Quantum entanglement remains one of the most counterintuitive and challenging phenomena in modern physics, with existing interpretations often struggling to reconcile its nonlocal correlations with a coherent ontological framework. This work presents a novel, ontological identity-based explanation for quantum entanglement, positing that entangled particles maintain an fundamental existential unity rather than exhibiting isolated spooky action at a distance. The proposed framework resolves key conceptual paradoxes by redefining the nature of quantum individuality, establishing a consistent metaphysical foundation for the interpretation of non-local quantum correlations. To validate this approach, equilibrium state interference experiments are conducted, and the results are shown to align precisely with the predictions of the identity-based model. These findings not only provide a robust theoretical underpinning for quantum entanglement but also offer new directions for the foundational research in quantum mechanics, bridging the gap between abstract mathematical formalism and concrete physical ontology.
Quantum entanglement remains one of the most counterintuitive and challenging phenomena in modern physics, with existing interpretations often struggling to reconcile its nonlocal correlations with a coherent ontological framework. This work presents a novel, ontological identity-based explanation for quantum entanglement, positing that entangled particles maintain an fundamental existential unity rather than exhibiting isolated spooky action at a distance. The proposed framework resolves key conceptual paradoxes by redefining the nature of quantum individuality, establishing a consistent metaphysical foundation for the interpretation of non-local quantum correlations. To validate this approach, equilibrium state interference experiments are conducted, and the results are shown to align precisely with the predictions of the identity-based model. These findings not only provide a robust theoretical underpinning for quantum entanglement but also offer new directions for the foundational research in quantum mechanics, bridging the gap between abstract mathematical formalism and concrete physical ontology.
Quantum entanglement represents one of the most profound and counterintuitive phenomena in modern physics, challenging our classical understanding of locality and causality. While the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics accurately predicts entanglement correlations, the lack of a physically intuitive mechanism has led to numerous interpretational difficulties and philosophical debates. This article presents a comprehensive analysis of existing interpretations of quantum entanglement, from the Copenhagen interpretation to many-worlds and hidden variable theories, highlighting their limitations and motivating a novel vortex-based interpretation grounded in the hydrodynamic behavior of a superfluid vacuum, drawing upon the author’s published work on electron, quark, and gravitational force dynamics. This vortex model provides a physically intuitive and causally consistent explanation for nonlocal correlations without invoking superluminal signaling, offering a bridge between classical physics and quantum mechanics. The proposed interpretation suggests that entangled particles are surface manifestations of deeper, coherent vortex structures within a continuous vacuum medium, analogous to connected vortices in a fluid system. This framework not only resolves the conceptual difficulties associated with “spooky action at a distance” but also provides a foundation for understanding quantum phenomena through classical hydrodynamic principles.
This paper proposes an ontological framework that resolves the apparent paradox of quantum entanglement without invoking faster-than-light signaling or violating the principle of locality in special relativity. The solution rests on a strict ontological separation between two levels of reality: (1) an existential level governed by a single, absolute, non-spatial existential time τ, where quantum information resides in unified superposed states; and (2) a cosmic level consisting of ordinary relativistic spacetime, where material systems are spatially separated and causality is preserved. Under this framework, entanglement represents a dual-layer phenomenon: existential–informational unity at the level of being, combined with cosmic–material separation at the level of appearance. Quantum correlations are thus explained not as superluminal influence, but as the manifestation in spacetime of a pre-unified informational structure in existential time. The framework preserves all mathematical formalism of standard quantum mechanics, remains fully consistent with special and general relativity, and offers a deep ontological grounding for the foundations of quantum theory
This paper proposes an ontological framework that resolves the apparent paradox of quantum entanglement without invoking faster-than-light signaling or violating the principle of locality in special relativity. The solution rests on a strict ontological separation between two levels of reality: (1) an existential level governed by a single, absolute, non-spatial existential time τ, where quantum information resides in unified superposed states; and (2) a cosmic level consisting of ordinary relativistic spacetime, where material systems are spatially separated and causality is preserved. Under this framework, entanglement represents a dual-layer phenomenon: existential–informational unity at the level of being, combined with cosmic–material separation at the level of appearance. Quantum correlations are thus explained not as superluminal influence, but as the manifestation in spacetime of a pre-unified informational structure in existential time. The framework preserves all mathematical formalism of standard quantum mechanics, remains fully consistent with special and general relativity, and offers a deep ontological grounding for the foundations of quantum theory.
