This contribution proposes a conceptual framework for quantum relations understood as operator-based, scale-dependent semantic structures. It explores the "fractaquantum" hypothesis, emphasizing that nature exhibits quantum properties at all scales, from subatomic particles to social structures. Using Pauli operators, we propose a semantic theory of quantum relations based on the "semiotic square" and on eigenlogic. The "two one-half spin" quantum composition defines the exchange operator at the basis of fundamental quantum relations. The approach is applied to macroscopic phenomena such as "social lasers" and the rhythmic "breathing" of entanglement, suggesting that individuality and social coherence are governed by scale-invariant quantum principles. This project aims to unify several quantum-like approaches under a common relational paradigm and highlights the role of fractal scaling, contextuality, non-commutativity, exchange, indistinguishability and entanglement in the emergence of semantic relations across physical, cognitive, social and artistic domains.
This contribution proposes a conceptual framework for quantum relations understood as operator-based, scale-dependent semantic structures. It explores the "fractaquantum" hypothesis, emphasizing that nature exhibits quantum properties at all scales, from subatomic particles to social structures. Using Pauli operators, we propose a semantic theory of quantum relations based on the "semiotic square" and on eigenlogic. The "two one-half spin" quantum composition defines the exchange operator at the basis of fundamental quantum relations. The approach is applied to macroscopic phenomena such as "social lasers" and the rhythmic "breathing" of entanglement, suggesting that individuality and social coherence are governed by scale-invariant quantum principles. This project aims to unify several quantum-like approaches under a common relational paradigm and highlights the role of fractal scaling, contextuality, non-commutativity, exchange, indistinguishability and entanglement in the emergence of semantic relations across physical, cognitive, social and artistic domains.
Quantum entanglement remains one of the most conceptually unresolved phenomena in modern physics. Although quantum mechanics predicts experimental outcomes with exceptional accuracy, the ontological interpretation of nonlocal correlations remains open to debate. This paper presents a conceptual relational interpretation proposal in which entangled systems originate from a unified invariant informational structure. Under this framework, measurement is not treated as passive observation of pre-existing classical values, but as a contextual projection process interacting with an underlying shared state. The proposal suggests that entangled particles may remain contextual projections of a deeper unified relational structure rather than fully independent separated systems exchanging information after separation. To clarify the concept, the paper introduces a software architecture analogy in which multiple observable variants may share the same immutable core state while generating contextual outputs depending on interaction and input configuration. Under this interpretation, correlated quantum outcomes may emerge from shared invariant structure rather than post-separation communication. The paper also introduces a complementary Color Sphere analogy representing a unified quantum state containing structured relational information. Different measurement configurations generate distinct projections of the same underlying structure while preserving internal relational consistency. This proposal does not claim experimental verification or a complete mathematical replacement for quantum mechanics. Instead, it offers a conceptual and philosophical framework intended to motivate future mathematical, informational, or relational approaches toward understanding entanglement, measurement, and structural consistency in physical reality.
Purpose The paper aims to provide a semiotic interpretation of the role played by entanglement in quantum-based models aimed to information retrieval and suggests possible improvements. Actual models are capable of retrieving documents relevant to a query composed of a keyword and its acceptation expressed by a given context. The paper also considers some analogies between this technique and quantum-based approaches in other disciplines to discuss the consequence of this quantum turn, as epistemology and philosophy of language are concerned. Design/methodology/approach We use quantum geometry to design a formal model for textual semiotics. In particular, the authors refer to Greimas’s work on semantics and information theory, to Eco’s writings on semantic memory and to Lotman’s work on a cybernetic notion of culture. Findings Quantum approaches imply a particular point of view on meaning. Meaning is not a real, positive quality of a given word. It is a net of relations constructed in the text, whose value is progressively determined during the reading process. Furthermore, reading is not a neutral operation: to read is to determine meaning. If it is said that, from a general semiotic point of view, meaning is stored in quantum semantic memories and is read/written by semantic machines, then the operation of “reading/writing” is analogous to the operation of measuring in quantum theory: in other terms, meaning is a value, and this implies an instance (not necessarily human) according to which values are valuable. Research limitations/implications The authors are not proposing a complete quantum semantics. At the present, quantum information retrieval can detect the presence of semantic relations. The authors suggest a way to characterize them, leaving open the problem on how to formalize the document as a vector in four-state semantic space. Practical implications A quantum turn shows deep semiotic implications on the approach to language, which shows an immanent semantic organization not reducible to syntax and morphology. This organization is probabilistic and indeterministic and explains to what extent text fixes the meaning of its lexical units. Social implications In the authors’ perspective, signification is not the exclusivity of a human subject. Criticizing Turing test, the great semiotic and cybernetic scholar Jurij Lotman wrote that if we identify “intelligent” and “human”, we raise the failings of an actual form of intelligence to the rank of an essential characteristic. On this line, meaning is considered as a feature of social, artificial and biological systems. Originality/value The adoption of quantum formalism seems in line with cybernetic framework, involving a probabilistic, non-cartesian point of view on meaning aimed to critically discuss the human–machine relation. Furthermore, Quantum theory (QT) implies a phenomenological point of view on the conditions of possibility of meaning.
