[CORRECTION NOTE, June 2026: The central uniqueness claim of this preprint is corrected. The object 1 + ((1,1);1) (d_A = 4) is NOT an algebra: its generator fails fusion closure. The correct classification has exactly two non-trivial condensable algebras, the Z3 simple-current algebra (d_A = 3) and the maximal algebra (d_A = 6), and the maximal condensation yields the nu=11 Ising-type category of the sixteen-fold way - the modular tensor category of SO(11)_1 (h_sigma = 11/16) - which shares its fusion rules with Ising and its fusion category with SU(2)_2 but is equivalent to neither as a braided category. See the corrected release at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20618695 (concept 10.5281/zenodo.20128951). A corrected manuscript is under journal review. The text below is the original and is retained for the record.] We give a complete analysis of anyon condensation in the rank-30 modular tensor category C = SU(3)_3 ⊗ SU(2)_2. We prove that A = 1 ⊕ ((1,1);1) is the unique non-trivial condensable algebra by classifying all physical modular invariants. The local module category C^loc_A is computed explicitly: it is a rank-3 MTC with quantum dimensions (1,1,√2), total quantum dimension D² = 4, and Ising fusion rules. The F-symbol F^{σσσ}_σ = (1/√2)[[1,1],[1,-1]] is verified from SU(2)_2 quantum 6j-symbols, confirming C^loc_A ≅ Ising ≅ SU(2)_2 as modular tensor categories.
[CORRECTION NOTE, June 2026: The central uniqueness claim of this preprint is corrected. The object 1 + ((1,1);1) (d_A = 4) is NOT an algebra: its generator fails fusion closure. The correct classification has exactly two non-trivial condensable algebras, the Z3 simple-current algebra (d_A = 3) and the maximal algebra (d_A = 6), and the maximal condensation yields the nu=11 Ising-type category of the sixteen-fold way - the modular tensor category of SO(11)_1 (h_sigma = 11/16) - which shares its fusion rules with Ising and its fusion category with SU(2)_2 but is equivalent to neither as a braided category. See the corrected release at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20618695 (concept 10.5281/zenodo.20128951). A corrected manuscript is under journal review. The text below is the original and is retained for the record.] We give a complete analysis of anyon condensation in the rank-30 modular tensor category C = SU(3)_3 ⊗ SU(2)_2. We prove that A = 1 ⊕ ((1,1);1) is the unique non-trivial condensable algebra by classifying all physical modular invariants. The local module category C^loc_A is computed explicitly: it is a rank-3 MTC with quantum dimensions (1,1,√2), total quantum dimension D² = 4, and Ising fusion rules. The F-symbol F^{σσσ}_σ = (1/√2)[[1,1],[1,-1]] is verified from SU(2)_2 quantum 6j-symbols, confirming C^loc_A ≅ Ising ≅ SU(2)_2 as modular tensor categories.
[CORRECTION NOTE, June 2026: This companion paper inherits the corrected classification: the object 1 + ((1,1);1) (d_A = 4) is NOT an algebra (its generator fails fusion closure); the correct algebras are the Z3 simple-current algebra (d_A = 3) and the maximal algebra (d_A = 6). The condensed phase is the nu=11 Ising-type category of the sixteen-fold way - the modular tensor category of SO(11)_1 (h_sigma = 11/16), fixed by the preserved central charge c = 11/2 mod 8 - which shares its fusion rules with Ising and its fusion category with SU(2)_2 but is equivalent to neither as a braided category (the claim 'matching the Ising MTC (equivalently SU(2)_2)' below is corrected accordingly). See DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20618695 (concept 10.5281/zenodo.20128951). The text below is the original and is retained for the record.] We compute the local module category ClocA for the condensable algebra A = 1 ⊕ ((1,1);1) in the product modular tensor category SU(3)3 ⊗ SU(2)2. Starting from the rank-30 parent theory with total quantum dimension D2 = 144, we identify the unique modular invariant Z commuting with the modular S- and T-matrices, extract a 30×3 branching matrix, and compute the condensed S-matrix via Sloc = (1/dA)bTSb. The result is a rank-3 modular tensor category with quantum dimensions (1, 1, √2), total quantum dimension D2 = 4, and modular data matching the Ising MTC (equivalently SU(2)2) to machine precision. The D2 discrepancy between intrinsic (= 4) and extrinsic (= 9) values is resolved by the embedding dimension factor (d0embed)2 = 9/4. This is a companion paper to 'Anyon condensation in SU(3)3 ⊗ SU(2)2: condensable algebras, monodromy spectrum, and the Z6 fusion ring' (Bazih, 2026), resolving its Remark 3.4 on the structure of ClocA.
We present a systematic computational survey of condensable algebras (connected étale algebras) in product modular tensor categories of the form SU(N₁)_{k₁} ⊗ SU(N₂)_{k₂} at small rank. Using the Verlinde formula and modular invariant classification, we identify all non-trivial condensable algebras across 10 product MTCs with rank ≤ 36. We verify the Shimizu-Yadav conditions ensuring that the local module categories are modular, and compute the condensation completion structure including domain walls and defects using the Décoppet-Yu framework. Our survey reveals a rich landscape: simple current algebras of types Z₂, Z₃, and Z₂×Z₂ dominate, with condensed phases including the Ising MTC. We also correct an error in a previous classification of SU(3)₃ ⊗ SU(2)₂, where the maximal condensable algebra has d_A = 6 (not 4), yielding the Ising MTC as the condensed phase. All computational code is included.
