Abstract This document explains the source of principles and theoretical basis for the experimental setup described in the Theoretical Prediction and Technical Protocol for a Controlled-Time Quantum Erasure Experiment, the physical logic chain of the experiment, the quantitative veriffcation anchors of the theoretical foundation, as well as a statement against conceptual plagiarism and four judgments on the scientiffc seriousness of the technical protocol. It is ffrst established that: quantum erasure is not an absolutely instantaneous projection, but a physical process in which the information ffeld completes dynamic restructuring within a very limited time window. Based on this, two falsiffable predictions are given: 1) Controlledtime / gradual erasure yields higher interference visibility; 2) Visibility exhibits a nonlinear single-peak distribution with respect to the erasure time window. An original experimental scheme is simultaneously proposed: using a Pockels cell to realize continuous polarization-rotation controlled-time erasure, in contrast with traditional instantaneous ffxed-polarization erasure. Any work that substantively includes any of the core elements (mechanism + prediction + experimental scheme) must cite this document; otherwise, it constitutes academic misconduct.
Abstract This document explains the source of principles and theoretical basis for the experimental setup described in the Theoretical Prediction and Technical Protocol for a Controlled-Time Quantum Erasure Experiment, the physical logic chain of the experiment, the quantitative veriffcation anchors of the theoretical foundation, as well as a statement against conceptual plagiarism and four judgments on the scientiffc seriousness of the technical protocol. It is ffrst established that: quantum erasure is not an absolutely instantaneous projection, but a physical process in which the information ffeld completes dynamic restructuring within a very limited time window. Based on this, two falsiffable predictions are given: 1) Controlledtime / gradual erasure yields higher interference visibility; 2) Visibility exhibits a nonlinear single-peak distribution with respect to the erasure time window. An original experimental scheme is simultaneously proposed: using a Pockels cell to realize continuous polarization-rotation controlled-time erasure, in contrast with traditional instantaneous ffxed-polarization erasure. Any work that substantively includes any of the core elements (mechanism + prediction + experimental scheme) must cite this document; otherwise, it constitutes academic misconduct.
Priority Statement: This document was ffrst publicly disclosed on May 12, 2026. All physical predictions, experimental design proposals, theoretical interpretations, and their connection to the information ffeld dynamic restructuring mechanism contained herein establish priority as of this date. Any individual or group subsequently putting forward the same or substantially similar experimental conception, prediction, or theoretical interpretation, independently or otherwise, shall acknowledge the temporal precedence of this document.
Abstract :Starting from the complementarity-repulsion duality axiom S+ω = 1 of information ffeld theory, this paper systematically expounds the basic frameworks, physical pictures, theoretical confficts, and experimental detection routes of mnemon-based information ffeld theory and the Standard Model of particle physics. The theory is then applied to the ffeld of quantum optics, providing a complete explanation of the underlying physical mechanisms of double-slit interference, path marking, and quantum erasure experiments. On this basis, this paper proposes the theoretical prediction and technical protocol for a controlled-time quantum erasure experiment — the information ffeld restructuring process possesses a ffnite characteristic time τint , there exists a nonlinear dependence between interference visibility and erasure rate, and controlled-time erasure will produce higher interference visibility than instantaneous erasure. The research shows that the Standard Model is an effective theory in the high-energy regime, while mnemon information ffeld theory is a uniffed framework exploring the fundamental laws of physics. The two have no essential conffict within the currently tested energy regimes. Information ffeld theory interprets quantum interference as the macroscopic emergence of collective mnemon matching coherence. The introduction and erasure of path information correspond to the rise and fall of the mnemon repulsion state proportion and the reconstruction of coherence under the mechanism of information ffltering. The controlled-time quantum erasure experiment is the ffrst dedicated laboratory test scheme for information ffeld theory. Regardless of the outcome, it will advance the further development of the theory. While being fully compatible with existing physics, the entire theoretical system reveals the deep mechanisms of quantum phenomena, providing a new paradigm for foundational quantum mechanics research, quantum information physics, and the exploration of new physics beyond the Standard Model.
This repository presents a theoretical and experimental proposal for a non-conservative source of quantum decoherence linked to irreversible logical erasure in a physically coupled classical system. The work introduces a minimal model in which a quantum system is weakly coupled to a classical predictor performing real-time inference. When the predictor irreversibly erases internal counterfactual states, the model predicts an additional decoherence channel that scales with the rate of logical erasure, independently of energy dissipation or measurement strength. The manuscript derives the expected scaling, defines strict null tests excluding standard decoherence mechanisms, and outlines a concrete experimental protocol designed to be decisively falsifiable. No experimental data are included. This deposit establishes theoretical priority and experimental criteria for testing the proposed effect.
