The axiom. Irreducible statistical dependence implies a connecting structure. This is the foundational principle of causal inference, applied without exception—including to quantum entanglement. The variational formulation. The axiom is given mathematical form as a variational principle on bipartite quantum systems. The action S = ∫[i⟨Φ̇|Φ⟩ − ⟨Φ|(K_A + K_B)|Φ⟩]dτ has modular flow as its Euler–Lagrange equation, the local-unitary group U(d_A) × U(d_B) as its symmetry, and the entanglement spectrum as its conserved Noether charges. The local form of this conservation law is the spectral equivalence of reduced modular Hamiltonians, spec(K_A) = spec(K_B), which is the informational analog of Newton's third law; Newton's third law itself is recovered as a special case in the thermal limit. The action is shown to be uniquely determined—not chosen—by six published uniqueness theorems (Schmidt decomposition, Stone–Tomita–Takesaki, Aharonov–Anandan, bipartite splitting, internal-consistency state-preservation via Noether, Ostrogradsky stability). The dependence axiom is therefore not a philosophical commitment but a variational principle of the same kind as those that organize the rest of physics. The central new theorem. For any bipartite pure state, the Holevo capacity of the measurement-induced channel exactly equals the entanglement entropy, the maximum is uniquely achieved by Schmidt-basis measurement, and the excess capacity is identically zero (χ = I = S_E). This Capacity Saturation Theorem is the framework's quantitative foundation and follows from the variational structure. Derivations from saturation: The Born rule—derived as the unique probability rule compatible with capacity saturation, with an independent derivation from channel thermalization. Two distinct paths to the same result. The Tsirelson bound S_CHSH ≤ 2√2 derived as the matching point where simulation cost equals channel capacity. Einstein's field equations via Bisognano–Wichmann and Jacobson's thermodynamic construction, with quantum corrections of order O(exp(−A/16Għ)) from finite thermalization precision. The cosmological constant Λ = 12/(N·Għ·t²_age) ≈ 10⁻¹²¹ in Planck units—within one order of magnitude of the observed value ~10⁻¹²². Uses one observed input (the age of the universe) and the number of massless species; no free parameters. A 120-order-of-magnitude improvement over the QFT prediction. Additional theorems (50+ total): the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, Hawking temperature, holographic bound, Bekenstein bound, generalized second law, classical area theorem, no-hair theorem, Page curve, firewall paradox resolution, prohibition of closed timelike curves, arrow of time, singularity resolution, two-phase inflation, flatness and horizon problem resolutions, Hubble parameter range, monogamy from information budget, fine-tuning resolution, Reeh–Schlieder, Kochen–Specker contextuality, quantum Zeno effect, no-signaling, CPT theorem, measurement without collapse, second law of entanglement thermodynamics, Landauer bound for entangled systems, vacuum channel capacity, entanglement–energy equivalence. Predictions: S_CHSH temporal decay; decoherence rate ≤ MSS bound; gravitational entanglement bound for BMV-class experiments; entanglement-triggered gravitational collapse; entanglement content of gravitational waves; exponential corrections to black hole entropy. What this paper claims. The paper introduces a variational principle that formalizes the dependence axiom, proves the action is forced (not chosen) by six published uniqueness theorems, derives the entanglement spectrum as a Noether charge, recovers Newton's third law as a special case in the thermal limit, and shows that the resulting framework unifies quantum foundations, quantum information, general relativity, and cosmology under a single organizing principle. The contribution is both new mathematics—most notably the Capacity Saturation Theorem, the variational formulation with its uniqueness chain, and the cosmological constant prediction—and structural unification across results previously developed in disconnected subfields. The framework is presented as a compression of known physics with one falsifiable prediction already passed (Λ to within an order of magnitude, zero free parameters) and several further predictions proposed. No established result in quantum mechanics, general relativity, or quantum information theory is contradicted. Correspondence: student_t_vs_bohr@proton.me
