Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Post-Selection Sensitivity in a GHZ-Type Mermin Statistic: An In-Silico Audit (medium-v10) GHZ 型 Mermin 统计量的后选择敏感性:medium-v10 仿真审计(非硬件复刻)

Hui Wang

Published Apr 26, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

[EN] This deposit documents a rigorous in-silico post-selection audit of a GHZ-type Mermin statistic in the repository's medium-v10 wave model (three local phase-locked sources), motivated by textbook/laboratory GHZ narratives—it is not claimed to replay one specific hardware run. Within that simulator class, we show that chasing high F couples to amplitude gating and low retention, and matched-retention random controls fail to reproduce the gated lift—supporting a selection-driven reading of the reported metric inside the model. Using the V10.4 real cost curve and matched-retention random controls, we show that elevated F values in this simulator class are tightly coupled to selection rules and retention trade-offs. We frame this as a method-level sensitivity result inside the model class, not as a hardware-level claim. [中] 本归档记录对 medium-v10 波动模型中 GHZ 型 Mermin 统计量的严格仿真后选择审计(三个局域相位锁定源),动机来自教科书/实验室叙事,不声称复刻某一具体硬件实验。在该模拟器类内,我们展示:追逐高 F 与振幅门控及低保留率绑定,而同保留率随机对照无法复现门控抬升——从而在模型内支持对报告指标的筛选驱动解读。 通过 V10.4 真实代价曲线和同保留率随机对照,我们展示了:在该模拟器类内,较高 F 与筛选规则及保留率权衡紧密耦合。本文将其定位为模型内的方法学敏感性结果,而非硬件层结论。 Reproducibility (repository): from repo root run python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py (see script header for output paths). Companion figure in this deposit: figures/V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png. 可复现(配套仓库): 在仓库根目录运行 python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py(输出路径见脚本头部)。本归档插图:figures/V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png。

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19785021

Related papers

The Audit Trilogy: NIST CHSH Denominator Audit + GHZ V10.4 Computed Cost Curve (medium-v10) 审计三部曲:NIST CHSH 分母审计 + GHZ V10.4 计算代价曲线(medium-v10)

Hui Wang

[EN] This deposit summarizes two frozen workflows in one methodological bundle. (1) Bell / CHSH (real public data): Binary CHSH on the NIST complete-blind CSV. Pairing uses tolerances in NIST grid-index units on the exported t axis (not calibrated seconds in this repository). Frozen snapshot: battle_results/nist_completeblind_2015-09-19/battle_result.json (S_strict = 2.336276 at tolerance 0.0 vs S_standard = 2.839387 at 15.0; pair counts 136632 vs 148670). Reproduce the window scan via python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py. (2) GHZ-style statistic (simulation, V10.4 only): The GHZ leg is not tied to ghz_loop_explosion_v19.py. It is anchored to scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py, which emits a computed_curve (type in V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.meta.json): a fixed RNG phase sample (medium_phase_states), soft amplitude gating with parameter gate_k, reported F_gated, mean simultaneous-hit retention R_gated, and a matched-retention random control (F_random_mean, F_random_std). Canonical outputs live under artifacts/ghz_medium_v10/ (V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png, .csv, .meta.json, V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE_REPORT.md). Scope statement: This is methodological reproducibility documentation — not a claim that either pipeline certifies a specific hardware Bell or GHZ experiment. [中] 本归档将两条冻结工作流合并为一条方法论叙述。 (1)贝尔 / CHSH(真实公开数据): 在 NIST complete-blind CSV 上做二元 CHSH。配对容差取导出列 t 上的 NIST 网格指数单位(本仓库不标定为秒)。冻结快照:battle_results/nist_completeblind_2015-09-19/battle_result.json(容差 0.0 时 S_strict = 2.336276,15.0 时 S_standard = 2.839387;配对数 136632 / 148670)。窗口扫描复现:python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py。 (2)GHZ 型统计量(仿真,仅 V10.4): GHZ 侧不再绑定 ghz_loop_explosion_v19.py。唯一锚点为 scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py,产出 computed_curve(见 V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.meta.json 中 type):固定 RNG 相位样本(medium_phase_states)、参数为 gate_k 的软振幅门控、报告 F_gated、同时触中平均保留 R_gated,以及同保留率随机对照(F_random_mean、F_random_std)。规范产物位于 artifacts/ghz_medium_v10/(V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png、.csv、.meta.json、V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE_REPORT.md)。 范围声明: 本文为方法论与可复现性文档——不声称任一脚本对某一具体硬件贝尔或 GHZ 实验作出鉴定。 Reproducibility (repository): Bell: python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py (needs data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv). GHZ V10.4: python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py. 可复现(配套仓库): Bell:python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py(需 data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv)。GHZ V10.4:python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py。

•Apr 26, 2026•0 citations

Unitary Noise and the Mermin-GHZ Game

Ivan Ivan, Fialik

•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

Denominator Audit of Bell/CHSH Statistics: Protocol Sensitivity to Pairing-Rule Definitions 贝尔不等式的分母审计:配对规则定义的协议敏感性分析

Hui Wang

Archive Notice (Deprecated): This record is kept for archival purposes and is no longer the current version. Please use the latest Bell Audit v5 record: https://zenodo.org/records/19904639 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19904639). 留档提示(已过期): 本记录仅用于历史留档,已非当前版本。请优先访问最新版 Bell Audit v5:https://zenodo.org/records/19904639(DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19904639)。 [EN] This paper presents a "Denominator Audit" of Bell/CHSH violations using NIST experimental data. Historically, violations of S > 2.0 are cited as proof of non-locality. Our audit reveals that these results are not intrinsic to the physical system but are "manufactured" through the selective manipulation of coincidence windows (Accounting Fraud). On the same NIST complete-blind stream, we compare a strict pairing tolerance (0.0) versus the Round-1 standard tolerance (15.0) in NIST grid-index units on the exported CSV t axis (not calibrated seconds in this deposit). The frozen binary-CHSH snapshot gives S_strict = 2.336276 vs S_standard = 2.839387 (Δ = +0.503111). A bootstrap CI for the standard branch includes 2\sqrt{2} (artifacts/reports/chsh_bootstrap_ci_standard15.json, ci_contains_tsirelson: true); we therefore discuss protocol sensitivity, not Tsirelson violation. Separately, the “30 cm truth” is a laboratory heuristic (about 1 ns ↔ ~30 cm in vacuum); it motivates coincidence bookkeeping sensitivity and must not be read as “parameter 15.0 equals 15 ns” here. Reproducibility (repository): data file data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv; run from repo root python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py (writes artifacts/bell_window_scan_v1/). [中] 在同一组 NIST complete-blind 事件流上,我们在导出 CSV 的 t 网格上对比严苛配对容差(0.0)与第一轮标准容差(15.0),单位为 NIST 网格指数(本归档不将其标定为秒)。冻结的二元 CHSH 快照为 S_strict = 2.336276 与 S_standard = 2.839387(Δ = +0.503111)。标准分支的 bootstrap 置信区间覆盖 2\sqrt{2}(artifacts/reports/chsh_bootstrap_ci_standard15.json,ci_contains_tsirelson: true);因此本文强调协议敏感性,而非 Tsirelson 违背。另:“30 厘米的真相”是实验室启发(真空中约 1 纳秒 ↔ 约 30 厘米),用于提示符合会计的敏感性,不应被读作“参数 15.0 等于 15 纳秒”。 可复现(配套仓库): 数据 data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv;在仓库根目录运行 python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py(输出写入 artifacts/bell_window_scan_v1/)。

•Apr 26, 2026•0 citations

Finite Local Models for the GHZ Experiment

C. Garola, M. Persano, J. Pykacz +1 more

arXiv:1209.4028•International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Oct 16, 2013•5 citations

Cryptanalysis and Improvement of Two GHZ-State-Based QSDC Protocols

郭奋卓, 秦素娟, Wen Qiao Yan +1 more

在一份最近的报纸[J。朝鲜语。Phys。Soc。49 (2006 ) 459 ] ,二 GHZ-state-based 量安全直接通讯协议被介绍。这里,我们指出一个偷听者能利用 GHZ 状态的一个特殊性质,即。“ correlation-elicitable ”到没有在两个协议被检测,获得播送秘密的半信息。特别攻击策略详细被表明。而且,可能的改进被建议,它对这种攻击使协议安全。[从作者抽象]

Chinese Physics Letters•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Ripple Reality: A Rigid Parametric Unification Audit from Bell-Style Statistics to Compton-Style Shift (v6+v7+v8) Ripple Reality:从 Bell 样式统计到 Compton 样式位移的刚性参数统一审计(v6+v7+v8)

Hui Wang

[EN] This deposit reports a merged v6+v7+v8 audit under one locked parameter triplet (mu, rho, eta)=(1.5495, 2.35, 0.08). v6 layer: four-benchmark baseline joint consistency (laser threshold, semiconductor cutoff, MRI Larmor, atomic-clock modes). v7 layer: three-benchmark consistency (double-slit, tunneling, spin-cos2), rigidity scans (27/27 local, 18/20 random-global), counterfactual expected-fail suite, and 7-seed stability. v8 layer: radial levels, decoherence, and Compton-style shift at the same locked point, plus anti-cheat closure (eta counterfactual fail, negative controls fail, multi-round hardening 100/100). The claim is methodological and reproducibility-centered: auditable model-class consistency under declared gates. Not claimed: completed SI mapping, ontology uniqueness, or direct falsification of standard quantum mechanics. Primary manuscript files: papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/07_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.md papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/08_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.html [中] 本归档给出 v6+v7+v8 合并审计,在单一锁定参数三元组 (mu, rho, eta)=(1.5495, 2.35, 0.08) 下完成证据闭环。 v6 层:四项基线联合一致性(激光阈值、半导体截止、MRI Larmor、原子钟模态)。 v7 层:三项基准(双缝、隧穿、自旋 cos2)联合一致性,刚性扫描(局部 27/27、全局随机 18/20)、反事实按预期失败、7 种子稳定性。 v8 层:同锁定点下的径向能级、退相干、类 Compton 位移,并带反作弊闭环(eta 反事实失败、负对照失败、多轮加固 100/100)。 本文主张属于方法学与可复现性主张:在声明门槛下具备可审计一致性。 本文不主张:SI 映射已完成、唯一本体论成立、或可据此直接否定标准量子力学。 主要稿件文件: papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/07_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.md papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/08_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.html Reproducibility / 可复现 Run from repository root: python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/generate_v7_paper_figures.py python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/ripple_quantum_tests_v6_joint.py python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/ripple_quantum_tests_v8_unify.py --rounds 100 --eta-probe 0.001 python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/generate_v8_paper_figures.py python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/build_merged_v7_v8_html.py

