Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Basis of Design Tools for Quantum Computing

Lukas Burgholzer, Robert Wille

Published Jan 1, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-032-06770-8_3

Related papers

Design Automation Tools and Software for Quantum Computing

Lukas Burgholzer, Robert Wille

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Design Automation for Quantum Computing

Prabhat Mishra

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Visualizing Decision Diagrams for Quantum Computing (Special Session Summary)

Robert Wille, Lukas Burgholzer, Michael Artner

With the emergence of more and more applications for quantum computing, also the development of corresponding methods for design automation is receiving increasing interest. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising basis for many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, verification, and more. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we present a visualization tool which visualizes quantum decision diagrams and allows to explore their behavior when used in the design tasks mentioned above. The installation-free web-tool allows users to interactively learn how decision diagrams can be used in quantum computing, e.g., to (1) compactly represent quantum states and the functionality of quantum circuits, (2) to efficiently simulate quantum circuits, and (3) to verify the equivalence of two circuits. The tool is available at https://iic.jku.at/eda/research/quantum_dd/tool

Design, Automation, and Test in Europe•Feb 1, 2021•11 citations

Optimized Density Matrix Representations : Improving the Basis for Noise-Aware Quantum Circuit Design Tools

Thomas Grurl, Jürgen Fuß, Robert Wille

By exploiting quantum mechanical effects, quantum computers can tackle problems that are infeasible for classical computers. At the same time, these quantum mechanical properties make handling quantum states exponentially hard—imposing major challenges on design tools. In the past, methods such as tensor networks or decision diagrams have shown that they can often keep those resource requirements in check by exploiting redundancies within the description of quantum states. But developments thus far focused on pure quantum states which do not provide a physically complete picture and, e.g., ignore frequently occurring noise effects. Density matrix representations provide such a complete picture, but are substantially larger. At the same time, they come with characteristics that allow for a more compact representation. In this work, we unveil this untapped potential and use it to provide a decision diagram representation that is optimized for density matrix representations. By this, we are providing a basis for more efficient design tools such as quantum circuit simulation which explicitly takes noise/error effects into account.

IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL)•May 1, 2023•1 citation

Introducing Design Automation for Quantum Computing

Alwin Zulehner, Robert Wille

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2020•18 citations

The basis of design tools for quantum computing

Robert Wille, Lukas Burgholzer, Stefan Hillmich +3 more

Quantum computers promise to efficiently solve important problems classical computers never will. However, in order to capitalize on these prospects, a fully automated quantum software stack needs to be developed. This involves a multitude of complex tasks from the classical simulation of quantum circuits, over their compilation to specific devices, to the verification of the circuits to be executed as well as the obtained results. All of these tasks are highly non-trivial and necessitate efficient data structures to tackle the inherent complexity. Starting from rather straight-forward arrays over decision diagrams (inspired by the design automation community) to tensor networks and the ZX-calculus, various complementary approaches have been proposed. This work provides a look "under the hood" of today's tools and showcases how these means are utilized in them, e.g., for simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits.

arXiv:2301.04147•ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC)•Jul 10, 2022•11 citations
With the emergence of more and more applications for quantum computing, also the development of corresponding methods for design automation is receiving increasing interest. In this respect, decision diagrams provide a promising basis for many design tasks such as simulation, synthesis, verification, and more. However, users of the corresponding tools often do not have a proper background or an intuition about how these methods based on decision diagrams work and what their strengths and limits are. In an effort to make decision diagrams for quantum computing more accessible, we present a visualization tool which visualizes quantum decision diagrams and allows to explore their behavior when used in the design tasks mentioned above. The installation-free web-tool allows users to interactively learn how decision diagrams can be used in quantum computing, e.g., to (1) compactly represent quantum states and the functionality of quantum circuits, (2) to efficiently simulate quantum circuits, and (3) to verify the equivalence of two circuits. The tool is available at https://iic.jku.at/eda/research/quantum_dd/tool
By exploiting quantum mechanical effects, quantum computers can tackle problems that are infeasible for classical computers. At the same time, these quantum mechanical properties make handling quantum states exponentially hard—imposing major challenges on design tools. In the past, methods such as tensor networks or decision diagrams have shown that they can often keep those resource requirements in check by exploiting redundancies within the description of quantum states. But developments thus far focused on pure quantum states which do not provide a physically complete picture and, e.g., ignore frequently occurring noise effects. Density matrix representations provide such a complete picture, but are substantially larger. At the same time, they come with characteristics that allow for a more compact representation. In this work, we unveil this untapped potential and use it to provide a decision diagram representation that is optimized for density matrix representations. By this, we are providing a basis for more efficient design tools such as quantum circuit simulation which explicitly takes noise/error effects into account.
Quantum computers promise to efficiently solve important problems classical computers never will. However, in order to capitalize on these prospects, a fully automated quantum software stack needs to be developed. This involves a multitude of complex tasks from the classical simulation of quantum circuits, over their compilation to specific devices, to the verification of the circuits to be executed as well as the obtained results. All of these tasks are highly non-trivial and necessitate efficient data structures to tackle the inherent complexity. Starting from rather straight-forward arrays over decision diagrams (inspired by the design automation community) to tensor networks and the ZX-calculus, various complementary approaches have been proposed. This work provides a look "under the hood" of today's tools and showcases how these means are utilized in them, e.g., for simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits.