric Consistency Framework for Entanglement Stability and Quantum Internet Reliability — Reproducibility Package v3.0

Halil Özbil

This repository contains the full reproducibility package for: "Structure-Sensitive Quantum Networks: A Geometric Consistency Framework for Entanglement Stability and Quantum Internet Reliability" This work investigates a structure-sensitive approach for monitoring quantum network stability beyond conventional fidelity-only metrics. The proposed Ω_QN functional combines: • quantum state fidelity loss• geometric drift based on Bures distance• normalized entropy contribution to evaluate structural degradation in noisy quantum links. The package includes: • Python Monte Carlo simulation framework• quantum noise models using Kraus channels• Ω_QN early-warning analysis• preventive entanglement purification model• reproducible datasets• figure generation scripts• statistical validation workflow Version 3.0 includes reproducibility improvements: ✓ corrected Bures distance implementation✓ explicit Kraus-channel noise modelling✓ purification-based preventive correction mechanism✓ clean CSV outputs✓ fixed random seed configuration for reproducibility All reported numerical results should be regenerated from the released source code before citation. This release is a computational simulation and theoretical research framework. Physical quantum hardware validation remains future work. Part of:Structure-Sensitive Science Research Program (2026–2035) Author:Halil ÖzbilIndependent ResearcherElazığ, Turkey License:Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)

•Jun 9, 2026•0 citations
This work presents the fifth and final paper of the Structure-Sensitive Mathematics (SSM) research series, extending the Omega framework from mathematical foundations into physical modeling, quantum information, artificial intelligence systems, and reliability analysis. Building upon: Part I — Omega-Sensitive Function Spaces Part II — Omega-Banach and Omega-Hilbert Structures Part III — Omega-Operator Theory and Omega-Calculus Part IV — Omega-Topology and Omega-Geometry this study explores the application layer of Structure-Sensitive Mathematics. The central principle investigated is: Observable equivalence does not necessarily imply structural equivalence. The framework extends system representation from: x toward: (x, Ω(x)) where Ω represents a structure-sensitive functional combining geometric, informational, and complexity-related components. This paper introduces and discusses: • Omega-based physical field extensions • Structure-sensitive action principles • Omega-field equations • Quantum structural state discrimination • Connections with Quantum Structural Perturbation Framework (QSPF) • Structural decoherence indicators • AI model structural monitoring • Omega-based pre-failure detection • Structure-sensitive digital twin concepts Core formulations include: δ(S + λΩ) = 0 and: Ω = αG + βI + γC The proposed approach investigates whether systems that appear identical under classical measurements may contain hidden structural differences affecting future evolution, robustness, or reliability. Potential research connections include: • theoretical physics • quantum information science • artificial intelligence safety and reliability • complex adaptive systems • digital twins • predictive maintenance • structure-aware engineering systems This work does not replace existing physical, quantum, or computational theories. Instead, it proposes an additional structural analysis layer and defines open problems requiring experimental validation, domain-specific calibration, and empirical testing. Part V of V — Applications and Future Directions of Omega-Based Structural Analysis.
This technical report introduces the Quantum Structural-Process Functional (QSPF), a proposed complementary diagnostic framework for analyzing structural information degradation in open quantum systems. While conventional quantum metrics such as fidelity, trace distance, and Bures distance quantify state similarity, they may assign similar values to quantum processes that damage different structural components of the density matrix. QSPF introduces a structure-sensitive decomposition based on: • coherence loss• population-geometry loss• purity degradation combined into a unified functional ΩQ(t). The work presents the Structural Degeneracy Separation Principle, demonstrating that equivalent fidelity loss does not necessarily imply equivalent geometric deformation. The framework is evaluated through: • fidelity-matched single-qubit noise channels• robustness testing across initial states• Bell-state entanglement extension• comparison with trace and Bures distances• weight sensitivity analysis• additional quantum noise channels• IBM-inspired T1/T2 decoherence simulations QSPF is proposed as a complementary diagnostic tool for NISQ-era quantum processor characterization and structure-sensitive quantum control. This work is part of the Structure-Sensitive Science Research Initiative.
