Quantum machine learning (QML) models hold promise for leveraging quantum computers in data-driven tasks but their performance on today's noisy quantum hardware remains an open question. In this work, we investigate the impact of shot noise, the statistical noise due to finite sampling in quantum measurements, on the training and performance of quantum neural network (QNN) models. Using a dataset of dielectron collision events from CERN, we train QNNs under varying levels of simulated noise. Three ansatz circuit architectures are explored namely BasicEntanglerLayers (Ansatz-1), SimplifiedTwoDesign (Ansatz-2) and StronglyEntanglingLayers (Ansatz-3). Each model is repeatedly trained for multiple runs at noise levels ranging from zero up to significant noise fractions (0.5), with each training run consisting of 20 epochs of parameter optimization. We evaluate the convergence behavior, final error rates and variability across runs for each noise setting. Our results show a clear degradation of QNN performance as shot noise increases with training loss converging more slowly and to higher values and the model's prediction accuracy deteriorates with larger noise. Notably, the ansatz with fewer parametric gates demonstrates relatively better robustness to noise compared to deeper, more strongly entangling circuits which suffer sharper performance drops under noise. We provide detailed comparisons of the three circuit designs, including training loss curves and statistical summaries of performance at each noise level. These findings shed light on the practical limits of QML models in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era and highlight the trade-offs between circuit expressiveness and noise resilience. Finally, we discuss implications for designing noise-aware quantum models and possible strategies to mitigate shot noise effects in quantum learning.
Quantum machine learning (QML) models hold promise for leveraging quantum computers in data-driven tasks but their performance on today's noisy quantum hardware remains an open question. In this work, we investigate the impact of shot noise, the statistical noise due to finite sampling in quantum measurements, on the training and performance of quantum neural network (QNN) models. Using a dataset of dielectron collision events from CERN, we train QNNs under varying levels of simulated noise. Three ansatz circuit architectures are explored namely BasicEntanglerLayers (Ansatz-1), SimplifiedTwoDesign (Ansatz-2) and StronglyEntanglingLayers (Ansatz-3). Each model is repeatedly trained for multiple runs at noise levels ranging from zero up to significant noise fractions (0.5), with each training run consisting of 20 epochs of parameter optimization. We evaluate the convergence behavior, final error rates and variability across runs for each noise setting. Our results show a clear degradation of QNN performance as shot noise increases with training loss converging more slowly and to higher values and the model's prediction accuracy deteriorates with larger noise. Notably, the ansatz with fewer parametric gates demonstrates relatively better robustness to noise compared to deeper, more strongly entangling circuits which suffer sharper performance drops under noise. We provide detailed comparisons of the three circuit designs, including training loss curves and statistical summaries of performance at each noise level. These findings shed light on the practical limits of QML models in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era and highlight the trade-offs between circuit expressiveness and noise resilience. Finally, we discuss implications for designing noise-aware quantum models and possible strategies to mitigate shot noise effects in quantum learning.
Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has recently emerged as a highly promising research frontier. Within this domain, Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs),characterized by Variational Quantum Circuits (VQCs) at their core and featuring layers of quantum gates optimized by classical algorithms, have garnered significant attention. However, a rigorous and exhaustive evaluation of their practical performance remains largely incomplete. In this study, we conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of three prominent hybrid classical-quantum architectures: Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNN), Quantum Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNN), and Quantum Vision Transformers (QViT), focusing on the critical dimensions of generalization, accuracy, and robustness. Our findings provide novel insights that address previous evaluative gaps. Notably, while these models exhibit exceptional performance on low-feature datasets such as MNIST, their learning efficacy degrades significantly when transitioned to high-feature datasets. Furthermore, convolutional-based models like QCNN appear less effective on high-dimensional data than other machine learning architectures. Additionally, while all models are susceptible to adversarial noise, traditional architectures, such as recurrent and convolutional networks, demonstrate superior resilience. Conversely, in the presence of quantum noise, the transformer-based architecture proves its strength by maintaining high robustness against measurement noise, channel noise, and finite-shot effects, whereas other architectures suffer marked performance declines. These results provide a granular perspective on the current state of the field and underscore the critical importance of tailoring model selection to the constraints of contemporary Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) environments.
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) represent a promising direction within Quantum Machine Learning (QML), yet their realization on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices remains constrained by decoherence, gate imperfections, crosstalk, and readout errors. This study provides a systematic evaluation of noise effects and mitigation strategies in hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs). Zero-Noise Extrapolation (ZNE), Digital Dynamical Decoupling (DDD), and Layerwise Richardson Extrapolation (LRE) are incorporated into end-to-end QNN training pipelines developed with PennyLane, simulated using Qiskit Aer noise models, and integrated with the Mitiq framework, while Probabilistic Error Cancellation (PEC) is evaluated separately under depolarizing noise due to its computational cost. Experiments conducted on the Iris dataset with five representative noise channels show that the impact of noise and the effect of mitigation are strongly dependent on the noise model and its strength. The model maintains comparatively strong performance under phase-flip and phase-damping noise, while substantial degradation is observed under high depolarizing and amplitude-damping noise. Across the evaluated mitigation methods, the observed benefits remain limited and noise-dependent: ZNE, DDD, and LRE generally follow the same degradation trends as the unmitigated baseline, while PEC shows limited gains only in the low-noise depolarizing regime. These findings highlight the need for context-specific mitigation strategies to improve the robustness of QNNs in practical NISQ settings.