The mainstream interpretation of quantum entanglement and its derivative phenomena has long relied on concepts such as non-locality and superposition, leading to a lack of dynamical mechanism description for wave function collapse and creating profound conflicts with physical causality. This paper, based on the "Great Tao Model" and its "Existence Field Theory," proposes a systematic and unified interpretation of quantum entanglement phenomena, exemplified by the experiments recognized by the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics. First, it analyzes the erroneous presuppositions in the derivation of Bell's inequality based on Existence Field Theory and establishes a general classical interpretation framework grounded in "static initial correlations" and "local interactions." Subsequently, through a classical physical reconstruction of milestone experiments such as Aspect's, it demonstrates that this framework is sufficient to explain all observed phenomena self-consistently, without introducing "non-local superluminal action." Building on this, the paper successfully extends this interpretative framework to core quantum phenomena such as quantum decoherence, teleportation, and many-body entanglement, revealing that they also originate from classical conservation law constraints and local field interactions. Furthermore, this paper compares the Great Tao Model with hidden variable theories, finding that although both belong to the classical realism camp and oppose non-locality, the Great Tao Model requires no introduction of any hidden variables. Instead, it explains phenomena directly based on the specific physical properties (charge, mass) of elementary particles and the local dynamics of their existence fields, thus providing a more physically realistic and unified theoretical framework. This study offers a unified, causality-compliant classical explanation for a series of quantum phenomena claimed to exhibit "non-locality," fundamentally challenging the conceptual foundation of related quantum information technologies and providing a new path for physics to return to a theoretical paradigm based on realism, locality, and clear dynamical mechanisms.
Quantum mechanics is among the most successful mathematical frameworks in modern science, providing precise predictions, experimental validation, and wide-ranging technological applications. This success, however, has been accompanied by a long-standing suspension of a fundamental question: the ontological status of quantum itself. While dominant approaches emphasize how quantum phenomena behave, the question of what these behaviors are the behavior of has largely been deferred. This work does not propose a new physical theory, nor does it challenge the empirical or mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Instead, it offers an ontological positioning that reintroduces the question of ground. Quantum is approached neither as a discrete object nor as a purely mathematical formalism, but as the joint mode of operation of energy, nature, and consciousness. Within this framework, consciousness is not treated as an external causal agent acting upon physical systems, but as an immanent, organizing, and meaning-generating aspect of energetic continuity. Differentiation is thus located not in nature itself, but at the level of meaning. Observation and measurement are reinterpreted accordingly, not as mechanisms of physical collapse, but as processes through which ontological distinctions become articulated. By reframing quantum as a ground rather than a thing, this study aims to clarify persistent conceptual tensions—such as the observer problem and the status of measurement—without invoking speculative physics or metaphysical dualism. The paper presents not a solution, but a repositioning: an invitation to reconsider the ontological assumptions that guide contemporary readings of quantum mechanics.
Quantum entanglement represents one of the most profound and counterintuitive phenomena in modern physics, fundamentally challenging classical notions of locality, causality, and separability. This comprehensive review examines the theoretical foundations of quantum entanglement, tracing its conceptual development from Einstein's critique of quantum mechanics through Bell's theorem to contemporary experimental verification. The paper synthesizes current understanding of entanglement's mathematical formalism, its role in violating Bell inequalities, and the resolution of the EPR paradox. Extensive discussion is devoted to landmark experiments that have conclusively demonstrated non-local correlations, including photon polarization studies, satellite-based quantum communication, and loophole-free Bell tests. The work further explores emerging technological applications in quantum cryptography, quantum computing, and quantum teleportation, while addressing fundamental questions regarding the nature of reality, information, and the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity. Finally, the paper examines open questions and speculative frameworks suggesting that entanglement may represent a foundational principle underlying spacetime geometry itself. Video documentation of this analysis is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDGKuXYRPpI.