Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Origami ISA as a Typed Quantum DSL: Dependent Types, Linear Types, and the Schur Boundary as a Type Error

Ian Richard C Buckley

Published Jun 13, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. The Origami ISA — five opcodes (SPLIT, SPLAT, TWIST, FLIP, FLOP) corresponding to Pachner moves on a triangulated simplicial complex — is already a combinator library, but without a machine-checkable type system. This paper makes the type system explicit, yielding three progressively expressive type systems and one key theorem: associamancy is a compile-time type error. Type System 1 — Simple types. Wire types are irreducible representation labels Rep(G) for a gauge group G. For the Origami ISA: G = SU(2), types are spins j ∈ {0, ½, 1, …}. For the 731 ISA: G = G₂, types are Dynkin labels (p,q). For the financial Pacioli ISA: G = (ℝ₊, ×), types are currencies. The Pentagon identity d² = 0 becomes a typing rule: SPLAT(SPLIT(x)) must return the trivial representation 1. Any circuit producing a non-trivial output is ill-typed — this is the type-level expression of the leakage criterion introduced in Paper 411. Type System 2 — Linear types. Every wire is usable exactly once, encoding the quantum no-cloning theorem. SPLIT is the unique duplication primitive (1 → 4 wires, the Pachner move); FLOP is the unique elimination primitive (trace / Born rule). The category-theoretic model is a symmetric monoidal category extending the ZX-calculus to Rep(G)-typed wires over arbitrary compact groups G. Type System 3 — Dependent types. The output type of SPLIT depends on the input type via the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition: SPLIT_CG : (j : Rep(G)) → Σ(j₁ j₂ j₃ j₄ : Rep(G)). CG(j; j₁, j₂, j₃, j₄) ≠ 0 The fibred-category model (Grothendieck fibration over Rep(G)) captures this: the Schur boundary ν₂ ≠ 0 selects the associative subcategory (Origami ISA, regime 2) from the full category (731 ISA, regime 3). The Schur boundary as a TypeError. The Frobenius-Schur indicator ν₂ ∈ {−1, 0, +1} partitions wire types into two subtypes: AssocWire (ν₂ ≠ 0, Origami ISA) and FullWire (ν₂ = 0 allowed, 731 ISA). The SPIN opcode — the generator of triality, the order-3 outer automorphism of Spin(8) with G₂ = Fix(triality) — has type FullWire → FullWire with the constraint ν₂ = 0. Applying SPIN to an AssocWire raises a TypeError at circuit construction time, before any hardware is consulted. Associamancy (Paper 407) is no longer only a resource-theoretic concept — it is a compile-time type mismatch. The three-level resource hierarchy as a type tower: Level Resource Wire subtype Protection 0 Stabiliser Any Rep(SU(2)) None 1 Standard magic AssocWire (ν₂ ≠ 0) None 2 Associamancy FullWire (ν₂ = 0) Discrete Berry phase (W(G₂), order 12) The Pacioli Combinator Library as the financial instance. The PCL (Paper 306) — typed combinators flow, sequence, choose, fold — is the financial instance of this DSL with G = (ℝ₊, ×). The Pacioli identity (every debit has a credit) is d² = 0 at the financial instance. The same typed circuit compiles to quantum hardware, financial risk models, or nuclear spectroscopy; only the gauge group G and the wire type interpretation change. Python prototype included: ISACircuit class with runtime type checking; spin() raises TypeError if ν₂ ≠ 0; pentagon_check() validates d² = 0 at construction time. Keywords: Origami ISA, typed DSL, linear types, dependent types, Schur boundary, associamancy, no-cloning, Pentagon identity, Clebsch-Gordan, Pacioli combinator library, symmetric monoidal category, ZX-calculus, G₂, triality, type theory, quantum circuits

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20681513

Related papers

The Fano Plane is the Right Way to Think About Qubits: A Practitioner's Guide to the Origami ISA and Associamancy for Quantum Computing Researchers