In a delayed-choice quantum eraser, interference fringes are obtained by erasing which-way information after the interfering particle has already been irreversibly detected. Following an introductory review of delayed-choice experiments and quantum erasure, we describe the experimental realization of an optical delayed-choice quantum eraser, suitable for advanced undergraduates, based on polarization-entangled pairs of single photons. In our experiment, the delay of the erasure is implemented using two different setups. The first setup employs an arrangement of mirrors to increase the optical path length of the photons carrying which-way information. In the second setup, we use fiber-optic cables to elongate the path of these photons after their passage through the polarization analyzer but prior to their arrival at the detector. We compare our results to data obtained in the absence of a delay and find excellent agreement. This shows that the timing of the erasure is irrelevant, as also predicted by quantum mechanics. The experiment can serve as a valuable pedagogical tool for conveying the fundamentals of quantum mechanics.
I. Core Propositions and Logical Outline This depository document establishes the absolute original authorship and intellectual property rights of the FT Physical Realism and Probability Analytical Framework, independently constructed by the declarant. Originating from pure mathematical logic and local geometric causality, this framework accomplishes a fundamental boundary redrawing of classical and modern probability theory, while establishing a local deterministic physical ontology:1. The Dual Classification Law of Probability's Essence: Defines and proves that the objective physical role of probability exists and is complete exclusively in two forms.2. Decoupling of Ontology and Epistemology: Rigorously denies the physical reality of "intrinsic randomness" and "pure probabilistic superposition."3. The Three Physical Barriers of Observation Limits: Systematically derives and proves the endogenous mechanism that prevents an observer from achieving "omniscience and omnipotence" within physical limits.II. Cryptographic Fingerprint and Priority LockingTo prevent unauthorized academic plagiarism and the theft of ideas, the declarant has generated an unforgeable digital fingerprint via the SHA-256 cryptographic hash algorithm for the underlying technical manuscript (Full Manuscript Version), which contains the complete mathematical derivations, local geometric evolution algorithms, corollary units, and original texts.Any act of utilizing, modifying, redefining the aforementioned core propositions, or publishing isomorphic theories without the explicit written authorization of the declarant constitutes an infringement of the declarant's priority and intellectual property rights.• Document SHA-256 Hash Values:Main Document: Core Theoretical Papers (Bundled Archive)DOC1: 2ed04fc84a8d381a3783fa86c379eb387146cac312831703577477d796748976Appendix:DOC2: 2efae2c302b2123d545b09578e101695546e1f9e8adda22080baa5552ccbb439III. Legal and Academic Notice 1. Activation of Priority: This statement takes effect upon the date of signing and the generation of the cryptographic deposit. The declarant reserves all copyrights, patent application rights, academic naming rights, and interpretive rights over derived theories worldwide.2. Confidentiality and Disclosure Restrictions: Due to the revolutionary nature of this theoretical system regarding the foundations of physics, all detailed technical specifications and mathematical derivations are currently held under the highest level of Confidential status, and will not be publicly released to the general public or any academic journals at this time.3. Infringement Liability: Should any institution or individual acquire or misappropriate this deposited propositional framework through improper channels, or attempt a secondary "re-invention," this deposit shall serve as absolute evidence in international intellectual property arbitration and legal proceedings.Declarant Signature: Feng Yuling (冯玉玲)Date of Signing: July 26, 2026
As indicated by the name "quantum erasure," the most common interpretation of certain classes of delayed choice quantum experiments is that they, in some fashion, erase or undo past decisions. Unfortunately, this interpretation cannot be correct since the past decisions were already classically and irreversibly captured as recorded information or datums. A datum is information that, through temporal entanglement, constrains future events. The correct interpretation of such experiments is stranger than erasure: Recordings made early in such quantum experiments predestine choices made later through arbitrarily complex and often human-scale classical choices. Since this process of quantum predestination occurs only within the future light cone of datum creation, another (possibly) less radical way to interpret such experiments is that time is multiscale, granular, and impossible to define outside of the quantum state of the entities involved. The continuum time abstraction is not compatible with this view.