Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

History-Recoverability Post-Quantum Security (HR-PQS)

Trinity Labo

Published May 10, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This paper introduces History-Recoverability Post-Quantum Security (HR-PQS), a lightweight theoretical framework for post-quantum security based on the principle of unrecoverable history. Rather than treating the quantum threat as merely a problem of replacing vulnerable cryptographic algorithms, HR-PQS reformulates post-quantum security as a question of whether future quantum-capable adversaries can reconstruct meaningful past histories from stored ciphertexts, keys, logs, backups, certificates, metadata, and operational residues. The central claim is that post-quantum cryptography is necessary but not sufficient. Even when quantum-resistant algorithms are deployed, long-lived information may remain vulnerable through archived ciphertexts, residual key material, metadata leakage, certificate chains, traffic patterns, and backup recovery paths. HR-PQS therefore shifts the security objective from simple decryption failure to semantic history-unrecoverability. The framework unifies existing security practices such as post-quantum cryptography, perfect forward secrecy, ratcheting, secure key erasure, re-encryption, envelope encryption, metadata hiding, and cryptographic agility under a single operational principle: history pruning. In this view, key rotation is not merely a lifecycle procedure, but a mechanism for cutting future reconstruction paths from past encrypted histories. Mathematically, HR-PQS models a future quantum adversary as a relational observer with access to quantum computation, classical computation, internal information, stored ciphertexts, backups, and metadata. Security is defined through a history-recoverability functional combining mutual information leakage, semantic recovery advantage, collapse risk, and operational cost. The paper further introduces a semantic recovery game and a history-recoverability distance for measuring whether an adversary can reconstruct useful domain-specific features of past information, such as financial transaction graphs, medical diagnosis patterns, communication networks, or enterprise activity timelines. The theory is inspired by TrinityLabo's Recoverable Reality Principle and Relational Recoverable Reality Principle, but reverses their role for cryptographic security: in physical theory, good compression should remain recoverable; in security theory, attacker-side reconstruction must remain impossible. HR-PQS is not proposed as a new cryptographic primitive or replacement protocol. Instead, it is a lightweight upper-level theory for organizing existing and emerging post-quantum security practices around the deeper requirement of protecting the past from future reconstruction. In short: not merely quantum-resistant encryption, but unrecoverable history.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20102394

Related papers

Quantum-AI Number-Theoretic Frameworks for Post-Quantum Cryptography and Long-Term Information Security

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti

Abstract: This study investigates Quantum-AI number-theoretic frameworks for post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and long-term information security. The paper positions lattice-based, hash-based and code-based cryptographic standards as formal security substrates for a future in which adversaries may combine classical cyber operations, artificial intelligence and quantum computation. The proposed framework treats cryptography not merely as an algorithmic primitive but as a socio-technical assurance layer that links formal number theory, cryptographic agility, AI-assisted verification, hardware deployment and governance-grade migration planning. The analysis is motivated by the harvest-now-decrypt-later threat, the standardisation of ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, and the selection of HQC as a backup encryption mechanism for resilience against unexpected cryptanalytic progress. The methodological contribution is a Literature-Reasoning (LR) framework that identifies mathematical research strategies through a reasoning agent, converts tentative proofs and design claims into machine-checkable representations through a proof agent, and validates each step to reduce hallucination, informal overclaiming and migration error. The empirical component uses real standards-derived data from NIST PQC publications, including parameter sizes, key/ciphertext footprints and signature footprints, together with a structured migration scorecard for long-term information security. Results show that PQC migration is not a one-dimensional replacement problem: stronger security categories increase payload and storage costs, while governance maturity, software dependency visibility and formal verification capacity determine whether long-term confidentiality can be preserved across finance, telecom, health, industry, government and cloud infrastructure. Keywords: post-quantum cryptography; quantum artificial intelligence; number theory; ML-KEM; ML-DSA; SLH-DSA; HQC; crypto-agility; long-term security; formal verification

International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)•May 8, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Resilient Architectures for Enterprise and Cloud Information Systems, Implications of Quantum Computing for Enterprise Cybersecurity and Data Integrity

MANIKANTHA VARAPRASAD INAKOLLU

The emergence of quantum computing presents unprecedented challenges to contemporary enterprise cybersecurity frameworks. Current cryptographic systems that protect sensitive data and secure communications will become vulnerable to quantum attacks within the next decade. This research examines the implications of quantum computing advancement for enterprise and cloud information systems, proposing quantum-resilient architectural frameworks that can withstand both classical and quantum threats. We analyze the timeline of quantum computing development, assess vulnerabilities in existing enterprise security infrastructures, and evaluate post-quantum cryptographic approaches suitable for organizational implementation. Through comparative analysis of quantum-resistant algorithms and architectural patterns, this study demonstrates that enterprises must begin transitioning to quantum-safe systems immediately despite quantum computers' current limitations. The research reveals that organizations storing long-lived sensitive data face immediate risks from "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks where adversaries collect encrypted data today for future quantum decryption. Our proposed architecture integrates post-quantum cryptography, hybrid classical-quantum security approaches, and crypto-agility frameworks that enable organizations to adapt as quantum threats evolve. The findings contribute practical guidance for enterprise architects, security professionals, and cloud service providers navigating the transition to quantum-resilient information systems. This work emphasizes that quantum preparedness is not a future concern but an urgent present requirement for organizations handling sensitive data with long confidentiality requirements.

•Nov 30, 2025•0 citations

Quantum-Resilient Cryptographic Frameworks for Post-Quantum Cloud and Edge Computing

Aswathy P S

The rapid advancement of quantum computing introduces unprecedented security threats to modern cloud and edge computing infrastructures. Classical public-key cryptographic algorithms such as RSA, Diffie–Hellman, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) are fundamentally vulnerable to quantum attacks enabled by Shor’s algorithm. As a result, the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of data stored and processed in distributed systems are at serious risk.Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) aims to develop cryptographic algorithms that are resistant to both classical and quantum adversaries. This paper presents a comprehensive quantum-resilient cryptographic framework designed specifically for post-quantum cloud and edge computing environments. The framework integrates post-quantum cryptographic primitives, hybrid cryptographic approaches, crypto-agile architectures, and secure key management mechanisms. The proposed framework addresses performance constraints, scalability requirements, and deployment challenges in heterogeneous environments. A detailed discussion of security threats, architectural components, performance considerations, and future research directions is provided. The proposed approach enables longterm security and supports a smooth transition toward quantum-safe distributed computing systems.

•Feb 12, 2026•0 citations

Securing the Future: A Comprehensive Review of Post-Quantum Cryptography in the Modern Threat Landscape

Nodira Rustamovna Rustamova, S. Dutta

The accelerating development of quantum computing represents one of the most significant paradigm shifts in the history of information security. Cryptographic systems that currently underpin global digital infrastructure—including RSA, Diffie–Hellman, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography—rely on mathematical assumptions that collapse under quantum algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) emerges as the most viable and immediate solution to secure communications in the quantum era, offering cryptographic primitives that can be deployed on today’s classical hardware while resisting both classical and quantum attacks. This review provides a comprehensive, detailed examination of PQC, analyzing its mathematical foundations, algorithmic families, standardization progress, and deployment challenges. Special emphasis is placed on the NIST PQC standardization process, the risk posed by “harvest-now-decrypt-later” adversaries, the complexities of global cryptographic migration, and the implications for critical digital infrastructures such as cloud computing, blockchain systems, long-lifespan data archives, IoT ecosystems, and national cybersecurity. Through standalone equations, tables, and figures—including a conceptual visual provided by the user—this paper offers a complete, cohesive, and rigorous synthesis. The findings underscore that the transition to PQC is not optional but imperative, requiring coordinated scientific, governmental, and industrial effort to safeguard the digital future.

