From the dawn of civilization Humans struggled to understand and explain their environment. The process of that struggle resulted in various branches of investigations and knowledge, which Humans denote as Science. Because the Human mind, which created this Science, is by itself composed of components which might be the same components that the environment is also composed of, Humans might be bound to never being able to understand and explain completely this environment, which is also denoted as the Existence, because one cannot explain an issue, if that explanation relies on this same issue. Nevertheless, Humans were still able to build a magnificent structure, of knowledge and explanations, which, as mentioned above, is denoted as Science which is still an ongoing endeavor, which continuously expands, reveals and explains more and more secrets embedded in the Existence. However, the nowadays Physics, which is the branch of Science which specifically focuses on understanding and explaining the Existence, is still composed of branches which are not fully compatible. One of these branches is the branch denoted as the Classic Physics, which focuses on understanding and explaining what is denoted as the Macroscopic Environment. Another such branch is the branch denoted as the Quantum Physics, which focuses on understanding and explaining what is denoted as the Microscopic Environment. And, as presented above, these two branches of Physics are not fully compatible, and Humans are still struggling, to expand the knowledge that might bridge the gap that still exists between these two branches of Physics. Moreover, even the branch of the Classic Physics itself, still embeds branches which are also not fully compatible, as for example, the Gravity and the Electromagnetism, and more must be done to bridge the gap that exists also between these two branches, which both belong, as stated above, to the branch of the Classic Physics. In the process of building the above-mentioned magnificent structure of Science, Humans detected in the Existence various components, and denoted these components as Entities, and used these Entities as the building blocks on which the Science of Physics was constructed. Two such Entities are the Entity of Space and the Entity of Time, which together were interweaved into one Entity, denoted as Einstein's four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity, by the Relativity Theories of Einstein. The branch of Classic Physics relates to the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity as a real component, that really exists in the environment, or the Existence. Moreover, the branch of Classic Physics states that the environment embeds just one single four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity which is a real component of the environment, that really exists in the environment. However, this paper argues, that the branch of Quantum Physics, might also imply that the above-mentioned four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might not be a component that really exists in the environment, or the Existence. Moreover, this paper also argues, that although the nowadays branch of Classic Physics does state that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity is a real existing Entity, a contrary conclusion can be also derived, a conclusion that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might not be a component that really exists in the environment, or the Existence, and that contrary conclusion can be also derived from arguments based only on the nowadays Classic Physics. Thus, if it can be concluded that arguments based only on the Classic Physics might imply that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity does not really exists in the Existence, a conclusion which might be also in line, and compatible, with what the Quantum Physics also implies, then, by abandoning the conclusion that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity is a component that really exists in the environment, and by validating the assumption that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might be only a facet or an attribute of another component of the Existence, which the Science of Physics denotes as Energy, this might provide also a lead for starting some bridging between the Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics, which, as already stated above, are still significantly incompatible.
From the dawn of civilization Humans struggled to understand and explain their environment. The process of that struggle resulted in various branches of investigations and knowledge, which Humans denote as Science. Because the Human mind, which created this Science, is by itself composed of components which might be the same components that the environment is also composed of, Humans might be bound to never being able to understand and explain completely this environment, which is also denoted as the Existence, because one cannot explain an issue, if that explanation relies on this same issue. Nevertheless, Humans were still able to build a magnificent structure, of knowledge and explanations, which, as mentioned above, is denoted as Science which is still an ongoing endeavor, which continuously expands, reveals and explains more and more secrets embedded in the Existence. However, the nowadays Physics, which is the branch of Science which specifically focuses on understanding and explaining the Existence, is still composed of branches which are not fully compatible. One of these branches is the branch denoted as the Classic Physics, which focuses on understanding and explaining what is denoted as the Macroscopic Environment. Another such branch is the branch denoted as the Quantum Physics, which focuses on understanding and explaining what is denoted as the Microscopic Environment. And, as presented above, these two branches of Physics are not fully compatible, and Humans are still struggling, to expand the knowledge that might bridge the gap that still exists between these two branches of Physics. Moreover, even the branch of the Classic Physics itself, still embeds branches which are also not fully compatible, as for example, the Gravity and the Electromagnetism, and more must be done to bridge the gap that exists also between these two branches, which both belong, as stated above, to the branch of the Classic Physics. In the process of building the above-mentioned magnificent structure of Science, Humans detected in the Existence various components, and denoted these components as Entities, and used these Entities as the building blocks on which the Science of Physics was constructed. Two such Entities are the Entity of Space and the Entity of Time, which together were interweaved into one Entity, denoted as Einstein's four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity, by the Relativity Theories of Einstein. The branch of Classic Physics relates to the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity as a real component, that really exists in the environment, or the Existence. Moreover, the branch of Classic Physics states that the environment embeds just one single four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity which is a real component of the environment, that really exists in the environment. However, this paper argues, that the branch of Quantum Physics, might also imply that the above-mentioned four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might not be a component that really exists in the environment, or the Existence. Moreover, this paper also argues, that although the nowadays branch of Classic Physics does state that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity is a real existing Entity, a contrary conclusion can be also derived, a conclusion that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might not be a component that really exists in the environment, or the Existence, and that contrary conclusion can be also derived from arguments based only on the nowadays Classic Physics. Thus, if it can be concluded that arguments based only on the Classic Physics might imply that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity does not really exists in the Existence, a conclusion which might be also in line, and compatible, with what the Quantum Physics also implies, then, by abandoning the conclusion that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity is a component that really exists in the environment, and by validating the assumption that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might be only a facet or an attribute of another component of the Existence, which the Science of Physics denotes as Energy, this might provide also a lead for starting some bridging between the Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics, which, as already stated above, are still significantly incompatible.
