Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Experimental Tests of Future-Boundary Influence in the Two-State Vector Formalism: Quantum, Geological, and Classical-Memory Protocols

Denis Saklakov

Published Mar 11, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The asymmetry of causation, according to which physical influences propagate from past events to future events, remains deeply embedded in scientific reasoning. Time-symmetric formulations of quantum mechanics, including the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF), challenge the assumption that initial conditions alone provide a complete description of physical systems. Motivated by TSVF and by broader retrocausal interpretations, this paper proposes three falsifiable protocols for testing possible future-boundary influence. Experiment 1 investigates whether weak-measurement records exhibit statistically significant correlations with later postselection conditions in a delayed-choice optical architecture. Experiment 2 evaluates geological asymmetry using impact, extinction, geomagnetic, and large-igneous-province datasets through a predefined correlation-asymmetry statistic near a hypothesized 36 Myr lag. The geological protocol is subject to intrinsic power limitations, as the Phanerozoic record contains only approximately fifteen cycles of the hypothesized 36 Myr period. Experiment 3 examines whether protected classical memory records remain independent of a later quantum-random decision, thereby establishing upper bounds on any putative retrocausal extension beyond standard laboratory TSVF applications. The paper does not claim that retrocausality has been demonstrated; it formulates quantitative null hypotheses, significance criteria, replication requirements, and upper-bound methodologies.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20620558

Related papers

Predictive Programming as a Quantum Boundary Effect

Daniel Lee Harrell

This manuscript proposes that predictive programming—the appearance of future events in earlier cultural works—may emerge naturally from a two-boundary quantum framework rather than coincidence or intentional signaling. Drawing on the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF), Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiments, and Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation, the paper models cultural imagination as a bidirectional information system shaped jointly by past initial conditions and future boundary states. When combined with attractor dynamics, this framework identifies a statistical overlap region in which certain cultural motifs become amplified because they satisfy both forward-evolved plausibility and backward-constrained compatibility. This overlap region creates the appearance of cultural “predictions” without invoking conspiracy, mysticism, or intentional foreknowledge. The manuscript argues that narrative systems may function similarly to time-symmetric physical systems, where information flow is constrained by both historical momentum and eventual outcomes. Fiction, satire, and speculative media act as probes of this probability landscape, revealing regions of cultural state space with unusually high stability under two-boundary constraints. This work forms part of an ongoing research effort exploring retrocausal models, boundary-condition dynamics, and emergent structure in cultural and historical systems. Keywords: retrocausality, predictive programming, TSVF, delayed choice, attractor dynamics, boundary conditions, nonlinear systems

•Nov 15, 2025•0 citations

The Quantum Eraser Paradox

Colm P. Bracken, Jonte R. Hance, Sabine Hossenfelder

The Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiment is commonly interpreted as implying that in quantum mechanics a choice made at one time can influence an earlier event. We here suggest an extension of the experiment that results in a paradox when analysed in a local realist interpretation combined with backward causation (``dynamical retrocausality''). We argue that resolving the paradox requires giving up the idea that, in quantum mechanics, a choice can influence the past in this way, and that it instead requires a violation of Statistical Independence without (what most people think of as) retrocausality. Finally, we propose an implementation of the experiment that we believe to be possible with existing technology. This new experiment can distinguish between different types of hidden-variables theories in a way that Bell-type tests cannot: unlike in a Bell test, the measurement setting here is set by an earlier outcome, which makes the consistency of the backwards influence itself testable. We classify the fixed-point (consistency-enforcing) hidden-variables models of the experiment, which can reproduce quantum mechanics only if the backwards influence has no observable effect.

arXiv:2111.09347•Nov 17, 2021•0 citations

Weak Measurement and TSVF

K.G.M. Orbons

In this thesis, the article “Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement’s\nOutcome?” is used as a starting point to explore the peculiar\ncorrelations between subsequent weak (i.e. non-projective) and\nstrong measurements in a variation of the EPR-Bell experiment. Bell’s\ntheorem states that particles may not possess predetermined values.\nHowever, as the outcomes of the subsequent weak and strong measurements\ndo statistically agree, an apparent contridiction arises. The\nauthors claim that the correlations between the results are best explained\nusing the time-symmetric two-state vector formalism, stating\nthat the experimenter’s future choice has been encrypted in the weak\nmeasurement’s outcomes.\nAlternative explanations are analyzed and a numerical simulation was\nmade to invigorate the notion of a so called weak-bias. Meaning that\nthe weak measurements sufficiently influence the particles’ states to\naccount for the statistical agreement.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Does the Quantum Eraser Erase the Past?: Correlation Structures and Accessibility within the Intrinsic Observability Framework

Atsushi Okamoto

The delayed-choice quantum eraser is frequently presented as suggesting that a measurement performed in the future can influence an event that has already occurred. However, the experimental observations themselves do not require such a retrocausal interpretation. This paper reexamines the quantum eraser from the perspective of the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), with particular attention to the role of distinguishability in the idler measurement. The essential experimental distinction is whether the idler is measured in a basis that preserves the distinguishability of the two generation alternatives or in a superposition basis that removes this distinguishability. In the former case, no conditional interference pattern appears, whereas in the latter, complementary interference patterns can be recovered through coincidence analysis. Importantly, this delayed choice does not modify any previously recorded signal event. Rather, the later idler outcome determines how the already recorded signal events are conditionally classified according to the implemented measurement basis. Within the IOF, this structure is interpreted by distinguishing Potential Observability (PO) from operationally established observable values. PO may contain phase relations, entanglement, and correlation structures without requiring pre-existing definite observable values. Measurement grants accessibility and establishes observable values, while subsequent correlation analysis reveals relational structures preserved among those values. From this perspective, the quantum eraser neither erases nor rewrites the past; it reveals how different accessibility conditions expose different conditional structures within the same set of measurement records. The analysis further shows that the beam splitter itself is not the fundamental element of quantum erasure: the essential condition is whether the idler measurement preserves or removes distinguishability between the alternatives. This distinction provides a direct connection between quantum erasure and the broader IOF concept of accessibility while remaining compatible with the standard quantum-mechanical formalism.

•Sep 26, 2026•0 citations

Resolving the Delayed Choice Paradox via Observer-Relative Information

Greco, Giuseppe Junior

Delayed-choice and quantum eraser experiments are frequently interpreted as implying retrocausal effects, in which present measurement decisions influence past physical events. This paper develops an Observer-First Interpretation (OFI) in which quantum states are treated as observer-relative informational constructs constrained by evidence accessibility and record availability. Within this framework, delayed-choice phenomena do not involve backward-in-time physical influence, but instead arise from conditional informational updates applied to measurement records that were never globally fixed. Temporal paradoxes emerge only when observer-relative state assignments are illegitimately promoted to observer-independent histories. The proposed interpretation preserves causal ordering, respects relativistic constraints, and reproduces all standard quantum predictions without modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics.

•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

Empirical Hardware Demonstration of Coherence Shielding via Floquet Time-Crystal Dynamics and Post-Selected Temporal Boundaries on Superconducting Processors

Gemini AI, Colin Oreilly

Building upon the framework of Relativity of Information and Geometric Principles, this study presents empirical hardware-level execution results investigating quantum informational geometry and temporal boundary constraints. Utilizing a multi-qubit observer circuit deployed on live IBM quantum hardware (⁠ibm_fez⁠), we implement periodic Floquet driving loops and Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF) post-selection filtering. By examining the resulting multi-state distributions and constrained sub-ensembles, we explore how retrocausally-coupled boundary conditions can be leveraged to probe processes outside standard present-moment observation horizons and evaluate coherence extension on physical transmon architectures.