The axiom. Irreducible statistical dependence implies a connecting structure. This is the foundational principle of causal inference, applied without exception—including to quantum entanglement. The variational formulation. The axiom is given mathematical form as a variational principle on bipartite quantum systems. The action S = ∫[i⟨Φ̇|Φ⟩ − ⟨Φ|(K_A + K_B)|Φ⟩]dτ has modular flow as its Euler–Lagrange equation, the local-unitary group U(d_A) × U(d_B) as its symmetry, and the entanglement spectrum as its conserved Noether charges. The local form of this conservation law is the spectral equivalence of reduced modular Hamiltonians, spec(K_A) = spec(K_B), which is the informational analog of Newton's third law; Newton's third law itself is recovered as a special case in the thermal limit. The action is shown to be uniquely determined—not chosen—by six published uniqueness theorems (Schmidt decomposition, Stone–Tomita–Takesaki, Aharonov–Anandan, bipartite splitting, internal-consistency state-preservation via Noether, Ostrogradsky stability). The dependence axiom is therefore not a philosophical commitment but a variational principle of the same kind as those that organize the rest of physics. The central new theorem. For any bipartite pure state, the Holevo capacity of the measurement-induced channel exactly equals the entanglement entropy, the maximum is uniquely achieved by Schmidt-basis measurement, and the excess capacity is identically zero (χ = I = S_E). This Capacity Saturation Theorem is the framework's quantitative foundation and follows from the variational structure. Derivations from saturation: The Born rule—derived as the unique probability rule compatible with capacity saturation, with an independent derivation from channel thermalization. Two distinct paths to the same result. The Tsirelson bound S_CHSH ≤ 2√2 derived as the matching point where simulation cost equals channel capacity. Einstein's field equations via Bisognano–Wichmann and Jacobson's thermodynamic construction, with quantum corrections of order O(exp(−A/16Għ)) from finite thermalization precision. The cosmological constant Λ = 12/(N·Għ·t²_age) ≈ 10⁻¹²¹ in Planck units—within one order of magnitude of the observed value ~10⁻¹²². Uses one observed input (the age of the universe) and the number of massless species; no free parameters. A 120-order-of-magnitude improvement over the QFT prediction. Additional theorems (50+ total): the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy, Hawking temperature, holographic bound, Bekenstein bound, generalized second law, classical area theorem, no-hair theorem, Page curve, firewall paradox resolution, prohibition of closed timelike curves, arrow of time, singularity resolution, two-phase inflation, flatness and horizon problem resolutions, Hubble parameter range, monogamy from information budget, fine-tuning resolution, Reeh–Schlieder, Kochen–Specker contextuality, quantum Zeno effect, no-signaling, CPT theorem, measurement without collapse, second law of entanglement thermodynamics, Landauer bound for entangled systems, vacuum channel capacity, entanglement–energy equivalence. Predictions: S_CHSH temporal decay; decoherence rate ≤ MSS bound; gravitational entanglement bound for BMV-class experiments; entanglement-triggered gravitational collapse; entanglement content of gravitational waves; exponential corrections to black hole entropy. What this paper claims. The paper introduces a variational principle that formalizes the dependence axiom, proves the action is forced (not chosen) by six published uniqueness theorems, derives the entanglement spectrum as a Noether charge, recovers Newton's third law as a special case in the thermal limit, and shows that the resulting framework unifies quantum foundations, quantum information, general relativity, and cosmology under a single organizing principle. The contribution is both new mathematics—most notably the Capacity Saturation Theorem, the variational formulation with its uniqueness chain, and the cosmological constant prediction—and structural unification across results previously developed in disconnected subfields. The framework is presented as a compression of known physics with one falsifiable prediction already passed (Λ to within an order of magnitude, zero free parameters) and several further predictions proposed. No established result in quantum mechanics, general relativity, or quantum information theory is contradicted. Correspondence: student_t_vs_bohr@proton.me
