Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect as a Window into the 2D Substrate: A TGIU Interpretation of Non-Local Phase Shifts

Sebastian Virtosu

Published May 3, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect—where charged particles exhibit phase shifts in the absence of a classical electromagnetic field—has long challenged the foundations of quantum mechanics. While standard interpretations attribute this to the "reality" of the vector potential, the Theory of Global Irreducible Unfolding (TGIU) offers a radically different perspective: the AB effect is a direct experimental confirmation of the 2D informational substrate underlying 3D reality. In this paper, we demonstrate that the AB effect arises from topological phase-lag in the 2D substrate, where the vector potential ($A$) represents unrendered informational curvature ($\nabla \Phi$), and the phase shift is a TEF-regulated adjustment to preserve the ontological invariance of the system (21.7% unrendered information). We further connect this to Ghost Dark Matter (GDM), non-Shannon information, and the $\Theta_C$ collapse spectrum, showing how the AB effect validates TGIU’s core tenets: that 3D reality is a rendered projection of a 2D archive, and that phase, not force, is the fundamental currency of the universe. This framework resolves the AB effect’s "non-locality paradox" by treating it as a localized fracture in the substrate’s rendering process, with implications for quantum gravity, dark matter, and non-iterative self-organization. Keywords: Aharonov-Bohm Effect, TGIU, 2D Substrate, Informational Latency, Ghost Dark Matter, Non-Shannon Information, $\Theta_C$ Spectrum, TEF (TGIU Equilibrium Force), Phase-Lag, Quantum Non-Locality.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20000929

Related papers

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect Explained: Reality of Gauge Potentials and Its Implications

Gao, Shan

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, wherein an electron acquires a phase shift in a field-free region due to electromagnetic potentials, poses a profound challenge to the ontology of quantum mechanics and gauge theories. This paper demonstrates that gauge-invariant explanations, which attribute the phase to measurable quantities, rely on nonlocal and discontinuous mechanism and fail to account for its continuous accumulation along the electron's path—a process evident in the generalized AB effect, where a time-varying magnetic flux induces a phase that builds gradually over time, as predicted by quantum mechanics. Through a new analysis spanning quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics, I argue that the electromagnetic potentials $A_\mu$, fixed in the Lorenz gauge, emerge as the fundamental physical reality, offering a local, relativistically consistent account of the phase’s generation. This exclusion of gauge-invariant paradigms reverberates across gauge theories: it redefines the Higgs mechanism, favoring dynamic potentials over static invariants, and extends to general relativity, where gravitational potentials $g_{\mu\nu}$ may anchor spacetime’s substantival reality via a gravitational AB effect. By unraveling the AB phase’s continuous generation—locally mediated by potentials—this study not only addresses a long-standing conundrum but also bridges electromagnetic, gravitational, and Yang-Mills frameworks, offering a unified potential-centric perspective with novel implications for physics and philosophy.

•Mar 16, 2025•0 citations

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect: An Exploration of Quantum Interference and Electromagnetic Potentials

Bahman Zohuri

The AB (Aharonov-Bohm) effect is a pivotal quantum mechanical phenomenon that illustrates the fundamental role of the electromagnetic vector potential A in determining the phase of a charged particle's wave function, even in regions where the magnetic field B is zero.This effect demonstrates that quantum particles are influenced not only by the fields directly present but also by the potentials associated with those fields.In the AB effect, an electron beam is split into two paths, with one path encircling a solenoid and the other bypassing it.Despite the absence of a magnetic field in the regions traversed by the beams, the vector potential A associated with the magnetic flux  through the solenoid induces a phase shift in the electron's wave function.This phase shift, quantified by qc     , manifests as a change in the interference pattern observed in the detection screen.The phenomenon underscores the principle of gauge invariance in QED (quantum electrodynamics), where physical observables remain invariant under local gauge transformations of the vector and scalar potentials.This reinforces the notion that the vector potential A has a profound impact on quantum systems, beyond its classical role.This article outlines the AB effect, including its theoretical framework, experimental observations, and implications.The focus on the role of the vector potential in quantum mechanics provides a comprehensive understanding of this important phenomenon.

Journal of Energy and Power Engineering•Jun 28, 2024•1 citation

Revisiting Modular Momentum in the Aharonov-Bohm Effect: A Resolution of Aharonov’s Paradox

Gao, Shan

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect demonstrates that electromagnetic potentials can influence quantum systems in field-free regions, challenging classical intuitions. In 2004, Aharonov and Kaufherr proposed that the AB phase shift arises from a nonlocal exchange of modular momentum, a gauge-invariant quantity, occurring at a definite time before wave packet interference. This framework, however, introduces a paradox: the expectation value of the modular momentum operator, $\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle$, changes abruptly when the electron’s wave packets cross the solenoid, yet local, gauge-invariant properties of the electron, such as its velocity distribution, remain continuous. We resolve this paradox by showing that $\hat{M}_y=\exp(i \frac{m v_y L}{\hbar})$ and the velocity operator $\hat{v}_y$ have distinct spectral measures, and the abrupt change in $\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle$ reflects a global topological change in the electromagnetic environment, not a dynamical alteration in the electron’s state. Through a corrected, gauge-invariant formulation, we demonstrate that $\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle$ encodes the AB phase but does not explain the AB effect’s mechanism. This resolution reaffirms the conventional explanation of the AB effect while clarifying the nonlocal nature and experimental limitations of modular momentum.

•Sep 10, 2025•0 citations

From Primitives to the Aharonov–Bohm Phase

Allen Proxmire

In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm pointed out an experiment that should be impossible according to the standard intuitions of classical electromagnetism. A charged particle is sent through a double‑slit apparatus with a long thin solenoid placed between the two paths. The solenoid contains a magnetic field; the regions traversed by the particle do not. In classical mechanics, the particle should be entirely unaffected — no force, no torque, no Lorentz coupling. The interference pattern should be unchanged whether the solenoid is on or off. It isn't. When the solenoid is energized, the interference pattern shifts by Δφ = (q/ℏ) Φ, where Φ = ∫B·dA is the magnetic flux threading the solenoid. The particle’s wavefunction registers a region of magnetic field through which the particle never travels. Chambers performed the experiment in 1960; Tonomura confirmed it definitively with superconducting measurements in 1986. The effect is now standard textbook material and one of the deepest empirical phenomena in quantum mechanics. The puzzle is structural. In classical electromagnetism, the magnetic vector potential A was treated as a mathematical convenience — a quantity from which B = ∇×A could be computed but with no independent physical reality. The AB effect breaks this picture: the interference shift depends on ∮A·dx around the closed path, a gauge‑invariant integral that is non‑zero in regions where B = 0. The vector potential carries physical information that the magnetic field alone does not. Standard QM accommodates this by accepting that A is the physically meaningful quantity in the quantum context. This works mathematically but leaves a deeper question open: why should A have physical reality at all? This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework provides an answer through Theorem 17. T17 establishes that gauge fields are the continuum‑level appearance of the substrate’s rule‑type connection — the substrate object that carries rule‑type label information from one substrate region to another. The gauge potential is not a mathematical convenience; it is the substrate’s parallel‑transport infrastructure for the rule‑type relabeling group. The AB phase is the integral of this substrate connection around a non‑contractible loop in a multiply‑connected substrate channel — a substrate‑level monodromy with observable consequences whenever the substrate’s topology supports closed loops the wavefunction can wind around. Stokes’ theorem connects the monodromy to the enclosed flux: Δφ = qΦ/ℏ. The structural payoff: the AB phase is not a mysterious nonlocal effect of the gauge potential. It is the substrate‑level monodromy of the rule‑type connection around a closed loop in a multiply‑connected substrate region. The gauge potential’s physical reality is not a postulate; it is what T17 establishes the substrate to provide.

