Quantum classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that manipulate their input classical or quantum data. A promising countermeasure is adversarial training, where quantum classifiers are trained by using an attack-aware, adversarial loss function. This work establishes novel bounds on the generalization error of adversarially trained quantum classifiers when tested in the presence of perturbation-constrained adversaries. The bounds quantify the excess generalization error incurred to ensure robustness to adversarial attacks as scaling with the training sample size m as 1/m, while yielding insights into the impact of the quantum embedding. For quantum binary classifiers employing \textit{rotation embedding}, we find that, in the presence of adversarial attacks on classical inputs x, the increase in sample complexity due to adversarial training over conventional training vanishes in the limit of high dimensional inputs x. In contrast, when the adversary can directly attack the quantum state ρ(x) encoding the input x, the excess generalization error depends on the choice of embedding only through its Hilbert space dimension. The results are also extended to multi-class classifiers. We validate our theoretical findings with numerical experiments.
In a manner analogous to their classical counterparts, quantum classifiers are vulnerable to adversarial attacks that perturb their inputs. A promising countermeasure is to train the quantum classifier by adopting an attack-aware, or adversarial, loss function. This paper studies the generalization properties of quantum classifiers that are adversarially trained against bounded-norm white-box attacks. Specifically, a quantum adversary maximizes the classifier's loss by transforming an input stateρ(x)into a stateτthat isϵ-close to the original stateρ(x)in p-Schatten distance. Under suitable assumptions on the quantum embeddingρ(x), we derive novel information-theoretic upper bounds on the generalization error of adversarially trained quantum classifiers forp=1andp=∞. The derived upper bounds consist of two terms: the first is an exponential function of the 2-Renyi mutual information between classical data and quantum embedding, while the second term scales linearly with the adversarial perturbation sizeϵ. Both terms are shown to decrease as1/Tover the training set sizeT. An extension is also considered in which the adversary assumed during training has different parameterspandϵas compared to the adversary affecting the test inputs. Finally, we validate our theoretical findings with numerical experiments for a synthetic setting.