Introduction The central claim of this book is that all intentional phenomena are quantum mechanical. That goes both for the private thoughts inside our heads and for public or collective intentions like norms, culture, and language, which we might generically call institutions. I suggested in Chapter 1 that by virtue of their dependence on consciousness, a classical, materialist ontology cannot explain these phenomena, and as such from that perspective they must be epiphenomenal or illusions. In the rest of this book I show that a quantum, panpsychist ontology can provide a physical basis for what we all know to be true, which is that both private and collective intentions are part of the natural order. The elementary parts of social ontology are human beings in their biological individuality, which in this Part I consider in abstraction from their lived social contexts. By taking humans out of their natural habitat I aim to focus attention on what we bring to the social table simply by virtue of being organisms of a certain kind. The abstract individual is a common enough starting point in classical social theory (think Hobbes and the state of nature). However, it might seem an odd place to begin a quantum social theory, given the holism of quantum phenomena, both “all the way down” in having no elementary parts, and “all the way across” in universal non-locality. What look like separate organisms are just local decoherence effects of quantum fields; everything really is related to everything else. In that light the abstract individual appears not just as an abstraction, but as positively occluding what “the individual” really is. However, there is a difference between what is true of a universal ontology and what is practically relevant to specifically socialontologies, which are constrained by the properties of their constituent organisms. Unlike some organisms, humans live in highly interdependent societies, and most of what is interesting about us is socially constituted as well.
As far as classical physics is concerned, it is possible to trace causal relations between physical objects (i.e. particles in this case) back to intrinsic properties of these objects (such as their mass and charge). On this view, causal relations turn out to be internal instead of external relations, supervening on intrinsic properties of the relata (as proposed by Heil and Lowe). However, one can raise doubts about this view already in Newtonian mechanics. The decisive blow to this view comes from quantum physics, with Bell’s theorem proving that no dynamics based on local, intrinsic properties of quantum objects can yield the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. Nonetheless, quantum entanglement by no means implies that we have to abandon an ontology of objects (i.e. substances such as particles) in favour of an ontology of structures (as claimed by French and Ladyman). Any of the known proposals for a quantum ontology of matter in space-time is committed to objects. However, on any of these proposals, what determines the dynamics of these objects are not local, intrinsic properties, but a global or holistic property instantiated by all the objects together – that is, a structure that takes all the objects in the universe as its relata. The view set out in this paper thus amounts to combining ontic structural realism with an ontology of objects that can be conceived as substances. This suggestion is illustrated by drawing on the ontology of quantum physics worked out by Bohm and Bell. 1.
Social Laser Theory (SLT) provides an innovative quantum-like mathematical formalism for tracking complex collective social activation dynamics. While its macroscopic manifestations structurally mimic laser physics, the underlying driver stems from the internal state configurations of the individual "social atom." Broadening this framework, this Perspective article introduces a prescriptive, quantum-like conceptual architecture for the individual cognitive system, formalizing the social atom as a composite entity where mental markers-spanning cognitive, affective, and valence dimensions-are represented as internal degrees of freedom in an abstract Hilbert space. We propose a theoretical framework wherein social activation is modeled through a hypothetical Triple-Resonance Mechanism: the simultaneous quantum-like matching of semantic topic, energetic impact, and valence stance between the agent's internal state and the informational field. We detail how the recursive processing of quantized informational units ("infons") can be mathematically represented as a state of cognitive population inversion, and link it to Human Entanglement Theory (HET) by suggesting that the emergence of coherent informational fields is rooted in the phase alignment of these internal markers across a population. By situating SLT within Social Quantum Field Theory (SQFT), this paper offers a neuro-cognitively informed foundation for collective phenomena like emotional contagion and rapid narrative amplification. Our conceptual model suggests that the "Social Laser" should be understood not as a literal physical mapping, but as a flexible analytical manifestation of quantum-like effects across idealized descriptions of human cognitive and neuro-social architecture, serving as an epistemic baseline to stimulate future experimental design and contextuality testing.
Purpose The present contribution is in the field of quantum modelling of macroscopic phenomena. The focus is on one enigmatic aspect of quantum physics, namely, the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox and entanglement. After a review of the state-of-the-art concerning macroscopic quantum effects and quantum interaction, this paper aims to propose a link between embryology and acupuncture in the framework of macroscopic intricate states induced by quantum mechanics. Design/methodology/approach The author uses the fractaquantum hypothesis which supposes that the quantum framework is applicable to all insecable elements in nature, whatever their size. Findings This contribution considers an open question related to a possible link between acupuncture and embryology: can a weak form of intrication be maintained during stem cell division to interpret the acupuncture meridians as an explicit manifestation of a macroscopic intricate system? The macroscopic structure suggested by quantum mechanics could be a beginning of explanation of acupuncture through the embryologic development. Research limitations/implications A fundamental hypothesis is the fact that during cell division, cells keep some weak intrication. Practical implications This contribution suggests a structure of the acupuncture meridians. The links between the acupuncture points have to be searched in the embryologic development of the individual through a weak remaing intrication of some of his cells and not in present explicit relations. Social implications A new link between occidental and oriental cultures is explored. Originality/value This contribution suggests conceptual links between acupuncture, embryology and macroscopic intricate states.