•May 12, 2026•0 citations

Gauge-independent description of the Aharonov-Bohm effect

Xiang Li, T. H. Hansson, Wei Ku

The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential $\mathbf{A}$, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics $\mathbf{A}$ is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than $\mathbf{B}$ in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant $\mathbf{B}$ field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the $\mathbf{B}$ field in the region inaccessible to the particle.

arXiv:2209.11091•Physical Review A•Sep 21, 2022•9 citations

BEYOND THE GHOST IN THE VACUUM

Delája Schuppers

BEYOND THE GHOST IN THE VACUUM The Mechanical Derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase Shift : Replacing Gauge Abstractions with Hydrodynamic Toroidal Vortex Dynamics Abstract Modern physics relies on the magnetic vector potential \(\vec{A}\) to explain the phase shift of electrons in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. This framework views the vector potential not as a mathematical convenience, but as a curve-fit approximation of a real, physical process unexplained in LCDM. UniPhiEd Realativity replaces this void abstract quantum vacuum assumption with a high-density, non-zero fluid substrate known as the neutrino ether. This paper provides a comprehensive, mechanical explanation of how a magnetic solenoid acts as a physical pump, creating a localized, twisting vortex in this substrate. We show that when a two-dimensional (2D) surface particle with a Möbius-torus topology—the electron—passes through this mechanical "micro-hurricane," its internal rotation phase is altered by one-dimensional (1D) linear neutrino streams. Using a hydrodynamic analogue of Ohm’s law, specific volumetric scaling (10 × 10 × 10), and strict matrix equations, we derive the exact experimental energy boundaries (10.2 keV, 20.4 keV, and 102.2 keV) and fully explain the observed pattern shift without resorting to non-local gauge actions.

