Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Unity of the Real and the Virtual: The Ontological Foundation of Quantum Tide Theory

wangchao

Published May 3, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20001835

Related papers

Distinctive predictions and theorems of the Quantum Tide Theory

wangchao

•Sep 25, 2026•0 citations

Ontology and the foundations of quantum theory

Gregg S. Jaeger

The European Physical Journal Special Topics•Sep 1, 2023•1 citation

A Four-Level Ontological Framework for Quantum Field Theory: From Quantum Vacuum to Phenomenal Reality

Ali Reza Mirzaee

One of the foundational challenges in both Quantum Field Theory and the philosophy of physics lies in the traditional binary classification of entities as either real or unreal. The classical view posits that material entities are real, while mental constructs or theoretical entities are unreal. However, quantum phenomena such as virtual particles challenge this simplistic dichotomy. These unobservable entities, by influencing measurable phenomena, raise profound questions about the nature and modes of existence. To address this, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy that spans from the quantum vacuum and the virtual level to the quantum level and phenomenal reality, providing a coherent continuum from potentiality to actualization. This framework not only clarifies the interpretation of quantum theory but also offers a unified perspective linking the unobservable with the observable. In QFT, virtual particles play a crucial role in mediating forces and in correcting the measurable properties of real particles. They arise within the mathematical structure of Feynman diagrams and, despite being unobservable, produce real, measurable effects such as the Lamb shift and the Casimir effect. Philosophically, this raises deep ontological questions: if unobservable entities affect measurable phenomena, can they truly be dismissed as unreal? Conversely, if they are real, what mode of existence do they possess? The traditional dichotomy of real versus unreal is thus insufficient for interpreting the ontological implications of quantum processes. To overcome these limitations, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy.

physics.hist-phCross-listedarXiv:2511.07476•Nov 11, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Tidal Water Theory: An Exploration of a Physical Framework Based on Relational Ontology

wangchao

•Jun 21, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tide Theory v2.0: Ontological Core, Core Theorem System, and Evidence Hierarchy Reconstruction

Chao Wang

•Jul 31, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Tide Theory v2.0: Ontological Core, Core Theorem System, and Evidence Hierarchy Reconstruction

Chao Wang

•Jul 31, 2026•0 citations
One of the foundational challenges in both Quantum Field Theory and the philosophy of physics lies in the traditional binary classification of entities as either real or unreal. The classical view posits that material entities are real, while mental constructs or theoretical entities are unreal. However, quantum phenomena such as virtual particles challenge this simplistic dichotomy. These unobservable entities, by influencing measurable phenomena, raise profound questions about the nature and modes of existence. To address this, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy that spans from the quantum vacuum and the virtual level to the quantum level and phenomenal reality, providing a coherent continuum from potentiality to actualization. This framework not only clarifies the interpretation of quantum theory but also offers a unified perspective linking the unobservable with the observable. In QFT, virtual particles play a crucial role in mediating forces and in correcting the measurable properties of real particles. They arise within the mathematical structure of Feynman diagrams and, despite being unobservable, produce real, measurable effects such as the Lamb shift and the Casimir effect. Philosophically, this raises deep ontological questions: if unobservable entities affect measurable phenomena, can they truly be dismissed as unreal? Conversely, if they are real, what mode of existence do they possess? The traditional dichotomy of real versus unreal is thus insufficient for interpreting the ontological implications of quantum processes. To overcome these limitations, we propose a four-level ontological hierarchy.