Abstract Optimizing the \((T)\)-depth of quantum circuits is a central challenge in fault-tolerant quantum computation, where non-Clifford resources dominate implementation cost. Graph-based abstractions provide lower bounds on achievable \((T)\)-depth by grouping commuting gates into parallel layers, typically computed via graph coloring. In this work, we investigate the extent to which such graph-optimal \((T)\)-layerings can be realized using a fixed, replayable local-commutation transformation framework. We introduce a formal distinction between graph-optimal depth, obtained via SAT-based certification, and the depth produced by a concrete transformation procedure. This leads to the notion of an observed construction gap.A replayable local-commutation constructor is defined, providing verifiable transformation sequences and a deterministic mapping from circuits to transformed circuit representations. Empirical evaluation across multiple circuit families indicates that the constructor frequently fails to realize graph-optimal layerings, even in structurally simple cases. In particular, positive observed construction gaps are found in a substantial fraction of benchmark instances.These results highlight a systematic discrepancy between graph-level optimality and realizability under local transformation constraints. The findings suggest that graph-optimal \((T)\)-depth should be interpreted with caution when used as a proxy for achievable circuit performance under fixed replayable construction procedures.
Abstract Optimizing the ((T))-depth of quantum circuits is a central challenge in fault-tolerant quantum computation, where non-Clifford resources dominate implementation cost. Graph-based abstractions provide lower bounds on achievable ((T))-depth by grouping commuting gates into parallel layers, typically computed via graph coloring. In this work, we investigate the extent to which such graph-optimal ((T))-layerings can be realized using a fixed, replayable local-commutation transformation framework. We introduce a formal distinction between graph-optimal depth, obtained via SAT-based certification, and the depth produced by a concrete transformation procedure. This leads to the notion of an observed construction gap.A replayable local-commutation constructor is defined, providing verifiable transformation sequences and a deterministic mapping from circuits to transformed circuit representations. Empirical evaluation across multiple circuit families indicates that the constructor frequently fails to realize graph-optimal layerings, even in structurally simple cases. In particular, positive observed construction gaps are found in a substantial fraction of benchmark instances.These results highlight a systematic discrepancy between graph-level optimality and realizability under local transformation constraints. The findings suggest that graph-optimal ((T))-depth should be interpreted with caution when used as a proxy for achievable circuit performance under fixed replayable construction procedures.
Circuit synthesis is the task of decomposing a given logical functionality into a sequence of elementary gates. It is (depth-)optimal if it is impossible to achieve the desired functionality with even shorter circuits. Optimal synthesis is a central problem in both quantum and classical hardware design, but also plagued by complexity-theoretic obstacles. Motivated by fault-tolerant quantum computation, we consider the special case of synthesizing blocks of Clifford unitaries. Leveraging entangling input stimuli and the stabilizer formalism allows us to reduce the Clifford synthesis problem to a family of poly-size satisfiability (SAT) problems - one for each target circuit depth. On a conceptual level, our result showcases that the Clifford synthesis problem is contained in the first level of the polynomial hierarchy (NP), while the classical synthesis problem for logical circuits is known to be complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy (Σp2). Based on this theoretical reduction, we formulate a SAT encoding for depth-optimal Clifford synthesis. We then employ SAT solvers to determine a satisfying assignment or to prove that no such assignment exists. From that, the shortest depth for which synthesis is still possible (optimality) as well as the actual circuit (synthesis) can be obtained. Empirical evaluations show that the optimal synthesis approach yields a substantial depth improvement for random Clifford circuits and Clifford+T circuits for Grover search.
Abstract The paradigm of measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC) starts from a highly entangled resource state on which unitary operations are executed through adaptive measurements and corrections ensuring determinism. This is set in contrast to the more common quantum circuit model, in which unitary operations are directly implemented through quantum gates prior to final measurements. In this work, we incorporate concepts from MBQC into the circuit model to create a hybrid simulation technique, permitting us to split any quantum circuit into a classically efficiently simulatable Clifford-part and a second part consisting of a stabilizer state and local (adaptive) measurement instructions—a so-called standard form—which is executed on a quantum computer. We further process the stabilizer state with the graph state formalism, thus, enabling a significant decrease in circuit depth for certain applications. We show that groups of mutually-commuting operators can be implemented using fully-parallel, i.e. non-adaptive, measurements within our protocol. In addition, we discuss how groups of mutually commuting observables can be simulatenously measured by adjusting the resource state, rather than performing a costly basis transformation prior to the measurement as it is done in the circuit model. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our technique on two examples of high practical relevance—the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) for the ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule. For the VQE, we find a reduction of the depth by a factor of 4 to 5 using measurement patterns vs. the standard circuit model. At the same time, since we incorporate the simultaneous measurements, our patterns allow us to save shots by a factor of at least 3.5 compared to measuring Pauli strings individually in the circuit model.