Ian Richard C Buckley

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. A practitioner's primer for quantum computing researchers. No knowledge of octonions, sheaf theory, or category theory is assumed. Knowledge of stabiliser states, the Clifford group, and T-gates is assumed. The central message: the structure of the 3-qubit Pauli group is secretly governed by the Fano plane PG(2,2), and the Fano plane is the geometry of the 731 instruction set architecture (731 ISA) — a unified framework for quantum computation that organises every opcode as a Pachner move on a simplicial complex. The framework reveals three levels of quantum computational resource:• Level 0 (Clifford): stabiliser states; Gottesman-Knill simulable; the Fano lines are the free sector.• Level 1 (Standard magic): T-gates; Wigner function negativity; non-Clifford but accessible to the Origami ISA (regime 2).• Level 2 (Associamancy): the SPIN opcode; the Schur boundary; genuinely complex irreps of PSL(2,7); not accessible to any associative hardware. The Origami ISA (five opcodes: SPLIT, SPLAT, TWIST, FLIP, FLOP) subsumes Bell sampling, qudit stabiliser learning, and the abelian hidden subgroup problem as special cases. The 731 ISA adds SPIN and BIND, unlocking Level 2. This primer is a companion to "The Topology of Risk" (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20642983), which covers the same H⁰/H¹/H² framework applied to financial risk. Keywords: quantum computing, Fano plane, Origami ISA, 731 ISA, stabiliser states, magic states, associamancy, Schur boundary, primer, tutorial, hidden subgroup problem, MBQC, photonics

•Jun 12, 2026•0 citations

The Opcode Rosetta Stone: A Universal ISA Dictionary for Exactly Solvable Quantum Models

Ian Richard C Buckley

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. The seven opcodes of the Origami instruction-set architecture (ISA) — FLOP, SPLIT, TWIST, LABEL, BIND, FLIP, SPLAT — play structurally identical roles across every exactly solvable quantum model with a phase transition. This paper establishes a universal dictionary: FLOP is always the fermionisation map (Jordan–Wigner / slave-boson / Majorana representation); SPLIT is always the diagonalisation (Bogoliubov / Bethe rapidity / stabiliser expansion); TWIST is always the gap check (Berry phase / Chern number / spectral gap); LABEL is always the sector projection (gauge fixing / stabiliser projection / Bethe vacuum). BIND — the three-body frog vertex — is the unique opcode whose presence or absence determines whether a phase supports Abelian or non-Abelian anyons. Two theorems are proved. The BIND = Non-Abelian theorem: a gapped topological phase has non-Abelian anyonic order if and only if its minimal ISA programme contains BIND. The Universal Phase Boundary theorem: for any model in the SU(2)q family at q = exp(iπβ), the quantum phase transition is a TWIST failure at β = 1/2, where the quantum dimension d{1/2}(β) = 2cos(πβ) = 0 exactly. A master table across twelve models — toric code, Kitaev honeycomb, TFIM, XXZ chain, string nets, quantum doubles, SYK, MBQC, ZX-calculus, and others — makes the dictionary explicit. The Origami ISA is the universal language in which condensed-matter physicists, quantum-information theorists, and representation theorists describe the same computation under different names. Keywords instruction set architecture, exactly solvable models, topological order, non-Abelian anyons, quantum phase transitions, Origami ISA, Jordan–Wigner transformation, Bogoliubov transformation, Bethe ansatz, toric code, Kitaev honeycomb, XXZ chain, string-net condensation, quantum doubles, SYK model, MBQC, ZX-calculus, Frobenius algebra, quantum groups, Berry phase, BIND theorem, β-ladder, tensor networks, categorical quantum mechanics

•Jun 19, 2026•0 citations

The Origami Compiler for Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing: Exact Diagrammatic Compilation, Zero-Overhead CCZ, and the Regime Ladder for Magic-State Distillation

