Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

CRC Press eBooks

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle

F. J. Duarte

Published Apr 10, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is one of the unique and iconic features of quantum mechanics that distinctly separates this physics, based on indeterminacy, from any and all classical deterministic theories. Besides its succinct utter beauty, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x Δ p ≈ h , as articulated by Feynman ‘it protects quantum mechanics.’ In addition to its foundational importance and ‘protection’ function, the uncertainty principle plays crucial experimental roles in the measurement of coherent emission linewidth https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ ν and in determining the nonlocality of the photon via measurements of coherence length https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x . Physically, it can be shown that https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x Δ p ≈ h has its origin in the physics of measurable interferometric quantum probability distributions. This insight teaches us that, unlike probability amplitudes, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x Δ p ≈ h firmly resides in the measurable realm.

DOI
10.1201/9781003649434-7

Related papers

Quantum Measurements

F.J. Duarte

As openly stated by Willis Lamb, the field of quantum measurements has not been helped by the ample participation of theorists in it (although Lamb himself has been described as a theorist turned experimentalist). The point is, as validly exposed by Lamb, that when it comes to quantum measurements there is a plethora of misunderstandings that mystify and confuse those who describe them and those who listen. Here, the so called ‘measurement problem’ comes to mind. The very first concept in explaining what is a measurement, and not just a quantum measurement, is that no measurement is exact . In physics no one can measure https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> x with https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x = 0 . When we measure https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> x we always measure it as https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> x ± Δ x where https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x is a nonzero quantity. This observation alone immediately brings in stochasticity into the measurement arena. In measurements there is no escape from stochasticity . In this chapter the measurement process is described from an interferometric perspective.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 29, 2013•0 citations

Uncertainty Principle

F.J. Duarte

R. P. Feynman, by far, physics’ most successful communicator, said: The uncertainty principle protects quantum mechanics. W. Heisenberg recognized that if it were possible to measure the momentum and the position simultaneously with a greater accuracy, quantum mechanics would collapse. Quantum mechanics maintains its perilous but correct existence”. In his book on Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , Feynman makes use of the two-slit experiment to provide an approximate description of the physics behind the uncertainty principle. Feynman’s description is outlined using a slightly different notation. The uncertainty principle is widely applied in optics. It applies to interferometry, linewidth measurements, and beam divergence measurements. The chapter focuses on the uncertainty principle and beam divergence. An important application of the uncertainty principle manifests itself in calculations of the angular resolution limit of telescopes used in astronomical observations. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be used to derive some useful identities in optics and interferometry.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 29, 2013•0 citations

Quantum Uncertainty Principles and Classical Statistical Mechanics

Francesco R. Ruggeri

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle for position-momentum delta x delta p >= hbar/2 is considered as an important statement regarding quantum mechanics i.e. one cannot know both p and x exactly. Delta x and delta p stand out because in classical mechanics one has an eact p and x at each t. Mathematically, however, delta x and delta p are standard deviations which may also be calculated in classical statistical mechanics, for example with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. In particular, if one considers the ground state of a simple harmonic oscillator, the quantum P(x) proportional to exp(-pp/a) and P(p) proportional to exp(-xxa) match the classical statistical probabilities P(x) and P(p) for a fixed value of T proportional to sqrt(k/m) where k is the spring constant. Thus for this special T, delta x delta p for a classical statistical mechanical gas is identical to delta x delta p for the ground state quantum oscillator. The probability is normalized the same way for both. The physics of the two situations, however, is completely different. Thus the Heisenberg uncertainty principle does not necessarily describe quantum mechanical behaviour alone. If one uses entropic uncertainty, i.e. Sp + Sx where S is Shannon’s entropy, once again one uses P(p)=a*(p)a(p) and P(x)=W*(x)W(x) where W(x)=wavefunction = Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx). In principle, one could also calculate such an entropy for a classical gas i.e. use P(x)P(p) in Shannon’s entropy. The result Sp+Sx does not imply one does not know about p if one knows x i.e. the usual quantum statement.

