KAN-DAM vs TENSOR NETWORKS A Direct Comparison of Computational Architectures for Finite Spectral Manifolds
Michael I Aksman
We present a rigorous head-to-head analytical comparison between the KAN-DAM (KolmogorovArnold Network + Dense Associative Memory) architecture operating on a xed nite spectral manifold (N = 861) and conventional tensor-network (TN) methods. Tensor networks suer exponential scaling with bond dimension due to volume-law entanglement generation, and their exact contraction in 2D/3D is strictly #P-hard, forcing systematic topological destruction via Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) truncation. Conversely, KAN-DAMmaintains a xed dimensionality N, achieves a bounded per-step complexity of O(N2) and total cost O(N2T), and suppresses non-physical errors globally via Dense Associative Memory geometric projection rather than truncation. The Kolmogorov-Arnold representation guarantees dense functional expressivity without requiring explicit, localized entanglement management. This establishes KAN-DAM as a bounded-cost, geometrically stabilized computational paradigm ideally suited for non-perturbative problems whose physics is constrained to a low-dimensional topological surface.
•Jun 18, 2026•0 citations