Qubahan Techno Journal•May 25, 2025•3 citations

Beyond encryption: post-quantum cryptography and the future of quantum-safe networks

Radhakrishnan Delhibabu

Introduction The rapid advancement of quantum computing presents an existential threat to the mathematical foundations of modern internet security. Fault-tolerant quantum computers are projected to reach the logical qubit scale necessary to execute Shor's algorithm by 2030–2035, threatening currently deployed public-key cryptography infrastructures. Methods We evaluate the performance metrics of integrating post-quantum cryptography (PQC), specifically the newly finalized NIST standards (FIPS 203, 204, and 205), with quantum key distribution (QKD) across communication networks. Results Our analysis demonstrates that while hybrid PQC-QKD models reduce long-term key compromise probabilities to near 0%, they introduce a 15% to 40% increase in bandwidth overhead during initial cryptographic handshakes. Discussion Given that enterprise-wide cryptographic migrations historically require 7–10 years, organizations face an immediate vulnerability window against “harvest now, decrypt later” adversaries. Ultimately, we propose a phased, cryptographically agile framework to achieve a Zero-Trust, Quantum-Safe network architecture within a 5-year implementation timeline.

Frontiers in Computer Science•Aug 27, 2026•0 citations

Quantum-Resistant Security

Ramana Rao Kompella

Quantum computing poses an immense threat to classical digital infrastructure security, as existing encryption schemes are vulnerable to Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms. The accelerating quantum computing timeline makes this risk particularly imminent. Harvest-now-decrypt-later threats elevate the security risks further. While enterprises will eventually adopt the recently standardized post-quantum cryptograph (PQC) schemes as a way to defend against these attacks, many challenges remain to be addressed. To begin with, crypto observability in large enterprises is a challenging task, given the wide variety of hardware, applications, and software deployed with cryptography artefacts used across the depth and breadth of the infrastructure. We also cannot fully rely solely on PQC schemes to make an infrastructure quantum-safe, since just because they have not been broken yet does not mean they can never be broken in the future. Therefore, we need crypto resiliency, where we need to augment the use of PQC with other quantum-resistant network protocols. Finally, we need crypto agility as a foundational paradigm to deal with the constant new threats to ensure fast response and remediation to emerging threats. Enterprises need to consider all three approaches in a holistic manner in order to achieve a practical path towards quantum resistance.

•Oct 13, 2025•0 citations
This paper introduces History-Recoverability Post-Quantum Security (HR-PQS), a lightweight theoretical framework for post-quantum security based on the principle of unrecoverable history. Rather than treating the quantum threat as merely a problem of replacing vulnerable cryptographic algorithms, HR-PQS reformulates post-quantum security as a question of whether future quantum-capable adversaries can reconstruct meaningful past histories from stored ciphertexts, keys, logs, backups, certificates, metadata, and operational residues. The central claim is that post-quantum cryptography is necessary but not sufficient. Even when quantum-resistant algorithms are deployed, long-lived information may remain vulnerable through archived ciphertexts, residual key material, metadata leakage, certificate chains, traffic patterns, and backup recovery paths. HR-PQS therefore shifts the security objective from simple decryption failure to semantic history-unrecoverability. The framework unifies existing security practices such as post-quantum cryptography, perfect forward secrecy, ratcheting, secure key erasure, re-encryption, envelope encryption, metadata hiding, and cryptographic agility under a single operational principle: history pruning. In this view, key rotation is not merely a lifecycle procedure, but a mechanism for cutting future reconstruction paths from past encrypted histories. Mathematically, HR-PQS models a future quantum adversary as a relational observer with access to quantum computation, classical computation, internal information, stored ciphertexts, backups, and metadata. Security is defined through a history-recoverability functional combining mutual information leakage, semantic recovery advantage, collapse risk, and operational cost. The paper further introduces a semantic recovery game and a history-recoverability distance for measuring whether an adversary can reconstruct useful domain-specific features of past information, such as financial transaction graphs, medical diagnosis patterns, communication networks, or enterprise activity timelines. The theory is inspired by TrinityLabo's Recoverable Reality Principle and Relational Recoverable Reality Principle, but reverses their role for cryptographic security: in physical theory, good compression should remain recoverable; in security theory, attacker-side reconstruction must remain impossible. HR-PQS is not proposed as a new cryptographic primitive or replacement protocol. Instead, it is a lightweight upper-level theory for organizing existing and emerging post-quantum security practices around the deeper requirement of protecting the past from future reconstruction. In short: not merely quantum-resistant encryption, but unrecoverable history.
Abstract: This study investigates Quantum-AI number-theoretic frameworks for post-quantum cryptography (PQC) and long-term information security. The paper positions lattice-based, hash-based and code-based cryptographic standards as formal security substrates for a future in which adversaries may combine classical cyber operations, artificial intelligence and quantum computation. The proposed framework treats cryptography not merely as an algorithmic primitive but as a socio-technical assurance layer that links formal number theory, cryptographic agility, AI-assisted verification, hardware deployment and governance-grade migration planning. The analysis is motivated by the harvest-now-decrypt-later threat, the standardisation of ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA, and the selection of HQC as a backup encryption mechanism for resilience against unexpected cryptanalytic progress. The methodological contribution is a Literature-Reasoning (LR) framework that identifies mathematical research strategies through a reasoning agent, converts tentative proofs and design claims into machine-checkable representations through a proof agent, and validates each step to reduce hallucination, informal overclaiming and migration error. The empirical component uses real standards-derived data from NIST PQC publications, including parameter sizes, key/ciphertext footprints and signature footprints, together with a structured migration scorecard for long-term information security. Results show that PQC migration is not a one-dimensional replacement problem: stronger security categories increase payload and storage costs, while governance maturity, software dependency visibility and formal verification capacity determine whether long-term confidentiality can be preserved across finance, telecom, health, industry, government and cloud infrastructure. Keywords: post-quantum cryptography; quantum artificial intelligence; number theory; ML-KEM; ML-DSA; SLH-DSA; HQC; crypto-agility; long-term security; formal verification
The emergence of quantum computing presents unprecedented challenges to contemporary enterprise cybersecurity frameworks. Current cryptographic systems that protect sensitive data and secure communications will become vulnerable to quantum attacks within the next decade. This research examines the implications of quantum computing advancement for enterprise and cloud information systems, proposing quantum-resilient architectural frameworks that can withstand both classical and quantum threats. We analyze the timeline of quantum computing development, assess vulnerabilities in existing enterprise security infrastructures, and evaluate post-quantum cryptographic approaches suitable for organizational implementation. Through comparative analysis of quantum-resistant algorithms and architectural patterns, this study demonstrates that enterprises must begin transitioning to quantum-safe systems immediately despite quantum computers' current limitations. The research reveals that organizations storing long-lived sensitive data face immediate risks from "harvest now, decrypt later" attacks where adversaries collect encrypted data today for future quantum decryption. Our proposed architecture integrates post-quantum cryptography, hybrid classical-quantum security approaches, and crypto-agility frameworks that enable organizations to adapt as quantum threats evolve. The findings contribute practical guidance for enterprise architects, security professionals, and cloud service providers navigating the transition to quantum-resilient information systems. This work emphasizes that quantum preparedness is not a future concern but an urgent present requirement for organizations handling sensitive data with long confidentiality requirements.