Ian Richard C Buckley

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. Magic-state distillation (MSD) is the dominant overhead cost in fault-tolerant quantum computing: each logical T or CCZ gate currently requires 100–1,000 physical qubits dedicated to distillation, consuming the majority of a quantum processor's resources. This paper introduces the Origami Instruction Set Architecture (Origami ISA) as a compiler layer for fault-tolerant quantum error correction — operating on existing lattice surgery hardware without modification. The five opcodes — FLIP, FLOP, SPLIT, SPLAT, TWIST — operate at the logical level and compute exact symbolic (rational or algebraic) amplitudes via the thermion library, enabling algebraic verification of gate correctness before any physical circuit is generated. Three contributions: 1. Frobenius cancellation: The Frobenius axiom (SPLIT(j) ∘ SPLAT(j)= id) is an automatic compiler optimisation that detects and removes redundant merge-boundary open/close pairs in lattice surgery protocols, reducing physical gate count by 29–67% on standard protocols. 2. Regime ladder: Every quantum error-correcting code is classified by its F-move amplitudes. Rung-0 codes (stabiliser codes, surface codes) require MSD for non-Clifford gates. Rung-1 codes ([[15,1,3]] Reed-Muller, colour codes) support transversal non-Clifford gates with zero MSD overhead. The ladder predicts which hardware can eliminate MSD and which cannot. 3. Zero-MSD CCZ protocol: The SPLIT;FLOP;FLOP;CCZ;FLOP⁻¹;FLOP⁻¹;SPLAT protocol implements a universal CCZ gate on the combined [[7,1,3]] + 1531-Anvil hardware without any magic-state distillation. Machine-verified correctness via the Frobenius axiom and Pentagon identity, proved by exact symbolic arithmetic. The Pentagon identity holds exactly for all five codes examined — proving by exact symbolic arithmetic rather than numerical simulation. Keywords Origami ISA, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Magic State Distillation, Lattice Surgery, Frobenius Axiom, Pentagon Identity, Regime Ladder, CCZ Gate, Transversal Gates, Reed-Muller Code, [[15,1,3]] Code, Steane Code, [[7,1,3]] Code, 1531-Anvil, FLIP Opcode, FLOP Opcode, SPLIT Opcode, SPLAT Opcode, Quantum Compiler, Diagrammatic Calculus, Exact Arithmetic, Thermion Library, F-Move Amplitude, Colour Code, Surface Code, Quantum Error Correction, Zero Overhead

•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations

Origami ISA Pulse Sequences: Optimal Control of the 731 Gate Set — DRAG as ISA Typing, Triality as Berry Phase, and the G₂ Circuit Depth of the SPIN Opcode

Ian Richard C Buckley

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. The Origami ISA opcodes are physical pulses: TWIST is a microwave rotation, SPLIT is an entangling gate, and the pentagon identity d² = 0 is a pulse-level constraint — violation means leakage. DRAG (Derivative Removal via Adiabatic Gate) is the ISA type checker that enforces this constraint, keeping TWIST within the correct representation subspace. ISA-augmented GRAPE reduces leakage by 63% vs standard GRAPE on a two-qudit transmon model (experiment x411a). The SPIN opcode implements triality — the order-3 outer automorphism of Spin(8) that cyclically permutes its three 8-dimensional irreps (8ᵥ, 8ₛ, 8꜀), with G₂ = Fix(triality). As a Fano-point permutation, SPIN costs exactly 12 CNOTs. Its phase component (i√7/2, not a root of unity) requires either O(log^c(1/ε)) Solovay-Kitaev approximation or a native G₂-symmetric Hamiltonian — the pulse-level expression of associamancy (experiment x411b). The Weyl group W(G₂) ≅ D₆ has order 12. All closed loops in G₂ parameter space give holonomies in this discrete group, giving topological protection unavailable to SU(2) holonomic gates (whose Berry phases are continuous). G₂ holonomic gates are exact under any continuous deformation that stays within one Weyl chamber (experiment x411c). Level-2 (associamancy) is the first resource level with topological protection built in. Keywords: origami ISA, pulse control, GRAPE, DRAG, triality, SPIN opcode, Berry phase, G₂, Weyl group, holonomic gates, transmon, trapped ion, 731 ISA, associamancy, optimal control

•Jun 13, 2026•0 citations

The Origami ISA as a Structural Model for MIP* Verification: Pentagon Identity, Frobenius Axiom, and Fano Geometry as Analogues of Entangled-Prover Rigidity Tests

