Inspired by the holographic theory of gravity originating from the microscopic degrees of freedom of black holes, as well as the profound connection between quantum entanglement and space-time revealed by the AdS/CFT correspondence, this paper attempts to establish a connection among quantum measurement, quantum entanglement, and space-time, thereby proposing a "Multi-Space-Time" scheme. Under this scheme, the "problem of the preferred basis" and the "problem of definite outcomes" in quantum measurement can be solved simultaneously. Furthermore, it reveals that classical space-time originates from quantum measurement. However, a derived result of this scheme is that the number of classical space-times in the universe is not unique; rather, there may exist a multitude of them. The "Multi-Space-Time" scheme demotes measuring instruments or observers to a status of parity, establishing an egalitarian relationship between the measured system and the measuring instrument. Nevertheless, the proposal remains largely a conceptual or epistemic framework at present, and its verification relies on the establishment of quantum gravity. Yet, it provides a potential direction for future quantum gravity research when dealing with classical space-time, quantum measurement, and quantum entanglement simultaneously.
Inspired by the holographic theory of gravity originating from the microscopic degrees of freedom of black holes, as well as the profound connection between quantum entanglement and space-time revealed by the AdS/CFT correspondence, this paper attempts to establish a connection among quantum measurement, quantum entanglement, and space-time, thereby proposing a "Multi-Space-Time" scheme. Under this scheme, the "problem of the preferred basis" and the "problem of definite outcomes" in quantum measurement can be solved simultaneously. Furthermore, it reveals that classical space-time originates from quantum measurement. However, a derived result of this scheme is that the number of classical space-times in the universe is not unique; rather, there may exist a multitude of them. The "Multi-Space-Time" scheme demotes measuring instruments or observers to a status of parity, establishing an egalitarian relationship between the measured system and the measuring instrument. Nevertheless, the proposal remains largely a conceptual or epistemic framework at present, and its verification relies on the establishment of quantum gravity. Yet, it provides a potential direction for future quantum gravity research when dealing with classical space-time, quantum measurement, and quantum entanglement simultaneously.
Abstract Quantum mechanics and relativity are two of the most successful theoretical frameworks in modern physics, yet their conceptual foundations remain difficult to reconcile at the deepest level. Quantum theory describes physical systems through states, observables, probabilities, measurement contexts, superposition, entanglement, and nonclassical correlations. Relativity describes physical processes through space-time structure, causal order, invariant physical law, observer-dependent decomposition of time and space, and constraints on signal propagation. This article examines the conceptual relationship between quantum measurement, relativistic causality, and space-time description. The purpose is not to present a mathematical unification but to analyze how the two frameworks organize physical explanation differently and where their interpretive tensions arise. Special attention is given to the measurement problem, the status of quantum states, the role of observers and reference frames, the meaning of locality, the distinction between correlation and causal influence, and the challenge of describing quantum processes without privileging a single global time. The article argues that many apparent conflicts between quantum theory and relativity result from importing classical intuitions into domains where they no longer apply. Quantum entanglement does not permit controllable faster-than-light communication, yet it challenges classical separability. Relativity forbids superluminal signaling, yet it does not require that all physically meaningful correlations be reducible to local classical properties. Measurement introduces another difficulty because standard quantum theory often describes state update in a way that appears instantaneous, while relativistic space-time does not provide a universal present. The discussion develops a conceptual framework in which quantum measurement is treated as a physical interaction, relativistic causality as a constraint on operational influence, and space-time description as an organizing structure for events rather than a simple background stage. This analysis is relevant for quantum field theory, quantum information, relativistic quantum foundations, and future approaches to quantum gravity.
This work explores the hypothesis that time is an emergent phenomenon arising from underlying quantum informational processes. By integrating principles from quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and general relativity, we develop a comprehensive framework that elucidates the relationship between quantum complexity, entanglement, and the nature of time. We investigate the role of quantum complexity in the evolution of quantum states and demonstrate how the increase in entanglement entropy provides a microscopic basis for the arrow of time. Using the AdS/CFT correspondence and the holographic principle, we establish connections between spacetime geometry and quantum informational measures like entanglement entropy. We address the black hole information paradox within this context, arguing that information is preserved in a highly scrambled form. Additionally, we propose an experimental design using black hole analogues to empirically validate our theoretical predictions, focusing on fast scrambling and the growth of quantum complexity. Our findings suggest that quantum informational dynamics govern the emergence of time and spacetime geometry. This work bridges quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, information theory, and general relativity, offering potential applications in quantum technologies and new insights into the fundamental nature of reality.
Measurements play a crucial role in quantum mechanics because they serve two fundamental purposes. First, they enable the extraction of information about a quantum system; second, they give rise to new physical effects that do not appear in classical physics, one important example being the measurement-induced state update, where the act of measurement alters the system’s state. For these reasons, the mathematical description of measurements plays a primary role in the foundational postulates of the theory. However, the essence of what happens during a measurement remains poorly understood, even within the relatively easy realm of non-relativistic quantum theory. The situation becomes even less transparent in the relativistic setting, where the requirement to preserve causality and prevent faster-than-light signalling introduces both formal and interpretational challenges, complicating the very mathematical formulation of a measurement theory. As for quantum gravity, the idea of applying quantum measurements within or onto a quantum spacetime remains virtually unexplored, presenting a vast and uncharted frontier for theoretical inquiry. Building on recent advances across several areas at the intersection of quantum foundations, quantum information theory, relativistic quantum theory, and quantum gravity, the last few years saw a surge of interest in formulating a consistent framework for describing local measurements in a relativistic context. The main results of this endeavour are two distinct proposals for a relativistic measurement postulate for quantum field theory in generic spacetimes. While these two proposals are still being understood, and a growing research community is working to clarify their implications and potential interconnections, the field of relativistic quantum measurements has now reached a level of maturity that allows us to ask both formal and interpretive questions on a solid footing. All this only applies to the regime in which quantum field theory in curved spacetime remains valid: nothing can yet be said about measurements at the Planck energy, where quantum gravitational effects are expected to become important. This thesis presents an introduction to the theory of measurements in non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics, along with four original research articles that explore aspects of measurements in both fields, as well as the potential extension of measurement theory to the domain of quantum gravity. The first article examines the limitations of realistic measurement apparatuses in non-relativistic quantum theory, establishing reasonable bounds for the precision that can be achieved with a given apparatus composed of many quantum components. The second article explores how to extract information from a newly introduced class of quantum systems, defined as those that cannot be replicated and thus fall outside the usual scope of quantum mechanics. Then, it applies the methodology to quantum field theory, demonstrating that classical results, such as the Unruh effect, can still be observed in this setting. The third article discusses detector-based measurements in quantum field theory. This is a recently proposed method that extends the non-relativistic measurement postulate to the relativistic regime by means of Unruh-de Witt detectors. The article highlights some conceptual and mathematical issues with the framework and proposes a solution using algebraic quantum field theory. The outcome is a self-consistent scheme for introducing local measurements in quantum field theory via measuring detectors. Finally, the fourth article uses the measurement scheme above to study how what we learned in the past years about local measurements can be extended to quantum gravity. This is achieved through the holographic principle realised in terms of the AdS-CFT correspondence. In conclusion, this thesis contributes to the development of both non-relativistic and relativistic measurement theories and introduces ideas and questions related to the role of measurement in quantum gravity. Though preliminary, this work opens a pathway toward studying measuring observers in quantum gravity.
Quantum measurement is a fundamental concept in the field of quantum mechanics. The action of quantum measurement, leading the superposition state of the measured quantum system into a definite output state, not only reconciles contradictions between quantum and classical mechanics but also facilitates quantum state manipulations, including reading and resetting. Despite its significance, four fundamental issues -- randomness, instantaneousness, irreversibility, and preferred-basis -- continue to pose significant challenges to the broader application of quantum measurement and our overall understanding of quantum mechanics. In this work, we employ a new space-time approach to relativistic quantum mechanics to address these issues systematically. Our approach provides a comprehensive elucidation of the intricate connections between quantum measurement and quantum unitary evolution, as well as an in-depth analysis for the interdependence of non-local correlations and relativistic theories. We thereby reveal a more fundamental dynamical theory, beyond the traditional time-evolution equation in quantum mechanics, where the axioms of quantum measurement naturally emerge as a corollary. These findings contribute to the advancement of related fields, and our work holds potential implications for future research and applications in the realm of quantum mechanics.