The rapid advancement of quantum computing introduces unprecedented security threats to modern cloud and edge computing infrastructures. Classical public-key cryptographic algorithms such as RSA, Diffie–Hellman, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) are fundamentally vulnerable to quantum attacks enabled by Shor’s algorithm. As a result, the confidentiality, integrity, and authenticity of data stored and processed in distributed systems are at serious risk.Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) aims to develop cryptographic algorithms that are resistant to both classical and quantum adversaries. This paper presents a comprehensive quantum-resilient cryptographic framework designed specifically for post-quantum cloud and edge computing environments. The framework integrates post-quantum cryptographic primitives, hybrid cryptographic approaches, crypto-agile architectures, and secure key management mechanisms. The proposed framework addresses performance constraints, scalability requirements, and deployment challenges in heterogeneous environments. A detailed discussion of security threats, architectural components, performance considerations, and future research directions is provided. The proposed approach enables longterm security and supports a smooth transition toward quantum-safe distributed computing systems.
The accelerating development of quantum computing represents one of the most significant paradigm shifts in the history of information security. Cryptographic systems that currently underpin global digital infrastructure—including RSA, Diffie–Hellman, and Elliptic Curve Cryptography—rely on mathematical assumptions that collapse under quantum algorithms such as Shor’s and Grover’s. Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) emerges as the most viable and immediate solution to secure communications in the quantum era, offering cryptographic primitives that can be deployed on today’s classical hardware while resisting both classical and quantum attacks. This review provides a comprehensive, detailed examination of PQC, analyzing its mathematical foundations, algorithmic families, standardization progress, and deployment challenges. Special emphasis is placed on the NIST PQC standardization process, the risk posed by “harvest-now-decrypt-later” adversaries, the complexities of global cryptographic migration, and the implications for critical digital infrastructures such as cloud computing, blockchain systems, long-lifespan data archives, IoT ecosystems, and national cybersecurity. Through standalone equations, tables, and figures—including a conceptual visual provided by the user—this paper offers a complete, cohesive, and rigorous synthesis. The findings underscore that the transition to PQC is not optional but imperative, requiring coordinated scientific, governmental, and industrial effort to safeguard the digital future.
Introduction The rapid advancement of quantum computing presents an existential threat to the mathematical foundations of modern internet security. Fault-tolerant quantum computers are projected to reach the logical qubit scale necessary to execute Shor's algorithm by 2030–2035, threatening currently deployed public-key cryptography infrastructures. Methods We evaluate the performance metrics of integrating post-quantum cryptography (PQC), specifically the newly finalized NIST standards (FIPS 203, 204, and 205), with quantum key distribution (QKD) across communication networks. Results Our analysis demonstrates that while hybrid PQC-QKD models reduce long-term key compromise probabilities to near 0%, they introduce a 15% to 40% increase in bandwidth overhead during initial cryptographic handshakes. Discussion Given that enterprise-wide cryptographic migrations historically require 7–10 years, organizations face an immediate vulnerability window against “harvest now, decrypt later” adversaries. Ultimately, we propose a phased, cryptographically agile framework to achieve a Zero-Trust, Quantum-Safe network architecture within a 5-year implementation timeline.
Quantum computing poses an immense threat to classical digital infrastructure security, as existing encryption schemes are vulnerable to Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms. The accelerating quantum computing timeline makes this risk particularly imminent. Harvest-now-decrypt-later threats elevate the security risks further. While enterprises will eventually adopt the recently standardized post-quantum cryptograph (PQC) schemes as a way to defend against these attacks, many challenges remain to be addressed. To begin with, crypto observability in large enterprises is a challenging task, given the wide variety of hardware, applications, and software deployed with cryptography artefacts used across the depth and breadth of the infrastructure. We also cannot fully rely solely on PQC schemes to make an infrastructure quantum-safe, since just because they have not been broken yet does not mean they can never be broken in the future. Therefore, we need crypto resiliency, where we need to augment the use of PQC with other quantum-resistant network protocols. Finally, we need crypto agility as a foundational paradigm to deal with the constant new threats to ensure fast response and remediation to emerging threats. Enterprises need to consider all three approaches in a holistic manner in order to achieve a practical path towards quantum resistance.