Abstract Any discussion of electromagnetic field calculations requires the addressing of the gauge degree of freedom. The velocity-dependent potential and its inclusion in quantum calculations in the presence of electromagnetic fields has to account for the so-called gauge degree of freedom in electrodynamics. The origin of this degree of freedom and its application in the Aharonov-Bohm effect are elaborated on in detail. The gauge variational procedure leads to the determination of the conserved current in quantum mechanical applications.
Abstract Any discussion of electromagnetic field calculations requires the addressing of the gauge degree of freedom. The velocity-dependent potential and its inclusion in quantum calculations in the presence of electromagnetic fields has to account for the so-called gauge degree of freedom in electrodynamics. The origin of this degree of freedom and its application in the Aharonov-Bohm effect are elaborated on in detail. The gauge variational procedure leads to the determination of the conserved current in quantum mechanical applications.
The gauge invariance of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect with a quantum treatment for the electromagnetic field is demonstrated. We provide an exact solution for the electromagnetic ground energy due to the interaction of the quantum electromagnetic field with the classical charges and currents that act as sources of the potentials in a classical description, in the Lorenz gauge. Then, we use first-order perturbation theory to compute an extra change on the electromagnetic ground energy due to the presence of a quantum charged particle with known wave function in the system. This energy in general depends on the quantum particle path in an interferometer, which results in an AB phase difference between the paths. The gauge invariance of this AB phase difference is then shown for the magnetic, electric, and the recently proposed electrodynamic versions of the AB effect. However, the AB phase difference could depend on the gauge for nonclosed paths, which reinforces the view that it only can be measured in closed paths.
This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.
Abstract: I address the view that the classical electromagnetic potentials are shown by the Aharonov–Bohm effect to be physically real (which I dub: ‘the potentials view’). I give a historico-philosophical presentation of this view and assess its prospects, more precisely than has so far been done in the literature. Taking the potential as physically real runs prima facie into ‘gauge-underdetermination’: different gauge choices represent different physical states of affairs and hence different theories. This fact is usually not acknowledged in the literature (or in classrooms), neither by proponents nor by opponents of the potentials view. I then illustrate this theme by what I take to be the basic insight of the AB effect for the potentials view, namely that the gauge equivalence class that directly corresponds to the electric and magnetic fields (which I call the Wide Equivalence Class) is too wide, i.e., the Narrow Equivalence Class encodes additional physical degrees of freedom: these only play a distinct role in a multiply-connected space. There is a trade-off between explanatory power and gauge symmetries. On the one hand, this narrower equivalence class gives a local explanation of the AB effect in the sense that the phase is incrementally picked up along the path of the electron. On the other hand, locality is not satisfied in the sense of signal locality, viz. the finite speed of propagation exhibited by electric and magnetic fields. It is therefore intellectually mandatory to seek desiderata that will distinguish even within these narrower equivalence classes, i.e. will prefer some elements of such an equivalence class over others. I consider various formulations of locality, such as Bell locality, local interaction Hamiltonians, and signal locality. I show that Bell locality can only be evaluated if one fixes the gauge freedom completely. Yet, an explanation in terms of signal locality can be accommodated by the Lorenz gauge: the potentials propagate in waves at finite speed. I therefore suggest the Lorenz gauge potentials theory—an even narrower gauge equivalence relation—as the ontology of electrodynamics.
It is often said that the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect (1959) is an effect that is due to the vector potential. This is considered remarkable since a quantity that is not uniquely determined has a measurable effect. The authors show that, in the symmetric Coulomb gauge, (e/c)A(r) is simply the momentum of the electromagnetic field. The effect may equally well be considered an effect of the electromagnetic momentum. Thus, it is possible to discuss the AB effect strictly in terms of observables. The idea that the effect is due to the vector potential is correct, but sheds little light on the physics of the effect.
The standard semiclassical treatment of the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, which predicts no observable phase shift for open electron paths in field-free regions due to gauge dependence, is shown to be incomplete. By fully quantizing both the probe electron and the electromagnetic source within quantum electrodynamics (QED), we derive an effective action that decomposes the AB phase into two equal contributions: a gauge-dependent probe phase from the source's potential acting on the electron, and a gauge-invariant source phase arising from the electron's quantum backreaction on the source via virtual-photon exchange. For open paths, where the probe phase vanishes under gauge choice, the source phase persists as a measurable part of the closed-loop value, isolated through a polarization--magnetization decomposition that separates its invariant bulk from a gauge-dependent boundary term. This uncovers a leading-order QED correction to nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, resolves longstanding debates on the AB phase's origin and locality, and refines gauge principles by revealing hidden gauge invariants in formally gauge-dependent quantities. While challenging to test directly, a conceptual scheme involving phase transfer to auxiliary qubits illustrates its potential observability, emphasizing its novelty beyond conventional closed-loop paradigms.
Abstract I address the view that the classical electromagnetic potentials are shown by the Aharonov–Bohm effect to be physically real (which I dub: ‘the potentials view’). I give a historico-philosophical presentation of this view and assess its prospects, more precisely than has so far been done in the literature. Taking the potential as physically real runs prima facie into ‘gauge-underdetermination’: different gauge choices represent different physical states of affairs and hence different theories. This fact is usually not acknowledged in the literature (or in classrooms), neither by proponents nor by opponents of the potentials view. I then illustrate this theme by what I take to be the basic insight of the AB effect for the potentials view, namely that the gauge equivalence class that directly corresponds to the electric and magnetic fields (which I call the Wide Equivalence Class) is too wide, i.e., the Narrow Equivalence Class encodes additional physical degrees of freedom: these only play a distinct role in a multiply-connected space. There is a trade-off between explanatory power and gauge symmetries. On the one hand, this narrower equivalence class gives a local explanation of the AB effect in the sense that the phase is incrementally picked up along the path of the electron. On the other hand, locality is not satisfied in the sense of signal locality, viz. the finite speed of propagation exhibited by electric and magnetic fields. It is therefore intellectually mandatory to seek desiderata that will distinguish even within these narrower equivalence classes, i.e. will prefer some elements of such an equivalence class over others. I consider various formulations of locality, such as Bell locality, local interaction Hamiltonians, and signal locality. I show that Bell locality can only be evaluated if one fixes the gauge freedom completely. Yet, an explanation in terms of signal locality can be accommodated by the Lorenz gauge: the potentials propagate in waves at finite speed. I therefore suggest the Lorenz gauge potentials theory—an even narrower gauge equivalence relation—as the ontology of electrodynamics.