A relational, interaction‑first derivation showing particle indistinguishability need not be imposed by a symmetrization postulate. Quantum mechanics treats the indistinguishability of identical particles as a fact to be imposed by hand, through the symmetrization postulate. This paper shows that the imposition is unnecessary in a framework where interaction, rather than quantification, is the foundational primitive. Quantification presupposes distinguishability; distinguishability is available only through relation; what is available only through relation is downstream of interaction. Taking interaction as the foundational primitive yields indistinguishability not as a postulate to be honoured but as a feature of the grammar itself: labels for what cannot be answered apart have no place in the system that produces what can be counted. The empirical success of the symmetrization postulate is then read as warrant for the framework that did not require it. The postulate’s other role — fixing the topological phase that distinguishes fermions from bosons — requires the boundary mechanics of recursive patterns of interaction and is taken up in a subsequent paper.
A relational, interaction‑first derivation showing particle indistinguishability need not be imposed by a symmetrization postulate. Quantum mechanics treats the indistinguishability of identical particles as a fact to be imposed by hand, through the symmetrization postulate. This paper shows that the imposition is unnecessary in a framework where interaction, rather than quantification, is the foundational primitive. Quantification presupposes distinguishability; distinguishability is available only through relation; what is available only through relation is downstream of interaction. Taking interaction as the foundational primitive yields indistinguishability not as a postulate to be honoured but as a feature of the grammar itself: labels for what cannot be answered apart have no place in the system that produces what can be counted. The empirical success of the symmetrization postulate is then read as warrant for the framework that did not require it. The postulate’s other role — fixing the topological phase that distinguishes fermions from bosons — requires the boundary mechanics of recursive patterns of interaction and is taken up in a subsequent paper.
A remarkable feature of quantum theory is that particles with identical intrinsic properties must be treated as indistinguishable if the theory is to give valid predictions in all cases. In the quantum formalism, indistinguishability is expressed via the symmetrization postulate (Dirac P 1926 Proc. R. Soc. A 112 661 , Heisenberg W 1926 Z. Phys. 38 411 ), which restricts a system of identical particles to the set of symmetric states ('bosons') or the set of antisymmetric states ('fermions'). However, the physical basis and range of validity of the symmetrization postulate has not been established. A well-known topological derivation of the postulate implies that its validity depends on the dimensionality of the space in which the particles move (Laidlaw M and DeWitt C 1971 Phys. Rev. D 3 1375–8 , Leinaas J M and Myrheim J 1977 Il Nuovo Cimento B 37 1–23 ). Here we show that the symmetrization postulate can be derived by strictly adhering to the informational requirement that particles which cannot be experimentally distinguished from one another are not labelled. Our key novel postulate is the operational indistinguishability postulate, which posits that the amplitude of a process involving several indistinguishable particles is determined by the amplitudes of all possible transitions of these particles when treated as distinguishable. The symmetrization postulate follows by requiring consistency with the rest of the quantum formalism. The derivation implies that the symmetrization postulate admits no natural variants. In particular, the possibility that identical particles generically exhibit anyonic behavior in two dimensions is excluded.
The suggestion that particles of the same kind may be indistinguishable in a fundamental sense, even so that challenges to traditional notions of individuality and identity may arise, has first come up in the context of classical statistical mechanics. In particular, the Gibbs paradox has sometimes been interpreted as a sign of the untenability of the classical concept of a particle and as a premonition that quantum theory is needed. This idea of a ‘quantum connection’ stubbornly persists in the literature, even though it has also been criticized frequently. Here we shall argue that although this criticism is justified, the proposed alternative solutions have often been wrong and have not put the paradox in its right perspective. In fact, the Gibbs paradox is unrelated to fundamental issues of particle identity; only distinguishability in a pragmatic sense plays a role (in this we develop ideas of van Kampen [10]), and in principle the paradox always is there as long as the concept of a particle applies at all. In line with this we show that the paradox survives even in quantum mechanics, in spite of the quantum mechanical (anti-)symmetrization postulates.
In this article, we discuss the identity and indistinguishability of quantum systems and the consequent need to introduce an extra postulate in Quantum Mechanics to correctly describe situations involving indistinguishable particles. This is, for electrons, the Pauli Exclusion Principle, or in general, the Symmetrization Postulate. Then, we introduce fermions and bosons and the distributions respectively describing their statistical behaviour in indistinguishable situations. Following that, we discuss the spin-statistics connection, as well as alternative statistics and experimental evidence for all these results, including the use of bunching and antibunching of particles emerging from a beam splitter as a signature for some bosonic or fermionic states.
In this article, we discuss the identity and indistinguishability of quantum systems and the consequent need to introduce an extra postulate in Quantum Mechanics to correctly describe situations involving indistinguishable particles. This is, for electrons, the Pauli Exclusion Principle, or in general, the Symmetrization Postulate. Then, we introduce fermions and bosons and the distributions respectively describing their statistical behaviour in indistinguishable situations. Following that, we discuss the spin-statistics connection, as well as alternative statistics and experimental evidence for all these results, including the use of bunching and antibunching of particles emerging from a beam splitter as a signature for some bosonic or fermionic states.
Quantum mechanics is empirically unrivalled, yet the origin of its distinctive non-classical features remains a foundational question. This paper proves, within the unchanged standard quantum formalism, that these features—collectively termed “quantumness”—arise if and only if certain configurations of the system are indistinguishable in principle. Quantumness is defined as any deviation from classical probability distributions, i.e., probabilities that require coherent amplitude addition rather than incoherent probability addition. Three theorems are established using only the standard Hilbert-space formalism and unitary evolution: 1. Indistinguishability of configurations is necessary and sufficient for quantumness.2. Indistinguishability of identical particles is neither necessary nor sufficient.3. An equivalent restatement in precise operational terms: quantumness occurs exactly when a variable lacks physical definition (distinguishability in principle by macroscopic outcomes). These results are presented and interpreted within the Logical Interpretation of quantum mechanics, a minimalist framework that adds no new postulates and applies classical logic strictly to physically defined facts. The interpretation provides the conceptual tools—particularly the precise notion of “indistinguishability in principle”—that make the theorems sharp and unified. This work unifies the origin of quantumness and serves as the conceptual prequel to the full Logical Interpretation developed in the author’s companion paper.
This dissertation reports our investigation into the existence of anyons, which interpolate between bosons and fermions, in light of the Symmetrization Postulate, which states that only the two extremes exist. The Symmetrization Postulate can be understood as asserting that there are only two consistent ways of combining the behavior of distinguishable particles to obtain the behavior of identical ones. We showed that anyonic behavior then arises because of the way in which the probability amplitudes of distinguishable particles in two dimensions are affected by the topology of the space. These can then be combined in one of the ways arising from the Symmetrization Postulate, to form identical anyons. Therefore, anyons do not invalidate the Symmetrization Postulate, but are entirely compatible with it. In order to show that anyons can arise without particle identity, we investigated how distinguishable particles can gain particular properties from the topology of their configuration space. We managed to do so, and in the process, discovered a novel approach for quantizing multiply-connected spaces, in a way that is more suited to anyons than the standard approach.