This paper establishes a complete, ontological interpretation of quantum tunneling within the PFUSRC framework, based on the 11-dimensional triple coaxial bicone as the universal primordial structure. Quantum tunneling is not a stochastic effect in 4D spacetime, but a deterministic topological motion occurring in the cone–prism interlayer domain. The mechanism is governed by golden-ratio fractal recursion, gap-driving axiom, inherent symmetry breaking, and the Noetic–Affective dual-terminal drive. This work unifies normal and anomalous tunneling phenomena with a self-consistent, falsifiable, geometrically grounded theory.
This paper establishes a complete, ontological interpretation of quantum tunneling within the PFUSRC framework, based on the 11-dimensional triple coaxial bicone as the universal primordial structure. Quantum tunneling is not a stochastic effect in 4D spacetime, but a deterministic topological motion occurring in the cone–prism interlayer domain. The mechanism is governed by golden-ratio fractal recursion, gap-driving axiom, inherent symmetry breaking, and the Noetic–Affective dual-terminal drive. This work unifies normal and anomalous tunneling phenomena with a self-consistent, falsifiable, geometrically grounded theory.
Based on the PFUSRC 45° triple coaxial bicone topology, cone-prism interlayer domain, and universal rigid axiom system, this paper reconstructs the ontological origin and dynamic framework of quantum tunneling. We strictly distinguish the 4D global space from the cone-prism interlayer quasi-void domain, and point out that quantum tunneling is not “penetration through a barrier” in ordinary space, but a directional propagation of wavefunctions along topological vertices inside the interlayer. This paper introduces the passive-autonomous behavior dichotomy into tunneling theory: passive influence is determined by interlayer geometry, vertex position, and boundary constraints; autonomous behavior originates from coupling-zero perturbations and ζ-element order control, manifesting as intrabarrier recollision, path selection, symmetry breaking, and cooperative tunneling of massive clusters. Recent authoritative experiments show that all anomalous tunneling phenomena can be uniformly explained as responses to conforming or inverse primordial bicone topology. When the structure is inverse to the optimal topology, obvious anomalies appear, which are defined as inverse primordial cone behaviors. The theory is self-consistent, falsifiable, and supported by reliable experimental evidence.
Based on the PFUSRC 45° triple coaxial bicone topology, cone-prism interlayer domain, and universal rigid axiom system, this paper reconstructs the ontological origin and dynamic framework of quantum tunneling. We strictly distinguish the 4D global space from the cone-prism interlayer quasi-void domain, and point out that quantum tunneling is not “penetration through a barrier” in our daily space, but a directional propagation of wavefunctions along topological vertices inside the interlayer. This paper introduces the passive-autonomous behavior dichotomy into tunneling theory: passive influence is determined by interlayer geometry, vertex position, and boundary constraints; autonomous behavior originates from coupling-zero perturbations and ζ-element order control, manifesting as intraboundary recollision, path selection, symmetry breaking, and cooperative tunneling of massive clusters. Recent authoritative experiments show that all anomalous tunneling phenomena can be uniformly explained as the response of conforming or inverse primordial bicone topology. When the structure is inverse to the optimal topology, obvious anomalies appear, which are called inverse primordial cone behaviors. The theory is self-consistent, falsifiable, and supported by reliable experimental evidence. Keywords
Based on the PFUSRC 45° triple coaxial bicone topology, cone-prism interlayer domain, and universal rigid axiom system, this paper reconstructs the ontological origin and dynamic framework of quantum tunneling. We strictly distinguish the 4D global space from the cone-prism interlayer quasi-void domain, and point out that quantum tunneling is not “penetration through a barrier” in our daily space, but a directional propagation of wavefunctions along topological vertices inside the interlayer. This paper introduces the passive-autonomous behavior dichotomy into tunneling theory: passive influence is determined by interlayer geometry, vertex position, and boundary constraints; autonomous behavior originates from coupling-zero perturbations and ζ-element order control, manifesting as intraboundary recollision, path selection, symmetry breaking, and cooperative tunneling of massive clusters. Recent authoritative experiments show that all anomalous tunneling phenomena can be uniformly explained as the response of conforming or inverse primordial bicone topology. When the structure is inverse to the optimal topology, obvious anomalies appear, which are called inverse primordial cone behaviors. The theory is self-consistent, falsifiable, and supported by reliable experimental evidence.
Based on the PFUSRC 45° triple coaxial bicone topology, the cone–prism interlayer domain, the Valuation Axiom, the Fault-Tolerance Axiom, and the First Center observational anchoring framework, this paper constructs a unified and complete ontological mechanism for double-slit interference, wavefunction collapse, quantum fluctuation, and decoherence. We demonstrate that quantum fluctuation is not random vacuum noise, but the topological distribution of primordial units driven by Weizhao (the primordial micro-triggering mechanism in PFUSRC topology); interference occurs in the interlayer quasi-void domain rather than standard 4D spacetime; wavefunction collapse is not a stochastic jump, but deterministic topological ownership confirmation under observational anchoring; decoherence corresponds to irreversible steady-state locking. The entire process is governed by the β₁ global coupling field and satisfies the 1→5→11 dimensional evolution sequence and 12:11 universal gauge invariance. This mechanism unifies deterministic global structure and local observational phenomena, provides a complete origin-level interpretation for quantum behavior, and maintains full compatibility with conventional quantum mechanics while offering stricter logical closure.
Feynman’s path integral treats quantum evolution as a sum over all possible histories, yet mainstream physics cannot explain the ontological origin of path distribution, weight generation, or the emergence of optimal trajectories. Based on the PFUSRC axiom system, this paper addresses three core assertions: (1) The “all-paths” concept is reinterpreted as a global topological spread determined by primordial geometry, not a literal traversal. (2) The observed optimal path is a low-dimensional projection illusion, not the real evolutionary mechanism. (3) The action and path weights are not fundamental; they arise from primordial topology and the Noetic Primordium operator Ω. This paper formalizes the Noetic Primordium as a mathematical operator on path space, defines the β₁ field as the background geometry for nonlocal coherence, and links the Noeton to the valuation axiom. Unifying PFUSRC 18, PFUSRC 22, and PFUSRC 23, this work provides a complete origin-level interpretation of the path integral and an axiomatic foundation for quantum ontology.
The path integral is a foundational formalism of quantum mechanics, yet mainstream physics cannot answer: where does the distribution of paths come from? Who determines the weights? How does the system maintain global coherence? Based on the PFUSRC framework, this paper establishes the theory of Cosmic Traffic Rules. Core claims: 1. A path is not a curve in space. A path is the spatiotemporal projection of Ψ-Ξ anchoring relationships (PFUSRC-009). It is the historical trace of anchoring, not a spatial curve.2. The orbital network is determined by bicone topological ontology (PFUSRC-00). All path distributions are predetermined by topological rigidity, not “explored” by particles.3. Coupling Interface 0 is where anchoring occurs. Its projection in the mother universe ontology is the bicone waist ring; its projection in the 4D universe projection layer is the minimal spatial gap.4. The vertex is absolutely impenetrable (PFUSRC-38). Any particle reaching the vertex is reflected — this is a topological prohibition, not a mechanical collision.5. Path conflict triggers exclusion (PFUSRC-004). When ΔA exceeds the tolerance limit, the system triggers deterministic rejection. The excluded structures become dark matter/dark energy.6. Conduction failure can lead to mother universe topological rupture (corollary). When the scale exceeds the synchronization limit of information conduction, breathing desynchronization may trigger structural disintegration. In this paper, π₁ = 12/11 is a presupposed axiom of the PFUSRC system; the complete derivation is found in PFUSRC-001. The containment relationship with general relativity is a physical mapping, not a mathematical equivalence proof.