ΩQ introduces a structure-sensitive framework for monitoring quantum system stability based on Heisenberg-picture dynamics and commutator-norm analysis. The framework defines ΩQ as a structural stability metric derived from the relationship between a Hamiltonian and observable operators, and extends it to open quantum systems (ΩQE) by incorporating environmental noise contributions. This work investigates whether structural changes in quantum systems can provide an early-warning diagnostic signal before conventional error indicators become observable. Key components include: • A commutator-norm-based structural metric derived from Heisenberg dynamics• Extension to open quantum systems with environmental interaction terms• Analytical relationship studies with fidelity and purity degradation• Robustness evaluation through parameter testing• Quantum Error Correction (QEC) benchmarks using stabilizer-based models• Surface-code-type analysis with realistic syndrome extraction timing• Proposed Stim + MWPM decoder-level validation protocol ΩQ is not proposed as a replacement for existing quantum error correction methods or as a new physical law. Instead, it is presented as a complementary diagnostic layer for studying structural transitions, degradation dynamics, and potential early-warning mechanisms in quantum systems. The framework is designed to be falsifiable and further validated through full circuit-level quantum simulations. Version: ΩQ v1.4Author: Halil Özbil
This work introduces ΩQ-SILQ, a structure-sensitive quantum compilation framework that extends high-level quantum programming concepts with Hamiltonian-aware stability analysis. Modern quantum compilers and languages such as Silq improve quantum software development through abstraction, resource optimization, and automatic uncomputation. However, traditional optimization primarily focuses on computational metrics such as gate count, circuit depth, and qubit usage. ΩQ-SILQ proposes an additional structure-sensitive layer based on a commutator-norm metric: Omega_Q(U,H) = ||[H,U]|| / ||U|| to evaluate the compatibility between quantum operations and the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics of the target system. The framework introduces: • Hamiltonian-aware structural scoring of quantum circuits • Structure-sensitive compiler decision functions • Integration concept with high-level quantum language pipelines • Fidelity-based validation using logically equivalent circuit decompositions • Extended GHZ benchmark experiments • A proposed Qiskit transpiler comparison protocol Initial simulations demonstrate that lower ΩQ circuit selections can preserve higher fidelity under structurally coupled noise models. A multi-sample GHZ benchmark further evaluates the relationship between structural-score differences and fidelity behavior. This work does not propose replacing existing quantum compilers or quantum error correction methods. Instead, ΩQ-SILQ is presented as a complementary pre-error structural optimization layer designed to explore how future quantum compilers may incorporate physical system dynamics alongside computational efficiency. Version v1.1 includes extended hub-selection benchmarking, and the accompanying v1.2 protocol defines future validation against Qiskit transpiler optimization levels and standard quantum algorithm families.
AHDT-Ω/QC v1.0 introduces an Adaptive Hamiltonian Digital Twin framework for Quantum Processor Coherence Monitoring, investigating symplectic Hamiltonian energy-space divergence as a potential pre-decoherence structural indicator for near-term quantum hardware. Quantum processors are highly sensitive to microscopic disturbances. Current quantum hardware monitoring primarily relies on observable performance indicators such as: • gate fidelity degradation• error rates• calibration drift• T1/T2 relaxation measurements However, quantum state degradation may begin at the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics level before these effects become visible in computational performance. AHDT-Ω/QC explores a complementary structure-sensitive approach: Instead of only asking: “Has the quantum gate performance degraded?” it investigates: “Is the underlying Hamiltonian energy structure of the quantum processor beginning to drift?” The framework introduces: • Quantum Hamiltonian Digital Twin formulation: ℋ_quantum(t)=T(q,p)+V(q,p)+E_coh(t) where: T(q,p) represents kinetic/symplectic components, V(q,p) represents potential interaction terms, E_coh(t) represents coherence-related structural energy information. • Dual Hamiltonian Digital Twin architecture: ℋ_R(t) ↔ ℋ_D(t) (real quantum system vs digital twin reference) • Hamiltonian structural divergence metric: ΔH_F(t)=||ℋ_R(t) − ℋ_D(t)||_F • Quantum