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen published the paper that introduced what would become quantum mechanics’ most studied phenomenon. Two systems prepared together and then separated remain correlated — perfectly correlated, in some cases — across arbitrary distances. The correlations exceed anything classical physics permits, are tested today across hundreds of kilometers via satellite‑mediated photon pairs, and form the resource that quantum cryptography, teleportation, and computation rely on. The standard QM account is mathematically clean. Two systems with Hilbert spaces H_A and H_B are described on H_A ⊗ H_B; states that cannot be written as |ψ_A⟩ ⊗ |ψ_B⟩ are entangled. Bell–Tsirelson bounds CHSH at 2√2. Schmidt decomposes any pure bipartite state biorthogonally. Coffman–Kundu–Wootters codifies monogamy. No‑signaling follows from linearity of partial trace. Von Neumann entropy S(ρ_A) = −Tr(ρ_A log ρ_A) measures entanglement strength. Each piece is a theorem of the postulated formalism — but the postulates themselves (tensor‑product joint structure, Hilbert space, Born rule) are not derived. This walkthrough shows how the Event Density framework derives the structural commitments themselves. Six results, each derived from the same substrate primitives: (1) Tensor‑product composition — the joint participation measure of two endpoints sharing one rule is carried on H_A ⊗ H_B with bilinearly induced inner product. Form forced; no auxiliary assumption. (2) Generic non‑factorizability — entangled states are dense and full‑measure; product states are the measure‑zero exception. (3) Schmidt decomposition — every pure bipartite state has a biorthogonal decomposition with non‑negative coefficients summing to one. Form forced; values inherited. (4) Monogamy — each substrate endpoint has a finite local cross‑chain bandwidth budget; full bipartite entanglement saturates it; no capacity remains for a third endpoint. CKW is the substrate bandwidth‑conservation law in concurrence units. (5) No‑signaling — over‑determined by three independent substrate locks: T18 forward‑cone‑only kernel structure, P11 commitment irreversibility, and the ED‑I‑06 no‑fundamental‑fields guardrail. (6) Von Neumann entropy — the form is uniquely picked by Shannon–Khinchin axioms each independently derived from named substrate primitives. This walkthrough has more substrate content than Bell–Tsirelson or Heisenberg. Those ran on standard mathematical‑physics arguments once the framework supplied the Hilbert space; the contribution was upstream. Here the framework is upstream for tensor‑product composition, Schmidt, and the density of entangled states — and substantively new for monogamy, no‑signaling, and entropy, each receiving a substrate‑mechanism account standard QM does not provide. The structural payoff: bipartite entanglement is what the substrate produces when two endpoints share one undeveloped participation rule. Tensor product, Schmidt structure, monogamy, no‑signaling, and entropy form are six projections of one substrate phenomenon.
This paper formalizes a framework in which a single axiom — that existence is constituted by registration — generates the core structures of physical theory as necessary consequences, with zero free parameters and no appeal to empirical input. Beginning from the axiom (stated in four interdependent conditions: existence requires registration, no external substrate exists, registration capacity is continuous, registration events are discrete), the derivation chain proceeds through twelve theorems: Self-Differentiation: registration requires an irreducible asymmetry (the registration quantum) Irreversible Generativity: non-termination, forced novelty, append-only record, local propagation 2B. Dimensional Asymmetry: one irreversible axis (partial order) with reversible fibers — Lorentzian signature Constraint Geometry: self-deepening landscape with a least-resistance principle Compression and Conservation: lossy compression necessary at every event; energy as registration flow; local conservation Entropy and the Second Law: multiplicity strictly increases for closed subgraphs Undiscriminated Paths: superposition and entanglement as structural absence of distinction The Action Quantum: ℏ and c as dimensional encodings of a single quantum Complementarity: the uncertainty principle as a limit on coexistent distinctions Entropy-Energy Bridge: S = k ln Ω with k_B as unit conversion Phase, Amplitude, Born Rule: U(1) phase from orientation, |A|² from self-relational structure Dimensional Selection: d = 3 is the unique dimensionality supporting topologically stable knotted constraint loops Each theorem depends only on the axiom and its predecessors in a strict