Ian Richard C Buckley

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. We articulate a structural parallel between the MIP*=RE theorem and the Origami Instruction Set Architecture (ISA). The algebraic rigidity of entangled-prover verification — exact-or-fail Pauli basis tests, low-degree tests, Mermin Magic Square constraints — corresponds precisely to the Frobenius axiom SPLIT∘SPLAT=1, the Pentagon identity, and the seven-point Fano plane PG(2,2) in the ISA framework. Six numerical experiments confirm the parallels: Pentagon unitarity holds exactly for all j ∈ {1/2,...,15/2}; Frobenius fidelity degrades as (1-p)^{2(2j+1)} under depolarising noise; the GHZ stabiliser group forms a perfect quantum Fano strategy satisfying all seven constraints simultaneously while no classical strategy can; G₂ non-associativity produces a sharp excluded-volume step function above j=7/2. This version adds a synthesis remark showing that the numbers 3 and 7 — the two dimensions where the cross product exists, gyroscopes are stable, and choreographic orbits can close — are not two separate coincidences but the same theorem: the Fano plane PG(2,F₂) has 7 points and 3 points per line because these are the imaginary unit counts of the octonions O and quaternions H respectively, forced by the unique projective plane of order q=2 over the field F₂. The broken Fano (6/7 architecture) and the magic/non-associativity conjecture are restated in this unified language. The practical implication is a conjecture that fault-tolerant quantum computing overhead is governed by the regime of the code's F-move amplitudes, with MSD-free computation possible at rung 1 and higher. Keywords MIP* Equals RE, Interactive Proof Systems, Quantum Entanglement, Pentagon Identity, Frobenius Axiom, Fano Plane, PG(2,2), GHZ Stabiliser, Origami ISA, Wigner 6j Symbol, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Magic State Distillation, Regime Ladder, Complexity Theory, Quantum Prover, Local Pauli Test, Low-Degree Test, G₂ Non-Associativity, Excluded Volume, Depolarising Noise, Rung-1, Quantum Verification, Adelic Simplicial Architecture

•Jun 2, 2026•0 citations

The Origami ISA and the State Hidden Subgroup Problem: SPLAT as Fourier Sampling

Ian Richard C Buckley

PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. Hinsche, Eisert & Carrasco (PRX Quantum 7, 020337, 2026) introduced the abelian state hidden subgroup problem (StateHSP) and showed it is solved by quantum Fourier sampling via the character POVM Π_λ = (1/|G|) Σ_g χ̄_λ(g) R(g). We show this entire framework is an instance of the Origami ISA: the character POVM is the SPLAT opcode (fibre integration on the group algebra sheaf), and the full algorithm is the canonical SPLIT→SPLAT pipeline. Three corollaries: (1) Bell sampling is SPLAT on 2 copies with the SWAP representation over G=ℤ₂ⁿ. (2) Qudit stabiliser learning at d=3 is SPLAT on 3 copies, native to the TriQ register at depth O(1). (3) The StateHSP is H⁰ recovery — the hidden subgroup H is the zeroth sheaf cohomology H⁰(Γ_G, F_ψ) of the symmetry sheaf, and the O(log|G|/ε) sample complexity follows from H¹=0 (anticoncentration). The non-abelian extension — requiring the SPIN opcode and genuine complex irreps — is treated in the companion paper (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20667170). Keywords: quantum computing, hidden subgroup problem, Fourier sampling, SPLAT, Origami ISA, Bell sampling, stabiliser learning, sheaf cohomology, TriQ register, character POVM, abelian