•Apr 26, 2026•0 citations
[EN] This deposit documents a rigorous in-silico post-selection audit of a GHZ-type Mermin statistic in the repository's medium-v10 wave model (three local phase-locked sources), motivated by textbook/laboratory GHZ narratives—it is not claimed to replay one specific hardware run. Within that simulator class, we show that chasing high F couples to amplitude gating and low retention, and matched-retention random controls fail to reproduce the gated lift—supporting a selection-driven reading of the reported metric inside the model. Using the V10.4 real cost curve and matched-retention random controls, we show that elevated F values in this simulator class are tightly coupled to selection rules and retention trade-offs. We frame this as a method-level sensitivity result inside the model class, not as a hardware-level claim. [中] 本归档记录对 medium-v10 波动模型中 GHZ 型 Mermin 统计量的严格仿真后选择审计(三个局域相位锁定源),动机来自教科书/实验室叙事,不声称复刻某一具体硬件实验。在该模拟器类内,我们展示:追逐高 F 与振幅门控及低保留率绑定,而同保留率随机对照无法复现门控抬升——从而在模型内支持对报告指标的筛选驱动解读。 通过 V10.4 真实代价曲线和同保留率随机对照,我们展示了:在该模拟器类内,较高 F 与筛选规则及保留率权衡紧密耦合。本文将其定位为模型内的方法学敏感性结果,而非硬件层结论。 Reproducibility (repository): from repo root run python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py (see script header for output paths). Companion figure in this deposit: figures/V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png. 可复现(配套仓库): 在仓库根目录运行 python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py(输出路径见脚本头部)。本归档插图:figures/V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png。
[EN] This deposit summarizes two frozen workflows in one methodological bundle. (1) Bell / CHSH (real public data): Binary CHSH on the NIST complete-blind CSV. Pairing uses tolerances in NIST grid-index units on the exported t axis (not calibrated seconds in this repository). Frozen snapshot: battle_results/nist_completeblind_2015-09-19/battle_result.json (S_strict = 2.336276 at tolerance 0.0 vs S_standard = 2.839387 at 15.0; pair counts 136632 vs 148670). Reproduce the window scan via python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py. (2) GHZ-style statistic (simulation, V10.4 only): The GHZ leg is not tied to ghz_loop_explosion_v19.py. It is anchored to scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py, which emits a computed_curve (type in V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.meta.json): a fixed RNG phase sample (medium_phase_states), soft amplitude gating with parameter gate_k, reported F_gated, mean simultaneous-hit retention R_gated, and a matched-retention random control (F_random_mean, F_random_std). Canonical outputs live under artifacts/ghz_medium_v10/ (V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png, .csv, .meta.json, V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE_REPORT.md). Scope statement: This is methodological reproducibility documentation — not a claim that either pipeline certifies a specific hardware Bell or GHZ experiment. [中] 本归档将两条冻结工作流合并为一条方法论叙述。 (1)贝尔 / CHSH(真实公开数据): 在 NIST complete-blind CSV 上做二元 CHSH。配对容差取导出列 t 上的 NIST 网格指数单位(本仓库不标定为秒)。冻结快照:battle_results/nist_completeblind_2015-09-19/battle_result.json(容差 0.0 时 S_strict = 2.336276,15.0 时 S_standard = 2.839387;配对数 136632 / 148670)。窗口扫描复现:python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py。 (2)GHZ 型统计量(仿真,仅 V10.4): GHZ 侧不再绑定 ghz_loop_explosion_v19.py。唯一锚点为 scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py,产出 computed_curve(见 V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.meta.json 中 type):固定 RNG 相位样本(medium_phase_states)、参数为 gate_k 的软振幅门控、报告 F_gated、同时触中平均保留 R_gated,以及同保留率随机对照(F_random_mean、F_random_std)。规范产物位于 artifacts/ghz_medium_v10/(V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE.png、.csv、.meta.json、V10_4_REAL_COST_CURVE_REPORT.md)。 范围声明: 本文为方法论与可复现性文档——不声称任一脚本对某一具体硬件贝尔或 GHZ 实验作出鉴定。 Reproducibility (repository): Bell: python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py (needs data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv). GHZ V10.4: python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py. 可复现(配套仓库): Bell:python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py(需 data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv)。GHZ V10.4:python scripts/explore/ghz_medium_v10/v10_4_real_cost_curve.py。
