Abstract Quantum machine learning (QML) has attracted growing interest because quantum states and circuits may provide new representational primitives for learning, yet progress remains constrained by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware and heterogeneous evaluation practices. This article presents a critical review of recent QML architectures and representative empirical and theoretical studies, with emphasis on work published since 2022 alongside selected seminal references. To improve comparability, “quantum advantage” is assessed in three distinct senses: computational scaling under stated input-access assumptions, empirical predictive performance in the benchmark setting considered, and resource efficiency at a fixed budget accounting for both classical compute and quantum execution, including shot costs. Organized by architecture family and application domain, the review analyzes how baseline strength, hyperparameter optimization, preprocessing, and budget reporting shape conclusions. Overall, quantum feature maps and kernels, as well as variational (often hybrid) pipelines, can be competitive on selected small- to medium-scale benchmarks, but robust end-to-end evidence for a general practical advantage remains limited. Reported gains are often sensitive to budget matching and may be dominated by measurement overheads, dataset and preprocessing effects, and training instabilities. The review concludes that credible progress requires standardized benchmarking, transparent end-to-end resource accounting, and hardware-centered evaluations that test scalability and robustness beyond toy regimes.
Abstract Quantum machine learning (QML) has attracted growing interest because quantum states and circuits may provide new representational primitives for learning, yet progress remains constrained by noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware and heterogeneous evaluation practices. This article presents a critical review of recent QML architectures and representative empirical and theoretical studies, with emphasis on work published since 2022 alongside selected seminal references. To improve comparability, “quantum advantage” is assessed in three distinct senses: computational scaling under stated input-access assumptions, empirical predictive performance in the benchmark setting considered, and resource efficiency at a fixed budget accounting for both classical compute and quantum execution, including shot costs. Organized by architecture family and application domain, the review analyzes how baseline strength, hyperparameter optimization, preprocessing, and budget reporting shape conclusions. Overall, quantum feature maps and kernels, as well as variational (often hybrid) pipelines, can be competitive on selected small- to medium-scale benchmarks, but robust end-to-end evidence for a general practical advantage remains limited. Reported gains are often sensitive to budget matching and may be dominated by measurement overheads, dataset and preprocessing effects, and training instabilities. The review concludes that credible progress requires standardized benchmarking, transparent end-to-end resource accounting, and hardware-centered evaluations that test scalability and robustness beyond toy regimes.
Quantum computing has generated significant expectations for its potential to enhance machine learning (ML) tasks, with theoretical research proposing computational advantages ranging from polynomial to exponential speedups for specific subroutines.However, a critical disconnect remains: theoretical or asymptotic speedup claims do not automatically imply a practical, end-to-end advantage.Current evidence does not clearly establish whether these claimed advantages translate into measurable superiority over optimised classical approaches.This review critically assesses the relationship between theoretical claims of quantum advantage and the currently available practical and experimental evidence.We critically examine the evidence and assumptions underlying claimed speedups, including the overheads associated with data encoding and access, as well as the use of appropriate and competitive classical baselines for fair comparison.The scope of this assessment covers key limiting factors, such as scalability, trainability, hardware noise in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, and overall resource requirements.By distinguishing between theoretical potential and demonstrated practical performance, this work identifies where current evidence is convincing and where it remains insufficient.The review identifies the specific conditions required for the credible validation of quantum advantage and argues that future progress must be positioned around rigorous, realistic, and end-to-end evaluation rather than theoretical complexity claims alone.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has become an important research area in recent years due to its potential to overcome the computational bottlenecks faced by classical machine learning methods. In this study, only SCI/SCI-Expanded journal articles published between 2023 and 2025 and accepted as early access for 2026 are considered, and 30 such articles are systematically examined to provide a comprehensive assessment of the current state of QML methods. The reviewed literature covers variational quantum circuits, quantum kernel methods, hybrid quantum–classical models, quantum annealing approaches, federated QML architectures, data encoding strategies, and adversarial robustness analyses. The findings indicate that QML models can exhibit stronger representational capacity and higher generalization performance compared to classical methods, particularly on high-dimensional, noisy, or small sample datasets. Reported results in domains such as healthcare, chemistry, energy systems, cybersecurity, blockchain, and finance reveal the diversity of QML applications and its interdisciplinary potential. Nevertheless, the limited qubit capacity of current NISQ hardware, constraints on circuit depth, and noise-related issues remain fundamental factors that restrict the scalability of QML models. This study synthesizes methodological trends, identifies open research problems, and proposes a directional roadmap for future QML research focused on hardware-aware circuit design, efficient data encoding schemes, and robust learning frameworks.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) unites quantum computing with modern AI to achieve potential gains in expressivity, runtime, and sample efficiency. This paper synthesizes advances in quantum feature maps, variational quantum circuits (VQCs), and hybrid quantum-classical workflows deployable on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. We outline design principles for data encoding, ansatz selection, and trainability, and summarize error-aware practices—error mitigation, shot-frugal estimation, and compiler co-design. Using synthetic but instructive experiments, we illustrate scaling behavior, noise sensitivity, end-to-end inference latency across backends, and optimizer convergence in variational training. We conclude with an agenda emphasizing domain-aligned encodings, rigorous benchmarking, and reproducible open science to validate advantage beyond asymptotic claims.
An interesting approach to using noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices is hybrid classical-quantum machine learning (QML). In these methods, classical processors handle optimisation and large-scale computation, while quantum hardware is devoted to tasks like feature mapping, nonlinear transformations, or kernel evaluation. Practical near-term demonstrations are made possible by this division of labour, which also mitigates existing hardware restrictions. In specialised fields like molecular modelling, materials discovery, and small-sample learning issues, recent advancements in variational quantum circuits, hybrid neural networks, and quantum kernel techniques have produced promising outcomes. However, scalability and wider applicability are still hampered by enduring issues including noise, barren plateaus, and the expense of repeated measurements. Long-term developments will require fault tolerance, logical qubits, and established software infrastructures, whereas near-term success depends on noise-aware algorithm design, repeatable experimental benchmarks, and enhanced error-mitigation strategies. When taken as a whole, these advancements show a viable path to achieving quantum advantage in machine learning. Quanta 2026; 15: 1–12.
Quantum machine learning (QML) has emerged as a promising interdisciplinary field that integrates principles of quantum computing with machine learning techniques to address complex computational challenges. By leveraging quantum phenomena such as superposition and entanglement, QML aims to enhance learning efficiency, improve model performance, and enable the exploration of high-dimensional feature spaces that are intractable for classical methods. This paper presents a comprehensive review of recent developments in QML, covering fundamental concepts, algorithmic taxonomies, data encoding techniques, implementation challenges, and real-world applications. Key approaches, including quantum support vector machines (QSVM), variational quantum circuits (VQC), and quantum neural networks (QNN), are systematically analyzed. Furthermore, critical challenges, including noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) limitations, barren plateaus, data encoding bottlenecks, and the lack of demonstrated quantum advantage, are discussed in detail. The review also highlights emerging applications in material informatics, energy systems, healthcare, and optimization problems. Finally, future research directions are outlined, emphasizing the need for advancements in quantum hardware, scalable algorithms, hybrid frameworks, and standardized benchmarking. This work aims to provide a structured perspective on the current state of QML and to identify opportunities in deploy it effectively in solve real-world problems.
Supervised quantum machine learning (QML) applies quantum resources to classical tasks such as classification and regression. We examine methods feasible on current Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware, including variational (parameterized) quantum circuits (VQCs/PQCs), quantum kernel methods, data encodings, and hybrid quantumclassical workflows, and we summarize recent experiments in quantum-native and low-data regimes. We clarify theory on generalization and trainability and identify practical blockers: noise and depth limits, encoding overheads, missing standardized benchmarks, and unsettled conditions for advantage. Our main contribution is a ten-year outlook from 2025 to 2035 that maps hardware progress, error mitigation, benchmarking, quantum data generation, federated learning & privacy, and AutoQML to potential enterprise use cases. The roadmap draws on a qualitative synthesis of publication trends, milestone experiments, prior surveys, and practitioner insights. Near-term gains are most likely in niche applications and hybrid deployments; broader adoption depends on scalable error-corrected hardware, shared benchmarks, interdisciplinary training, and calibrated expectations.