Graph states form a broad class of multipartite entangled states underlying measurement-based quantum computation, quantum networks, and stabilizer codes. However, systematic entanglement distillation for arbitrary graph states remains challenging because the circuit design space grows rapidly with the number of parties. We introduce a group of Clifford operations that we call "factorized graph-preserving". It enables us to efficiently enumerate and optimize graph-state purification circuits at finite size for realistic noisy hardware. These operations map products of graph-basis states to products of graph-basis states, so their action can be represented as permutations of graph-basis labels. Moreover, this useful gate set admits a compact factorized description determined by simple graph-theoretic features. This structure also allows, after some initial cached precomputation, drastically lower computational complexity for simulating a gate. We further organize these operations over local-complementation (LC) orbits using minimum-edge representatives (MERs), which let us design purification circuits that apply to all locally equivalent graph states (up to a basis change). Using this framework, we optimize noisy finite-size multipartite distillation circuits for several graph-state families. Numerical results show that the resulting graph-preserving circuits can outperform standard recurrence-based purification protocols under realistic gate and measurement noise. Our results establish LC-orbit structure and factorized graph-preserving operations as practical tools for scalable, topology-aware and hardware-constrained graph-state distillation protocol design. Our work can also be interpreted as a graph-based heuristic for finding transversal gates.
We present a completely new approach to quantum circuit optimisation, based on the ZX-calculus. We first interpret quantum circuits as ZX-diagrams, which provide a flexible, lower-level language for describing quantum computations graphically. Then, using the rules of the ZX-calculus, we give a simplification strategy for ZX-diagrams based on the two graph transformations of local complementation and pivoting and show that the resulting reduced diagram can be transformed back into a quantum circuit. While little is known about extracting circuits from arbitrary ZX-diagrams, we show that the underlying graph of our simplified ZX-diagram always has a graph-theoretic property called generalised flow, which in turn yields a deterministic circuit extraction procedure. For Clifford circuits, this extraction procedure yields a new normal form that is both asymptotically optimal in size and gives a new, smaller upper bound on gate depth for nearest-neighbour architectures. For Clifford+T and more general circuits, our technique enables us to to `see around' gates that obstruct the Clifford structure and produce smaller circuits than naïve `cut-and-resynthesise' methods.
The paradigm of measurement-based quantum computing (MBQC) starts from a highly entangled resource state on which unitary operations are executed through adaptive measurements and corrections ensuring determinism. This is set in contrast to the more common quantum circuit model, in which unitary operations are directly implemented through quantum gates prior to final measurements. In this work, we incorporate concepts from MBQC into the circuit model to create a hybrid simulation technique, permitting us to split any quantum circuit into a classically efficiently simulatable Clifford-part and a second part consisting of a stabilizer state and local (adaptive) measurement instructions—a so-called standard for —which is executed on a quantum computer. We further process the stabilizer state with the graph state formalism, thus, enabling a significant decrease in circuit depth for certain applications. We show that groups of mutually-commuting operators can be implemented using fully-parallel, i.e. non-adaptive, measurements within our protocol. In addition, we discuss how groups of mutually commuting observables can be simulatenously measured by adjusting the resource state, rather than performing a costly basis transformation prior to the measurement as it is done in the circuit model. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our technique on two examples of high practical relevance—the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm and the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) for the ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule. For the VQE, we find a reduction of the depth by a factor of 4 to 5 using measurement patterns vs. the standard circuit model. At the same time, since we incorporate the simultaneous measurements, our patterns allow us to save shots by a factor of at least 3.5 compared to measuring Pauli strings individually in the circuit model.
Circuit depth is a central resource in complexity theory. While bounded-depth classical circuits admit well-understood hierarchy theorems, the internal structure of constant-depth quantum computation remains comparatively unexplored.
We prove an explicit depth hierarchy theorem for QNC0. For each d≥12, we construct a family of two-round interactive problems on which no depth-(d−1) quantum circuit can achieve near-perfect success, regardless of gate set, circuit size, or ancillary qubits. In contrast, we prove that our construction admits realizations by simple bounded fan-in quantum circuits of depth larger than d by a small constant factor. Moreover, all bounded fan-in classical circuits of sublogarithmic depth (in the input size) fail to achieve perfect success on these tasks for every d, yielding a hierarchy of problems that show unconditional quantum advantage of QNC0 over NC0.
A key obstacle is the scarcity of lower bound techniques for quantum circuits. To address this, we develop methods to analyze how depth affects a circuit's ability to realize nonlocal correlations amongst its output qubits in a fine-grained manner. Our approach exploits the correspondence between constraint systems and nonlocal games, translating group-theoretic constructions into rigid operator-valued constraint systems and then into non-local games. In particular, we construct constraint systems whose unique faithful operator-valued solutions require every perfect strategy, and every near-perfect strategy to a fixed precision, to implement multi-controlled phase operations. This reduces to a nonlocal unitary-synthesis problem, yielding depth lower bounds for both shallow quantum and classical circuits.
These results show that increasing depth strictly increases computational power within QNC0, establishing a genuinely quantum hierarchy.