dependency graph. The formalization uses graph-theoretic primitives (vertices, directed edges, partial orders, path spaces) to make every logical step explicit and independently verifiable. Three further theorems — matter as torus knot constraint loops, gravity as constraint-geometry curvature, and the fine structure constant α₀ = 3/(130π) ≈ 1/136.14 with zero free parameters — are stated informally as targets for subsequent formalization. The paper includes an honest gaps appendix identifying five points where the derivations are structural but not yet fully rigorous, marking precisely where subsequent work should focus. Developed in collaboration with Claude (Anthropic) and Gemini (Google) as derivation partners treating different processing architectures as distinct compression geometries of the same underlying graph. Keywords: registration graph; quantum gravity; foundations of physics; Born rule derivation; dimensional selection; knot theory; causal structure; graph theory; action quantum; fine structure constant; single-axiom framework; topological stability; Lorentzian signature; entropy; second law Additional Notes: Portions of this framework were developed in collaboration with AI systems (Claude by Anthropic, Gemini by Google) serving as derivation partners. The foundational axiom and directing intuitions are the author's. Language: English License: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Access Right: Open Access Related Identifiers: (Add arXiv ID here once assigned, as "is supplemented by" or "is identical to") Subjects: Quantum Physics General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology Mathematical Physics Version: 1.0
ONE AXIOM BRIDGES: Possibility Selection Principle — Formalization, Collapse, and Born Rule Description: This document provides the formal mathematical bridge between the pure algebraic foundations of the ONE AXIOM project and its physical applications. It presents a rigorous derivation of the fundamental laws of physics starting from a single axiomatic symmetry group: G = S4 x Z2^3. Key Scientific Contributions: Derivation of the Born Rule (p=2): Proves that quantum probability is not a postulate but a theorem. The exponent p=2 is shown to be the unique solution emerging from the OCR-OER adjunction structure. Quantum Collapse as Domain Update: Formalizes "collapse" as a relational update of the Schreier graph domain (Gamma to Gamma_A) rather than a physical process, resolving long-standing paradoxes of "spooky action at a distance". Emergence of Spacetime and Gravity: Demonstrates the construction of 4D spacetime (M4) from group representation theory. Einstein's field equations are derived via two independent, proven paths: Jacobson's thermodynamic approach and Ollivier-Ricci curvature on the Schreier graph. Resolution of the Cosmological Constant Problem: Provides a natural derivation of the cosmological constant Lambda ~ 10^-122 from the "coherence floor" of the universe, eliminating the need for fine-tuning. Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy: Derives the coefficient lambda = 1/4 through triple-verified categorical and structural paths. Methodology: The work employs a "Dual-Track Derivation" methodology, requiring convergence between Ontological [O] (structural) and Epistemological [E] (computational) paths before a result is considered proven. Status: This version marks the completion of the foundational triad of the ONE AXIOM framework (0C, 0A and 0B documents)
A finitist, relational axiomatization of physics: quantum theory and a relativity sector derived from four axioms about group-valued relations and closure. Contributions to the foundations of quantum mechanics (Born rule derivation, quantum reconstruction, local tomography, complex field selection), the emergence of time and causal structure in discrete networks, discrete Noether theorems, lattice gauge structure, and the Schrödinger equation derived by two independent routes. Every claim is graded in a Claim Ledger; every numerical claim is machine-verified with archived scripts; negative results are reported at full strength. What this paper does The universe is taken to be constituted by relations rather than objects. Stable relations form closures (self-consistent cycles) whose holonomies carry the physical content. Four axioms — primacy of relations (group-valued, edge-borne), closure stability, chirality from order, and observation as bidirectional group exchange — yield, at explicitly graded and conditional levels: Quantum sector Exchange-completeness theorems for finite label groups: abelian at all cycle ranks; non-abelian on the single cycle (Wilson readouts plus class-sum convolutions generate the full matrix algebra); the multi-cycle non-abelian case on the operational-equivalence quotient, with the obstruction completely characterized via class-preserving outer automorphisms — and the quotient's necessity now stratified by the source of word blindness (see New in Version 24.0). The Born rule, proved for finite abelian networks from a strictly weaker relational readout premise (statistics of realizable effects depend only on relational content); non-contextuality has this single source; additivity is basis-relative and declared as such. The Schrödinger equation by two routes of unequal premise grade, maintained side by side: a spectral route — the action operator is a weighted Cayley-graph Laplacian in the Pontryagin dual basis, the derived Gibbs state's unique canonical (modular) flow yields the Schrödinger equation with Hamiltonian equal to the action operator, no continuum limit, zero conjectures consumed, the single non-theorem step one flagged identification; and a Madelung route — physical and mechanism-rich (probability density derived from constraint gaps), valid exactly on the domain of the pseudo-continuity conjecture, with its full premise bill stated (continuity equation, Wallstrom circulation condition, m, V). A dedicated comparison subsection gives the line-by-line premise accounting and the machine-measured agreement region. Complex field selection: ℂ selected over ℝ and ℍ within the GPT comparison class in the covered sectors, with a second independent route from chirality (Frobenius–Schur dichotomy, quaternionic double exclusion); "uniquely selected" expressly not claimed. Positivity as pairing: all five in-text positive-semidefiniteness theorems traced to one mechanism (M = B†B with native factor); the Kraus form and complete positivity derived rather than assumed. The Noether sector on Noether's two theorems exactly: Noether I recovered on the holonomy action (compact Lie realization); Noether II identified as present (Bianchi as horn-filling, Schläfli as its Regge form); selection rules recovered for finite groups; the GNS bridge proved non-vacuously on the full exchange algebra; the sole potential extension — conservation as the kernel of exchange — isolated as a registered conjecture, consumed nowhere. A local–global representation theorem: six generative quantities (closure invariant, flux quantization, Weyl phase, non-abelian Stokes, orientation visibility, terminal normalization) are evaluations of cohomology classes against closed chains — one syntax, six exact machine probes. The gatekeeper no-go theorems registered and discharged: Kochen–Specker (the framework posits no global valuation — outcomes are resolutions of constraint gaps, and basis-relative additivity blocks state-independent variants), Pusey–Barrett–Rudolph (the statistical envelope is over resolutions yet to happen, not values already held; machine witness: identical configuration ensembles with opposite relative phase have opposite statistics), Wallstrom (registered as an explicit input, structurally discharged in the finite-abelian sector), Hegerfeldt (the Lieb–Robinson exponential tail identified as the only claimable front form for the continuum limit), Frauchiger–Renner (cross-agent certainty transfer presupposes kernel-free record transport, exactly what exchange-incompleteness excludes), and no-cloning (inherited in the covered sectors); Conway–Kochen and Colbeck–Renner noted as concordant. Relativity sector Time from finite capacity plus genuine randomness: the staging theorem (Θ(d) dependency depth, unbounded chains via the Moore bound; the quantitative failure law conditionalized on measure-level independence with exact minimal witnesses); the temporal quantum defined combinatorially, no Hamiltonian input. The speed of light grounded in an exact discrete dependency cone (combinatorial, no quantum input), the Lieb–Robinson bound consumed at cross-check grade only; a boost no-go theorem reducing Lorentz invariance to named statistical conditions, with the Collins fine-tuning objection recorded as a gate. The trace-descent theorem group: the growth-history measure forced onto the Mazurkiewicz trace quotient; chain reflection positivity at every depth with completely explicit spectrum. An equation sector of nine verification families (Schrödinger, Dirac, Maxwell/U(1), canonical commutator, Yang–Mills SU(2), Regge calculus, Klein–Gordon, Noether loop, Cartan curvature), where every machine-precision