This paper presents an efficient and scalable tensor network framework for quantum kernel circuit simulation, alleviating practical costs associated with increasing qubit counts and data size. The framework enables systematic large-scale evaluation of a linearly mixed quantum-classical dual kernel of up to 784 qubits. Using Fashion-MNIST, the classification performance of the test dataset is compared between a classical kernel, a quantum kernel, and the quantum-classical dual kernel across the feature dimensions from 2 to 784, with a one-to-one mapping between encoded features and qubits. Our result shows that the quantum-classical dual kernel consistently outperforms both single-kernel baselines, remains stable as the dimensionality increases, and mitigates the large-scale degradation observed in the quantum kernel. Analysis of the learned mixing weights indicates that quantum contributions dominate below 128 features, while classical contributions become increasingly important beyond 128, suggesting that the classical kernel provides a stabilizing anchor against concentration effects and hardware noise while preserving quantum gains at lower dimensions.
This paper presents an efficient and scalable tensor network framework for quantum kernel circuit simulation, alleviating practical costs associated with increasing qubit counts and data size. The framework enables systematic large-scale evaluation of a linearly mixed quantum-classical dual kernel of up to 784 qubits. Using Fashion-MNIST, the classification performance of the test dataset is compared between a classical kernel, a quantum kernel, and the quantum-classical dual kernel across the feature dimensions from 2 to 784, with a one-to-one mapping between encoded features and qubits. Our result shows that the quantum-classical dual kernel consistently outperforms both single-kernel baselines, remains stable as the dimensionality increases, and mitigates the large-scale degradation observed in the quantum kernel. Analysis of the learned mixing weights indicates that quantum contributions dominate below 128 features, while classical contributions become increasingly important beyond 128, suggesting that the classical kernel provides a stabilizing anchor against concentration effects and hardware noise while preserving quantum gains at lower dimensions.
This paper presents an efficient and scalable tensor network framework for quantum kernel circuit simulation, alleviating practical costs associated with increasing qubit counts and data size. The framework enables systematic large-scale evaluation of a linearly mixed quantum-classical dual kernel of up to 784 qubits. Using Fashion-MNIST, the classification performance of the test dataset is compared between a classical kernel, a quantum kernel, and the quantum-classical dual kernel across the feature dimensions from 2 to 784, with a one-to-one mapping between encoded features and qubits. Our result shows that the quantum-classical dual kernel consistently outperforms both single-kernel baselines, remains stable as the dimensionality increases, and mitigates the large-scale degradation observed in the quantum kernel. Analysis of the learned mixing weights indicates that quantum contributions dominate below 128 features, while classical contributions become increasingly important beyond 128, suggesting that the classical kernel provides a stabilizing anchor against concentration effects and hardware noise while preserving quantum gains at lower dimensions.
Abstract We present an efficient tensor-network-based approach for simulating large-scale quantum circuits exemplified by quantum support vector machines (QSVMs). Experimentally, leveraging the cuTensorNet library on multiple GPUs, our method effectively reduces the exponential runtime growth to near-quadratic scaling with respect to the number of qubits in practical scenarios. Traditional state-vector simulations become computationally infeasible beyond approximately 50 qubits; in contrast, our simulator successfully handles QSVMs with up to 784 qubits, executing simulations within seconds on a single high-performance GPU. Furthermore, utilizing the message passing interface for multi-GPU environments, our method demonstrates strong linear scalability, effectively decreasing computation time as dataset sizes increase. We validate our framework using the MNIST and Fashion MNIST datasets, achieving successful multiclass classification and highlighting the potential of QSVMs for high-dimensional data analysis. By integrating tensor-network techniques with advanced high-performance computing resources, this work demonstrates both the feasibility and scalability of simulating large-qubit quantum machine learning models, providing a valuable validation tool within the emerging Quantum-HPC ecosystem.
As quantum computers become increasingly practical, so does the prospect of using quantum computation to improve upon traditional algorithms. Kernel methods in machine learning is one area where such improvements could be realized in the near future. Paired with kernel methods like support-vector machines, small and noisy quantum computers can evaluate classically-hard quantum kernels that capture unique notions of similarity in data. Taking inspiration from techniques in classical machine learning, this work investigates simulated quantum kernels in the context of multiple kernel learning (MKL). We consider pairwise combinations of several classical-classical, quantum-quantum, and quantum-classical kernels in an empirical investigation of their classification performance with support-vector machines. We also introduce a novel approach, which we call QCC-net (quantum-classical-convex neural network), for optimizing the weights of base kernels together with any kernel parameters. We show this approach to be effective for enhancing various performance metrics in an MKL setting. Looking at data with an increasing number of features (up to 13 dimensions), we find parameter training to be important for successfully weighting kernels in some combinations. Using the optimal kernel weights as indicators of relative utility, we find growing contributions from trainable quantum kernels in quantum-classical kernel combinations as the number of features increases. We observe the opposite trend for combinations containing simpler, non-parametric quantum kernels.
