Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Electron structure

Wei Fu

Published Apr 6, 2026• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

This work presents a novel theoretical framework addressing a fundamental problem in atomic and quantum physics. We propose a new physical mechanism to resolve long-standing inconsistencies in the description of electron behavior within atoms, establishing a consistent physical picture that bridges classical electromagnetic principles and quantum mechanical observations. This work lays a foundational conceptual basis for further rigorous mathematical formalization, detailed theoretical derivation, and experimental validation, with the aim of formal publication in leading peer-reviewed physics journals.

DOI
10.5281/zenodo.19441367

Related papers

The Third Type of Mathematical Knowledge and Relative Rigor in Reasoning with Incompatible Descriptions

Berezuiev Roman

Preprint of a conceptual paper that constructs the Special Theory of RelativeMathematics (STRM) — an intermediate framework providing a formal justificationfor the diagnostic method introduced in the author's earlier work (the labelingof switches between incompatible mathematical descriptions), using only existingmathematical concepts and introducing no new formal objects.The paper argues that many quantum-mechanical "paradoxes" — from EPR to theFrauchiger–Renner argument — arise not from an internal inconsistency of quantumtheory, but from the implicit gluing together of incompatible descriptions(wave vs. particle, probability distribution vs. recorded outcome, pre- vs.post-measurement state). The following are introduced and defined: a criterionof incompatibility of descriptions through violation of rigor; the third type ofknowledge as a premise that arises at the transition between incompatible tasks;relative rigor as a construction in which the rules of inference are fixed withineach task but may change at its boundary; and the protocol of switches as anobservable physical act. A structural symmetry is established between differentways of organizing such reasoning — and between different interpretations ofquantum mechanics — from which it follows that the method confers relative rigoron interpretive reasoning regardless of the interpretation used.This paper is currently under peer review at Studies in History and Philosophyof Science.It is the foundational, formal-justification paper of a cycle of five works ofincreasing depth, intended to be read as a whole: 1. Incompatible Mathematical Descriptions and Hidden Switching Errors in Quantum Thought Experiments — the labeling method; openly available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19099007). 2. Incompatible Descriptions and the Structural Gap in the Formalism — a survey of five interpretations; published in the International Journal of Quantum Foundations (https://ijqf.org/archives/8302). 3. The Third Type of Mathematical Knowledge and Relative Rigor in Reasoning with Incompatible Descriptions - (this paper, STRM) — the formal foundation of the cycle; under review at Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Zenodo, 2026. (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20720635). 4. An Analysis of Bell's Theorem within the STRM — under review at the International Journal of Quantum Foundations. 5. The Structural Limit of the Axiomatic Approach: Hardy's Axioms… — under review at the International Journal of Quantum Foundations.This record contains three language versions of the same paper (Ukrainian,Russian, English).Keywords: incompatible mathematical descriptions; third type of knowledge;relative rigor; complementarity; foundations of quantum mechanics; applied logic.

•Jun 16, 2026•0 citations

Atomic Electron Configuration

David E. Pressler

In this work I suggest that early twentieth century theoretical physicists did not have enough facts or experimental data to formulate a consistent atomic model and as a result the concept of the atom needs revised. I conclude that the new atomic model presented is based only on first principles, is easy to understand and visualize, and provides such a significant theoretical advance as to be a final theory.

International Journal of Modern Physics A•Sep 1, 2001•0 citations

Quantum Reality Stabilizing Feedback

Jincheng Zhang

This paper introduces the Quantum Reality Stabilizing Feedback (QRSF) framework, a novel approach to addressing fundamental challenges in quantum measurement and the broader interpretation of quantum mechanics. The core concept revolves around employing controlled feedback mechanisms to influence the decoherence processes that inevitably degrade quantum states. Specifically, the framework leverages the potential for classical information to interact with quantum systems, aiming to 'stabilize' the reality of the quantum state by mitigating the effects of environmental noise. The theoretical underpinnings are presented, outlining the mathematical formalism and key equations governing the feedback loop. The proposed method offers a potential pathway toward resolving the measurement problem and could represent a significant step forward in our understanding of quantum reality. The exploration is primarily conceptual and theoretical, lacking experimental validation at this stage, but it lays the groundwork for future research and potentially groundbreaking experiments. The focus is on the conceptual development and mathematical description of the QRSF framework rather than detailed experimental procedures.

•Aug 17, 2026•0 citations

ATOMIC STRUCTURE AND THE FUNDAMENTALS OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

Jiří Bareš, Čestmír Černý, Vojtech Fried +1 more

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1961•0 citations

Atoms in Electromagnetic Fields

David Tong

The universe we live in is both strange and interesting. This strangeness comes about because, at the most fundamental level, the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. This is the most spectacularly accurate and powerful theory ever devised, one that has given us insights into many aspects of the world, from the structure of matter to the meaning of information. This textbook provides a comprehensive account of all things quantum. It starts by introducing the wavefunction and its interpretation as an ephemeral wave of complex probability, before delving into the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics and exploring its diverse applications, from atomic physics and scattering, to quantum computing. Designed to be accessible, this volume is suitable for both students and researchers, beginning with the basics before progressing to more advanced topics.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jun 19, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Information-Theoretic Chaos Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum Information-Theoretic Chaos Theory explores the potential of quantum mechanics to fundamentally define and understand chaos, offering a novel approach to predicting and controlling its behavior. This paper proposes a formalization of chaos as a fundamental quantum phenomenon, leveraging quantum entanglement and decoherence to generate inherently chaotic patterns. We introduce a new set of rules governing these interactions, aiming to provide a mathematically rigorous framework for analyzing and manipulating chaotic systems. The core mechanism revolves around establishing a precise relationship between quantum states and chaotic dynamics, offering a potential pathway to enhanced predictive capabilities. This research addresses a long-standing challenge in quantum mechanics: the lack of a consistent mathematical description of chaos, presenting a bold new direction for theoretical investigation and practical application.