Archive Notice (Deprecated): This record is kept for archival purposes and is no longer the current version. Please use the latest Bell Audit v5 record: https://zenodo.org/records/19904639 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19904639). 留档提示(已过期): 本记录仅用于历史留档,已非当前版本。请优先访问最新版 Bell Audit v5:https://zenodo.org/records/19904639(DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19904639)。 [EN] This paper presents a "Denominator Audit" of Bell/CHSH violations using NIST experimental data. Historically, violations of S > 2.0 are cited as proof of non-locality. Our audit reveals that these results are not intrinsic to the physical system but are "manufactured" through the selective manipulation of coincidence windows (Accounting Fraud). On the same NIST complete-blind stream, we compare a strict pairing tolerance (0.0) versus the Round-1 standard tolerance (15.0) in NIST grid-index units on the exported CSV t axis (not calibrated seconds in this deposit). The frozen binary-CHSH snapshot gives S_strict = 2.336276 vs S_standard = 2.839387 (Δ = +0.503111). A bootstrap CI for the standard branch includes 2\sqrt{2} (artifacts/reports/chsh_bootstrap_ci_standard15.json, ci_contains_tsirelson: true); we therefore discuss protocol sensitivity, not Tsirelson violation. Separately, the “30 cm truth” is a laboratory heuristic (about 1 ns ↔ ~30 cm in vacuum); it motivates coincidence bookkeeping sensitivity and must not be read as “parameter 15.0 equals 15 ns” here. Reproducibility (repository): data file data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv; run from repo root python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py (writes artifacts/bell_window_scan_v1/). [中] 在同一组 NIST complete-blind 事件流上,我们在导出 CSV 的 t 网格上对比严苛配对容差(0.0)与第一轮标准容差(15.0),单位为 NIST 网格指数(本归档不将其标定为秒)。冻结的二元 CHSH 快照为 S_strict = 2.336276 与 S_standard = 2.839387(Δ = +0.503111)。标准分支的 bootstrap 置信区间覆盖 2\sqrt{2}(artifacts/reports/chsh_bootstrap_ci_standard15.json,ci_contains_tsirelson: true);因此本文强调协议敏感性,而非 Tsirelson 违背。另:“30 厘米的真相”是实验室启发(真空中约 1 纳秒 ↔ 约 30 厘米),用于提示符合会计的敏感性,不应被读作“参数 15.0 等于 15 纳秒”。 可复现(配套仓库): 数据 data/nist_completeblind_side_streams.csv;在仓库根目录运行 python scripts/explore/chsh_denominator_audit.py(输出写入 artifacts/bell_window_scan_v1/)。
[EN] This deposit reports a merged v6+v7+v8 audit under one locked parameter triplet (mu, rho, eta)=(1.5495, 2.35, 0.08). v6 layer: four-benchmark baseline joint consistency (laser threshold, semiconductor cutoff, MRI Larmor, atomic-clock modes). v7 layer: three-benchmark consistency (double-slit, tunneling, spin-cos2), rigidity scans (27/27 local, 18/20 random-global), counterfactual expected-fail suite, and 7-seed stability. v8 layer: radial levels, decoherence, and Compton-style shift at the same locked point, plus anti-cheat closure (eta counterfactual fail, negative controls fail, multi-round hardening 100/100). The claim is methodological and reproducibility-centered: auditable model-class consistency under declared gates. Not claimed: completed SI mapping, ontology uniqueness, or direct falsification of standard quantum mechanics. Primary manuscript files: papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/07_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.md papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/08_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.html [中] 本归档给出 v6+v7+v8 合并审计,在单一锁定参数三元组 (mu, rho, eta)=(1.5495, 2.35, 0.08) 下完成证据闭环。 v6 层:四项基线联合一致性(激光阈值、半导体截止、MRI Larmor、原子钟模态)。 v7 层:三项基准(双缝、隧穿、自旋 cos2)联合一致性,刚性扫描(局部 27/27、全局随机 18/20)、反事实按预期失败、7 种子稳定性。 v8 层:同锁定点下的径向能级、退相干、类 Compton 位移,并带反作弊闭环(eta 反事实失败、负对照失败、多轮加固 100/100)。 本文主张属于方法学与可复现性主张:在声明门槛下具备可审计一致性。 本文不主张:SI 映射已完成、唯一本体论成立、或可据此直接否定标准量子力学。 主要稿件文件: papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/07_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.md papers_final/04_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/version_01/【0】_Ripple_Rigidity_Audit/files/08_Manuscript_Merged_v7_v8_Bilingual.html Reproducibility / 可复现 Run from repository root: python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/generate_v7_paper_figures.py python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/ripple_quantum_tests_v6_joint.py python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/ripple_quantum_tests_v8_unify.py --rounds 100 --eta-probe 0.001 python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/generate_v8_paper_figures.py python scripts/explore/ripple_quantum_tests/build_merged_v7_v8_html.py