Quantum kernel methods are the most concrete near-term proposal for quantum machine learning on classical data, yet published benchmarks disagree on whether they outperform tuned classical kernels, and the disagreement cannot be resolved from the literature because the comparisons are not protocol-controlled. We argue that the obstacle is one of measurement, not theory: the usual setup fixes the quantum feature map's data scaling while grid-searching the classical kernel's hyperparameters, recomputes nothing per fold, and reports cost in simulator time. We therefore treat the comparison itself as the object of study and impose three controls. The bandwidth is tuned on the same grid budget as the classical γ, the kernel is recomputed inside every fold from fold-fitted preprocessing, and cost is counted in hardware circuit evaluations. On top of these we run a factorial design of 324 cells in which dimensionality, training size, class separability and data structure are explicit covariates, together with four standard datasets, a shots-versus-gate-noise ablation, and a cost sweep. The dominant effect we measure is not quantum: tuning the feature map's bandwidth is worth 0.120 accuracy on synthetic data and 0.339 on real data, exceeding every quantum-classical difference we observe. Tuned quantum kernels are then statistically indistinguishable from a tuned RBF on all four real datasets. The advantage on synthetic data is confined almost entirely to data generated by the feature map itself, and it shrinks with dimensionality (-0.0045 per qubit) while growing with sample size. Finite sampling costs an order of magnitude more accuracy than gate and readout noise, and a fidelity kernel needs 5×107 circuits at n = 10,000. Protocol variance is thus sufficient to explain the field's contradictory conclusions.
Abstract Quantum machine learning (QML) is an emerging field that investigates the capabilities of quantum computers for learning tasks. While QML models can theoretically offer advantages such as exponential speed-ups, challenges in data loading and the ability to scale to relevant problem sizes have prevented demonstrations of such advantages on practical problems. In particular, the encoding of arbitrary classical data into quantum states usually comes at a high computational cost, either in terms of qubits or gate count. However, real-world data typically exhibits some inherent structure (such as image data) which can be leveraged to load them with a much smaller cost on a quantum computer. This work further develops an efficient algorithm for finding low-depth quantum circuits to load classical image data as quantum states. To evaluate its effectiveness, we conduct systematic studies on the MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Imagenette datasets. The corresponding circuits for loading the full large-scale datasets are available publicly as PennyLane datasets and can be used by the community for their own benchmarks. We further analyze the performance of various quantum classifiers, such as quantum kernel methods, parameterized quantum circuits, and tensor-network classifiers, and we compare them to convolutional neural networks. In particular, we focus on the performance of the quantum classifiers as we introduce nonlinear functions of the input state, e.g. by letting the circuit parameters depend on the input state.
Quantum kernel methods have emerged as a promising approach for leveraging high-dimensional feature spaces in machine learning, particularly in domains where classical kernel methods face scalability limitations. In this work, we present the first large-scale study of fidelity-quantum-kernel support vector machines for hyperspectral data classification without requiring heavy prior feature selection or dimensionality reduction. By simulating quantum kernels using tensor network contraction techniques and GPU acceleration, we overcome the computational bottlenecks traditionally associated with quantum models, achieving quadratic scaling O(n^2) in the number of qubits. Our approach enables the evaluation of quantum kernels on hyperspectral data with hundreds of spectral bands, aligning quantum feature spaces with real-world remote sensing applications. We provide an in-depth analysis of kernel bandwidth optimization, demonstrating its crucial role in mitigating exponential concentration effects and ensuring the model's ability to generalize. Experimental results on binary classification (Indian Pines and Methane Detection) and multiclass classification (Indian Pines) demonstrate that quantum kernels achieve competitive performance compared to a broad range of state-of-the-art classical baselines. As illustrative cases, on four 50-band splits selected from Indian Pines, the quantum model achieved a 78.0 pm6.2% accuracy for a binary classification task compared to 72.0 pm5.0% for the standard radial basis function (RBF) kernel. For a four-class classification task, the quantum kernel reached 83.3 pm3.1% accuracy, outperforming several state-of-the-art baselines. On five 75-band splits selected from the Methane Detection dataset, the quantum approach yielded 58.5\pm5.0% accuracy versus 55.1\pm2.5% for the classical counterpart...