•Aug 29, 2026•0 citations
This work presents a novel theoretical framework addressing a fundamental problem in atomic and quantum physics. We propose a new physical mechanism to resolve long-standing inconsistencies in the description of electron behavior within atoms, establishing a consistent physical picture that bridges classical electromagnetic principles and quantum mechanical observations. This work lays a foundational conceptual basis for further rigorous mathematical formalization, detailed theoretical derivation, and experimental validation, with the aim of formal publication in leading peer-reviewed physics journals.
Preprint of a conceptual paper that constructs the Special Theory of RelativeMathematics (STRM) — an intermediate framework providing a formal justificationfor the diagnostic method introduced in the author's earlier work (the labelingof switches between incompatible mathematical descriptions), using only existingmathematical concepts and introducing no new formal objects.The paper argues that many quantum-mechanical "paradoxes" — from EPR to theFrauchiger–Renner argument — arise not from an internal inconsistency of quantumtheory, but from the implicit gluing together of incompatible descriptions(wave vs. particle, probability distribution vs. recorded outcome, pre- vs.post-measurement state). The following are introduced and defined: a criterionof incompatibility of descriptions through violation of rigor; the third type ofknowledge as a premise that arises at the transition between incompatible tasks;relative rigor as a construction in which the rules of inference are fixed withineach task but may change at its boundary; and the protocol of switches as anobservable physical act. A structural symmetry is established between differentways of organizing such reasoning — and between different interpretations ofquantum mechanics — from which it follows that the method confers relative rigoron interpretive reasoning regardless of the interpretation used.This paper is currently under peer review at Studies in History and Philosophyof Science.It is the foundational, formal-justification paper of a cycle of five works ofincreasing depth, intended to be read as a whole: 1. Incompatible Mathematical Descriptions and Hidden Switching Errors in Quantum Thought Experiments — the labeling method; openly available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19099007). 2. Incompatible Descriptions and the Structural Gap in the Formalism — a survey of five interpretations; published in the International Journal of Quantum Foundations (https://ijqf.org/archives/8302). 3. The Third Type of Mathematical Knowledge and Relative Rigor in Reasoning with Incompatible Descriptions - (this paper, STRM) — the formal foundation of the cycle; under review at Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Zenodo, 2026. (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20720635). 4. An Analysis of Bell's Theorem within the STRM — under review at the International Journal of Quantum Foundations. 5. The Structural Limit of the Axiomatic Approach: Hardy's Axioms… — under review at the International Journal of Quantum Foundations.This record contains three language versions of the same paper (Ukrainian,Russian, English).Keywords: incompatible mathematical descriptions; third type of knowledge;relative rigor; complementarity; foundations of quantum mechanics; applied logic.
This paper introduces the Quantum Reality Stabilizing Feedback (QRSF) framework, a novel approach to addressing fundamental challenges in quantum measurement and the broader interpretation of quantum mechanics. The core concept revolves around employing controlled feedback mechanisms to influence the decoherence processes that inevitably degrade quantum states. Specifically, the framework leverages the potential for classical information to interact with quantum systems, aiming to 'stabilize' the reality of the quantum state by mitigating the effects of environmental noise. The theoretical underpinnings are presented, outlining the mathematical formalism and key equations governing the feedback loop. The proposed method offers a potential pathway toward resolving the measurement problem and could represent a significant step forward in our understanding of quantum reality. The exploration is primarily conceptual and theoretical, lacking experimental validation at this stage, but it lays the groundwork for future research and potentially groundbreaking experiments. The focus is on the conceptual development and mathematical description of the QRSF framework rather than detailed experimental procedures.
The universe we live in is both strange and interesting. This strangeness comes about because, at the most fundamental level, the universe is governed by the laws of quantum mechanics. This is the most spectacularly accurate and powerful theory ever devised, one that has given us insights into many aspects of the world, from the structure of matter to the meaning of information. This textbook provides a comprehensive account of all things quantum. It starts by introducing the wavefunction and its interpretation as an ephemeral wave of complex probability, before delving into the mathematical formalism of quantum mechanics and exploring its diverse applications, from atomic physics and scattering, to quantum computing. Designed to be accessible, this volume is suitable for both students and researchers, beginning with the basics before progressing to more advanced topics.
Quantum Information-Theoretic Chaos Theory explores the potential of quantum mechanics to fundamentally define and understand chaos, offering a novel approach to predicting and controlling its behavior. This paper proposes a formalization of chaos as a fundamental quantum phenomenon, leveraging quantum entanglement and decoherence to generate inherently chaotic patterns. We introduce a new set of rules governing these interactions, aiming to provide a mathematically rigorous framework for analyzing and manipulating chaotic systems. The core mechanism revolves around establishing a precise relationship between quantum states and chaotic dynamics, offering a potential pathway to enhanced predictive capabilities. This research addresses a long-standing challenge in quantum mechanics: the lack of a consistent mathematical description of chaos, presenting a bold new direction for theoretical investigation and practical application.