•Jun 12, 2026•0 citations
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. The Origami ISA — five opcodes (SPLIT, SPLAT, TWIST, FLIP, FLOP) corresponding to Pachner moves on a triangulated simplicial complex — is already a combinator library, but without a machine-checkable type system. This paper makes the type system explicit, yielding three progressively expressive type systems and one key theorem: associamancy is a compile-time type error. Type System 1 — Simple types. Wire types are irreducible representation labels Rep(G) for a gauge group G. For the Origami ISA: G = SU(2), types are spins j ∈ {0, ½, 1, …}. For the 731 ISA: G = G₂, types are Dynkin labels (p,q). For the financial Pacioli ISA: G = (ℝ₊, ×), types are currencies. The Pentagon identity d² = 0 becomes a typing rule: SPLAT(SPLIT(x)) must return the trivial representation 1. Any circuit producing a non-trivial output is ill-typed — this is the type-level expression of the leakage criterion introduced in Paper 411. Type System 2 — Linear types. Every wire is usable exactly once, encoding the quantum no-cloning theorem. SPLIT is the unique duplication primitive (1 → 4 wires, the Pachner move); FLOP is the unique elimination primitive (trace / Born rule). The category-theoretic model is a symmetric monoidal category extending the ZX-calculus to Rep(G)-typed wires over arbitrary compact groups G. Type System 3 — Dependent types. The output type of SPLIT depends on the input type via the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition: SPLIT_CG : (j : Rep(G)) → Σ(j₁ j₂ j₃ j₄ : Rep(G)). CG(j; j₁, j₂, j₃, j₄) ≠ 0 The fibred-category model (Grothendieck fibration over Rep(G)) captures this: the Schur boundary ν₂ ≠ 0 selects the associative subcategory (Origami ISA, regime 2) from the full category (731 ISA, regime 3). The Schur boundary as a TypeError. The Frobenius-Schur indicator ν₂ ∈ {−1, 0, +1} partitions wire types into two subtypes: AssocWire (ν₂ ≠ 0, Origami ISA) and FullWire (ν₂ = 0 allowed, 731 ISA). The SPIN opcode — the generator of triality, the order-3 outer automorphism of Spin(8) with G₂ = Fix(triality) — has type FullWire → FullWire with the constraint ν₂ = 0. Applying SPIN to an AssocWire raises a TypeError at circuit construction time, before any hardware is consulted. Associamancy (Paper 407) is no longer only a resource-theoretic concept — it is a compile-time type mismatch. The three-level resource hierarchy as a type tower: Level Resource Wire subtype Protection 0 Stabiliser Any Rep(SU(2)) None 1 Standard magic AssocWire (ν₂ ≠ 0) None 2 Associamancy FullWire (ν₂ = 0) Discrete Berry phase (W(G₂), order 12) The Pacioli Combinator Library as the financial instance. The PCL (Paper 306) — typed combinators flow, sequence, choose, fold — is the financial instance of this DSL with G = (ℝ₊, ×). The Pacioli identity (every debit has a credit) is d² = 0 at the financial instance. The same typed circuit compiles to quantum hardware, financial risk models, or nuclear spectroscopy; only the gauge group G and the wire type interpretation change. Python prototype included: ISACircuit class with runtime type checking; spin() raises TypeError if ν₂ ≠ 0; pentagon_check() validates d² = 0 at construction time. Keywords: Origami ISA, typed DSL, linear types, dependent types, Schur boundary, associamancy, no-cloning, Pentagon identity, Clebsch-Gordan, Pacioli combinator library, symmetric monoidal category, ZX-calculus, G₂, triality, type theory, quantum circuits
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. A practitioner's primer for quantum computing researchers. No knowledge of octonions, sheaf theory, or category theory is assumed. Knowledge of stabiliser states, the Clifford group, and T-gates is assumed. The central message: the structure of the 3-qubit Pauli group is secretly governed by the Fano plane PG(2,2), and the Fano plane is the geometry of the 731 instruction set architecture (731 ISA) — a unified framework for quantum computation that organises every opcode as a Pachner move on a simplicial complex. The framework reveals three levels of quantum computational resource:• Level 0 (Clifford): stabiliser states; Gottesman-Knill simulable; the Fano lines are the free sector.• Level 1 (Standard magic): T-gates; Wigner function negativity; non-Clifford but accessible to the Origami ISA (regime 2).• Level 2 (Associamancy): the SPIN opcode; the Schur boundary; genuinely complex irreps of PSL(2,7); not accessible to any associative hardware. The Origami ISA (five opcodes: SPLIT, SPLAT, TWIST, FLIP, FLOP) subsumes Bell sampling, qudit stabiliser learning, and the abelian hidden subgroup problem as special cases. The 731 ISA adds SPIN and BIND, unlocking Level 2. This primer is a companion to "The Topology of Risk" (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20642983), which covers the same H⁰/H¹/H² framework applied to financial risk. Keywords: quantum computing, Fano plane, Origami ISA, 731 ISA, stabiliser states, magic states, associamancy, Schur boundary, primer, tutorial, hidden subgroup problem, MBQC, photonics
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. The seven opcodes of the Origami instruction-set architecture (ISA) — FLOP, SPLIT, TWIST, LABEL, BIND, FLIP, SPLAT — play structurally identical roles across every exactly solvable quantum model with a phase transition. This paper establishes a universal dictionary: FLOP is always the fermionisation map (Jordan–Wigner / slave-boson / Majorana representation); SPLIT is always the diagonalisation (Bogoliubov / Bethe rapidity / stabiliser expansion); TWIST is always the gap check (Berry phase / Chern number / spectral gap); LABEL is always the sector projection (gauge fixing / stabiliser projection / Bethe vacuum). BIND — the three-body frog vertex — is the unique opcode whose presence or absence determines whether a phase supports Abelian or non-Abelian anyons. Two theorems are proved. The BIND = Non-Abelian theorem: a gapped topological phase has non-Abelian anyonic order if and only if its minimal ISA programme contains BIND. The Universal Phase Boundary theorem: for any model in the SU(2)q family at q = exp(iπβ), the quantum phase transition is a TWIST failure at β = 1/2, where the quantum dimension d{1/2}(β) = 2cos(πβ) = 0 exactly. A master table across twelve models — toric code, Kitaev honeycomb, TFIM, XXZ chain, string nets, quantum doubles, SYK, MBQC, ZX-calculus, and others — makes the dictionary explicit. The Origami ISA is the universal language in which condensed-matter physicists, quantum-information theorists, and representation theorists describe the same computation under different names. Keywords instruction set architecture, exactly solvable models, topological order, non-Abelian anyons, quantum phase transitions, Origami ISA, Jordan–Wigner transformation, Bogoliubov transformation, Bethe ansatz, toric code, Kitaev honeycomb, XXZ chain, string-net condensation, quantum doubles, SYK model, MBQC, ZX-calculus, Frobenius algebra, quantum groups, Berry phase, BIND theorem, β-ladder, tensor networks, categorical quantum mechanics
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. Magic-state distillation (MSD) is the dominant overhead cost in fault-tolerant quantum computing: each logical T or CCZ gate currently requires 100–1,000 physical qubits dedicated to distillation, consuming the majority of a quantum processor's resources. This paper introduces the Origami Instruction Set Architecture (Origami ISA) as a compiler layer for fault-tolerant quantum error correction — operating on existing lattice surgery hardware without modification. The five opcodes — FLIP, FLOP, SPLIT, SPLAT, TWIST — operate at the logical level and compute exact symbolic (rational or algebraic) amplitudes via the thermion library, enabling algebraic verification of gate correctness before any physical circuit is generated. Three contributions: 1. Frobenius cancellation: The Frobenius axiom (SPLIT(j) ∘ SPLAT(j)= id) is an automatic compiler optimisation that detects and removes redundant merge-boundary open/close pairs in lattice surgery protocols, reducing physical gate count by 29–67% on standard protocols. 2. Regime ladder: Every quantum error-correcting code is classified by its F-move amplitudes. Rung-0 codes (stabiliser codes, surface codes) require MSD for non-Clifford gates. Rung-1 codes ([[15,1,3]] Reed-Muller, colour codes) support transversal non-Clifford gates with zero MSD overhead. The ladder predicts which hardware can eliminate MSD and which cannot. 3. Zero-MSD CCZ protocol: The SPLIT;FLOP;FLOP;CCZ;FLOP⁻¹;FLOP⁻¹;SPLAT protocol implements a universal CCZ gate on the combined [[7,1,3]] + 1531-Anvil hardware without any magic-state distillation. Machine-verified correctness via the Frobenius axiom and Pentagon identity, proved by exact symbolic arithmetic. The Pentagon identity holds exactly for all five codes examined — proving by exact symbolic arithmetic rather than numerical simulation. Keywords Origami ISA, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Magic State Distillation, Lattice Surgery, Frobenius Axiom, Pentagon Identity, Regime Ladder, CCZ Gate, Transversal Gates, Reed-Muller Code, [[15,1,3]] Code, Steane Code, [[7,1,3]] Code, 1531-Anvil, FLIP Opcode, FLOP Opcode, SPLIT Opcode, SPLAT Opcode, Quantum Compiler, Diagrammatic Calculus, Exact Arithmetic, Thermion Library, F-Move Amplitude, Colour Code, Surface Code, Quantum Error Correction, Zero Overhead
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. The Origami ISA opcodes are physical pulses: TWIST is a microwave rotation, SPLIT is an entangling gate, and the pentagon identity d² = 0 is a pulse-level constraint — violation means leakage. DRAG (Derivative Removal via Adiabatic Gate) is the ISA type checker that enforces this constraint, keeping TWIST within the correct representation subspace. ISA-augmented GRAPE reduces leakage by 63% vs standard GRAPE on a two-qudit transmon model (experiment x411a). The SPIN opcode implements triality — the order-3 outer automorphism of Spin(8) that cyclically permutes its three 8-dimensional irreps (8ᵥ, 8ₛ, 8꜀), with G₂ = Fix(triality). As a Fano-point permutation, SPIN costs exactly 12 CNOTs. Its phase component (i√7/2, not a root of unity) requires either O(log^c(1/ε)) Solovay-Kitaev approximation or a native G₂-symmetric Hamiltonian — the pulse-level expression of associamancy (experiment x411b). The Weyl group W(G₂) ≅ D₆ has order 12. All closed loops in G₂ parameter space give holonomies in this discrete group, giving topological protection unavailable to SU(2) holonomic gates (whose Berry phases are continuous). G₂ holonomic gates are exact under any continuous deformation that stays within one Weyl chamber (experiment x411c). Level-2 (associamancy) is the first resource level with topological protection built in. Keywords: origami ISA, pulse control, GRAPE, DRAG, triality, SPIN opcode, Berry phase, G₂, Weyl group, holonomic gates, transmon, trapped ion, 731 ISA, associamancy, optimal control
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. We articulate a structural parallel between the MIP*=RE theorem and the Origami Instruction Set Architecture (ISA). The algebraic rigidity of entangled-prover verification — exact-or-fail Pauli basis tests, low-degree tests, Mermin Magic Square constraints — corresponds precisely to the Frobenius axiom SPLIT∘SPLAT=1, the Pentagon identity, and the seven-point Fano plane PG(2,2) in the ISA framework. Six numerical experiments confirm the parallels: Pentagon unitarity holds exactly for all j ∈ {1/2,...,15/2}; Frobenius fidelity degrades as (1-p)^{2(2j+1)} under depolarising noise; the GHZ stabiliser group forms a perfect quantum Fano strategy satisfying all seven constraints simultaneously while no classical strategy can; G₂ non-associativity produces a sharp excluded-volume step function above j=7/2. This version adds a synthesis remark showing that the numbers 3 and 7 — the two dimensions where the cross product exists, gyroscopes are stable, and choreographic orbits can close — are not two separate coincidences but the same theorem: the Fano plane PG(2,F₂) has 7 points and 3 points per line because these are the imaginary unit counts of the octonions O and quaternions H respectively, forced by the unique projective plane of order q=2 over the field F₂. The broken Fano (6/7 architecture) and the magic/non-associativity conjecture are restated in this unified language. The practical implication is a conjecture that fault-tolerant quantum computing overhead is governed by the regime of the code's F-move amplitudes, with MSD-free computation possible at rung 1 and higher. Keywords MIP* Equals RE, Interactive Proof Systems, Quantum Entanglement, Pentagon Identity, Frobenius Axiom, Fano Plane, PG(2,2), GHZ Stabiliser, Origami ISA, Wigner 6j Symbol, Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing, Magic State Distillation, Regime Ladder, Complexity Theory, Quantum Prover, Local Pauli Test, Low-Degree Test, G₂ Non-Associativity, Excluded Volume, Depolarising Noise, Rung-1, Quantum Verification, Adelic Simplicial Architecture
PENDING QUALITY AUDIT (2026-08). The file is restricted while this record is reviewed as part of a systematic audit of the author's corpus. It has not yet been assessed. Metadata and DOI remain public, and access can be requested. Hinsche, Eisert & Carrasco (PRX Quantum 7, 020337, 2026) introduced the abelian state hidden subgroup problem (StateHSP) and showed it is solved by quantum Fourier sampling via the character POVM Π_λ = (1/|G|) Σ_g χ̄_λ(g) R(g). We show this entire framework is an instance of the Origami ISA: the character POVM is the SPLAT opcode (fibre integration on the group algebra sheaf), and the full algorithm is the canonical SPLIT→SPLAT pipeline. Three corollaries: (1) Bell sampling is SPLAT on 2 copies with the SWAP representation over G=ℤ₂ⁿ. (2) Qudit stabiliser learning at d=3 is SPLAT on 3 copies, native to the TriQ register at depth O(1). (3) The StateHSP is H⁰ recovery — the hidden subgroup H is the zeroth sheaf cohomology H⁰(Γ_G, F_ψ) of the symmetry sheaf, and the O(log|G|/ε) sample complexity follows from H¹=0 (anticoncentration). The non-abelian extension — requiring the SPIN opcode and genuine complex irreps — is treated in the companion paper (doi:10.5281/zenodo.20667170). Keywords: quantum computing, hidden subgroup problem, Fourier sampling, SPLAT, Origami ISA, Bell sampling, stabiliser learning, sheaf cohomology, TriQ register, character POVM, abelian