•Oct 8, 2026•0 citations
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect—where charged particles exhibit phase shifts in the absence of a classical electromagnetic field—has long challenged the foundations of quantum mechanics. While standard interpretations attribute this to the "reality" of the vector potential, the Theory of Global Irreducible Unfolding (TGIU) offers a radically different perspective: the AB effect is a direct experimental confirmation of the 2D informational substrate underlying 3D reality. In this paper, we demonstrate that the AB effect arises from topological phase-lag in the 2D substrate, where the vector potential (AAA) represents unrendered informational curvature (∇Φ\nabla \Phi∇Φ), and the phase shift is a TEF-regulated adjustment to preserve the ontological invariance of the system (21.7% unrendered information). We further connect this to Ghost Dark Matter (GDM), non-Shannon information, and the ΘC\Theta_CΘC​ collapse spectrum, showing how the AB effect validates TGIU’s core tenets: that 3D reality is a rendered projection of a 2D archive, and that phase, not force, is the fundamental currency of the universe. This framework resolves the AB effect’s "non-locality paradox" by treating it as a localized fracture in the substrate’s rendering process, with implications for quantum gravity, dark matter, and non-iterative self-organization. Keywords: Aharonov-Bohm Effect, TGIU, 2D Substrate, Informational Latency, Ghost Dark Matter, Non-Shannon Information, ΘC\Theta_CΘC​ Spectrum, TEF (TGIU Equilibrium Force), Phase-Lag, Quantum Non-Locality.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, wherein an electron acquires a phase shift in a field-free region due to electromagnetic potentials, poses a profound challenge to the ontology of quantum mechanics and gauge theories. This paper demonstrates that gauge-invariant explanations, which attribute the phase to measurable quantities, rely on nonlocal and discontinuous mechanism and fail to account for its continuous accumulation along the electron's path—a process evident in the generalized AB effect, where a time-varying magnetic flux induces a phase that builds gradually over time, as predicted by quantum mechanics. Through a new analysis spanning quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics, I argue that the electromagnetic potentials AμA_\muAμ​, fixed in the Lorenz gauge, emerge as the fundamental physical reality, offering a local, relativistically consistent account of the phase’s generation. This exclusion of gauge-invariant paradigms reverberates across gauge theories: it redefines the Higgs mechanism, favoring dynamic potentials over static invariants, and extends to general relativity, where gravitational potentials gμνg_{\mu\nu}gμν​ may anchor spacetime’s substantival reality via a gravitational AB effect. By unraveling the AB phase’s continuous generation—locally mediated by potentials—this study not only addresses a long-standing conundrum but also bridges electromagnetic, gravitational, and Yang-Mills frameworks, offering a unified potential-centric perspective with novel implications for physics and philosophy.
The AB (Aharonov-Bohm) effect is a pivotal quantum mechanical phenomenon that illustrates the fundamental role of the electromagnetic vector potential A in determining the phase of a charged particle's wave function, even in regions where the magnetic field B is zero.This effect demonstrates that quantum particles are influenced not only by the fields directly present but also by the potentials associated with those fields.In the AB effect, an electron beam is split into two paths, with one path encircling a solenoid and the other bypassing it.Despite the absence of a magnetic field in the regions traversed by the beams, the vector potential A associated with the magnetic flux  through the solenoid induces a phase shift in the electron's wave function.This phase shift, quantified by qc     , manifests as a change in the interference pattern observed in the detection screen.The phenomenon underscores the principle of gauge invariance in QED (quantum electrodynamics), where physical observables remain invariant under local gauge transformations of the vector and scalar potentials.This reinforces the notion that the vector potential A has a profound impact on quantum systems, beyond its classical role.This article outlines the AB effect, including its theoretical framework, experimental observations, and implications.The focus on the role of the vector potential in quantum mechanics provides a comprehensive understanding of this important phenomenon.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect demonstrates that electromagnetic potentials can influence quantum systems in field-free regions, challenging classical intuitions. In 2004, Aharonov and Kaufherr proposed that the AB phase shift arises from a nonlocal exchange of modular momentum, a gauge-invariant quantity, occurring at a definite time before wave packet interference. This framework, however, introduces a paradox: the expectation value of the modular momentum operator, ⟨M^y⟩\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle⟨M^y​⟩, changes abruptly when the electron’s wave packets cross the solenoid, yet local, gauge-invariant properties of the electron, such as its velocity distribution, remain continuous. We resolve this paradox by showing that M^y=exp⁡(imvyLℏ)\hat{M}_y=\exp(i \frac{m v_y L}{\hbar})M^y​=exp(iℏmvy​L​) and the velocity operator v^y\hat{v}_yv^y​ have distinct spectral measures, and the abrupt change in ⟨M^y⟩\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle⟨M^y​⟩ reflects a global topological change in the electromagnetic environment, not a dynamical alteration in the electron’s state. Through a corrected, gauge-invariant formulation, we demonstrate that ⟨M^y⟩\langle \hat{M}_y \rangle⟨M^y​⟩ encodes the AB phase but does not explain the AB effect’s mechanism. This resolution reaffirms the conventional explanation of the AB effect while clarifying the nonlocal nature and experimental limitations of modular momentum.