From the dawn of civilization Humans struggled to understand and explain their environment. The process of that struggle resulted in various branches of investigations and knowledge, which Humans denote as Science. Because the Human mind, which created this Science, is by itself composed of components which might be the same components that the environment is also composed of, Humans might be bound to never being able to understand and explain completely this environment, which is also denoted as the Existence, because one cannot explain an issue, if that explanation relies on this same issue. Nevertheless, Humans were still able to build a magnificent structure, of knowledge and explanations, which, as mentioned above, is denoted as Science which is still an ongoing endeavor, which continuously expands, reveals and explains more and more secrets embedded in the Existence. However, the nowadays Physics, which is the branch of Science which specifically focuses on understanding and explaining the Existence, is still composed of branches which are not fully compatible. One of these branches is the branch denoted as the Classic Physics, which focuses on understanding and explaining what is denoted as the Macroscopic Environment. Another such branch is the branch denoted as the Quantum Physics, which focuses on understanding and explaining what is denoted as the Microscopic Environment. And, as presented above, these two branches of Physics are not fully compatible, and Humans are still struggling, to expand the knowledge that might bridge the gap that still exists between these two branches of Physics. Moreover, even the branch of the Classic Physics itself, still embeds branches which are also not fully compatible, as for example, the Gravity and the Electromagnetism, and more must be done to bridge the gap that exists also between these two branches, which both belong, as stated above, to the branch of the Classic Physics. In the process of building the above-mentioned magnificent structure of Science, Humans detected in the Existence various components, and denoted these components as Entities, and used these Entities as the building blocks on which the Science of Physics was constructed. Two such Entities are the Entity of Space and the Entity of Time, which together were interweaved into one Entity, denoted as Einstein's four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity, by the Relativity Theories of Einstein. The branch of Classic Physics relates to the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity as a real component, that really exists in the environment, or the Existence. Moreover, the branch of Classic Physics states that the environment embeds just one single four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity which is a real component of the environment, that really exists in the environment. However, this paper argues, that the branch of Quantum Physics, might also imply that the above-mentioned four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might not be a component that really exists in the environment, or the Existence. Moreover, this paper also argues, that although the nowadays branch of Classic Physics does state that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity is a real existing Entity, a contrary conclusion can be also derived, a conclusion that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might not be a component that really exists in the environment, or the Existence, and that contrary conclusion can be also derived from arguments based only on the nowadays Classic Physics. Thus, if it can be concluded that arguments based only on the Classic Physics might imply that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity does not really exists in the Existence, a conclusion which might be also in line, and compatible, with what the Quantum Physics also implies, then, by abandoning the conclusion that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity is a component that really exists in the environment, and by validating the assumption that the four-dimensional Interwoven Space-Time Entity might be only a facet or an attribute of another component of the Existence, which the Science of Physics denotes as Energy, this might provide also a lead for starting some bridging between the Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics, which, as already stated above, are still significantly incompatible.