•Aug 9, 2026•0 citations
The asymmetry of causation, according to which physical influences propagate from past events to future events, remains deeply embedded in scientific reasoning. Time-symmetric formulations of quantum mechanics, including the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF), challenge the assumption that initial conditions alone provide a complete description of physical systems. Motivated by TSVF and by broader retrocausal interpretations, this paper proposes three falsifiable protocols for testing possible future-boundary influence. Experiment 1 investigates whether weak-measurement records exhibit statistically significant correlations with later postselection conditions in a delayed-choice optical architecture. Experiment 2 evaluates geological asymmetry using impact, extinction, geomagnetic, and large-igneous-province datasets through a predefined correlation-asymmetry statistic near a hypothesized 36 Myr lag. The geological protocol is subject to intrinsic power limitations, as the Phanerozoic record contains only approximately fifteen cycles of the hypothesized 36 Myr period. Experiment 3 examines whether protected classical memory records remain independent of a later quantum-random decision, thereby establishing upper bounds on any putative retrocausal extension beyond standard laboratory TSVF applications. The paper does not claim that retrocausality has been demonstrated; it formulates quantitative null hypotheses, significance criteria, replication requirements, and upper-bound methodologies.
This manuscript proposes that predictive programming—the appearance of future events in earlier cultural works—may emerge naturally from a two-boundary quantum framework rather than coincidence or intentional signaling. Drawing on the Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF), Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiments, and Cramer’s Transactional Interpretation, the paper models cultural imagination as a bidirectional information system shaped jointly by past initial conditions and future boundary states. When combined with attractor dynamics, this framework identifies a statistical overlap region in which certain cultural motifs become amplified because they satisfy both forward-evolved plausibility and backward-constrained compatibility. This overlap region creates the appearance of cultural “predictions” without invoking conspiracy, mysticism, or intentional foreknowledge. The manuscript argues that narrative systems may function similarly to time-symmetric physical systems, where information flow is constrained by both historical momentum and eventual outcomes. Fiction, satire, and speculative media act as probes of this probability landscape, revealing regions of cultural state space with unusually high stability under two-boundary constraints. This work forms part of an ongoing research effort exploring retrocausal models, boundary-condition dynamics, and emergent structure in cultural and historical systems. Keywords: retrocausality, predictive programming, TSVF, delayed choice, attractor dynamics, boundary conditions, nonlinear systems
The Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser experiment is commonly interpreted as implying that in quantum mechanics a choice made at one time can influence an earlier event. We here suggest an extension of the experiment that results in a paradox when analysed in a local realist interpretation combined with backward causation (``dynamical retrocausality''). We argue that resolving the paradox requires giving up the idea that, in quantum mechanics, a choice can influence the past in this way, and that it instead requires a violation of Statistical Independence without (what most people think of as) retrocausality. Finally, we propose an implementation of the experiment that we believe to be possible with existing technology. This new experiment can distinguish between different types of hidden-variables theories in a way that Bell-type tests cannot: unlike in a Bell test, the measurement setting here is set by an earlier outcome, which makes the consistency of the backwards influence itself testable. We classify the fixed-point (consistency-enforcing) hidden-variables models of the experiment, which can reproduce quantum mechanics only if the backwards influence has no observable effect.
In this thesis, the article “Can a Future Choice Affect a Past Measurement’s\nOutcome?” is used as a starting point to explore the peculiar\ncorrelations between subsequent weak (i.e. non-projective) and\nstrong measurements in a variation of the EPR-Bell experiment. Bell’s\ntheorem states that particles may not possess predetermined values.\nHowever, as the outcomes of the subsequent weak and strong measurements\ndo statistically agree, an apparent contridiction arises. The\nauthors claim that the correlations between the results are best explained\nusing the time-symmetric two-state vector formalism, stating\nthat the experimenter’s future choice has been encrypted in the weak\nmeasurement’s outcomes.\nAlternative explanations are analyzed and a numerical simulation was\nmade to invigorate the notion of a so called weak-bias. Meaning that\nthe weak measurements sufficiently influence the particles’ states to\naccount for the statistical agreement.
The delayed-choice quantum eraser is frequently presented as suggesting that a measurement performed in the future can influence an event that has already occurred. However, the experimental observations themselves do not require such a retrocausal interpretation. This paper reexamines the quantum eraser from the perspective of the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), with particular attention to the role of distinguishability in the idler measurement. The essential experimental distinction is whether the idler is measured in a basis that preserves the distinguishability of the two generation alternatives or in a superposition basis that removes this distinguishability. In the former case, no conditional interference pattern appears, whereas in the latter, complementary interference patterns can be recovered through coincidence analysis. Importantly, this delayed choice does not modify any previously recorded signal event. Rather, the later idler outcome determines how the already recorded signal events are conditionally classified according to the implemented measurement basis. Within the IOF, this structure is interpreted by distinguishing Potential Observability (PO) from operationally established observable values. PO may contain phase relations, entanglement, and correlation structures without requiring pre-existing definite observable values. Measurement grants accessibility and establishes observable values, while subsequent correlation analysis reveals relational structures preserved among those values. From this perspective, the quantum eraser neither erases nor rewrites the past; it reveals how different accessibility conditions expose different conditional structures within the same set of measurement records. The analysis further shows that the beam splitter itself is not the fundamental element of quantum erasure: the essential condition is whether the idler measurement preserves or removes distinguishability between the alternatives. This distinction provides a direct connection between quantum erasure and the broader IOF concept of accessibility while remaining compatible with the standard quantum-mechanical formalism.
Delayed-choice and quantum eraser experiments are frequently interpreted as implying retrocausal effects, in which present measurement decisions influence past physical events. This paper develops an Observer-First Interpretation (OFI) in which quantum states are treated as observer-relative informational constructs constrained by evidence accessibility and record availability. Within this framework, delayed-choice phenomena do not involve backward-in-time physical influence, but instead arise from conditional informational updates applied to measurement records that were never globally fixed. Temporal paradoxes emerge only when observer-relative state assignments are illegitimately promoted to observer-independent histories. The proposed interpretation preserves causal ordering, respects relativistic constraints, and reproduces all standard quantum predictions without modifying the formalism of quantum mechanics.
Building upon the framework of Relativity of Information and Geometric Principles, this study presents empirical hardware-level execution results investigating quantum informational geometry and temporal boundary constraints. Utilizing a multi-qubit observer circuit deployed on live IBM quantum hardware (⁠ibm_fez⁠), we implement periodic Floquet driving loops and Two-State Vector Formalism (TSVF) post-selection filtering. By examining the resulting multi-state distributions and constrained sub-ensembles, we explore how retrocausally-coupled boundary conditions can be leveraged to probe processes outside standard present-moment observation horizons and evaluate coherence extension on physical transmon architectures.