In 1959, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm pointed out an experiment that should be impossible according to the standard intuitions of classical electromagnetism. A charged particle is sent through a double‑slit apparatus with a long thin solenoid placed between the two paths. The solenoid contains a magnetic field; the regions traversed by the particle do not. In classical mechanics, the particle should be entirely unaffected — no force, no torque, no Lorentz coupling. The interference pattern should be unchanged whether the solenoid is on or off. It isn't. When the solenoid is energized, the interference pattern shifts by Δφ = (q/ℏ) Φ, where Φ = ∫B·dA is the magnetic flux threading the solenoid. The particle’s wavefunction registers a region of magnetic field through which the particle never travels. Chambers performed the experiment in 1960; Tonomura confirmed it definitively with superconducting measurements in 1986. The effect is now standard textbook material and one of the deepest empirical phenomena in quantum mechanics. The puzzle is structural. In classical electromagnetism, the magnetic vector potential A was treated as a mathematical convenience — a quantity from which B = ∇×A could be computed but with no independent physical reality. The AB effect breaks this picture: the interference shift depends on ∮A·dx around the closed path, a gauge‑invariant integral that is non‑zero in regions where B = 0. The vector potential carries physical information that the magnetic field alone does not. Standard QM accommodates this by accepting that A is the physically meaningful quantity in the quantum context. This works mathematically but leaves a deeper question open: why should A have physical reality at all? This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework provides an answer through Theorem 17. T17 establishes that gauge fields are the continuum‑level appearance of the substrate’s rule‑type connection — the substrate object that carries rule‑type label information from one substrate region to another. The gauge potential is not a mathematical convenience; it is the substrate’s parallel‑transport infrastructure for the rule‑type relabeling group. The AB phase is the integral of this substrate connection around a non‑contractible loop in a multiply‑connected substrate channel — a substrate‑level monodromy with observable consequences whenever the substrate’s topology supports closed loops the wavefunction can wind around. Stokes’ theorem connects the monodromy to the enclosed flux: Δφ = qΦ/ℏ. The structural payoff: the AB phase is not a mysterious nonlocal effect of the gauge potential. It is the substrate‑level monodromy of the rule‑type connection around a closed loop in a multiply‑connected substrate region. The gauge potential’s physical reality is not a postulate; it is what T17 establishes the substrate to provide.
The Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect is a pure quantum effect that implies a measurable phase shift in the wave function for a charged particle that encircles a magnetic flux located in a region inaccessible to the particle. Classically, such a nonlocal effect appears to be impossible since the Lorentz force depends on only the magnetic field at the location of the particle. In quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian, and thus the Schr\"odinger equation, has a local coupling between the current due to the particle and the electromagnetic vector potential A\mathbf{A}A, which extends to the entire space beyond the region with finite magnetic field. This has sometimes been interpreted as meaning that in quantum mechanics A\mathbf{A}A is in some sense more ``fundamental'' than B\mathbf{B}B in spite of the former being gauge dependent and thus unobservable. Here we shall, with a general proof followed by a few examples, demonstrate that the AB effect can be fully accounted for by considering only the gauge-invariant B\mathbf{B}B field, as long as it is included as part of the quantum action of the entire isolated system. The price for the gauge-invariant formulation is that we must give up locality---the AB phase for the particle will arise from the change in the action for the B\mathbf{B}B field in the region inaccessible to the particle.
BEYOND THE GHOST IN THE VACUUM The Mechanical Derivation of the Aharonov-Bohm Phase Shift : Replacing Gauge Abstractions with Hydrodynamic Toroidal Vortex Dynamics Abstract Modern physics relies on the magnetic vector potential A⃗\vec{A}A to explain the phase shift of electrons in the Aharonov-Bohm effect. This framework views the vector potential not as a mathematical convenience, but as a curve-fit approximation of a real, physical process unexplained in LCDM. UniPhiEd Realativity replaces this void abstract quantum vacuum assumption with a high-density, non-zero fluid substrate known as the neutrino ether. This paper provides a comprehensive, mechanical explanation of how a magnetic solenoid acts as a physical pump, creating a localized, twisting vortex in this substrate. We show that when a two-dimensional (2D) surface particle with a Möbius-torus topology—the electron—passes through this mechanical "micro-hurricane," its internal rotation phase is altered by one-dimensional (1D) linear neutrino streams. Using a hydrodynamic analogue of Ohm’s law, specific volumetric scaling (10 × 10 × 10), and strict matrix equations, we derive the exact experimental energy boundaries (10.2 keV, 20.4 keV, and 102.2 keV) and fully explain the observed pattern shift without resorting to non-local gauge actions.