Quantum machine learning (QML) is promising for potential speedups and improvements in conventional machine learning (ML) tasks. Existing QML models that use deep parametric quantum circuits (PQC) suffer from a large accumulation of gate errors and decoherence. To circumvent this issue, we propose a new QML architecture called QNet. QNet consists of several small quantum neural networks (QNN). Each of these smaller QNN’s can be executed on small quantum computers that dominate the NISQ-era machines. By carefully choosing the size of these QNN’s, QNet can exploit arbitrary size quantum computers to solve supervised ML tasks of any scale. It also enables heterogeneous technology integration in a single QML application. Through empirical studies, we show the trainability and generalization of QNet and the impact of various configurable variables on its performance. We compare QNet performance against existing models and discuss potential issues and design considerations. In our study, we show 43% better accuracy on average over the existing models on noisy quantum hardware emulators. More importantly, QNet provides a blueprint to build noise-resilient QML models with a collection of small quantum neural networks with near-term noisy quantum devices.
This work focuses on the design and evaluation of Hybrid Quantum Neural Networks (HQNNs) that integrate the computational advantages of quantum circuits with the learning flexibility of classical deep neural networks to enhance machine learning performance in the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) era.The study investigates two prominent HQNN architectures, namely Quantum Convolutional Neural Networks (QCNNs) and Quanvolutional Neural Networks (QuanNNs), with an emphasis on their robustness under realistic quantum noise conditions.It was evaluated using image classification tasks.Under various quantum noise channels, including Bit Flip, Phase Flip, Phase Damping, Amplitude Damping, and Depolarizing Noise, were introduced to reflect realistic hardware conditions.To reduce noise-induced performance loss, error mitigation techniques such as Zero-Noise Extrapolation, Probabilistic Error Cancellation, and Measurement Error Mitigation were applied.In addition, an AI-assisted adaptive framework is proposed to automatically recommend suitable mitigation strategies based on observed noise behavior and circuit characteristics.Experimental results indicate that QuanNN exhibits strong robustness under lowto-moderate noise levels and maintains stable performance even under high bit-flip noise, while QCNN demonstrates occasional performance gains under specific noisy configurations but degrades more rapidly as noise intensity increases.The proposed AI-guided mitigation mechanism further enhances model stability across varying noise regimes.This study provides practical insights into architecture selection, noise resilience, and intelligent error mitigation integration, offering a scalable framework for deploying HQNNs in real-world NISQ-era quantum machine learning applications.
With the advent of quantum computing, researchers have explored the applicability and any potential advantages of quantum algorithms. This study investigates the application of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) models for regression tasks. Utilizing two distinct CERN datasets (Dielectron events and Proton collision), we investigate prediction accuracy using two QML algorithms, namely Quantum Neural Network (QNN) and Quantum Long Short-Term Memory (QLSTM). We also discuss the comparative analysis and computational efficiency of QNN and QLSTM compared to classical regression methods. The results show that while the two QML models gave comparable accuracy scores to some of the classical models, the best scores were still achieved by some of the more advanced classical algorithms such as CatBoost. Further analysis of the QNN and QLSTM algorithms using multiple ansätz designs showed that increased circuit complexity did not yield substantial improvements in prediction accuracy. These findings suggest that QML models, especially QLSTM with simpler ansätz designs, offer a promising approach for modeling high-energy physics data, and highlight the importance of balancing circuit complexity with performance. The study also underscores the need for further evaluation of these algorithms on quantum hardware to better understand real-world applicability.
Quantum Neural Networks (QNNs) offer a compelling approach to quantum machine learning, but their effectiveness is heavily constrained by noise on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) hardware. Prior studies examine global noise effects, yet the sensitivity of individual QNN layers remains underexplored.This paper presents a layer-wise noise sensitivity analysis framework that isolates the impact of depolarizing, amplitude damping, and phase damping noise on the encoding, variational, and measurement layers of QNNs. Using Qiskit Aer, we simulate targeted noise injection and evaluate performance on the Iris dataset. We introduce the Layerwise Sensitivity Drop (LSD) metric to quantify degradation under noise.Results show that the encoding layer is most vulnerable (LSD up to 42.9%), while the measurement layer is comparatively robust. Additionally, entangling gates are found to be more noisesensitive than rotational gates. These insights inform future QNN design strategies, emphasizing layer-specific error mitigation to improve resilience on near-term quantum hardware.