•Apr 28, 2022•0 citations

$100\pmΔt$ Years of Quantum Uncertainty: From Origins to Modern Insights

Lorcan O. Conlon, Biveen Shajilal, Jie Zhao +6 more

Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, marking a decisive departure from classical physics. Conceived almost a century ago through a thought experiment showing that measuring an electron's position inevitably disturbs its momentum, it began as a deceptively simple idea that sparked countless studies and grew into the rich research field it is today. This review traces its development into a spectrum of mathematical formulations -- known as uncertainty relations -- and explores their interconnections and wide-ranging applications. We highlight its central role in quantum metrology, where it underpins strategies for extracting information from quantum systems with ever-increasing precision, and its links to multiparameter estimation and squeezed states. This review, dedicated to the centenary of the uncertainty principle, reflects on how it has deepened our understanding of quantum theory and driven practical advances, and looks ahead to a century poised for further surprising and transformative discoveries.

quant-pharXiv:2606.07747•Jun 9, 2026•0 citations

The Quantumness of Quantum Mechanics

F. J. Duarte

The quantumness of quantum mechanics is integrated by those properties and characteristics so unique to quantum mechanics that makes it an utterly extraordinary, and fascinating, branch of physics. And the beauty of it is that this quantumness has its origin in the very foundations of quantum physics built on experimental facts and thus they reflect the character of Nature itself. Indeterminacy , indistinguishability , nonlocality , uncertainty , and superposition are not the byproducts of some strange unverified theory but they are the characteristics of a brave experimentally based physics that has been verified by experiment time and time again. Add to this that most of the action in quantum physics takes place via probability amplitudes , that exist in a purely mathematical realm, and you have something superbly unique. Those are the elements that configure the quantumness of quantum mechanics, as discussed and described in this chapter.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations

Born's Rule and Quantum Probabilities

F. J. Duarte

In quantum mechanics, the physics of probability amplitudes, that exists in the imaginary and complex mathematical realm, is brought to the measurable realm by the iconic Born rule https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 | ψ 〉 ∗ = | | ψ 〉 | 2 that convert the superposition probability amplitude https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 into a measurable interferometric probability distribution. When Born first introduced his rule, in 1926, he did so in the absence of a physical derivation. In fact, Born never offered a derivation for his most crucial rule. In this chapter a transparent interferometric derivation of Born's rule is given. Furthermore, it is indicated that far from a ‘collapse’ the https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 → | ψ 〉 | ψ 〉 ∗ transition, for interferometric configurations, clearly involves a mathematical expansion . The https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 → | ψ 〉 | ψ 〉 ∗ transition for quantum entanglement is also discussed.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 10, 2026•0 citations
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is one of the unique and iconic features of quantum mechanics that distinctly separates this physics, based on indeterminacy, from any and all classical deterministic theories. Besides its succinct utter beauty, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x Δ p ≈ h , as articulated by Feynman ‘it protects quantum mechanics.’ In addition to its foundational importance and ‘protection’ function, the uncertainty principle plays crucial experimental roles in the measurement of coherent emission linewidth https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ ν and in determining the nonlocality of the photon via measurements of coherence length https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x . Physically, it can be shown that https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x Δ p ≈ h has its origin in the physics of measurable interferometric quantum probability distributions. This insight teaches us that, unlike probability amplitudes, https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x Δ p ≈ h firmly resides in the measurable realm.
As openly stated by Willis Lamb, the field of quantum measurements has not been helped by the ample participation of theorists in it (although Lamb himself has been described as a theorist turned experimentalist). The point is, as validly exposed by Lamb, that when it comes to quantum measurements there is a plethora of misunderstandings that mystify and confuse those who describe them and those who listen. Here, the so called ‘measurement problem’ comes to mind. The very first concept in explaining what is a measurement, and not just a quantum measurement, is that no measurement is exact . In physics no one can measure https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> x with https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x = 0 . When we measure https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> x we always measure it as https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> x ± Δ x where https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> Δ x is a nonzero quantity. This observation alone immediately brings in stochasticity into the measurement arena. In measurements there is no escape from stochasticity . In this chapter the measurement process is described from an interferometric perspective.
R. P. Feynman, by far, physics’ most successful communicator, said: The uncertainty principle protects quantum mechanics. W. Heisenberg recognized that if it were possible to measure the momentum and the position simultaneously with a greater accuracy, quantum mechanics would collapse. Quantum mechanics maintains its perilous but correct existence”. In his book on Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals , Feynman makes use of the two-slit experiment to provide an approximate description of the physics behind the uncertainty principle. Feynman’s description is outlined using a slightly different notation. The uncertainty principle is widely applied in optics. It applies to interferometry, linewidth measurements, and beam divergence measurements. The chapter focuses on the uncertainty principle and beam divergence. An important application of the uncertainty principle manifests itself in calculations of the angular resolution limit of telescopes used in astronomical observations. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle can be used to derive some useful identities in optics and interferometry.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle for position-momentum delta x delta p >= hbar/2 is considered as an important statement regarding quantum mechanics i.e. one cannot know both p and x exactly. Delta x and delta p stand out because in classical mechanics one has an eact p and x at each t. Mathematically, however, delta x and delta p are standard deviations which may also be calculated in classical statistical mechanics, for example with the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. In particular, if one considers the ground state of a simple harmonic oscillator, the quantum P(x) proportional to exp(-pp/a) and P(p) proportional to exp(-xxa) match the classical statistical probabilities P(x) and P(p) for a fixed value of T proportional to sqrt(k/m) where k is the spring constant. Thus for this special T, delta x delta p for a classical statistical mechanical gas is identical to delta x delta p for the ground state quantum oscillator. The probability is normalized the same way for both. The physics of the two situations, however, is completely different. Thus the Heisenberg uncertainty principle does not necessarily describe quantum mechanical behaviour alone. If one uses entropic uncertainty, i.e. Sp + Sx where S is Shannon’s entropy, once again one uses P(p)=a*(p)a(p) and P(x)=W*(x)W(x) where W(x)=wavefunction = Sum over p a(p)exp(ipx). In principle, one could also calculate such an entropy for a classical gas i.e. use P(x)P(p) in Shannon’s entropy. The result Sp+Sx does not imply one does not know about p if one knows x i.e. the usual quantum statement.
100±Δt100\pmΔt100±Δt Years of Quantum Uncertainty: From Origins to Modern Insights
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, marking a decisive departure from classical physics. Conceived almost a century ago through a thought experiment showing that measuring an electron's position inevitably disturbs its momentum, it began as a deceptively simple idea that sparked countless studies and grew into the rich research field it is today. This review traces its development into a spectrum of mathematical formulations -- known as uncertainty relations -- and explores their interconnections and wide-ranging applications. We highlight its central role in quantum metrology, where it underpins strategies for extracting information from quantum systems with ever-increasing precision, and its links to multiparameter estimation and squeezed states. This review, dedicated to the centenary of the uncertainty principle, reflects on how it has deepened our understanding of quantum theory and driven practical advances, and looks ahead to a century poised for further surprising and transformative discoveries.
The quantumness of quantum mechanics is integrated by those properties and characteristics so unique to quantum mechanics that makes it an utterly extraordinary, and fascinating, branch of physics. And the beauty of it is that this quantumness has its origin in the very foundations of quantum physics built on experimental facts and thus they reflect the character of Nature itself. Indeterminacy , indistinguishability , nonlocality , uncertainty , and superposition are not the byproducts of some strange unverified theory but they are the characteristics of a brave experimentally based physics that has been verified by experiment time and time again. Add to this that most of the action in quantum physics takes place via probability amplitudes , that exist in a purely mathematical realm, and you have something superbly unique. Those are the elements that configure the quantumness of quantum mechanics, as discussed and described in this chapter.
In quantum mechanics, the physics of probability amplitudes, that exists in the imaginary and complex mathematical realm, is brought to the measurable realm by the iconic Born rule https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 | ψ 〉 ∗ = | | ψ 〉 | 2 that convert the superposition probability amplitude https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 into a measurable interferometric probability distribution. When Born first introduced his rule, in 1926, he did so in the absence of a physical derivation. In fact, Born never offered a derivation for his most crucial rule. In this chapter a transparent interferometric derivation of Born's rule is given. Furthermore, it is indicated that far from a ‘collapse’ the https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 → | ψ 〉 | ψ 〉 ∗ transition, for interferometric configurations, clearly involves a mathematical expansion . The https://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> | ψ 〉 → | ψ 〉 | ψ 〉 ∗ transition for quantum entanglement is also discussed.