This work investigates quantum kernel methods for classification on unbalanced datasets. The study considers the effect of techniques commonly used in classical machine learning, such as kernel centering and cost-sensitive learning, when applied to quantum models. Experiments are conducted on five datasets, including MNIST-1D, the real-world dataset Glass6, and synthetic datasets tailored for quantum classifiers. Results indicate that quantum kernel methods can address unbalanced classification tasks albeit none of the techniques studied showed a statistically significant improvement of the scoring metrics. Results also highlight the influence of hyperparameterization and in particular, quantum bandwidth is identified as a critical hyperparameter for the performance of quantum models.
This work investigates quantum kernel methods for classification on unbalanced datasets. The study considers the effect of techniques commonly used in classical machine learning, such as kernel centering and cost-sensitive learning, when applied to quantum models. Experiments are conducted on five datasets, including MNIST-1D, the real-world dataset Glass6, and synthetic datasets tailored for quantum classifiers. Results indicate that quantum kernel methods can address unbalanced classification tasks albeit none of the techniques studied showed a statistically significant improvement of the scoring metrics. Results also highlight the influence of hyperparameterization and in particular, quantum bandwidth is identified as a critical hyperparameter for the performance of quantum models.
This work investigates quantum kernel methods for classification on unbalanced datasets. The study considers the effect of techniques commonly used in classical machine learning, such as kernel centering and cost-sensitive learning, when applied to quantum models. Experiments are conducted on five datasets, including MNIST-1D, the real-world dataset Glass6, and synthetic datasets tailored for quantum classifiers. Results indicate that quantum kernel methods can address unbalanced classification tasks albeit none of the techniques studied showed a statistically significant improvement of the scoring metrics. Results also highlight the influence of hyperparameterization and in particular, quantum bandwidth is identified as a critical hyperparameter for the performance of quantum models.
Quantum-enhanced machine learning is a rapidly evolving field that aims to leverage the unique properties of quantum mechanics to enhance classical machine learning. However, the practical applicability of these methods remains an open question, particularly beyond the context of specifically crafted toy problems, and given the current limitations of quantum hardware. This study focuses on quantum kernel methods in the context of classification tasks. In particular, it examines the performance of quantum kernel estimation and quantum kernel training (QKT) in connection with two quantum feature mappings, namely, ZZFeatureMap and CovariantFeatureMap. Remarkably, these feature maps have been proposed in the literature under the conjecture of possible near-term quantum advantage and have shown promising performance in ad hoc datasets. This study aims to evaluate their versatility and generalization capabilities in a more general benchmark, encompassing both artificial and established reference datasets. Classical machine learning methods, specifically support vector machines and logistic regression, are also incorporated as baseline comparisons. Experimental results indicate that quantum methods exhibit varying performance across different datasets. Despite outperforming classical methods in ad hoc datasets, mixed results are obtained for the general case among standard classical benchmarks. The experimental data call into question a general added value of applying QKT optimization, for which the additional computational cost does not necessarily translate into improved classification performance. Instead, it is suggested that a careful choice of the quantum feature map in connection with proper hyperparameterization may prove more effective.
Abstract Quantum kernel methods are considered a promising avenue for applying quantum computers to machine learning problems. However, recent results overlook the central role hyperparameters play in determining the performance of machine learning methods. In this work we identify the hyperparameter controlling the bandwidth of a quantum kernel and show that it controls the expressivity of the resulting model. We use extensive numerical experiments with multiple quantum kernels and classical datasets to show consistent change in the model behavior from underfitting (bandwidth too large) to overfitting (bandwidth too small), with optimal generalization in between. We draw a connection between the bandwidth of classical and quantum kernels and show analogous behavior in both cases. Furthermore, we show that optimizing the bandwidth can help mitigate the exponential decay of kernel values with qubit count, which is the cause behind recent observations that the performance of quantum kernel methods decreases with qubit count. We reproduce these negative results and show that if the kernel bandwidth is optimized, the performance instead improves with growing qubit count and becomes competitive with the best classical methods.
The discovery of quantum algorithms offering provable advantages over the best known classical alternatives, together with the parallel ongoing revolution brought about by classical artificial intelligence, motivates a search for applications of quantum information processing methods to machine learning. Among several proposals in this domain, quantum kernel methods have emerged as particularly promising candidates. However, while some rigorous speedups on certain highly specific problems have been formally proven, only empirical proof-of-principle results have been reported so far for real-world datasets. Moreover, no systematic procedure is known, in general, to fine tune and optimize the performances of kernel-based quantum classification algorithms. At the same time, certain limitations such as kernel concentration effects-hindering the trainability of quantum classifiers-have also been recently pointed out. In this work, we propose several general-purpose optimization methods and best practices designed to enhance the practical usefulness of fidelity-based quantum classification algorithms. Specifically, we first describe a data pre-processing strategy that, by preserving the relevant relationships between data points when processed through quantum feature maps, substantially alleviates the effect of kernel concentration on structured datasets. We also introduce a classical post-processing method that, based on standard fidelity measures estimated on a quantum processor, yields non-linear decision boundaries in the feature Hilbert space, thus achieving the quantum counterpart of the radial basis functions technique that is widely employed in classical kernel methods. Finally, we apply the so-called quantum metric learning protocol to engineer and adjust trainable quantum embeddings, demonstrating substantial performance improvements on several paradigmatic real-world classification tasks.
Quantum kernel methods are a promising branch of quantum machine learning, but their per- formance across data types and encoding choices remains incompletely understood. To address this gap, we developed an algorithmic framework for variational quantum kernels utilizing resource- efficient ansätze for complex classification tasks and introduced a parameter scaling technique to accelerate convergence. We conducted a comprehensive benchmark of this framework on eight chal- lenging, real-world and high-dimensional datasets covering tabular, image, time series, and graph data. Our results show that the proposed quantum kernel demonstrated competitive classification accuracy compared to standard classical kernels in classical simulation, such as the radial basis function (RBF) kernel. This work demonstrates that properly designed quantum kernels can func- tion as versatile, high-performance tools, laying a foundation for quantum-enhanced applications in machine learning. Further research is needed to fully assess the practical performance of quantum methods.
Quantum kernel methods are the most concrete near-term proposal for quantum machine learning on classical data, yet published benchmarks disagree on whether they outperform tuned classical kernels, and the disagreement cannot be resolved from the literature because the comparisons are not protocol-controlled. We argue that the obstacle is one of measurement, not theory: the usual setup fixes the quantum feature map's data scaling while grid-searching the classical kernel's hyperparameters, recomputes nothing per fold, and reports cost in simulator time. We therefore treat the comparison itself as the object of study and impose three controls. The bandwidth is tuned on the same grid budget as the classical γ, the kernel is recomputed inside every fold from fold-fitted preprocessing, and cost is counted in hardware circuit evaluations. On top of these we run a factorial design of 324 cells in which dimensionality, training size, class separability and data structure are explicit covariates, together with four standard datasets, a shots-versus-gate-noise ablation, and a cost sweep. The dominant effect we measure is not quantum: tuning the feature map's bandwidth is worth 0.120 accuracy on synthetic data and 0.339 on real data, exceeding every quantum-classical difference we observe. Tuned quantum kernels are then statistically indistinguishable from a tuned RBF on all four real datasets. The advantage on synthetic data is confined almost entirely to data generated by the feature map itself, and it shrinks with dimensionality (-0.0045 per qubit) while growing with sample size. Finite sampling costs an order of magnitude more accuracy than gate and readout noise, and a fidelity kernel needs 5×107 circuits at n = 10,000. Protocol variance is thus sufficient to explain the field's contradictory conclusions.