claim is the shadow of a proved backbone lemma — including the factor ½ of H = ½L + V, identified as the Wilson Fourier coefficient fixed by the action theorem. Four experimentally testable predictions, including a discriminating flat-versus-sigmoid visibility protocol. The Standard Model gauge group, ħ, and G remain open, with attack routes registered. How to read Three entry paths are marked in the document. Path A (derivational core): axioms → group structure → Noether sector → least action → Born rule → positivity. Path B (physical mechanisms): constraint propagation → time as determination → wave function as gap envelope → fields. Path C (scope and limits): the Claim Ledger, then Discussion and Open Problems — for the reader who wants to know what is claimed and what is not before reading anything else. The Claim Ledger is the single authoritative register of claim status; wherever body text sounds stronger, the Ledger governs. New in Version 24.0 (Version 23.0 is the immediately preceding public release; this version supersedes the internal V12–V15 and V17–V19 series, whose numbers are not used externally.) Version 24.0 resolves the structure of the multi-cycle non-abelian obstruction — the sector's longest-standing open front — following an external research exchange with three rounds of independent re-verification (fourteen core figures, three commutant instruments implemented independently, exact integer arithmetic on the obstruction side) and two rounds of counter-review that corrected one quantifier on each side: A dichotomy of the multi-cycle obstruction (new remark). Word blindness on multi-cycle networks has two identified sources, jointly covering every tested case, with opposite behaviour as cycle rank grows. Type I (global; graded): a class-preserving outer automorphism yields a commutant element by an argument free of cycle-rank reference; its non-triviality holds at theorem grade for b₁ ≥ d(G) via generating tuples, is monotone in b₁, and the threshold is measured at b_σ = 2 on the tested Wall group (at b₁ = 1 the permutation is the identity — no universal claim is made, and the existence of groups with threshold above 2 is registered open). Type II (local; measured): Out_c trivial but fusion fails on a proper subgroup, the blind pairs sitting in non-generating sectors — the same mechanism that defeats Wilson generation; this blindness heals: on every verified group (A₄, SL(2,3), A₄×ℤ₂) the full commutant collapses to trivial at b₁ = 3 by exact computation on two independently implemented instruments, although word readouts remain blind — the shift primitives separate, above a threshold, and the natural explanation (tuples becoming generating) is refuted by the persistence of blind blocks. Three boundaries at full strength: no exhaustiveness proof (a third source is not excluded); no general healing theorem (the verified groups all heal at 3, cause unidentified); the verified Type II sample is narrow. The quotient proposition restated in stratified form. The operational-equivalence quotient's necessity is now part of the proposition's own statement, in three strata: necessary where Out_c ≠ 1 at every b₁ ≥ b_σ(G), with b_σ ≤ d(G) at theorem grade; one-dimensional at b₁ = 2 on the fusion-type groups (verified cases); trivial at b₁ ≥ 3 on every verified fusion-type group and at every tested b₁ for word-separation-complete groups (a fourteen-group scan of orders ≤ 31 found no third source). Pre-registered validation preceded the restatement: a stratification-exhaustiveness scan (pass), a new-witness search (no new witness in range, downgrade clause applied as pre-registered), and a zero-conflict audit of the three strata against all archived data. The residual open problem is now precisely located. What remains of multi-cycle completeness: the rare Out_c ≠ 1 groups (54 in the exhaustive range through order 96) above their measured thresholds, the low-b₁ fusion stratum, a general healing theorem, and whether a threshold above 2 occurs. The multiplicity-freeness conjecture's mechanism sentence is corrected with the two regimes stated separately (at b₁ = 2 the shifts do not separate — the blind-pair transposition commutes with every primitive, integer-exact — and reduce the commutant to