[NOTE, June 2026: Computations in this paper used mtctools <= 0.2.x, whose condensable-algebra finder has since been found to have false negatives on conformal-embedding (E-type) algebras, and whose condensed-phase identification did not resolve the sixteen-fold way (a D^2 = 4 condensed phase is determined only together with the central charge mod 8). Affected classifications should be re-checked against mtctools 0.3.0 and the corrected release at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20618695. The text below is the original and is retained for the record.] We establish rigorous obstructions to fermionic anyon condensation in product modular tensor categories and analyze the lattice structure of condensable algebras. Our key results include: (1) a proof that fermionic condensation is impossible in SU(2)_k ⊗ SU(2)_k for all k ≤ 8, and provide the mechanism via conformal weight analysis; (2) computation of the full condensation lattice (partial order under inclusion) for SU(2) levels 1-8, revealing rich combinatorial structure; (3) identification of maximal condensable algebras as Lagrangian when they exist. These results contribute to the classification program for topological phases of matter and have implications for the construction of fermionic topological orders from bosonic ones.
[NOTE, June 2026: Computations in this paper used mtctools <= 0.2.x, whose condensable-algebra finder has since been found to have false negatives on conformal-embedding (E-type) algebras (e.g. 1+(j=3) in SU(2)_10, within the level range covered here), and whose condensed-phase identification did not resolve the sixteen-fold way. The boundary counts below are therefore lower bounds where E-type algebras were missed; re-check against mtctools 0.3.0 and the corrected release at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20618695. The text below is the original and is retained for the record.] We develop a systematic computational framework connecting anyon condensation in modular tensor categories to the classification of non-invertible symmetry boundaries in the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) paradigm. For each condensable algebra in a doubled MTC, we identify the corresponding symmetry boundary condition and classify the resulting non-invertible symmetry structure. We present explicit results for SU(2) Chern-Simons theories at levels k=1-8, SU(3) at levels k=1-3, and G₂ at level 1, covering 40+ modular tensor categories and identifying 100+ distinct symmetry boundary types.
[NOTE, June 2026: This paper is part of the AME(4,6)/TOE series whose headline claims were partially retracted. In particular the "zero free parameters" framing and several numerical predictions are withdrawn; see the Status Note at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20618848 and the maintained mathematics at DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20128951. The text below is unchanged and remains as the record of the programme's history.] We present the complete R-matrix braiding catalog for SU(3)_3 modular tensor category, comprising all 144 eigenvalues across 55 anyon pairs. Each eigenvalue takes the form exp(in*pi/18) where n is an integer, establishing that pi/18 serves as the universal phase quantum. The catalog is obtained through direct Sage computation (127 eigenvalues), charge conjugation symmetry (15 eigenvalues), and a novel Hopf link derivation for the multiplicity-2 channel (1,1) x (1,1) -> (1,1) (2 eigenvalues). We verify consistency through the Verlinde formula (144/144 channels confirmed) and charge conjugation symmetry (71/71 pairs, zero failures). Universal patterns discovered include: (i) the adjoint anyon (1,1) produces a universal elastic phase of -pi/2 for all non-simple-current anyons, (ii) adjoint self-braiding yields exclusively fourth roots of unity, and (iii) the simple current (3,0) generates phases that are exact multiples of pi/3. This catalog provides the foundational braiding data for the AME(4,6) theory of everything based on the Walker-Wang model.
A central question in the theory of topological order asks whether the braid group representation BN carried by N non-Abelian anyons uniquely determines the modular data — the S and T matrices — of the underlying topological quantum field theory. We reconcile three lines of analysis into a single assessment. Structurally, we formalize the question as a reduction map Φ from modular tensor category data to projective braid group representations, whose kernel is the locus of potential counterexamples. Two rigorous finiteness results constrain the problem: braid representations from twisted quantum doubles of finite groups factor through finite groups, and the SO(N)2/O(N)2 braid representations are Gaussian with finite image. We then perform an explicit computation on the Ising anyon model — the canonical non-Abelian order of Majorana zero modes — reconstructing the topological spins θσ=eiπ/8, θψ=−1, the total quantum dimension D=2, and the full S matrix from the braid eigenvalues, with all arithmetic shown. We exhibit a Galois-conjugate deformation Ising(7) with identical fusion rules but distinct S matrix, and verify that its braid representation is inequivalent to the Ising representation on B3 by an explicit trace computation, while remaining indistinguishable at the level of fusion rules. We conclude that braid representations constrain but do not provably uniquely determine modular data in general: uniqueness can hold only under additional hypotheses, and the Majorana fusion-rule classification is not closed by braid data alone. The affirmative claim that braiding is a complete invariant is restricted to a narrower regime than sometimes asserted, and we document this divergence explicitly. ## 1. Introduction Non-Abelian anyons in two spatial dimensions are characterized by two layers of algebraic structure. The first is combinatorial: fusion rules Nabc specifying how anyon c Full text and updates: papers.qnfo.org/papers/braid-group-representations-and-modular-data-non-uniqueness-finite-images-and-th/