Structural Coherence Score: Ω_H(t)=exp(−αΔH_F(t)) • Logarithmic Geometric Correction (LGC) robustness layer • HAD-Ω/QC quantum anomaly monitoring pipeline • Lyapunov-based stability analysis • Uniform Ultimate Boundedness (UUB) formulation under bounded quantum noise disturbances A proof-of-concept Monte Carlo simulation study (N = 1,000) evaluates the framework using synthetic T1/T2 decoherence and Hamiltonian drift scenarios. The study investigates whether Hamiltonian energy-space divergence can provide an additional early-warning signal before measurable quantum performance degradation occurs. Included components: ✓ Symplectic Hamiltonian modeling approach ✓ Quantum energy-structure monitoring framework ✓ Coherence drift analysis ✓ Ω-based structural scoring ✓ LGC robustness mechanism ✓ Stability analysis ✓ Monte Carlo validation framework ✓ Future real-hardware validation roadmap Potential future validation targets include: • IBM Quantum hardware calibration datasets • Superconducting qubit systems • Trapped-ion quantum processors • Multi-qubit coherence monitoring environments Important note: Current quantitative results are based on synthetic proof-of-concept simulations and should not be interpreted as universal quantum error prediction guarantees. Experimental validation on real quantum processors is required as the next research phase. The long-term objective of AHDT-Ω/QC is to investigate whether Hamiltonian structural monitoring can become an additional physics-aware intelligence layer for future quantum computing reliability, calibration, and error mitigation systems. Application domains: Quantum computing, quantum hardware monitoring, quantum error mitigation, digital twins, physics-informed AI, structural intelligence, and complex system stability analysis.
Structure-Sensitive Quantum Runtime (SSQR): An Adaptive Runtime Framework for Structure-Aware Error Mitigation in NISQ Quantum Computing proposes a structure-sensitive runtime architecture for adaptive execution in Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) computing. Rather than applying a fixed error mitigation strategy to every quantum circuit, the proposed framework introduces a pre-execution decision layer that analyzes circuit structure and estimates execution reliability before selecting an appropriate mitigation strategy. The paper defines the core concepts of Structure Profile, Structure Fingerprint, Structure Complexity Index (SCI), Runtime Risk, and Confidence Score, and integrates them into a layered runtime architecture consisting of Structure Analysis, Hardware Abstraction, Runtime Intelligence, Adaptive Optimization, and Knowledge layers. This work is intentionally presented as a position and methodology paper. It introduces the mathematical framework, architectural design, theoretical complexity analysis, related-work comparison, and a pre-registered experimental protocol, but does not claim experimental validation or performance improvements. Those questions are reserved for subsequent papers in the SSQR research series. The proposed framework is intended to provide a falsifiable foundation for future research on adaptive quantum runtime systems, structure-aware error mitigation, and experience-driven execution strategies across NISQ quantum computing platforms.
This repository contains the full reproducibility package for: "Structure-Sensitive Quantum Networks: A Geometric Consistency Framework for Entanglement Stability and Quantum Internet Reliability" This work investigates a structure-sensitive approach for monitoring quantum network stability beyond conventional fidelity-only metrics. The proposed Ω_QN functional combines: • quantum state fidelity loss• geometric drift based on Bures distance• normalized entropy contribution to evaluate structural degradation in noisy quantum links. The package includes: • Python Monte Carlo simulation framework• quantum noise models using Kraus channels• Ω_QN early-warning analysis• preventive entanglement purification model• reproducible datasets• figure generation scripts• statistical validation workflow Version 3.0 includes reproducibility improvements: ✓ corrected Bures distance implementation✓ explicit Kraus-channel noise modelling✓ purification-based preventive correction mechanism✓ clean CSV outputs✓ fixed random seed configuration for reproducibility All reported numerical results should be regenerated from the released source code before citation. This release is a computational simulation and theoretical research framework. Physical quantum hardware validation remains future work. Part of:Structure-Sensitive Science Research Program (2026–2035) Author:Halil ÖzbilIndependent ResearcherElazığ, Turkey License:Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)