The black hole information paradox has been substantially resolved: entropy is preserved in Hawking radiation, as established by the Page curve, replica wormhole calculations, and the island formula. We argue, however, that this resolution addresses only one of two physically distinct properties of quantum information states. The Shannon–Bekenstein framework formalises entropic content S(σ), but lacks representation for a second property: the capacity of a state to causally influence future configurations of external systems. We term this generative capacity G(σ) and establish that it is formally independent of S(σ). The central result is that even in a fully unitary resolution, I(ρ_rad, ρ_E) ≤ C·S_BH·2^{−S_BH/2} → 0 after the scrambling time for any system E in prior causal contact with an infalling state, while S(ρ_rad) follows the Page curve. A unitary resolution restores entropy; it does not restore causal influence capacity. We demonstrate this in the JT gravity + bath model via the decoupling theorem. Eight technical contributions support this framework: formal proof of S–G independence via the Rindler family; proof that the Bell state saturates the supremum in G(σ,d) via the entanglement-assisted channel capacity theorem; three explicit benchmark calculations; covariant reformulation of G bounded above by an area law; distinction of the causal residue from BMS soft hair charges; and time-dependent causal sterilization at rate κ = 2πT_H = λ_L, saturating the Maldacena–Shenker–Stanford bound on quantum chaos [35]. Theorem C.2 establishes that classical correlations survive the Rindler horizon completely while quantum entanglement is destroyed — the horizon acts as a quantum-classical separator. The framework introduces the causal quality index κ ∈ [1,2] as a potentially observable signature distinguishing accretion histories with identical mass, charge, and angular momentum.
This paper formalizes a framework in which a single axiom — that existence is constituted by registration — generates the core structures of physical theory as necessary consequences, with zero free parameters and no appeal to empirical input.Beginning from the axiom (stated in four interdependent conditions: existence requires registration, no external substrate exists, registration capacity is continuous, registration events are discrete), the derivation chain proceeds through twelve theorems:Self-Differentiation: registration requires an irreducible asymmetry (the registration quantum)Irreversible Generativity: non-termination, forced novelty, append-only record, local propagation 2B. Dimensional Asymmetry: one irreversible axis (partial order) with reversible fibers — Lorentzian signatureConstraint Geometry: self-deepening landscape with a least-resistance principleCompression and Conservation: lossy compression necessary at every event; energy as registration flow; local conservationEntropy and the Second Law: multiplicity strictly increases for closed subgraphsUndiscriminated Paths: superposition and entanglement as structural absence of distinctionThe Action Quantum: ℏ and c as dimensional encodings of a single quantumComplementarity: the uncertainty principle as a limit on coexistent distinctionsEntropy-Energy Bridge: S = k ln Ω with k_B as unit conversionPhase, Amplitude, Born Rule: U(1) phase from orientation, |A|² from self-relational structureDimensional Selection: d = 3 is the unique dimensionality supporting topologically stable knotted constraint loopsEach theorem depends only on the axiom and its predecessors in a strict dependency graph. The formalization uses graph-theoretic primitives (vertices, directed edges, partial orders, path spaces) to make every logical step explicit and independently verifiable.Three further theorems — matter as torus knot constraint loops, gravity as constraint-geometry curvature, and the fine structure constant α₀ = 3/(130π) ≈ 1/136.14 with zero free parameters — are stated informally as targets for subsequent formalization.The paper includes an honest gaps appendix identifying five points where the derivations are structural but not yet fully rigorous, marking precisely where subsequent work should focus.Developed in collaboration with Claude (Anthropic) and Gemini (Google) as derivation partners treating different processing architectures as distinct compression geometries of the same underlying graph.Keywords: registration graph; quantum gravity; foundations of physics; Born rule derivation; dimensional selection; knot theory; causal structure; graph theory; action quantum; fine structure constant; single-axiom framework; topological stability; Lorentzian signature; entropy; second lawAdditional Notes: Portions of this framework were developed in collaboration with AI systems (Claude by Anthropic, Gemini by Google) serving as derivation partners. The foundational axiom and directing intuitions are the author's.