Which quantum algorithms suit photonic continuous-variable hardware? A comparative resource and noise-robustness study
Hikaru Wakaura, Taiki Tanimae
Abstract
Summary. A comparative, model-level study of four quantum algorithms ported to a common photonic continuous-variable (CV) model: control-free quantum phase estimation (QPE), randomized product formulas (qDRIFT), quantum Kolmogorov-Arnold networks (QKAN), and Regev's factoring algorithm. Algorithms are compared under a shared noise channel combining exact Fock-space photon loss and Gaussian displacement, with Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) error correction. Main findings. Control-free QPE is the most noise-robust because it needs no controlled unitaries and, for quadratic Hamiltonians, no non-Gaussian gates; the advantage survives for non-Gaussian Hamiltonians. GKP correction helps only once the physical noise exceeds the finite-squeezing floor (proved), and whether an algorithm benefits is set by a noise- versus systematic-limited dichotomy. The core GKP correction model is validated against an explicit Glancy-Knill error-correction Monte Carlo (agreement ≤0.1%). A discrete-variable surface-code baseline shows the CV advantage is structural (Gaussian operations are free), not threshold-based. Scope. This is a model-level numerical comparison, not an experiment; the GKP correction is a validated surrogate rather than a full Fock-space error-correction circuit, and instances are modest in size. Results, sensitivity analyses, and a two-dimensional noise phase diagram are included. Reproducibility. Standalone scripts and released JSON results reproduce every figure and table.