Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Theory and the Bhagavad Gita: A Philosophical Correlation

Arun Sharma

Published Jan 1, 2025• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Quantum Theory; Bhagavad Gita; Interconnectedness; Reality; Uncertainty
DOI
10.17605/osf.io/8wuvk

Related papers

Ontological Reality: Quantum Theory and Emptiness in Buddhist Philosophy

Geshe Dorji Damdul

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2019•3 citations

Advaita Vedanta and Modern Science: 5 Places Where Ancient Non-Duality and Quantum Physics Reach the Same Conclusion

Narayan Rout

Advaita Vedanta — the philosophical system articulated in its classical form by Adi Shankaracharya in the 8th century CE, drawing on the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita — holds that ultimate reality is non-dual: that beneath the apparent multiplicity of the phenomenal world lies a single, undivided, self-luminous consciousness (Brahman), and that the individual self (Atman) is not separate from this ground of being but identical with it. This is, on its face, a metaphysical claim. What is remarkable — and what this article examines — is how consistently the findings of 20th and 21st century physics have converged on structural parallels to this position, not through cultural influence but through independent empirical investigation. Drawing on quantum entanglement (the non-local correlation of particles across spatial separation), the measurement problem and the role of observation in wave function collapse, David Bohm's implicate order theory, the holographic principle in modern cosmology, and the hard problem of consciousness in neuroscience and philosophy of mind, the article traces five specific points of convergence between Advaita Vedanta and modern physics. The research is careful to distinguish genuine structural parallels from loose analogical thinking — neither conflating physics with metaphysics nor dismissing the parallels as coincidental. The conclusion argues that Advaita Vedanta and quantum physics, approaching the nature of reality from radically different methodological directions, have arrived at mutually illuminating positions that deserve serious interdisciplinary attention.

•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations

Superposition is Prakṛti's Generative Property

Manish Kumar Parihar

A prior paper (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19373266) proposed that quantum superposition is Puruṣa — the independent conscious witness described in the Sāṃkhya framework of the Bhagavad Gītā. This paper corrects that identification. A careful re-reading of the Gītā's Sāṃkhya framework reveals that superposition is not Puruṣa but a generative property of Prakṛti itself — specifically of its three guṇas. Puruṣa is the witness (bhoktā) of what Prakṛti generates, including superposition and its generated states. Puruṣa is genuinely untouched — more fundamental than superposition, not equivalent to it. This correction has significant implications: it reframes the measurement problem, clarifies why Information Theory operates within Prakṛti, and identifies Puruṣa as a genuinely unsolved and untouched category beyond current physics. Read this a open thought not as proven laws.

•Apr 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum theory and the relation between the conscious mind and the physical world

Euan J. Squires

Synthese•Oct 1, 1993•34 citations

Puruṣa as Superposition: A Vedic Framework for Redefining Quantum Measurement

Manish Kumar Parihar

Quantum mechanics has achieved extraordinary predictive power while leaving its deepestquestions unresolved. Chief among them is the measurement problem: why does a quantumsystem in superposition yield a definite classical outcome when observed? The standardCopenhagen interpretation accepts this as a fundamental feature of reality without offering aphysical account of what superposition is or why measurement destroys it.This paper proposes that the measurement problem persists because of a prior, unexaminedassumption: that superposition is a property of matter. We argue instead, drawing from theSāṃkhya metaphysics codified in the Bhagavad Gītā, that superposition is an independententity — Puruṣa — and that 0 and 1 are states of Prakṛti, the material domain. Superpositiondoes not collapse; rather, measurement instruments — being themselves instruments of Prakṛti— can only return Prakṛti-values. They are structurally incapable of accessing Puruṣa directly.This is not a metaphorical comparison. We treat it as a structural hypothesis with concreteimplications for quantum foundations, consciousness research, and the design of post-binarycomputational systems.Important note - This is cross domain mapping, no maths or physics proof mentioned in this, pure thought so read thinking this.

•Apr 1, 2026•0 citations

Idea of unity in quantum philosophy and Upanishads

T S Kartika

•Dec 28, 2012•0 citations
Advaita Vedanta — the philosophical system articulated in its classical form by Adi Shankaracharya in the 8th century CE, drawing on the Upanishads, the Brahma Sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita — holds that ultimate reality is non-dual: that beneath the apparent multiplicity of the phenomenal world lies a single, undivided, self-luminous consciousness (Brahman), and that the individual self (Atman) is not separate from this ground of being but identical with it. This is, on its face, a metaphysical claim. What is remarkable — and what this article examines — is how consistently the findings of 20th and 21st century physics have converged on structural parallels to this position, not through cultural influence but through independent empirical investigation. Drawing on quantum entanglement (the non-local correlation of particles across spatial separation), the measurement problem and the role of observation in wave function collapse, David Bohm's implicate order theory, the holographic principle in modern cosmology, and the hard problem of consciousness in neuroscience and philosophy of mind, the article traces five specific points of convergence between Advaita Vedanta and modern physics. The research is careful to distinguish genuine structural parallels from loose analogical thinking — neither conflating physics with metaphysics nor dismissing the parallels as coincidental. The conclusion argues that Advaita Vedanta and quantum physics, approaching the nature of reality from radically different methodological directions, have arrived at mutually illuminating positions that deserve serious interdisciplinary attention.
A prior paper (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19373266) proposed that quantum superposition is Puruṣa — the independent conscious witness described in the Sāṃkhya framework of the Bhagavad Gītā. This paper corrects that identification. A careful re-reading of the Gītā's Sāṃkhya framework reveals that superposition is not Puruṣa but a generative property of Prakṛti itself — specifically of its three guṇas. Puruṣa is the witness (bhoktā) of what Prakṛti generates, including superposition and its generated states. Puruṣa is genuinely untouched — more fundamental than superposition, not equivalent to it. This correction has significant implications: it reframes the measurement problem, clarifies why Information Theory operates within Prakṛti, and identifies Puruṣa as a genuinely unsolved and untouched category beyond current physics. Read this a open thought not as proven laws.
Quantum mechanics has achieved extraordinary predictive power while leaving its deepestquestions unresolved. Chief among them is the measurement problem: why does a quantumsystem in superposition yield a definite classical outcome when observed? The standardCopenhagen interpretation accepts this as a fundamental feature of reality without offering aphysical account of what superposition is or why measurement destroys it.This paper proposes that the measurement problem persists because of a prior, unexaminedassumption: that superposition is a property of matter. We argue instead, drawing from theSāṃkhya metaphysics codified in the Bhagavad Gītā, that superposition is an independententity — Puruṣa — and that 0 and 1 are states of Prakṛti, the material domain. Superpositiondoes not collapse; rather, measurement instruments — being themselves instruments of Prakṛti— can only return Prakṛti-values. They are structurally incapable of accessing Puruṣa directly.This is not a metaphorical comparison. We treat it as a structural hypothesis with concreteimplications for quantum foundations, consciousness research, and the design of post-binarycomputational systems.Important note - This is cross domain mapping, no maths or physics proof mentioned in this, pure thought so read thinking this.