The AdS/CFT correspondence and quantum entanglement (or quantum information). This is one of topics exciting many physicists in this decade. And black holes always play a role of inspiring lab in many cases. In this thesis, we will discuss about scrambling of quantum entanglement and complexity of states in AdS/CFT. In both topics, black holes are expected to be the fastest processors of quantum information. This thesis contains brief reviews of each topics and our own works. One work is an explicit calculation of fast scrambling time in two dimensional holographic CFTs and three dimensional BTZ black holes using the two-sided mutual information. This calculation is a first CFT counterpart of Shenker-Stanford’s work in the gravity dual and an extension of their shock-wave approximation to finite time region in the gravity side. Another work is about socalled optimization procedure of Euclidean path- integrals in CFTs. The optimization procedure gives us a new way to extract dual geometries only from CFT data. And it also gives a new proposal for the definition of complexity of states in CFTs.
Abstract: The quantum measurement problem has been the deepest conceptual difficulty since the birth of quantum mechanics. Standard quantum mechanics accepts wavefunction collapse as an independent postulate but never provides a physical explanation. The decoherence approach attributes collapse to the interaction between the system and its environment, but faces two fundamental limitations: the “infinite regress” problem and the “insufficiency of decoherence” problem. Within the framework of the Self-Construction Theory (SCT), this paper provides a complete resolution of the measurement problem. The core thesis is that quantum measurement is not a fundamental process independent of the laws of physical evolution, but rather a local manifestation of constructive renormalization—the scale evolution of the spacetime complex field K from microscopic degrees of freedom to macroscopic effective descriptions. The origins of wavefunction collapse, decoherence, and the Born rule receive a unified first‑principles interpretation in this framework. SCT’s spontaneous decoherence mechanism is the key to the resolution. Constructive renormalization inherently involves information loss—the integrated‑out microscopic degrees of freedom no longer exist in the macroscopic effective description. During a measurement, the measuring apparatus possesses a huge number (∼1023) of microscopic degrees of freedom. When the apparatus interacts with the measured system, constructive renormalization triggers information compression of these degrees of freedom—the apparatus can no longer distinguish which branch of the superposition it is in, and quantum coherence is thus spontaneously lost. No “external environment” is needed—the constructive renormalization dynamics of spacetime itself is the ultimate source of decoherence, thereby completely solving the “infinite regress” problem. Among the probability distribution given by the Born rule, the weights of non‑maximal probability branches are further suppressed by information compression under the huge number of microscopic degrees of freedom, so that macroscopic observers can perceive only a definite outcome in the effective description. The information loss caused by constructive renormalization is ontological—it does not rely on any approximation or truncation, thus fundamentally solving the “insufficiency of decoherence” problem. The Born rule—that measurement outcomes occur with probabilities given by the squared amplitudes—is directly derived from the constructive integral structure in SCT. In the constructive renormalization limit, interference terms between different configurations are naturally suppressed by off‑diagonal phase randomization, and the system automatically switches to a classical probabilistic description. In the diagonal density matrix representation, the squared amplitude is the only natural weight that is simultaneously real and non‑negative. Hence the Born rule is not an additional postulate of quantum mechanics but a necessary and unique manifestation of the relative frequencies of the constructive integral in the constructive renormalization limit. This derivation is rigorous within the mathematical framework of constructive renormalization—it does not rely on any approximations or truncations. SCT’s quantum measurement theory is deeply unified with the black hole information paradox. The “collapse” in quantum measurement and the “information loss” in black hole evaporation are different manifestations of the same core mechanism—the redistribution of information due to constructive renormalization—in two extreme physical situations. In quantum measurement, information is redistributed into the degrees of freedom of the macroscopic apparatus; in black hole evaporation, information is redistributed into the time‑point configurations on the horizon. This unification is the strongest proof of the universality of constructive renormalization as an information‑processing mechanism. Keywords: quantum measurement; spontaneous decoherence; constructive renormalization; Born rule; wavefunction collapse; information redistribution; Self-Construction Theory