In the nowadays Science of Classic Physics, Einstein's Relativity theories are the leading acceptable theories of the Classic Physics. However, the nowadays Science of Physics still embeds unresolved Paradoxes, incompatibilities between various branches of Physics, and Einstein's Relativity theories also rendered Human's perception of the Free Choice as an illusion, misleading perception. But, additional papers, by the author of this paper, present significant and reasonable arguments, which argue that the nowadays branch of the Classic Physics might be misleading in how it presents the concept of the Space-Time. By presenting an alternative view of how the nowadays Science of Physics might refer to the concept of the Space-Time, this paper, and the above-mentioned additional papers argue, that leads for bridging between several incompatible branches of Physics might be presented, new explanations to unresolved Paradoxes might be provided, and a reinstating of the Human's perception of the Free Choice as an appropriate perception might be also achieved. The above-mentioned additional papers also proposed experiments, based only on the Classic Physics, which if implemented successfully, might provide validity to what is presented in this paper and the above-mentioned additional papers. Thus, an implementation of the above-mentioned experiments, or any other experiments that might provide validity to the alternative view of how the Science of Physics should refer to the concept of the Space-Time, as presented in the above-mentioned papers, should be an important and a significant endeavor.
In the nowadays Science of Classic Physics, Einstein's Relativity theories are the leading acceptable theories of the Classic Physics. However, the nowadays Science of Physics still embeds unresolved Paradoxes, incompatibilities between various branches of Physics, and Einstein's Relativity theories also rendered Human's perception of the Free Choice as an illusion, misleading perception. But, additional papers, by the author of this paper, present significant and reasonable arguments, which argue that the nowadays branch of the Classic Physics might be misleading in how it presents the concept of the Space-Time. By presenting an alternative view of how the nowadays Science of Physics might refer to the concept of the Space-Time, this paper, and the above-mentioned additional papers argue, that leads for bridging between several incompatible branches of Physics might be presented, new explanations to unresolved Paradoxes might be provided, and a reinstating of the Human's perception of the Free Choice as an appropriate perception might be also achieved. The above-mentioned additional papers also proposed experiments, based only on the Classic Physics, which if implemented successfully, might provide validity to what is presented in this paper and the above-mentioned additional papers. Thus, an implementation of the above-mentioned experiments, or any other experiments that might provide validity to the alternative view of how the Science of Physics should refer to the concept of the Space-Time, as presented in the above-mentioned papers, should be an important and a significant endeavor.
The Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics are two branches of the nowadays Science of Physics, which are still incompatible. Einstein's Relativity theories, which are the leading acceptable theories of the nowadays Classic Physics, present the Universe as a "Block Universe", in which Time is not a flow of events, where the past vanishes and does not exist anymore, and the future is not yet created. Instead, the "Block Universe" model presents that the past, present and future are all equally real and coexist tenselessly, and everything, the past, present and future are all predefined and engraved in that "Block Universe" model of the Universe. On the other hand, the Quantum Mechanics presents, that the future is created continuously when particles interact with the environment, and the state of each particle is presented by what the Quantum Mechanics denotes as the "Wave Function" which presents the probabilities to find the particle in various locations, such that, before the particle is measured, or interacts with the environment, it can actually be in all those locations at once, and only after the particle is measured, or interacts with the environment, the "Wave Function Collapses" and the particle "chooses" randomly, to be only in one specific location. Actually, that "Wave Function Collapse" is one of the most mysterious phenomena in Physics. But it seems that Bell's Theorem, and the experiments that followed it, settled that long debate about it, providing the means to establish that the Quantum Mechanics view on this matter is the correct view and the Classic Physics and Einstein's Relativity theories view on this matter is not correct. Bell's Inequality provided the logic and the mathematics behind this decision, and physicists such as Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, who also won the Nobel prize on that, provided the experimental justification. However, although the above debate was settled, there is also still a need, to understand more precisely, what actually happens in experiments relating to Quantum entangled particles, which is what was tested in Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger experiments. The author of this paper refers to additional papers, by the author of this paper, which present significant and reasonable arguments, which argue that the nowadays branch of the Classic Physics might be misleading in how it presents the concept of the Space-Time. These additional papers propose to replace the Einstein's "Block Universe" model of the Universe with an alternate model, of a Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe, in which, each Energy might embed its own private Space-Time facet, or attribute, such that each such Space-Time cannot be considered to be a real entity, that really exists in the Universe. And this paper argues, that Bell's Theorem, and the experiments that followed it, might be also used to support the above-mentioned Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe, and this might also fill in the above-mentioned gap, which might be the need, to understand more precisely, what actually happens in experiments relating to Quantum entangled particles, which is what was tested in Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger experiments. In addition to the above, the above-mentioned additional papers, also propose additional experiments, based only on the Classic Physics, which if implemented successfully, might provide additional validity to the proposed Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe. The support that might be provided to the proposed model, of a Multi-Space-Times of the Universe, by the Bell's Theorem, and the experiments that followed it, is still based on the Quantum Mechanics. Thus, because these additional experiments, proposed in the above-mentioned additional papers, are based only on the Classic Physics, this might also provide a lead for further narrowing the gap between the Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics. Thus, an implementation of the above-mentioned experiments, or any other experiments that might provide validity to the proposed Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe, as presented in the above-mentioned papers, should be an important and a significant endeavor.
The Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics are two branches of the nowadays Science of Physics, which are still incompatible. Einstein's Relativity theories, which are the leading acceptable theories of the nowadays Classic Physics, present the Universe as a "Block Universe", in which Time is not a flow of events, where the past vanishes and does not exist anymore, and the future is not yet created. Instead, the "Block Universe" model presents that the past, present and future are all equally real and coexist tenselessly, and everything, the past, present and future are all predefined and engraved in that "Block Universe" model of the Universe. On the other hand, the Quantum Mechanics presents, that the future is created continuously when particles interact with the environment, and the state of each particle is presented by what the Quantum Mechanics denotes as the "Wave Function" which presents the probabilities to find the particle in various locations, such that, before the particle is measured, or interacts with the environment, it can actually be in all those locations at once, and only after the particle is measured, or interacts with the environment, the "Wave Function Collapses" and the particle "chooses" randomly, to be only in one specific location. Actually, that "Wave Function Collapse" is one of the most mysterious phenomena in Physics. But it seems that Bell's Theorem, and the experiments that followed it, settled that long debate about it, providing the means to establish that the Quantum Mechanics view on this matter is the correct view and the Classic Physics and Einstein's Relativity theories view on this matter is not correct. Bell's Inequality provided the logic and the mathematics behind this decision, and physicists such as Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger, who also won the Nobel prize on that, provided the experimental justification. However, although the above debate was settled, there is also still a need, to understand more precisely, what actually happens in experiments relating to Quantum entangled particles, which is what was tested in Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger experiments. The author of this paper refers to additional papers, by the author of this paper, which present significant and reasonable arguments, which argue that the nowadays branch of the Classic Physics might be misleading in how it presents the concept of the Space-Time. These additional papers propose to replace the Einstein's "Block Universe" model of the Universe with an alternate model, of a Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe, in which, each Energy might embed its own private Space-Time facet, or attribute, such that each such Space-Time cannot be considered to be a real entity, that really exists in the Universe. And this paper argues, that Bell's Theorem, and the experiments that followed it, might be also used to support the above-mentioned Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe, and this might also fill in the above-mentioned gap, which might be the need, to understand more precisely, what actually happens in experiments relating to Quantum entangled particles, which is what was tested in Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger experiments. In addition to the above, the above-mentioned additional papers, also propose additional experiments, based only on the Classic Physics, which if implemented successfully, might provide additional validity to the proposed Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe. The support that might be provided to the proposed model, of a Multi-Space-Times of the Universe, by the Bell's Theorem, and the experiments that followed it, is still based on the Quantum Mechanics. Thus, because these additional experiments, proposed in the above-mentioned additional papers, are based only on the Classic Physics, this might also provide a lead for further narrowing the gap between the Classic Physics and the Quantum Physics. Thus, an implementation of the above-mentioned experiments, or any other experiments that might provide validity to the proposed Multi-Space-Times model of the Universe, as presented in the above-mentioned papers, should be an important and a significant endeavor.
The modern version of the wave-function collapse in quantum mechanics is based on decoherence and leads to the multiverse interpretation of quantum mechanics. The decoherence causes the universe to develop an emergent branching structure. One can interpret the branching structure either as a tree structure or as parallel different histories. Time is not continuous since there are no measurable continuous in quantum physics. Notion of continuous range of possible values of time is just an idealization. The same goes with the direction of time that is a prior assumption based on the branching structure of the multiverse. The multiverse does not exist in external space nor time since there is nothing more beside it. The observer's mind should be not in a superposition with himself. Because of this, in the Many-minds interpretations it is argued that the distinction between worlds should be made at the level of the individual observer. The human bodies are in a superposition, but the minds have definite states that are never in superposition. All possible lives, personalities that do not violate the laws of physics are facts since they represent a valid history in the multiverse. We are one of this possible personalities. Our choices are defined by our personality explained to us by our mind, our consciousness is the unchangeable part of us. It is nonphysical and it senses the world. It does not interact with the brain in the other way beside it.